Blood Pressure Monitoring最新文献_第3页

Unattended versus conventional blood pressure measurements in hospitalized hypertensive patients. 住院高血压患者的无人值守血压测量与常规血压测量的比较。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000727

Zhe Hu, Rui Chu, Yang Gao, Xin Chen, Chang-Sheng Sheng

{"title":"Unattended versus conventional blood pressure measurements in hospitalized hypertensive patients.","authors":"Zhe Hu, Rui Chu, Yang Gao, Xin Chen, Chang-Sheng Sheng","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000727","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000727","url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aims to compare the differences between unattended and conventional blood pressure measurements in hospitalized hypertensive patients.Methods: In fall of 2019, hypertensive patients at Ruijin Hospital underwent two rounds of unattended and conventional (nurse-monitored) blood pressure measurement. Both rounds used the same electronic blood pressure monitor with measurements taken three times, 30 s apart. Comparison was made using intra-class correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, paired t -tests, etc.Results: Among the 92 subjects in the study, the median age was 50 years old, with women accounting for 33.7%. Among the subjects, the median duration of hypertension was 8.0 years. The prevalence of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and stroke were 26.1%, 5.4%, and 6.5%, respectively. Whether unattended or conventional measurements were taken first, the average blood pressure measured first was slightly higher than the one measured later, but the difference was within 1-2 mmHg. Except that the average DBP during the round of conventional blood pressure measurements was significantly reduced by 1.6 mmHg compared to the conventional DBP, there were no other significant differences. Subgroup analysis by age, gender, BMI, and diabetes showed no significant difference in blood pressure measurement results between unattended and conventional methods.Conclusion: No significant difference was observed between unattended and conventional methods of blood pressure measurement in hospitalized hypertensive patients. Unattended blood pressure measurement can be adopted as the current standard for blood pressure management in hospitalized patients.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Validation of the JAMR upper-arm pressure monitor B23 according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060- 2:2018/AMD 1:2020). 根据 AAMI/ESH/ISO 通用标准（ISO 81060- 2:2018/AMD 1:2020）对 JAMR 上臂压力监测仪 B23 进行验证。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000719

Jing Li, Li-Hong Han, Ru Feng, Li-Hao Wu, Jie Cai, Tian-Ying Zeng, Hui Liu, Lei Wang, Ju-Yun Li, Zhong-Qun Zhan

{"title":"Validation of the JAMR upper-arm pressure monitor B23 according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060- 2:2018/AMD 1:2020).","authors":"Jing Li, Li-Hong Han, Ru Feng, Li-Hao Wu, Jie Cai, Tian-Ying Zeng, Hui Liu, Lei Wang, Ju-Yun Li, Zhong-Qun Zhan","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000719","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000719","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the JAMR upper-arm blood pressure monitor B23 in the general population according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018/AMD 1 : 2020). The study recruited participants who met the criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard in terms of their number, sex, age, limb size, and blood pressure (BP) distribution. The study involved measuring BP, including both SBP and DBP, using both the test device and a standard mercury sphygmomanometer in sequential measurements. Of 90 participants, 85 qualified participants were analyzed. A total of 255 sets of comparison data (three sets for each subject) were obtained and analyzed. For the validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the JAMR B23 and mercury sphygmomanometer BP readings was -0.24 ± 6.52/-2.67 ± 5.6 mmHg (SBP/DBP). For criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP (SBP/DBP) differences between the JAMR B23 and reference BP (SBP/DBP) per participant was 5.61/5.13 mmHg (the requirement was ≤6.95/6.43 mmHg by calculation). The JAMR B23 passed all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018/AMD 1 : 2020) and can be recommended for clinical and self/home use in the general population.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"40-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654443/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141892806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Validation of TMB-2285-BT wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020 Protocol. 根据 ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020 协议对 TMB-2285-BT 普通人群腕式血压计进行验证。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000724

