The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants最新文献

{"title":"Research Trends and Mapping Knowledge for Short Implants in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.","authors":"Ozgun Yildirim","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Short implants have become an effective alternative to conventional implants, particularly in cases with insufficient bone volume where advanced surgery may increase costs and treatment duration. Although interest in short implants is growing, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research trends and influential studies in this area has not been done. This analysis aims to evaluate scientific publications on short implants, identify key trends, influential authors, journals, and articles, and visualize thematic areas to guide future research.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The Web of Science (WoS) database was searched using the keywords [\"Short Implant\" OR \"Short Implants\" OR \"Short Dental Implant\" OR \"Short Dental Implants\"]. After applying specific inclusion criteria, 626 articles published between 1994 and 2024 were included. Bibliometric and science mapping analyses were performed using the Bibliometrix R package. Performance analysis, keyword analysis, co-citation, and thematic mapping were conducted. The PRISMA guidelines were adapted to ensure transparency and reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed a significant increase in scientific production on short implants, with an annual growth rate of 12.69%. The average citation per article was 33.9. Clinical Oral Implants Research and the International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants were identified as the most influential journals. Esposito M. and Felice P. were the most prolific and cited authors. The most cited article was \"Bone Augmentation Procedures in Implant Dentistry\" by Chiapasco M. Thematic analysis revealed four major research areas and highlighted evolving trends. Despite a peak in publications in 2019, a recent decline was observed. Co-citation networks illustrated collaborations and frequently cited clusters in the field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the scientific landscape on short implants. The study highlights increasing interest and identifies leading authors, journals, and articles shaping the field. The findings reveal knowledge gaps and emerging themes, offering valuable insights to guide future research priorities and enhance clinical applications of short implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144002459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long-Term Comprehensive Results of Four-Implant-Supported Overdentures and Fixed Complete Dentures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rong Lan, Meisha Gul, Xinke Jiang, Yiqun Wu, Feng Wang","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose This systematic review aims to integrate the medium-term outcomes of four-implant supported overdentures (IODs) and full arch fixed restorations (IFRs) in the maxilla. Materials and Methods The search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, complemented by manual search. The inclusion criteria were at least 10 maxillary edentulous patients restored by IOD or IFR and at least five years of follow up. RoB 2, and NOS tools were used to assess risk of bias. Implant survival rate (ISR) was calculated as primary outcome. Protheses survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), and complications were the secondary outcomes. Results Sixteen studies with a total of 5568 implants met the criteria (nine on IODs, seven on IFRs). The weighted ISR of IODs was 94.5% (95% CI [92.1%, 96.9%], I2:84.22%), and subgroup analysis was performed on attachment system and study type. The weighted ISR of IFRs was 98.5% (95%CI [97.4%, 99.5%], I2:77.88%). For prostheses survival, the rate of 85.0% in IODs was lower than that of 99.9% in IFRs. MBL in the fifth year was -0.27±1.31 mm in IODs and -1.20±0.76 mm in IFRs. Retention loss (0.34 per patient) and dislodgement/fracture of the acrylic teeth (0.09 per patient) were the most common complications in IODs and IFRs, respectively. Conclusions Despite the variance of baseline, IFRs had a relatively higher implant and protheses survival rate than IODs, whereas IODs had less MBL at the fifth year and higher incidence rate of complications. Both fourimplant- supported maxillary overdentures and full arch fixed restorations have predictable medium-term clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tissue Changes After Immediate Tooth Replacement With and Without Socket-Shield: 1-Year Prospective Study.","authors":"Hung-Chi Liao, Joseph Y K Kan, Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, Guo-Hao Lin, Otto Zuhr, Markus Hürzeler, Joey Chen, Jaime Lozada","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>this study evaluates implant success rates and facial mucosal profile changes in maxillary single immediate implant placement and provisionalization with socket-shield (IIPP+SS) and without socket-shield (IIPP-SS) technique.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>thirty dental implants in 25 patients were assigned to either the IIPP-SS group (15 implants) or the IIPP+SS (15 implants) group. