Effect of wearing N95 masks for 10 hours on ambulatory blood pressure in healthy adults.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Zachary Zeigler, Anthony Acevedo, Isiaha Mews, Dalton Lesser, Abby Koornneef
{"title":"Effect of wearing N95 masks for 10 hours on ambulatory blood pressure in healthy adults.","authors":"Zachary Zeigler, Anthony Acevedo, Isiaha Mews, Dalton Lesser, Abby Koornneef","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of wearing a face mask for an extended duration is unknown. This study aimed to determine if wearing a face mask for 10 h impacts blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness. Subjects received an ambulatory blood pressure cuff and were asked to wear it for 10 h while readings were taken every 15 min. During the face mask trial, subjects wore an N95 mask for 10 h. During the control, subjects did not wear a mask. Subjects were randomized to start their trial. An accelerometer was given to ensure no physical activity differences. Linear mixed models were used to determine group differences, and McNemar test was used to assess frequency differences when determining BP load. Twelve college-aged (20.5 ± 1.5 years) male (n = 5) and female (n = 7) individuals with normal BP participated in this study. There were no differences in time spent in any physical activity domain (all P > 0.05). There was no difference in brachial SBP (P = 0.688), brachial DBP (P = 0.063), central SBP (P = 0.875), central DBP (P = 0.246), heart rate (P = 0.125), and augmentation pressure (P = 0.158) between conditions. During mask condition, augmentation pressure was reduced by 5.2 ± 3.1% compared to control (P < 0.001). There were no frequency differences in the number of BP readings above 140 mmHg for SBP (P = 0.479) and >90 mmHg for DBP (P = 0.212). The current study found that wearing an N95 mask for 10 h did not affect brachial or central BP but significantly decreased augmentation pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of wearing a face mask for an extended duration is unknown. This study aimed to determine if wearing a face mask for 10 h impacts blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness. Subjects received an ambulatory blood pressure cuff and were asked to wear it for 10 h while readings were taken every 15 min. During the face mask trial, subjects wore an N95 mask for 10 h. During the control, subjects did not wear a mask. Subjects were randomized to start their trial. An accelerometer was given to ensure no physical activity differences. Linear mixed models were used to determine group differences, and McNemar test was used to assess frequency differences when determining BP load. Twelve college-aged (20.5 ± 1.5 years) male (n = 5) and female (n = 7) individuals with normal BP participated in this study. There were no differences in time spent in any physical activity domain (all P > 0.05). There was no difference in brachial SBP (P = 0.688), brachial DBP (P = 0.063), central SBP (P = 0.875), central DBP (P = 0.246), heart rate (P = 0.125), and augmentation pressure (P = 0.158) between conditions. During mask condition, augmentation pressure was reduced by 5.2 ± 3.1% compared to control (P < 0.001). There were no frequency differences in the number of BP readings above 140 mmHg for SBP (P = 0.479) and >90 mmHg for DBP (P = 0.212). The current study found that wearing an N95 mask for 10 h did not affect brachial or central BP but significantly decreased augmentation pressure.

佩戴 N95 口罩 10 小时对健康成年人活动血压的影响。
长时间佩戴口罩的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定戴口罩 10 小时是否会影响血压(BP)和动脉僵化。受试者收到一个动态血压袖带,并被要求佩戴 10 小时,每隔 15 分钟测量一次血压。在面罩试验期间,受试者佩戴 N95 口罩 10 小时。受试者随机开始试验。受试者佩戴加速度计,以确保没有体力活动差异。在确定血压负荷时,使用线性混合模型确定组间差异,并使用 McNemar 检验评估频率差异。12 名大学年龄(20.5 ± 1.5 岁)、血压正常的男性(5 人)和女性(7 人)参加了这项研究。他们在任何体力活动领域花费的时间均无差异(P>0.05)。不同条件下的肱动脉SBP(P = 0.688)、肱动脉DBP(P = 0.063)、中心SBP(P = 0.875)、中心DBP(P = 0.246)、心率(P = 0.125)和增强压(P = 0.158)均无差异。在掩蔽条件下,增强压比对照组降低了 5.2 ± 3.1%(P < 0.001)。在血压读数超过 140 mmHg(SBP)(P = 0.479)和 >90 mmHg(DBP)(P = 0.212)时,没有频率差异。本研究发现,佩戴 N95 口罩 10 小时不会影响肱动脉血压或中心血压,但会显著降低增强压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信