Aesthetic Surgery Journal最新文献

{"title":"IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies.","authors":"John Joseph, Vladimir Sudimac, Sabine Mersmann, Martina Kerscher","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae222","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies of incobotulinumtoxinA for treating upper facial lines (UFLs; ie, a combination of glabellar frown lines [GFLs], horizontal forehead lines [HFLs], and lateral canthal lines [LCLs]) were conducted in the United States (ULTRA I: NCT04594213) and Germany (ULTRA II: NCT04622254).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of simultaneous intramuscular injections for UFLs. Longer-term safety and efficacy were assessed in open-label extension periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy participants (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe GFLs, HFLs, and symmetric LCLs at maximum contraction on the 5-point Merz Aesthetics Scales were randomized 2:1:1 to receive up to 64 units of incobotulinumtoxinA in the main period for each trial. Treatment groups were: UFLs, GFLs, and HFLs (ULTRA I), LCLs (ULTRA II), and placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of GFL, HFL, and LCL responders, defined as a Merz Aesthetics Scale score for the respective area of 0 (no) or 1 (mild) and a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline to Day 30, as assessed by both investigator and participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 362 and 368 participants received treatment in ULTRA I and ULTRA II, respectively. In both studies, incobotulinumtoxinA treatment was significantly more effective than placebo with respect to the primary endpoints (P < .0001) and key secondary endpoints (P < .0001). The open-label extension period results were consistent with those seen in the main period. No new safety findings were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ULTRA I and ULTRA II, the safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for the simultaneous treatment of moderate-to-severe UFLs were demonstrated, with significant improvements across all primary and secondary endpoints vs placebo.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 1 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"293-304"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834979/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142543152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Measuring Outcomes Relevant to the Décolletage From the Patient Perspective: Development and Validation of the BODY-Q Décolletage Scale.","authors":"Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Andrea L Pusic, Manraj Kaur","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae229","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A range of cosmetic treatments to improve skin quality of the décolletage are available. To measure outcomes from the patient perspective, a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate the BODY-Q Décolletage scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Appearance-related codes from BODY-Q concept elicitation interviews were re-examined and 13 items drafted and refined through qualitative interviews with patients and clinicians. The scale was tested in an online international sample of women aged ≥25 years who had previously received a treatment for the décolletage, or in the past 12 months had received a cosmetic treatment at a plastic surgery or dermatology clinic. Data were analysed with both Rasch measurement theory and classical test theory. Construct validity involved testing 20 hypotheses. Convergent validity tests included correlations between the décolletage scale and other BODY-Q scales and the SKIN-Q.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews conducted with 15 patients and 5 clinicians led to a 16-item scale with items that covered scenarios (mirror, photographs, low neckline, lay on side, breasts together, arms crossed, get up, up close), comparisons (with other people), age concerns (youthful, age), qualitative concerns (attractive, healthy), skin tone (even-colored), and texture (smooth, texture). The field test included 334 participants. An item with poor fit to the Rasch model was dropped. Data for the remaining 15 items fit the Rasch model (χ2 = 76.72, df = 60, P = .07). All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit. All reliability statistics were >0.93. A total of 19 of 20 predefined hypotheses (95%) were met, providing evidence of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BODY-Q Décolletage scale is available to incorporate the perspective of patients into clinical care and clinical trials of minimally invasive treatments to improve skin quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834981/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142612617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization (MFU-V) Effectiveness and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mojgan Amiri, Guardmond Ajasllari, Adea Llane, Gabriela Casabona, Tatjana Pavicic, Julia Sevi, Julieta Spada, Vasanop Vachiramon, Rossana Vasconcelos, Siew Tuck Wah, Taulant Muka, Sabrina Guillen Fabi","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae228","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is an advanced, noninvasive cosmetic procedure widely performed for skin lifting and tightening. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the aesthetic effectiveness, patient satisfaction, skin quality, and safety profile of MFU-V treatment. A comprehensive search of 5 bibliographic databases up to 2023 was conducted. Pooled effect estimates with random effects models and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Out of 4019 references, 42 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed 89% of patients (95% CI: 81%-94%; I2: 63%, n = 411) demonstrated some degree of global aesthetic improvement, as assessed by investigators. Similarly, 84% of patients (95% CI: 73%-91%; I2: 64%, n = 312) reported improvement following treatment. Satisfaction of any level was reported by 84% of patients (95% CI: 61%-94%; I²: 52%, n = 326), and 62% (95% CI: 37%-82%; I²: 3%, n = 172) when \"neutral\" as a response option was provided for patients. Skin quality (eg, wrinkles, texture) also improved. Patients reported a pooled mean pain score of 4.85 (95% CI: 4.35, 5.35; I2: 97%, n = 785), indicating moderate pain. Common adverse events included erythema, edema, swelling, bruising, and tenderness, all of which were generally mild to moderate in severity. Overall, our analysis demonstrated a notable increase in global aesthetic improvement and patient satisfaction following MFU-V treatment, accompanied by moderate pain and a generally favorable safety profile. However, the potential misclassification of neutral responses as positive may result in an overestimation of the treatment's efficacy. These findings highlight the need for