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected at pre-surgery (T0), 2- week (T1), 6-month (T6), and 12-month (T12) post-surgical follow-ups. The implant success rate, marginal bone level changes, facial mucosal level changes, and papilla level changes were evaluated at different time points. Facial mucosal profile changes were assessed individually for hard and soft tissue zones and as a whole using volumetric analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>two implants were excluded (1 patient dropped out and 1 implant failed) from the data analysis in this study, resulting in an overall implant success rate of 96.6% (28/29) after 1 year. Less facial mucosal profile changes were noted in the IIPP+SS group than in the IIPP-SS group, although the difference was only marginally statistically significant (p= 0.06). No statistically significant difference was found in the facial mucosal level changes (p=0.18) and papilla level changes (p = 0.67 for mesial papilla level and p = 0.41 for distal papilla level) changes between the IIPP-SS and IIPP+SS groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this 1-year prospective study, IIPP+SS appears to maintain only the implant facial mucosal profile slightly better than IIPP alone. Both treatment modalities provide clinically satisfactory outcomes biologically, functionally, and esthetically.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144059364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dimensional Changes of Alveolar Ridge After Tooth Extraction Using the Socket Shield Technique Without Immediate Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Soaad Tolba Badawy","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alveolar ridge preservation is essential for successful implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation. The modified socket shield technique (mSST) is one of the techniques developed to minimize ridge resorption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare radiographic dimensional changes in post-extraction sites treated with spontaneous healing versus the mSST without immediate implantation using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Study Design, Setting, Sample: This randomized clinical study included 80 patients with a singlenon-restorable non-molar maxillary tooth. Patients were divided into two equal groups: the test group (mSST) and the control group (atraumatic extraction with spontaneous healing). CBCT scans were performed at baseline (before or immediately after extraction) and 6 months post-surgery. Measurements included alveolar ridge width at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm levels, and buccal and palatal bone plate heights. Following this, implants were placed, and their primary stability was assessed.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The main intervention was the use of the mSST compared to atraumatic tooth extraction.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>included change in buccal bone plate height over a 6-month follow-up period. Covariates: included patient age and gender.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Paired t-tests and independent t-tests were used to evaluate intra- and intergroup differences, respectively. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test group, a significant reduction in palatal wall height was observed (p < 0.001), while no significant changes were noted in other parameters (p ≥ 0.05). In the control group, significant decreases were seen in buccal and palatal plate heights and ridge width (p < 0.05). Comparing the groups, the test group demonstrated significantly less buccal wall height and ridge width resorption than the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in palatal plate height resorption between groups (p = 0.507). The test group exhibited significantly higher primary stability compared to the control group (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The modified socket shield technique with delayed implantation demonstrated superior maintenance of buccal bone plate height and ridge width, along with significantly higher primary implant stability, compared to spontaneously healed sockets. This approach is beneficial for maintaining ridge integrity when immediate implant placement is not planned.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144049362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Study on Site Specific Early and Late Implant Failure in Single Teeth.","authors":"Michael A J Silva, Eszter Somogyi-Ganss, Vanessa C Mendes, Neena L D'Souza","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Research has identified several factors associated with early and late implant failure, however site specificity as a potential risk factor has not been investigated previously. The purpose of this research was to explore the association between specific implant site location as a potential risk factor for early and late implant failure when replacing single teeth, and to investigate possible local and systemic risk factors that could influence these failures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study design was a retrospective cohort study, a chart review was conducted based on records of patients who had received implants replacing single teeth at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry between January 2005 to December 2021. In addition to implant location, systemic, local, and prosthetic factors were evaluated as potential risk factors contributing to implant failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78 (2.3%) implant failures were identified from a total of 3460 single implants. The prevalence of early implant failures (1.4%) was significantly higher than late implant failures (0.9%), z=2.05 (p=0.040). The maxillary lateral incisor location (12/22) demonstrated