Group Processes & Intergroup Relations最新文献_第7页

Group-based emotion processes generalize across group exemplars and types 基于群体的情感过程在群体范例和类型之间进行概括

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231166856

D. Mackie, Eliot R. Smith, Ishani Banerji, Anudhi P. Munasinghe

引用次数: 0

Women evaluate ally men less positively and are less willing to work with them for gender equality when men deny their male privilege 当男性否认他们的男性特权时，女性对男性的评价就不那么积极，也不太愿意与他们一起为性别平等而工作

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231162042

S. Wiley, J. W. Park, Natalie Catalina

{"title":"Women evaluate ally men less positively and are less willing to work with them for gender equality when men deny their male privilege","authors":"S. Wiley, J. W. Park, Natalie Catalina","doi":"10.1177/13684302231162042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231162042","url":null,"abstract":"Members of advantaged groups can play a role in addressing discrimination and inequality. Sometimes, members of advantaged groups are motivated to deny their group-based privilege, however. In two studies ( Ns = 196, 600), we examined how privilege denial affects disadvantaged group members’ (i.e., women’s) evaluations of advantaged group members (i.e., men) who engage in collective action to support equality. We sampled women attending colleges or universities in the United States and randomly assigned them to read about a man who attended a rally to support gender equality and either denied his male privilege, acknowledged it, or said nothing about his privilege at all. We found that women evaluated a man who attended a rally to support gender equality less positively and were less willing to work with him for gender equality if he denied his male privilege. This pattern was either fully (Study 1) or partly (Study 2) statistically mediated by women rating a man who denied his male privilege as less moral, an effect that was stronger among women who identified more highly as feminists. Our findings indicate that advantaged group allies who deny their group-based privilege diminish their potential contributions to movements for equality.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124481781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Intergroup sensitivity in a divided society: Calls for unity and reconciliatory behavior during the 2020 U.S. presidential election 分裂社会中的群体间敏感性:呼吁2020年美国总统大选期间的团结与和解行为

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221147005

J. Thürmer, Sean M. McCrea

{"title":"Intergroup sensitivity in a divided society: Calls for unity and reconciliatory behavior during the 2020 U.S. presidential election","authors":"J. Thürmer, Sean M. McCrea","doi":"10.1177/13684302221147005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221147005","url":null,"abstract":"The United States is highly divided along party lines, and this partisan divide has a tremendous impact on social relationships and even health-related behavior. Although group members frequently reject criticism from individuals outside their own group relative to criticism from within the group (intergroup sensitivity effect), it remains unclear whether this effect holds for calls for unity across party lines. Additionally, the democratic process may itself help to mend intergroup sensitivity. Our high-powered experiment with self-identified U.S. Democratic or Republican voters across three time points during the 2020 U.S. presidential election demonstrates consistent rejection of calls for unity across party lines, which differentially affected consequent reconciliatory behavior. While the ascription of unconstructive motives decreased reconciliatory behavior, heightened threat perceptions increased reconciliatory behavior. Effects were consistent across time and party affiliation, indicating that the democratic election process and the determination of the election outcome were unable to mend intergroup sensitivity across the partisan divide. Calls for unity affected the reported emotional experience of pride but these self-reports had no consistent impact on behavior. We discuss how understanding these psychological mechanics of partisanship helps to prevent democratic backsliding and promote reconciliation.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"646 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123286685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Investigating the efficacy of prescribed labeling practices: Conceptualizing persons with disabilities 调查功效规定的标签做法:概念化残疾人

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-03-19 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231157990

Nicolette Granata, Jonathan D. Lane

引用次数: 0

Together we will rise? Perceptions of instrumentality and normalization as motivations for joint collective action among the disadvantaged 我们将一起崛起?将工具性和正常化视为弱势群体联合集体行动的动机

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-03-19 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231153830

Siwar Hasan-Aslih, Ruthie Pliskin, Eric Shuman, Martijn van Zomeren, Tamar Saguy, E. Halperin

{"title":"Together we will rise? Perceptions of instrumentality and normalization as motivations for joint collective action among the disadvantaged","authors":"Siwar Hasan-Aslih, Ruthie Pliskin, Eric Shuman, Martijn van Zomeren, Tamar Saguy, E. Halperin","doi":"10.1177/13684302231153830","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231153830","url":null,"abstract":"The current research examines joint collective action between advantaged and disadvantaged groups, from the perspective of the latter. We hypothesize that joint action poses a dilemma which lies in the tension between perceived instrumentality of joint action (i.e., ability to promote the disadvantaged’s goals) and perceived normalization (i.e., its tendency to blur power relations). We test this idea across three studies in the United States and Israel/Palestine. In Study 1 ( n = 361) we manipulated perceptions of joint action from the perspective of a hypothetical character, and in Study 2 ( n = 378) we presented participants with an article highlighting the risk and benefit of joint activism. Results showed that perceived instrumentality increases, whereas perceived normalization decreases joint action tendencies. In Study 3 ( n = 240), we described a joint action event that taps into some of the themes that induce concerns about normalization. We found that normalization perceptions feed into perceptions of instrumentality, and this occurred mainly among high identifiers, for whom the dilemma is most salient. The implications of these findings for understanding the complexity of joint collective action from the perspective of the disadvantaged are discussed.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126226290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The different effects of collective narcissism and secure ingroup identity on collective action and life satisfaction among LGBTQ+ individuals LGBTQ+群体自恋和安全感群体认同对群体行为和生活满意度的不同影响