Zijian Xie, Bin Peng, Jia Hu, Xinda Wang, Xiaoqin Du, Chaoya Li, Jiahui Liang

{"title":"Validation of TMB-2285-BT wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020 Protocol.","authors":"Zijian Xie, Bin Peng, Jia Hu, Xinda Wang, Xiaoqin Du, Chaoya Li, Jiahui Liang","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000724","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000724","url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the wrist blood pressure (BP) monitor (TMB-2285-BT) in general population according to international standard of ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020. The TMB-2285-BT BP monitor is an oscillometric device measuring BP from wrist. A single cuff for wrist sizes of 13.5-21.5 cm was used for the test device. The study was performed according to the 'International Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020) protocol' using the same-arm sequential BP measurement method. Subjects ( n ≥ 85) fulfilling the age, gender, BP, and cuff distribution criteria of the protocol were enrolled. For criterion 1, the mean difference of SBP and DBP between the test device and the reference device was -0.27 mmHg and -0.80 mmHg, respectively. For criterion 2, the SD of the averaged paired determinations of SBP and DBP for the test device and the reference device was 2.60 and 2.06 mmHg, respectively, both of which were less than 6.95 and 6.89 mmHg. The accuracy of the test device fulfilled the requirements of the criterion 1 and 2 of ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020. The TMB-2285-BT wrist BP monitor can be recommended for home BP measurement for general population.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"44-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Validation of the DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor in the general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol. 根据 ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 协议，在普通人群中验证 DBP-8278B 腕式全自动血压计。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000717

Qi Zhou

{"title":"Validation of the DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor in the general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol.","authors":"Qi Zhou","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000717","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000717","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor in the general population according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018/AMD 1 : 2020). The test monitor was used to measure SBP and DBP and pulse rate in the wrists using the oscillometric method. According to this protocol using the same-arm sequential blood pressure measurement method, subjects were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, blood pressure, and cuff distribution criteria of the Universal Standard. A single cuff for wrist sizes of 13.5-21.5 cm was used. A total of 85 subjects were included in this study. According to Criterion 1, the mean difference in SBP between the test device and the reference device was 0.89 mmHg, with a SD of 7.76 mmHg. The mean difference of DBP was -1.44 mmHg, with a SD of 6.23 mmHg. The mean difference between SBP and DBP was less than 5.0 mmHg, and the SD was less than 8.0 mmHg, which met the requirements. According to Criterion 2, the SD of the mean differences of SBP between the test device and the reference device per subject was 5.65 mmHg, which was less than 6.88 mmHg and met the requirements. The SD of the mean differences of DBP between the test device and the reference device per subject was 5.61 mmHg, which was less than 6.78 mmHg and met the requirements. The DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor met the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018/AMD 1 : 2020). It can be recommended for home and clinical use.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"36-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654442/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141619222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Could soluble ST2 levels be used to detect nondipper hypertensive subgroup in newly diagnosed hypertension patients. 可溶性 ST2 水平是否可用于检测新诊断的高血压患者中的非非高血压亚组。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000714

Emrah Ozdemir, Berna Stavileci, Bahar Ozdemir, Faik Alper Aksoy, Ceyla Zeynep Colakoglu Gevher, Ali Dogan, Murat Ziyrek

{"title":"Could soluble ST2 levels be used to detect nondipper hypertensive subgroup in newly diagnosed hypertension patients.","authors":"Emrah Ozdemir, Berna Stavileci, Bahar Ozdemir, Faik Alper Aksoy, Ceyla Zeynep Colakoglu Gevher, Ali Dogan, Murat Ziyrek","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000714","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000714","url":null,"abstract":"Aim: ST2 receptor is a member of toll-like/interleukin-1 receptor family. After the activation of IL-33/ST2 signaling pathway clinically detectable amount of soluble form of ST2 (sST2) is released into the circulation. Previous studies showed that sST2 levels were significantly higher in hypertension patients than in controls. In this prospective study, we aimed to analyze this relation and test the predictive accuracy of the sST2 level in diagnosis of nondipping hypertension in newly diagnosed hypertension patients.Methods: Three hundred thirty-seven patients (150 normal, 187 hypertension) who presented with symptoms of hypertension were included in the study. All patients underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and sST2 measurement.Results: Of 187 hypertension patients, 92 of them had nondipping and 95 of them had dipping pattern. sST2 level was significantly higher in nondipping group compared to dipping group and control group (40.79 ± 7.77 vs. 32.47 ± 6.68; P < 0.0001 and 40.79 ± 7.77 vs. 20.09 ± 7.09; P < 0.0001 respectively). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that; only sST2 level was an independent risk factor for hypertension [ P < 0.0001, β : 1.258, odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.158-1.366]. and also nondipping hypertension [ P < 0.0001, β : 1.208, OR (95% CI): 1.108-1.317].Conclusion: Based on the present study it could be concluded that sST2 level is significantly associated with the newly diagnosed hypertension and nondipping hypertension. Hence it could reliably be used to diagnose hypertension and nondipping hypertension with high sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"284-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141490727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Psychological distress, forced awakening, and morning blood pressure surge. 心理困扰、强迫觉醒和早晨血压飙升。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000718

Yeonsu Kim, Jill Howie Esquivel, Meghan Kathleen Mattos, Eric M Davis, Jeongok Logan