the highest site specific early implant failure rate (3.4%) relative to all other locations (Fisher exact test, p=0.026). All implants placed in the anterior region of the jaws (2.3%), especially those placed in the maxilla (2.4%), had significantly higher early failure when compared to posterior sites (1.1%), χ²(1)=6.21, p=0.013. Early implant failures in the study were significantly associated with patients whose health history was positive for a systemic condition other than type II diabetes (Fisher exact test, p=0.034). There was significantly higher late implant failure rate in mandibular implants (1.3%) compared to maxillary implants (0.6%), χ²(1)=5.17 (p=0.023). There was a significant association of late implant failures in the study with sites with a wide platform (4.6mm or greater) (χ²(2)=11.57, p=0.003) or wider implant diameter implant (4.51±0.6mm) (t(76) = 3.19, p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of implant failures was 2.3% with maxillary lateral incisors sites demonstrating the highest site specific early implant failure. Early implant failures were associated with patients with a systemic medical condition while late implant failures were associated with healthy individuals, mandibular implants overall, and in sites with wide diameter implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Immediate Loading of 4 Guided Unsplinted Implants Supporting a Maxillary Overdenture: A Prospective Clinical Trial.","authors":"Arif Salman, DoHeum Choi, Nathaniel Chertok, Christian Davila, Michele Agusto, Benjamin Kordusky, Gian Pietro Schincaglia","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate marginal bone level change and accuracy of 4 immediately loaded maxillary implants placed utilizing a flapless guided surgery approach to support a maxillary overdenture retained with solitary attachments.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Subjects with fully edentulous maxillae wearing complete dentures were included. All patients received 4 endosteal implants placed using a stereolithic, mucosa-supported surgical guide. Implants were immediately loaded following surgery with the maxillary overdenture using a solitary attachment system. Radiographic bone level change (RBLC) at 12-months following implant placement was the primary outcome variable. The implant survival rate, peri-implant clinical parameters, accuracy of implant position, prosthetic complications and patient-centered outcomes were the secondary outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 subjects accounting for 56 implants were enrolled and completed the study. Two implants failed with a cumulative survival rate of 96.4% at 12-months. The mean RBLC was 0.14 ± 0.36 (range=0 1.7 mm) and 0.31 ± 0.73 mm (range: 0-4.45 mm) at 6 and 12 months respectively. The delta RBLC was statistically significant from baseline to 6-months (p=0.005) and baseline to 12 months (p=0.002). The mean global angular deviation was 3.35 ± 1.945° with a range of 0.00-10.3°. The 3D offset at the platform and apex are 0.852 ± 0.483 mm (range: 0.19-2.32 mm) and 1.073 ± 0.611 mm (range: 0.26-2.65 mm), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the study limitations, results indicate that immediately loaded four-guided implants supporting a maxillary overdenture with solitary attachments may be a suitable treatment option for the edentulous maxilla.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144056356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"My Personal 'Entrustment': A Pathway of Ongoing Discovery.","authors":"Clark Stanford","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"40 2","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143805287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Does an Osteoporosis-like Condition Jeopardize the Osseointegration Process Around Dental Implants Placed in Animal Models? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eduardo C Kalil, Khalila C Cotrim, Rafael Siqueira, Vittorio Moraschini, Leonardo P Faverani, João Gabriel G Souza, Jamil A Shibli","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11057","DOIUrl":"10.11607/jomi.11057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To gather information on the characteristics of implant osseointegration in animal models of induced osteoporosis to identify the role that some factors have in increasing the success rate in these situations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify information between 2002 and 2023 regarding osseointegration of dental implants in animal models of induced osteoporosis. A standardized data extraction form was used to record data for each study, such as the article title, date, authors, number of animals, purpose of the study, type of analysis used by the authors, follow-up period, type of implants used, test and control groups, interventions, and conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 204 articles were found for evaluation and selection. Out of the articles found, 43 were selected and evaluated based on the bone-to-implant contact percentage (BIC%) reported in them. Other parameters such as the bone-to-implant mechanical interface, bone area (BA), and bone volume (BV) ratios were also evaluated in the studies, if applicable. In the selected articles, a tendency for compromised results of implant osseointegration in the presence of osteoporosis was found. Both the modification of the implant surface as well as systemic and local use of antiresorptive drugs and other substances showed benefits for implant success in osteoporotic