Assessment最新文献_第3页

The Development and Validation of a Dimensional Childhood Adversity Measure. 儿童期逆境维度量表的开发与验证。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251367142

Angelina Pei-Tzu Tsai, Peter F Halpin, Lucy Lurie, Meredith Gruhn, Maya Rosen, Donald H Baucom, Michael B Sarabosing, Sneha Sai Boda, Katie A McLaughlin, Margaret A Sheridan

{"title":"The Development and Validation of a Dimensional Childhood Adversity Measure.","authors":"Angelina Pei-Tzu Tsai, Peter F Halpin, Lucy Lurie, Meredith Gruhn, Maya Rosen, Donald H Baucom, Michael B Sarabosing, Sneha Sai Boda, Katie A McLaughlin, Margaret A Sheridan","doi":"10.1177/10731911251367142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251367142","url":null,"abstract":"Research on the developmental consequences of early adversity has grown rapidly, yet measures of childhood adversity have not kept pace with evolving theoretical models. Existing measures often lack comprehensive assessment and psychometric evidence. This study addresses these gaps by developing the Deprivation and Threat-Adult Self-report (DT-AS) measure, a psychometrically sound scale assessing childhood threat and deprivation exposure, evaluated in young adults. Psychometric analysis was performed in waves on a total sample of N = 796 participants. Pilot data (n1 = 210; n2 = 208) were analyzed using Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) to refine item selection and optimize response formats. The final sample (n3 = 378) confirmed a correlated factor structure of threat and deprivation with excellent psychometric properties. DT-AS consists of 33 items measuring threat and 30 measuring deprivation, offering a robust tool to examine associations between childhood adversity and psychopathology outcomes in adulthood.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251367142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Identifying Latent Cognitive Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales-5th Edition. 用斯坦福-比奈智力量表第5版识别自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷/多动障碍的潜在认知特征。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251369977

Soo Youn Kim, Eric A Youngstrom, Megan Norris, Ann Levine, Eric M Butter, Kevin G Stephenson

{"title":"Identifying Latent Cognitive Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales-5th Edition.","authors":"Soo Youn Kim, Eric A Youngstrom, Megan Norris, Ann Levine, Eric M Butter, Kevin G Stephenson","doi":"10.1177/10731911251369977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251369977","url":null,"abstract":"There is limited information concerning the presence of empirically derived, person-centered latent cognitive profiles in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and whether these profiles are diagnostically useful. The aim of this study was to identify empirically driven cognitive subgroups in youth with ASD or ADHD and examine predictors of those profiles. A retrospective chart review was conducted with patients seen at a developmental assessment clinic who were identified with ASD or ADHD aged 2 to 16 years (n = 1,679, Mage = 8.4, SDage = 3.1). A Latent Profile Analysis with Stanford-Binet-Fifth Edition composites resulted in 14 profiles, which were roughly parallel to each other across various levels of cognitive functioning. Several profiles were characterized by a relatively large discrepancy between the Nonverbal IQ and Verbal IQ. Younger age and higher IQ were significant predictors of those with scattered profiles, whereas diagnoses (i.e., ASD or ADHD), sex, and emotional-behavioral functioning were not.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251369977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The GRoNC: Guidelines for Reporting on Norm-Referenced and Criterion-Referenced Scores. GRoNC：标准参考分数和标准参考分数报告指南。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251371395