{"title":"Psychological distress, forced awakening, and morning blood pressure surge.","authors":"Yeonsu Kim, Jill Howie Esquivel, Meghan Kathleen Mattos, Eric M Davis, Jeongok Logan","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000718","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000718","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Morning blood pressure surge (MBPS) has been recognized as an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease events. Psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, and perceived stress, and behavioral risk factors, such as poor sleep quality, have been associated with increased MBPS. Elevations in sympathetic activity induced by forced awakening may also contribute to further increases in MBPS. Yet, no examination of the interrelationships among psychological distress, sleep quality, awakening mode (natural vs. forced awakenings), and MBPS has been undertaken.Objective: This pilot study aimed: (1) to examine if MBPS differs by awakening mode and (2) to investigate whether psychological distress is associated with MBPS difference between natural and forced awakenings, independent of sleep quality.Methods: Thirty-two healthy adults were included in this cross-sectional study. Blood pressure was measured using a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitor over two nights, consisting of one night of natural awakening and one night of forced awakening. Psychological distress and sleep quality were assessed using questionnaires. We conducted paired t -tests (aim 1) and multiple linear regressions (aim 2).Results: MBPS was significantly greater during forced awakening compared with natural awakening. In addition, the MBPS difference between natural and forced awakenings was significantly greater in participants with higher anxiety levels, independent of sleep quality.Conclusion: We found that augmentation of MBPS by forced awakening was significantly greater in individuals who reported higher anxiety levels. Additional research is needed to examine the potential impacts of forced awakening and anxiety on MBPS in a larger sample of individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"277-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141858927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Validation of two automatic sphygmomanometers according to the modified International Standardization Organization 81060-2:2018 protocol in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference of 22 centimeters or less. 根据国际标准化组织修订的 81060-2:2018 协议，对中上臂周长为 22 厘米或以下的成年人使用的两台自动血压计进行验证。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000715

Igor N Posokhov, Evgeny A Praskurnichiy, Olga S Orlova, Ekaterina A Sukhodolova, Aleksandra V Lystseva

{"title":"Validation of two automatic sphygmomanometers according to the modified International Standardization Organization 81060-2:2018 protocol in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference of 22 centimeters or less.","authors":"Igor N Posokhov, Evgeny A Praskurnichiy, Olga S Orlova, Ekaterina A Sukhodolova, Aleksandra V Lystseva","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000715","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000715","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: A recent International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Task Group report calls for research to investingate potential special populations in validation studies of automated blood pressure (BP) devices. Accordingly, we aimed to determine the accuracy of two previously validated BP monitors passed in a general population when measured in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) ≤ 22 cm.Methods: Test device A was the OMRON HEM 7121 equipped with the HEM CS24 cuff designed for an arm circumference of 17-22 cm. Test device B was the YuWell YE660Е with the YuWell '360°' cuff (18-36 cm). Data from 37 participants aged 20.14 ± 2.23 (18-28) years were analyzed according to criterion 1 of ISO Standard 81060-2 : 2018.Results: According to criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the BP differences for the device A was -7.81 ± 5.20/-10.66 ± 5.48 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) and for the device B was -8.00 ± 6.30/-16.11 ± 5.15 mmHg (systolic/diastolic), respectively. This means that neither device met the requirements.Conclusion: Since devices A and B, which had passed in a general population study, failed in adults aged 18-28 years with an MUAC ≤ 22 cm, such individuals might be considered as new special population for validation studies.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"312-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141490731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Arterial blood pressure monitoring in stroke cohorts: the impact of reduced sampling rates to optimise remote patient monitoring. 中风队列中的动脉血压监测：降低采样率对优化远程患者监测的影响。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000721