sites. However, there was still no observed consensus among studies regarding the superiority of systemic medications in improving the process of peri implant bone repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although it is possible to improve the osseointegration of implants in osteoporotic bone, either by using systemic or local factors, the metabolic bone syndrome caused by osteoporosis can jeopardize the osseointegration of dental implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Final Prosthetic Abutment Insertion Time (One-Time Abutment Insertion Protocol Versus Conventional Protocol) and Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with Meta-analysis.","authors":"Marta Nunes, Bruno Leitão, Miguel Pereira, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira Fernandes","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11221","DOIUrl":"10.11607/jomi.11221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify whether the use of a 'one abutment one time' (OAOT) insertion technique in dental implant treatment protocols significantly impacts clinical outcomes (ie, survival rates and success rates) and peri-implant indices (ie, survival rate, success rate, bleeding on probing, and marginal bone changes [MBC]) compared to conventional protocols.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The protocol used in this review was developed according to PRISMA guidelines. The focus question was 'In patients that are receiving a rehabilitation using dental implants, does the use of a OAOT technique have a better clinical performance compared to using provisional abutments?' The risk of bias (RoB) was performed using a modified version of the Cochrane RoB tool for randomized trials (RoB2, Cochrane Methods). A total of 554 articles were found in three databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and b-on). After screening them, 32 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 11 randomized controlled studies (RCTs) published between 2010 and 2024 in the English language were included (κ = 0.98).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 505 patients were included, with a mean age of 54 years; overall, there were more women than men (~ 58%). A total of 821 implants were included, with 397 implants in the test group (definitive abutment) and 424 implants in the control group (healing/provisional abutment). Follow-up periods ranged from 4 to 36 months. Five studies placed the implant shoulder at bone level, four studies placed it 0.5 to 2.0 mm below the bone crest, one admitted both placements, and another study did not disclose that information. The meta-analysis included 10 studies. The results showed a decrease in peri-implant vertical bone loss with the OAOT protocol compared to the conventional protocol at 6 and 12 months postoperative. Only one study exhibited a high RoB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing the OAOT protocol with platform switching (PS) and higher abutments led to a decrease in bone loss compared to the conventional protocol; however, this reduction may not be clinically significant and might not improve esthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"40 2","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143805286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Marginal Bone Level Changes and Evaluation of Long-Term Functional Dental Implants with the Implant Disease Risk Assessment Diagram: A 2- to 6-Year Follow-up Retrospective Study.","authors":"Batuhan Asik, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Busra Terzioglu, Seyma Eken","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10956","DOIUrl":"10.11607/jomi.10956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between risk profile assessments of dental implants that have been in function for at least 2 years and peri-implant marginal bone loss during the follow-up period using the Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA) diagram.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 70 patients, with 170 implants that had been functionally loaded for at least 2 years, had to attend follow-up sessions to be included in the study. Full-mouth plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. Other parameters were also recorded, including peri implant modified plaque index, modified bleeding index, keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and gingival recession (GR). According to the IDRA risk diagram, participants and dental implants were divided into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups. Marginal bone level (MBL) was measured on periapical radiographs obtained at functional loading (T0) and at the last follow-up session (T1), and mesial and distal marginal bone level changes (ΔMBL) were calculated as T1-T0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant correlation was found between the periodontitis history and periodontitis susceptibility regarding IDRA classification at the patient level. Full-mouth GI, PD, and BoP were found to be statistically higher in the high-risk IDRA group. No statistically significant results were found between the mesial and distal ΔMBL of the IDRA risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IDRA risk level increased especially by periodontitis susceptibility and periodontitis history, but no significant difference was found between risk groups in terms of ΔMBL.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":" ","pages":"218-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142020060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}