The Tyranny of the Abstract

0 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1111/johs.12490
Derek Sayer
{"title":"The Tyranny of the Abstract","authors":"Derek Sayer","doi":"10.1111/johs.12490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Submitting an invited text for the <i>Anthropology and Humanism</i> festschrift “Hundreds for Katie,” I experienced cognitive dissonance between the objectives of ethnographic writing championed by Kathleen Stewart and the journal's submission requirements. The insistence that every submission must contain keywords and an abstract signifies deeper issues with academic writing. Specific <i>forms</i> of writing enforce the disciplinary norms of Thomas Kuhn's “normal science.” To “write difference”, we may need to <i>write differently</i>. The paper draws inter alia on works by Kathleen Stewart, Lauren Berlant, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Peter Winch, Walter Benjamin, James Clifford, Georges Bataille, and members of the Mass–Observation group.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"38 2","pages":"90-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.12490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Submitting an invited text for the Anthropology and Humanism festschrift “Hundreds for Katie,” I experienced cognitive dissonance between the objectives of ethnographic writing championed by Kathleen Stewart and the journal's submission requirements. The insistence that every submission must contain keywords and an abstract signifies deeper issues with academic writing. Specific forms of writing enforce the disciplinary norms of Thomas Kuhn's “normal science.” To “write difference”, we may need to write differently. The paper draws inter alia on works by Kathleen Stewart, Lauren Berlant, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Peter Winch, Walter Benjamin, James Clifford, Georges Bataille, and members of the Mass–Observation group.

抽象的暴政
在为人类学和人文主义研讨会“为凯蒂写几百篇”提交邀请文章时,我经历了凯瑟琳·斯图尔特倡导的民族志写作目标与期刊提交要求之间的认知失调。坚持每篇文章都必须包含关键词和摘要,这表明学术写作存在更深层次的问题。具体的写作形式强化了托马斯·库恩的“常态科学”的学科规范。为了“写不同”,我们可能需要写不同的东西。这篇论文特别引用了凯瑟琳·斯图尔特、劳伦·伯兰特、路德维希·维特根斯坦、彼得·温奇、沃尔特·本杰明、詹姆斯·克利福德、乔治·巴塔耶和质量观察小组成员的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信