钛牙种植体骨整合的数学和计算模型:当前方法和未来方向的系统回顾。

IF 1.7
Tomás Gandía, María Prados-Privado
{"title":"钛牙种植体骨整合的数学和计算模型:当前方法和未来方向的系统回顾。","authors":"Tomás Gandía, María Prados-Privado","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify, compare, and critically evaluate the main mathematical and computational models used to study osseointegration in titanium dental implants. It focuses on the models' predictive accuracy, biological and mechanical integration, and clinical relevance, highlighting their contributions and limitations in simulating implant stability and bone remodeling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and SpringerLink databases up to February 2025. Studies were included if they employed mathematical or computational models-such as finite element analysis, mechanobiological frameworks, or reaction-diffusion systems-to investigate osseointegration in titanium dental implants. A quality assessment of included studies was performed using the GRADE approach to ensure methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Finite element analysis (FEA) was the most commonly used technique, primarily addressing mechanical aspects such as stress distribution and implant geometry. Mechanobiological and reaction-diffusion models incorporated biological and biochemical processes but lacked standardization and clinical validation. The integration of mechanical and biological factors remains limited, hindering real-world applicability. Despite progress, few models included patient-specific parameters or were validated experimentally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mathematical and computational models have substantially advanced our understanding of osseointegration in titanium dental implants. However, their translation into clinical practice is still constrained by validation gaps, heterogeneity in model parameters, and limited biological integration. Future research should emphasize hybrid models, incorporate robust validation protocols, and leverage artificial intelligence to enable personalized and clinically meaningful simulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical and Computational Models for Osseointegration in Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Current Approaches and Future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Tomás Gandía, María Prados-Privado\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify, compare, and critically evaluate the main mathematical and computational models used to study osseointegration in titanium dental implants. It focuses on the models' predictive accuracy, biological and mechanical integration, and clinical relevance, highlighting their contributions and limitations in simulating implant stability and bone remodeling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and SpringerLink databases up to February 2025. Studies were included if they employed mathematical or computational models-such as finite element analysis, mechanobiological frameworks, or reaction-diffusion systems-to investigate osseointegration in titanium dental implants. A quality assessment of included studies was performed using the GRADE approach to ensure methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Finite element analysis (FEA) was the most commonly used technique, primarily addressing mechanical aspects such as stress distribution and implant geometry. Mechanobiological and reaction-diffusion models incorporated biological and biochemical processes but lacked standardization and clinical validation. The integration of mechanical and biological factors remains limited, hindering real-world applicability. Despite progress, few models included patient-specific parameters or were validated experimentally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mathematical and computational models have substantially advanced our understanding of osseointegration in titanium dental implants. However, their translation into clinical practice is still constrained by validation gaps, heterogeneity in model parameters, and limited biological integration. Future research should emphasize hybrid models, incorporate robust validation protocols, and leverage artificial intelligence to enable personalized and clinically meaningful simulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:鉴别、比较和批判性评价用于研究钛牙种植体骨整合的主要数学和计算模型。它侧重于模型的预测准确性,生物和机械集成以及临床相关性,强调它们在模拟种植体稳定性和骨重塑方面的贡献和局限性。材料和方法:系统检索截至2025年2月的MEDLINE/PubMed、Scopus和SpringerLink数据库的文献。如果研究采用数学或计算模型——如有限元分析、机械生物学框架或反应扩散系统——来研究钛牙种植体的骨整合,则纳入研究。采用GRADE方法对纳入的研究进行质量评估,以确保方法的严谨性。结果:共有42项研究符合纳入标准。有限元分析(FEA)是最常用的技术,主要解决机械方面的问题,如应力分布和种植体的几何形状。机械生物学和反应扩散模型结合了生物和生化过程,但缺乏标准化和临床验证。机械和生物因素的整合仍然有限,阻碍了现实世界的适用性。尽管取得了进展,但很少有模型包括患者特定参数或通过实验验证。结论:数学和计算模型大大提高了我们对钛牙种植体骨整合的认识。然而,它们转化为临床实践仍然受到验证差距、模型参数异质性和有限的生物学整合的限制。未来的研究应强调混合模型,纳入稳健的验证协议,并利用人工智能实现个性化和临床有意义的模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathematical and Computational Models for Osseointegration in Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Current Approaches and Future Directions.

Purpose: To identify, compare, and critically evaluate the main mathematical and computational models used to study osseointegration in titanium dental implants. It focuses on the models' predictive accuracy, biological and mechanical integration, and clinical relevance, highlighting their contributions and limitations in simulating implant stability and bone remodeling.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and SpringerLink databases up to February 2025. Studies were included if they employed mathematical or computational models-such as finite element analysis, mechanobiological frameworks, or reaction-diffusion systems-to investigate osseointegration in titanium dental implants. A quality assessment of included studies was performed using the GRADE approach to ensure methodological rigor.

Results: A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Finite element analysis (FEA) was the most commonly used technique, primarily addressing mechanical aspects such as stress distribution and implant geometry. Mechanobiological and reaction-diffusion models incorporated biological and biochemical processes but lacked standardization and clinical validation. The integration of mechanical and biological factors remains limited, hindering real-world applicability. Despite progress, few models included patient-specific parameters or were validated experimentally.

Conclusion: Mathematical and computational models have substantially advanced our understanding of osseointegration in titanium dental implants. However, their translation into clinical practice is still constrained by validation gaps, heterogeneity in model parameters, and limited biological integration. Future research should emphasize hybrid models, incorporate robust validation protocols, and leverage artificial intelligence to enable personalized and clinically meaningful simulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信