Identifying Latent Cognitive Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales-5th Edition.

IF 3.4 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1177/10731911251369977

Soo Youn Kim, Eric A Youngstrom, Megan Norris, Ann Levine, Eric M Butter, Kevin G Stephenson

{"title":"Identifying Latent Cognitive Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales-5th Edition.","authors":"Soo Youn Kim, Eric A Youngstrom, Megan Norris, Ann Levine, Eric M Butter, Kevin G Stephenson","doi":"10.1177/10731911251369977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is limited information concerning the presence of empirically derived, person-centered latent cognitive profiles in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and whether these profiles are diagnostically useful. The aim of this study was to identify empirically driven cognitive subgroups in youth with ASD or ADHD and examine predictors of those profiles. A retrospective chart review was conducted with patients seen at a developmental assessment clinic who were identified with ASD or ADHD aged 2 to 16 years (n = 1,679, Mage = 8.4, SDage = 3.1). A Latent Profile Analysis with Stanford-Binet-Fifth Edition composites resulted in 14 profiles, which were roughly parallel to each other across various levels of cognitive functioning. Several profiles were characterized by a relatively large discrepancy between the Nonverbal IQ and Verbal IQ. Younger age and higher IQ were significant predictors of those with scattered profiles, whereas diagnoses (i.e., ASD or ADHD), sex, and emotional-behavioral functioning were not.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251369977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251369977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is limited information concerning the presence of empirically derived, person-centered latent cognitive profiles in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and whether these profiles are diagnostically useful. The aim of this study was to identify empirically driven cognitive subgroups in youth with ASD or ADHD and examine predictors of those profiles. A retrospective chart review was conducted with patients seen at a developmental assessment clinic who were identified with ASD or ADHD aged 2 to 16 years (n = 1,679, M_age = 8.4, SD_age = 3.1). A Latent Profile Analysis with Stanford-Binet-Fifth Edition composites resulted in 14 profiles, which were roughly parallel to each other across various levels of cognitive functioning. Several profiles were characterized by a relatively large discrepancy between the Nonverbal IQ and Verbal IQ. Younger age and higher IQ were significant predictors of those with scattered profiles, whereas diagnoses (i.e., ASD or ADHD), sex, and emotional-behavioral functioning were not.

查看原文本刊更多论文

用斯坦福-比奈智力量表第5版识别自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷/多动障碍的潜在认知特征。

关于在患有自闭症谱系障碍（ASD）或注意缺陷/多动障碍（ADHD）的青少年中存在经验衍生的、以人为中心的潜在认知特征以及这些特征是否在诊断上有用的信息有限。本研究的目的是在患有ASD或ADHD的青少年中确定经验驱动的认知亚组，并检查这些特征的预测因子。对在发育评估诊所就诊的2至16岁的ASD或ADHD患者进行回顾性图表回顾（n = 1679, Mage = 8.4, SDage = 3.1）。用斯坦福-比奈-第五版复合材料进行的潜在轮廓分析得出了14个轮廓，这些轮廓在不同的认知功能水平上大致平行。非语言智商和语言智商之间存在较大差异。年龄较小和智商较高是那些具有分散特征的人的显著预测因素，而诊断（即ASD或ADHD）、性别和情绪行为功能则不是。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

8.90

自引率

2.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.