Marieke E Timmerman, Annelies De Bildt, Julian Urban

{"title":"The GRoNC: Guidelines for Reporting on Norm-Referenced and Criterion-Referenced Scores.","authors":"Marieke E Timmerman, Annelies De Bildt, Julian Urban","doi":"10.1177/10731911251371395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251371395","url":null,"abstract":"Psychological test manuals vary widely in their reporting of the construction and interpretation of standardized scores. Consequently, the critical evaluation of norm quality and meaning is difficult for test users and reviewers. Because a specific standard for reporting on standardized scores is lacking, we developed Guidelines for Reporting on Norm-referenced and Criterion-referenced Scores (GRoNC), following a systematic approach for creating reporting guidelines (EQUATOR). The development took place in two stages: Stage 1, developing a preliminary version of the GRoNC based on a literature review; Stage 2, a Delphi process in two rounds, involving both theoretical experts (n = 11) and test developers (n = 14). The GRoNC includes a series of questions and associated explanations. It supports test developers in developing and reporting upon their standardized scores, and reviewers in evaluating a psychological test on its standardized scores. We provide recommendations on using the GRoNC and conclude by describing our expectations and plans to increase the impact of the GRoNC on reporting practice.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251371395"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Natural Language Response Formats for Assessing Depression and Worry With Large Language Models: A Sequential Evaluation With Model Pre-Registration. 用大语言模型评估抑郁和忧虑的自然语言反应格式：模型预注册的顺序评价。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-20 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251364022

Zhuojun Gu, Katarina Kjell, H Andrew Schwartz, Oscar Kjell

{"title":"Natural Language Response Formats for Assessing Depression and Worry With Large Language Models: A Sequential Evaluation With Model Pre-Registration.","authors":"Zhuojun Gu, Katarina Kjell, H Andrew Schwartz, Oscar Kjell","doi":"10.1177/10731911251364022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251364022","url":null,"abstract":"Large language models can transform individuals' mental health descriptions into scores that correlate with rating scales approaching theoretical upper limits. However, such analyses have combined word- and text responses with little known about their differences. We develop response formats ranging from closed-ended to open-ended: (a) select words from lists, write (b) descriptive words, (c) phrases, or (d) texts. Participants answered questions about their depression/worry using the response formats and related rating scales. Language responses were transformed into word embeddings and trained to rating scales. We compare the validity (concurrent, incremental, face, discriminant, and external validity) and reliability (prospective sample and test-retest reliability) of the response formats. Using the Sequential Evaluation with Model Pre-Registration design, machine-learning models were trained on a development dataset (N = 963), and then pre-registered before tested on a prospective sample (N = 145). The pre-registered models demonstrate strong validity and reliability, yielding high accuracy in the prospective sample (r = .60-.79). Additionally, the models demonstrated external validity to self-reported sick-leave/healthcare visits, where the text-format yielded the strongest correlations (being higher/equal to rating scales for 9 of 12 cases). The overall high validity and reliability across formats suggest the possibility of choosing formats according to clinical needs.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251364022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145091186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Personal Recovery in the General Population: Comparison of Psychometric Properties of the Brief INSPIRE-O in Those With and Without Common Mental Disorders. 普通人群的个人康复：有和没有常见精神障碍的人的简短INSPIRE-O心理测量特性的比较

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251367122

Xingjian Ruan, Femke Vergeer-Hagoort, Margreet Ten Have, Annemarie I Luik, Marlous Tuithof, Ernst Bohlmeijer, Peter M Ten Klooster

{"title":"Personal Recovery in the General Population: Comparison of Psychometric Properties of the Brief INSPIRE-O in Those With and Without Common Mental Disorders.","authors":"Xingjian Ruan, Femke Vergeer-Hagoort, Margreet Ten Have, Annemarie I Luik, Marlous Tuithof, Ernst Bohlmeijer, Peter M Ten Klooster","doi":"10.1177/10731911251367122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251367122","url":null,"abstract":"The 5-item Brief INSPIRE-O instrument, based on the Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning in Life, and Empowerment framework, is a novel tool to assess personal recovery. Although initially developed for clinical populations, its conceptual alignment with core dimensions of psychological well-being suggests its potential applicability to a broader audience. The current study aimed to examine its validity, reliability, and measurement invariance across people with and without common mental disorders (CMDs). The scale was administered in a Dutch general population sample (n = 5,451). Confirmatory factor analyses supported a unidimensional structure with robust factor loadings and scalar invariance across individuals with and without CMDs in the past year. In addition, the Brief INPSIRE-O showed acceptable reliability (ω = .71-.78) and the expected pattern of correlations with other health indicators supported its construct validity. In conclusion, the Brief INSPIRE-O appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of positive psychological functioning that can be validly used and compared across people with and without CMDs.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251367122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Indicators of Impulsivity in Routine Clinical Assessment of Adult ADHD. 成人ADHD临床常规评估中的冲动性指标。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251365744

