Validation of the G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor in different positions according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020).

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Rui Cheng, Linyi Li, Jinfeng Chen, Jie Ren, Yi Wan
{"title":"Validation of the G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor in different positions according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020).","authors":"Rui Cheng, Linyi Li, Jinfeng Chen, Jie Ren, Yi Wan","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the accuracy of the G.LAB MD6300 oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor in the sitting, supine, and right lateral decubitus position in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The qualified participants were recruited in the study and the same left-arm sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement according to the Universal Standard. The validation results were assessed for the three positions and the Bland-Altman scatter plot was used to show the difference between the test device and reference results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 85 participants were included in the analysis. The mean differences between the test device and reference readings were 0.95 ± 6.76/0.47 ± 6.71 mmHg, 0.55 ± 6.73/-0.20 ± 6.72 mmHg, and -0.71 ± 7.11/-0.86 ± 7.06 mmHg for SBP and DBP for the validation criterion 1 in the sitting position, supine with upward palm position, and right lateral decubitus position with downward left palm flat on left side position, respectively. Furthermore, the mean differences and their standard deviations for SBP and DBP calculated according to criterion 2 in the ISO81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020 were acceptable in all three positions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor fulfilled the validation criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020) in the sitting position, and its accuracy in the supine and right lateral decubitus position was acceptable and roughly equivalent to that in the sitting position. Therefore, it can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To validate the accuracy of the G.LAB MD6300 oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor in the sitting, supine, and right lateral decubitus position in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020).

Methods: The qualified participants were recruited in the study and the same left-arm sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement according to the Universal Standard. The validation results were assessed for the three positions and the Bland-Altman scatter plot was used to show the difference between the test device and reference results.

Results: A total of 85 participants were included in the analysis. The mean differences between the test device and reference readings were 0.95 ± 6.76/0.47 ± 6.71 mmHg, 0.55 ± 6.73/-0.20 ± 6.72 mmHg, and -0.71 ± 7.11/-0.86 ± 7.06 mmHg for SBP and DBP for the validation criterion 1 in the sitting position, supine with upward palm position, and right lateral decubitus position with downward left palm flat on left side position, respectively. Furthermore, the mean differences and their standard deviations for SBP and DBP calculated according to criterion 2 in the ISO81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020 were acceptable in all three positions.

Conclusion: The G.LAB MD6300 upper arm blood pressure monitor fulfilled the validation criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020) in the sitting position, and its accuracy in the supine and right lateral decubitus position was acceptable and roughly equivalent to that in the sitting position. Therefore, it can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement in the general population.

根据 AAMI/ESH/ISO 通用标准(ISO81060-2:2018+AMD1:2020),对 G.LAB MD6300 上臂血压计的不同位置进行验证。
目的根据美国医学仪器促进协会/欧洲高血压学会/国际标准化组织(AAMI/ESH/ISO)通用标准(ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020),验证 G.LAB MD6300示波上臂式血压计在普通人群中坐位、仰卧位和右侧卧位的准确性:研究招募了合格的参与者,并根据通用标准使用相同的左臂顺序法进行血压测量。对三个位置的验证结果进行评估,并使用布兰-阿尔特曼散点图来显示测试设备与参考结果之间的差异:结果:共有 85 名参与者参与了分析。对于验证标准 1,在坐位、仰卧位手掌向上、右侧卧位左手掌向下平放在左侧位置时,测试设备和参考读数的平均差分别为 0.95 ± 6.76/0.47 ± 6.71 mmHg、0.55 ± 6.73/-0.20 ± 6.72 mmHg 和 -0.71 ± 7.11/-0.86 ± 7.06 mmHg。此外,根据 ISO81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020 标准 2 计算的 SBP 和 DBP 的平均差及其标准偏差在所有三种体位下均可接受:G.LAB MD6300 上臂式血压计在坐位时符合 AAMI/ESH/ISO 通用标准 (ISO 81060-2 : 2018+AMD1 : 2020) 的验证标准,在仰卧位和右侧卧位时的准确度也可以接受,与坐位时的准确度基本相当。因此,可以建议将其用于临床和普通人群的自我测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信