James D Ball, Ronney B Panerai, Tim Henstock, Jatinder S Minhas

{"title":"Arterial blood pressure monitoring in stroke cohorts: the impact of reduced sampling rates to optimise remote patient monitoring.","authors":"James D Ball, Ronney B Panerai, Tim Henstock, Jatinder S Minhas","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000721","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000721","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) provides an opportunity to measure poststroke BP variability (BPV), which is associated with clinical stroke outcomes. BP sampling interval (SI) influences ambulatory BPV, but RPM BP SI optimisation research is limited. SI and RPM device capabilities require compromises, meaning SI impact requires investigation. Therefore, this study assessed healthy and stroke subtype BPV via optimised BP sampling, aiding sudden BP change identification and potentially assisting cardiovascular event (recurrent stroke) prediction.Methods: Leicester Cerebral Haemodynamic Database ischaemic [acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), n = 68] and haemorrhagic stroke (intracerebral haemorrhage, n = 12) patient and healthy control (HC, n = 40) baseline BP data were analysed. Intrasubject and interpatient SD (SD i /SD p ) represented individual/population variability with synthetically altered SIs. Matched-filter approaches using cross-correlation function detected sudden BP changes.Results: At SIs between 1 and 180 s, SBP and DBP SD i staticised while SD p increased at SI < 30 s. Mean BP and HR SD i and SD p increased at SI < 60s. AIS BPV, normalised to SI1s, increased at SI30s (26%-131%) and SI120s (1%-274%). BPV increased concomitantly with SI. Cross-correlation analysis showed HC and AIS BP sudden change detection accuracy reductions with increasing SI. Positive BP deviation detection fell 48.48% (SI10s) to 78.79% (SI75s) in HC and 67.5% (SI10s) to 100% (SI75s) in AIS. Negative BP deviation detection fell 50% (SI10s) to 82.35% (SI75s) in HC and 52.27% (SI10s) to 95.45% (SI75s) in AIS.Conclusion: Sudden BP change detection and BPV are relatively robust to SI increases within certain limits, but accuracy reductions generate unacceptable estimates, considerable within RPM device design. This research warrants further SI optimisation.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":"29 6","pages":"290-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142685919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Validation of the AViTA upper-arm blood pressure monitor BP636 with multiple cuff sizes in the general population according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018/Amd1:2020. 根据 ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018/Amd1:2020，在普通人群中验证 AViTA 上臂式血压计 BP636 的多种袖带尺寸。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000722

Chung-Yu Lin, I-Chih Huang

{"title":"Validation of the AViTA upper-arm blood pressure monitor BP636 with multiple cuff sizes in the general population according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018/Amd1:2020.","authors":"Chung-Yu Lin, I-Chih Huang","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000722","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000722","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the accuracy of the AViTA BP636 upper-arm home blood pressure (BP) monitor in general populations with small to extra-large arms according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018/Amd1 : 2020).Methods: The AViTA BPM636 was utilized on 85 adult participants with upper-arm circumferences ranging from 15 to 52 cm, and four cuffs of different sizes (small: 15-22 cm, normal: 22-33 cm, large: 33-42 cm, and extra large: 42-52 cm) were used in this study. The recruitment fulfills the criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO Universal Standard 81060-2 : 2018/Amd1 : 2020 in the general population using the same arm sequential BP measurement method.Results: For validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference blood pressure readings was -0.35 ± 4.68/0.56 ± 3.93 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) for adults. The mean difference of SBP between the test device and the reference device was -0.35 mmHg with a SD of 3.50 mmHg, which was within the acceptable range for criterion 2 (i.e. less than 6.93 mmHg) Similarly, the mean difference in DBP was 0.56 mmHg with a SD of 3.38 mmHg, which also met the criterion 2 (i.e. within 6.91 mmHg).Conclusion: AViTA BPM636 passed the criteria of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2 : 2018/Amd 1 : 2020 protocol. It can be recommended for home-based BP measurements in the general population and people with extra-large arms ranging from 42 to 52 cm.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"321-326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524622/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141916057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Validation of the validity of the new wrist-type fully automatic blood pressure monitor: DBP-2242 according to ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD 1:2020. 新型腕式全自动血压计的有效性验证：DBP-2242 符合 ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD 1:2020。

IF 1.2 4区医学

Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000716

Yuehong Jin, Xiaoming Bei, Ying Jin

{"title":"Validation of the validity of the new wrist-type fully automatic blood pressure monitor: DBP-2242 according to ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD 1:2020.","authors":"Yuehong Jin, Xiaoming Bei, Ying Jin","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000716","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000716","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluation of the accuracy of the wrist-type fully automatic blood pressure (BP) monitor: DBP-2242 in adolescent and adult populations according to ISO 81060-2 : 2018+Amd.1 : 2020.Methods: BP measurements were taken from the subjects using the same-arm sequential method, and BP data measured by a mercury sphygmomanometer was used as the standard.Results: This study analyzed 262 sets of data from 89 subjects. According to criterion 1, the mean difference between the SBP of the test and reference devices was -0.57 ± 7.31 mmHg, and the DBP was -2.27 ± 7.17 mmHg, which is in accordance with the requirements. According to criterion 2, the average difference between the SBP was -0.57 ± 6.25 mmHg and the DBP was -2.27 ± 5.99 mmHg, which is in accordance with the requirements.Conclusion: Wrist-type fully automatic BP monitor: DBP-2242 complies with ISO 81060-2 : 2018+Amd.1 : 2020 and can be used for BP measurement in adolescent and adult populations.","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"317-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524616/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141619223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0