Hui Dong, Anselm B M Fuermaier, Janneke Koerts, Gerdina H M Pijnenborg, Nana Guo, Ragnar Schwierczok, Norbert Scherbaum, Bernhard W Müller

{"title":"Indicators of Impulsivity in Routine Clinical Assessment of Adult ADHD.","authors":"Hui Dong, Anselm B M Fuermaier, Janneke Koerts, Gerdina H M Pijnenborg, Nana Guo, Ragnar Schwierczok, Norbert Scherbaum, Bernhard W Müller","doi":"10.1177/10731911251365744","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251365744","url":null,"abstract":"Impulsivity in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) represents a multidimensional construct rather than a unitary trait. This study examined a proposed three-factor model of impulsivity comprising (a) self-reported impulsive behavior (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale), (b) commission errors, and (c) reaction time measures from neuropsychological tests in 654 adults undergoing routine clinical assessment of adult ADHD. Using confirmatory factor analyses on split subsamples, we found consistent support for the proposed three-factor structure, whereas the network analysis favored a two-group conceptualization that separates performance-based from self-report-based measures. Self-reported impulsivity demonstrated the highest severity levels, followed by commission errors, with reaction times being least affected. Demographic and clinical characteristics significantly predicted self-reports and commission error measures but not reaction times. The results emphasize the importance of interpreting self-reports independently of performance-based tests. The coherence between commission errors and reaction time variables across tasks of related constructs suggests that administering multiple tasks may yield redundant information in the clinical assessment of impulsivity.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251365744"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

An Analysis of Measurement Invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Between Indonesia, Germany, and the USA. 印度尼西亚、德国和美国患者健康问卷-9测量不变性分析。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251361230

Eric Sucitra, Riangga Novrianto, Yolanda T Pasaribu, Tania M Lincoln, Edo S Jaya

{"title":"An Analysis of Measurement Invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Between Indonesia, Germany, and the USA.","authors":"Eric Sucitra, Riangga Novrianto, Yolanda T Pasaribu, Tania M Lincoln, Edo S Jaya","doi":"10.1177/10731911251361230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251361230","url":null,"abstract":"The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a screening tool for assessing depressive symptomatology that has received widespread use. However, there is a scarcity of research on whether the instrument measures the same construct between high-income (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Online surveys were utilized to assess samples across Indonesia, Germany, and the USA (N = 2350). Measurement Invariance (MI) was computed using multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. We found the general factor model to have a good fit and configural, metric, scalar, and residual MI across three countries. There were no significant differences in mean scores (Indonesia, M = 1.87, SD = 0.56; Germany, M = 1.90, SD = 0.65; USA, M = 1.90, SD = 0.75). These results highlight that depressive symptomatology is universal across distinct geographical regions, regardless of the population's income levels. Hence, this study further emphasizes the urgency of developing universal, accessible assessment and treatment for depression.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251361230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145028827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Big Five Inventory-2 in Korea: Validation and Cross-Cultural Comparisons with the U.S. and Chinese Versions. 韩国的五大目录-2：与美国和中国版本的验证和跨文化比较。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251357466

Jinsoo Choi, Nanhee Kim, Bo Zhang, Sang Woo Park, Seonghee Cho, Young Woo Sohn, Christopher J Soto, Oliver P John

