Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1111/johs.70016
Maddalena Alvi
{"title":"Kitsch, Decarnation, and the Erasure of Edible Animals From Visual Culture","authors":"Maddalena Alvi","doi":"10.1111/johs.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1111/johs.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In contemporary society, the consumption of animal products is increasingly disconnected from the reality of animal life and death. Edible animals are largely confined to industrial spaces, where killing is sanitized into “use,” while advertising and visual culture further reinforce this detachment. This paper examines how media representations obscure or transform the animal origins of meat, often rendering them into cartoonish or infantilized forms. Drawing on Hermann Broch's concept of kitsch, such depictions are shown to “rarefy” the animal, sublimating its living reality into palatable, aesthetically pleasing images that shield consumers from the ethical and material implications of their choices. Through an analysis of pleasure-oriented meat imagery and a focused case study on commercials employing infantilization strategies, the essay explores the cultural mechanisms that conceal animal death. It shows how, at its most extreme, this concealment can manifest through a religious subtext. Rather than offering moral judgment, this essay seeks to understand how contemporary visual culture mediates human engagement with animality, death, and consumption.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"2-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147565291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1111/johs.70030
Bülent Diken, Tuğba Göçer, Mesut Uçak
{"title":"Neo-Slavery as Instrumentalization: Amazon, Surrogate Motherhood, and Mobile Phones","authors":"Bülent Diken, Tuğba Göçer, Mesut Uçak","doi":"10.1111/johs.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1111/johs.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite being perceived as a remnant of the past, slavery persists in today's increasingly economized and biopoliticized world. To thematize the actuality of slavery, we initially return to Aristotle's discussion/justification of slavery as instrumentalization of human beings. Then we revisit Plato's allegory of the cave through three distinct readings. This threefold reading enables us to frame three present-day cases/examples to reconsider slavery: the Amazon, surrogate motherhood, and the cell phone. The concept of use is pivotal for such reconsideration. Finally, we propose the concept of neo-slavery. Although the traditional accounts of slavery understand slavery through its triangulation with property relations and force, we suggest another triangulation here: neo-slavery, instrumental use, and consent. In this way, the examination of the three cases casts the traditional accounts of slavery in a new light, revitalizing the concept of slavery by putting it into a different use.</p>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/johs.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1111/johs.70028
Ádám Havas
{"title":"The Social Genesis of the Hungarian Literary Field: Symbolic Revolution and the Fall of Aristocratic Authority","authors":"Ádám Havas","doi":"10.1111/johs.70028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<p>At the center of this study is a key event in the formation of the modern Hungarian literary field: the series of debates known as the Lexicon Trial (1830–1831), which played a decisive role in the institutionalization and autonomization of literature during Hungary's Reform Era (1825–1848). Over these years, the literary sphere gradually began to organize itself around “pure” esthetic judgments—a transformation that can be conceptualized as a “symbolic revolution” in Bourdieu's sense. This historical–sociological analysis focuses on strategies of the “social capitalization of knowledge,” drawing on Viktor Karády's concept to trace how pre-intellectual groups migrating to Pest-Buda laid the foundations for the main literary professions. I interpret the polemic surrounding the publication of the lexicon as a clash between the progressive-autonomous and conservative factions of literary figures, with the aim of capturing, in sociological terms, how a demarcated market of symbolic goods was established in Hungary. I aim to demonstrate the utility of a Bourdieusian historical–sociological framework for examining the genealogy of semi-peripheral fields of cultural production, particularly those marked by belated embourgeoisement, thereby offering an alternative to positivist literary history. This work also serves as an invitation to apply Bourdieusian historical analysis in one of its domains par excellence: the autonomization of fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"83-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/johs.70028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147564119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1111/johs.70016
Maddalena Alvi