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-03-10 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221147125

P. Górska, A. Stefaniak, Joanna Matera, Marta Marchlewska

{"title":"The different effects of collective narcissism and secure ingroup identity on collective action and life satisfaction among LGBTQ+ individuals","authors":"P. Górska, A. Stefaniak, Joanna Matera, Marta Marchlewska","doi":"10.1177/13684302221147125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221147125","url":null,"abstract":"For LGBTQ+ community members, one way to cope with the discrimination they experience is through a stronger ingroup identity. However, not all types of ingroup identity may be equally beneficial to LGBTQ+ individuals. A longitudinal ( N = 1,044) and a cross-sectional ( N = 8,464) study among LGBTQ+ people in Poland demonstrated that collective narcissism was a positive predictor of group-based anger (Study 2) and had a positive reciprocal relationship with group relative deprivation (GRD; Study 1), however, it was negatively related to life satisfaction and exhibited a stronger positive link with nonnormative than normative collective action. Secure LGBTQ+ identification was not longitudinally predicted by GRD (Study 1) and showed a weaker positive association with group-based anger (Study 2). It had a reciprocal positive relationship with life satisfaction and was a stronger predictor of normative than nonnormative collective action. These results show that whereas secure ingroup identity is a clearly positive coping mechanism, the effects of collective narcissism are mixed.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127191415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Inclusive social norms and nationals’ positive intergroup orientations toward refugees: The moderating role of initial prejudice and intergroup contact 包容性社会规范与国民对难民的积极群体间倾向:初始偏见和群体间接触的调节作用

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231156399

G. Valsecchi, Jacques Berent, Islam Borinca, E. Green, J. Falomir-Pichastor

{"title":"Inclusive social norms and nationals’ positive intergroup orientations toward refugees: The moderating role of initial prejudice and intergroup contact","authors":"G. Valsecchi, Jacques Berent, Islam Borinca, E. Green, J. Falomir-Pichastor","doi":"10.1177/13684302231156399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231156399","url":null,"abstract":"Research on the interplay between inclusive norms and intergroup contact on improving intergroup orientations has yielded conflicting results, suggesting either that an experience of personal contact is necessary to have a positive effect of inclusive norms or that such personal experience is not always necessary. To clarify this issue, across four studies ( N = 835), we investigated the influence of inclusive norms on positive intergroup orientations as a function of personal experiences of intergroup contact. Study 1 demonstrated that inclusive norms are more strongly correlated with experiences of personal contact with outgroups with whom opportunities of contact are more (i.e., immigrants) than less (i.e., refugees) frequent. Study 2 provided experimental evidence for this finding showing that inclusive norms increase prejudiced nationals’ willingness to engage in future contact with immigrants but not with refugees, suggesting that conformity to inclusive norms depends on varying contact opportunities with the outgroups. Studies 3 and 4 confirmed that prejudiced nationals conformed to inclusive norms specifically when experienced positive contact with a refugee (experimentally induced with the imagined contact paradigm), compared with no contact (Study 3) or negative contact (Study 4). We discuss the implications of these findings for research on intergroup contact, social influence, and intergroup relations.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122884576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Same view, different lens: How intersectional identities reduce Americans’ stereotypes of threat regarding Arab and Black men 相同的观点，不同的镜头:交叉身份如何减少美国人对阿拉伯和黑人男性的威胁的刻板印象

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231153802

Veronica N. Z. Bergstrom, Jonathan Cadieux, Drishti Thakkar, A. Chasteen

引用次数: 1

The irony of fairness: How procedural fairness climate perceptions can hinder disadvantaged group members’ support for social change 公平的讽刺:程序公平气候观念如何阻碍弱势群体成员对社会变革的支持

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231151941

Kim Dierckx, Alain Van Hiel, H. Swart, Barbara Valcke

{"title":"The irony of fairness: How procedural fairness climate perceptions can hinder disadvantaged group members’ support for social change","authors":"Kim Dierckx, Alain Van Hiel, H. Swart, Barbara Valcke","doi":"10.1177/13684302231151941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231151941","url":null,"abstract":"The current research investigated an “ironic” consequence of a perceived procedural fairness climate vis-à-vis disadvantaged groups. Specifically, we examined whether the perception that societal institutions treat one’s underprivileged group in a procedurally fair way negatively impacts upon minority group members’ support for social change. Six studies (total N = 1,076) supported our claims. In survey Study 1 (Belgian ethnic minorities), procedural fairness climate perceptions were negatively related to support for social change. Cross-sectional Studies 2 (colored South Africans) and 3 (Hispanic Americans) further showed that this relationship is mediated by beliefs in minority mobility. Finally, Studies 4–6 (Asian and African Americans) provided experimental evidence corroborating our causal mediation model. Our findings align with literature demonstrating similar “ironic” effects of procedural fairness among advantaged group members, as they illustrate that the perception of a procedural fairness climate can analogously prevent disadvantaged group members from advocating changes that could alleviate their state of deprivation.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124824546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Who endorses group-based violence? 谁支持群体暴力?

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231154412

Joanna Lindström, R. Bergh, N. Akrami, Milan Obaidi, Torun Lindholm Öymyr

引用次数: 1

Group Processes &amp; Intergroup Relations最新文献

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations最新文献