{"title":"The Big Five Inventory-2 in Korea: Validation and Cross-Cultural Comparisons with the U.S. and Chinese Versions.","authors":"Jinsoo Choi, Nanhee Kim, Bo Zhang, Sang Woo Park, Seonghee Cho, Young Woo Sohn, Christopher J Soto, Oliver P John","doi":"10.1177/10731911251357466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251357466","url":null,"abstract":"The Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) has enjoyed global popularity due to its good balance of content coverage and brevity and has been officially translated into 12 languages in addition to the original English version. The current study aimed to further enhance the cultural accessibility of the BFI-2 by translating it into the Korean language and comprehensively validating the Korean version in two South Korean samples: working adults and college students. Across the two samples, the Korean BFI-2 demonstrated good reliability (e.g., test-retest reliability, Cronbach's alpha), construct validity (e.g., convergent/discriminant validity), and criterion-related validity with a wide range of outcome measures. Additionally, we compared the psychometric properties of the Korean BFI-2 to those of the original English and Chinese versions to further establish its comparability with other language versions. Overall, our results demonstrate that the Korean BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure that can be confidently used by other researchers. Implications, limitations, and future directions were discussed.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251357466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145028861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Developing and Validating a Multi-Domain Risk Attitudes Scale in the Multi-Ethnic Asian Population in Singapore. 新加坡亚洲多种族人口多领域风险态度量表的开发与验证。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251365741

Yiyun Shou, Joey Elizabeth Yeo, Adela-Maria Isvoranu, Sacha Epskamp, Nan Luo

{"title":"Developing and Validating a Multi-Domain Risk Attitudes Scale in the Multi-Ethnic Asian Population in Singapore.","authors":"Yiyun Shou, Joey Elizabeth Yeo, Adela-Maria Isvoranu, Sacha Epskamp, Nan Luo","doi":"10.1177/10731911251365741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251365741","url":null,"abstract":"Maladaptive risk attitudes, such as extreme risk seeking and risk aversion, are closely linked to psychopathology such as psychopathy and anxiety. Having culturally appropriate assessments of risk attitudes is essential for the research of psychology and psychopathology of responses to risk in a target population. We aimed to develop and validate the multi-domain risk tolerance (MDRT) scale for the multi-ethnic Singaporean population. Initial items were constructed from revising the item pool used in the previous study via interviews with Singaporean community-dwelling adults (N = 31). The candidate items of the MDRT were then tested and selected via a subsequent survey study (N = 882). A second longitudinal study (N = 1003) with two time-point measurements was conducted to validate the MDRT scale. The results suggested that the scale had satisfactory structural validity, criterion validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The MDRT scale also demonstrated scalar measurement invariance across genders and age groups. The results further highlighted the importance of cultural adaptation of measures in risk attitudes and continuing improvement of assessment and understanding of risk attitudes across populations.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251365741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145028849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Unbiased Confidence Intervals for Psychological Testing: The Regression-Based True Score Approach With Scale Correction. 心理测试的无偏置信区间：基于回归的真实得分方法与量表校正。

IF 3.4 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1177/10731911251362532

Stefan C Schmukle

{"title":"Unbiased Confidence Intervals for Psychological Testing: The Regression-Based True Score Approach With Scale Correction.","authors":"Stefan C Schmukle","doi":"10.1177/10731911251362532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251362532","url":null,"abstract":"Two different approaches for calculating confidence intervals (CIs) for individual scores in psychological testing practice have been discussed in the literature within the framework of classical test theory. The traditional approach (CI: observed score ± z · standard error of measurement) has been criticized because it does not consider the phenomenon that, with imperfect measurement, true scores will be closer to the population average than the observed scores (regression to the mean). The regression approach (CI: regression-based true score estimate ± z · standard error of the estimate) takes this effect into account, but has the disadvantage that it leads to confidence intervals that are on a different scale than the observed scores. The different scaling occurs because true scores have a smaller standard deviation than observed scores, and the extent of this shrinkage depends on the reliability of the test. Here, I suggest a scale correction for the regression-based true score estimate to preserve the original scaling. Simulations indicate that this approach has the desired properties and outperforms the two existing approaches. The regression approach with scale correction is therefore recommended for calculating confidence intervals for individual scores in psychological testing practice.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251362532"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144990943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0