{"title":"Kitsch, Decarnation, and the Erasure of Edible Animals From Visual Culture","authors":"Maddalena Alvi","doi":"10.1111/johs.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In contemporary society, the consumption of animal products is increasingly disconnected from the reality of animal life and death. Edible animals are largely confined to industrial spaces, where killing is sanitized into “use,” while advertising and visual culture further reinforce this detachment. This paper examines how media representations obscure or transform the animal origins of meat, often rendering them into cartoonish or infantilized forms. Drawing on Hermann Broch's concept of kitsch, such depictions are shown to “rarefy” the animal, sublimating its living reality into palatable, aesthetically pleasing images that shield consumers from the ethical and material implications of their choices. Through an analysis of pleasure-oriented meat imagery and a focused case study on commercials employing infantilization strategies, the essay explores the cultural mechanisms that conceal animal death. It shows how, at its most extreme, this concealment can manifest through a religious subtext. Rather than offering moral judgment, this essay seeks to understand how contemporary visual culture mediates human engagement with animality, death, and consumption.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"2-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147565299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1111/johs.70032
Kerem Karaosmanoğlu
{"title":"Virtual Demons: Blue Whale and Moral Panic in the Digital Age","authors":"Kerem Karaosmanoğlu","doi":"10.1111/johs.70032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article examines the Blue Whale phenomenon as a case of moral panic with particular attention to its trajectory in Turkey. Originating in Russia in 2015, Blue Whale spread rapidly through sensationalist media coverage and soon became framed as a global threat to adolescents. In Turkey, the panic intensified between 2016 and 2019, marked by repetitive headlines, expert warnings, state interventions, and even academic publications, all of which reinforced a protectionist discourse while leaving the veracity of the phenomenon largely unquestioned. Adopting a sociological perspective, this article situates Blue Whale within the broader tradition of moral panic studies, highlighting how archetypes of evil and conspiratorial imagination shaped its circulation. It further argues that the Turkish experience mirrors global patterns yet unfolded through its own media ecologies and cultural anxieties. Ultimately, the Blue Whale panic reveals how digital-age fears are constructed, sustained, and localized in specific social contexts.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"119-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147565519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1111/johs.70026
Tammy Anderson
{"title":"When Heroes Hurt: Rethinking the Social Impact of “Positive” Labels","authors":"Tammy Anderson","doi":"10.1111/johs.70026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Social reaction theory has occupied a prominent place in sociology, helping to inform the labeling and stigma of a wide variety of traits, conditions and behaviors. While much of this scholarship emphasizes the social scorn and penalties imposed at the individual level, far less attention has been given to the collective impact of positive reactions to non-normative behaviors. This Perspectives essay examines how hero-making—which produces a mostly positive label—can lead to social harm, given the politicized, media-driven culture in which it takes place. In this Perspectives essay, I review current legacy and social media stories and commentary about two recent “vigilantes” (i.e., Daniel Penny and Luigi Mangione) to question the social benefits and consequences of classifying people as heroes or as villains (a mostly negative label) and victims (both a positive and negative label), that is, a hero's counterparts. My commentary underscores the continued value of social reaction theory today and identifies areas of growth, including collective labeling processes and the costs of positive moral judgments today.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147569982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1111/johs.70027
Naim Bin Hasan
{"title":"AI Efficiency Versus Human Empathy: A Paradox of AI and Human Agents in Service Support Interactions","authors":"Naim Bin Hasan","doi":"10.1111/johs.70027","DOIUrl":"10.1111/johs.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While artificial intelligence (AI) revolutionizes customer service, its emotional implications for users are less explored than its functional efficacy. In this study, the emotional responses of users interacting with AI-driven virtual assistants and human agents in service support interactions are compared. A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 150 U.S. adults who had used both human and AI assistants within the past 3 months was conducted. The findings show that human agents elicit more positive affect, with higher ratings for satisfaction, emotional support, and feeling understood. On the other hand, AI assistants were rated as improved problem-solvers, although interactions with human agents were associated with higher anxiety. In contrast with the efficiency of AI, users indicated a greater affinity for subsequent human interactions. All reported differences were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Sociologically interpreted through symbolic interactionism and affect theory, the findings show that users value affective connection more than utilitarian success. The study concludes that AI cannot directly substitute the nuanced affective connection provided by humans, with a call for the creation of emotionally intelligent hybrid models that combine the strengths of AI and human agents.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"73-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147563500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1111/johs.70032
Kerem Karaosmanoğlu
{"title":"Virtual Demons: Blue Whale and Moral Panic in the Digital Age","authors":"Kerem Karaosmanoğlu","doi":"10.1111/johs.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1111/johs.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article examines the Blue Whale phenomenon as a case of moral panic with particular attention to its trajectory in Turkey. Originating in Russia in 2015, Blue Whale spread rapidly through sensationalist media coverage and soon became framed as a global threat to adolescents. In Turkey, the panic intensified between 2016 and 2019, marked by repetitive headlines, expert warnings, state interventions, and even academic publications, all of which reinforced a protectionist discourse while leaving the veracity of the phenomenon largely unquestioned. Adopting a sociological perspective, this article situates Blue Whale within the broader tradition of moral panic studies, highlighting how archetypes of evil and conspiratorial imagination shaped its circulation. It further argues that the Turkish experience mirrors global patterns yet unfolded through its own media ecologies and cultural anxieties. Ultimately, the Blue Whale panic reveals how digital-age fears are constructed, sustained, and localized in specific social contexts.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"119-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147565571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-11-22DOI: 10.1111/johs.70025
Zhongyan Yang
{"title":"Father's Perspective: Factors Considered When Choosing to Enter a Stay-at-Home Father and Working Mother Relationship","authors":"Zhongyan Yang","doi":"10.1111/johs.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1111/johs.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The emergence of stay-at-home fathers (SAHFs) challenges the traditional societal gender division of labor in which men work outside the home while women manage the household. This new form of fatherhood profoundly impacts families' long-term development. Although SAHFs are a significant topic in western fatherhood research, they have received relatively little attention from domestic scholars. This paper uses grounded theory to analyze the motivations and practical experiences of 22 Chinese SAHFs through in-depth interviews. The findings reveal that there are multiple reasons for becoming a SAHF. Economic factors are the primary consideration, followed by career constraints or transitions, direct childcare needs, and personal strengths. Based on these motivations, the interviewers can be categorized as value-consistent, compromise-driven, and hybrid, demonstrating a degree of dynamic mobility. The study also emphasizes the significant impact of intersecting gender and class dynamics. Middle-class families tend to make active choices based on economic benefits and ideals of gender equality, whereas low-income families often transition into this role due to employment constraints or social pressures.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"42-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147568059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology LensPub Date : 2026-02-27Epub Date: 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1111/johs.70026
Tammy Anderson
{"title":"When Heroes Hurt: Rethinking the Social Impact of “Positive” Labels","authors":"Tammy Anderson","doi":"10.1111/johs.70026","DOIUrl":"10.1111/johs.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Social reaction theory has occupied a prominent place in sociology, helping to inform the labeling and stigma of a wide variety of traits, conditions and behaviors. While much of this scholarship emphasizes the social scorn and penalties imposed at the individual level, far less attention has been given to the collective impact of positive reactions to non-normative behaviors. This Perspectives essay examines how hero-making—which produces a mostly positive label—can lead to social harm, given the politicized, media-driven culture in which it takes place. In this Perspectives essay, I review current legacy and social media stories and commentary about two recent “vigilantes” (i.e., Daniel Penny and Luigi Mangione) to question the social benefits and consequences of classifying people as heroes or as villains (a mostly negative label) and victims (both a positive and negative label), that is, a hero's counterparts. My commentary underscores the continued value of social reaction theory today and identifies areas of growth, including collective labeling processes and the costs of positive moral judgments today.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"39 1","pages":"66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147569980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}