well-designed trials to further explore MFU-V's clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP86-NP94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834976/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142612620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pectoralis Major Muscle 3D Volumetric Reconstruction in the Tuberous Breast: Anatomical and Radiomics Differences With Potential Surgical Impact.","authors":"Stefano Vaccari, Stefano Lusi, Marco Ettore Attilio Klinger, Francesca Provini, Simone Furlan, Valeria Bandi, Riccardo Di Giuli, Daniela Bernardi, Francesco Maria Klinger, Valeriano Vinci","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae234","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberous breast (TB) is a congenital anomaly characterized by morphological, structural, and breast region alterations. The pectoralis major muscle (PMM) is crucial for correction when placing breast implants. Alterations at this level have received little attention in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study we aimed to define the anatomical characteristics of the PMM in TB patients with radiomics data extracted from MRI sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PMMs of 30 TB patients and 30 controls were analyzed by manual segmentation with 3D-Slicer v.5.4.0 software and radiomics techniques. A total of 46 features were extracted, both first-order statistical features and shape features (eg, median, mean, standard deviation, volume, area, centroid, number of voxels, flatness, roundness, elongation, principal axis length x, y, z, diameter).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was found in favor of the TB group for PMM roundness; PMM elongation was greater in the TB group. Principal axes 1, 2, and 3 were analyzed in the 3 planes x, y, and z. In the TB group, principal x axis 3 was lower than in the control group. Also, between the axes, principal z axis 2 was on average higher in the TB group than in the non-TB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide the first quantitative evidence of alterations affecting the PMM in TB patients. These differences were found in different planes and volumetric shape features, with potential surgical implications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong>(Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"264-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142724574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization (MFU-V) and Hyperdilute Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA-CMC) of the Lower Face and Submentum to Treat Skin Laxity: A Pilot Study Demonstrating Superiority of MFU-V First Followed by Hyperdilute CaHA-CMC.","authors":"Amanda Doyle, Iris Looi, Paul Chu","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae226","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) and hyperdilute calcium hydroxylapatite-carboxymethylcellulose (CaHA-CMC) dermal injections are effective for improving skin laxity in the lower face and submentum by stimulating neocollagenesis and neoelastogenesis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Combining these treatments in an optimal order may inform best practice in aesthetic dermatology. Despite their frequent concurrent use, no study has evaluated the impact of treatment order. This study aimed to determine the optimal sequence for administering MFU-V and hyperdilute CaHA-CMC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve healthy women aged 35 to 65 years were randomized into 2 groups. Group A received MFU-V followed by hyperdilute CaHA-CMC 6 weeks later, while Group B received the treatments in the opposite order. Evaluations included histological assessments, aesthetic outcomes, and safety measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A showed greater improvements in subjective Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, and FACE-Q Patient-Perceived Age visual analog scale scores. Both groups exhibited similar improvements in FACE-Q Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline scores. Histologically, both groups demonstrated significant elastin production at the 120-day follow-up. Group A showed a 143% relative increase in elastin coverage, compared with a 63% increase in Group B. Consequently, Group A exhibited superior qualitative and histologic improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administering MFU-V first, followed by hyperdilute CaHA-CMC 6 weeks later, is the optimal sequence for this combination therapy. Although both groups experienced increased elastin synthesis and aesthetic improvements, the order of treatments significantly impacted the outcomes, favoring the sequence used in Group A. This finding provides valuable insight for optimizing combination therapies in aesthetic dermatology.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"305-312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142602869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to: Breast Pocket Lavage With Clindamycin Solution for Silicone Removal After Implant Rupture.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae173","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae173","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141896494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in 252 Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons: Prevalences, ACE Clustering, and Effects on Adult Health and Behaviors, Including Self-Defined Depression, Work Addiction, and Burnout.","authors":"Mark B Constantian, Nick Zaborek","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae214","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CDC/Kaiser Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study documented that ACEs predict adult health and self-harming behaviors. ACEs have been documented in physicians and are higher in physicians treated for problematic behavior. Plastic surgeons have never been assayed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Might ACE prevalences in plastic surgeons predict their adult health and/or behavior?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 252 ABPS-certified plastic surgeons (72% men, 28% women) completed the 10-question CDC/Kaiser ACE survey by deidentified email. Data were collected on adult health and behaviors previously associated with ACEs in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 42% of plastic surgeons had 1 or more ACEs; 9.9% had 4 or more. Emotional abuse was 2 times higher than the control CDC/Kaiser population, although other ACEs were lower. Gender differences existed: female surgeons suffered more sexual abuse (17% vs 8%), physical neglect (7% vs 1%), violence against their mothers (7% vs 2%), and self-defined burnout (32% vs 17%). ACEs occurred in clusters. Total ACEs predicted autoimmune disorders, chronic pain/fatigue, self-defined depression, irritable bowel, antidepressant/anxiolytic use, alcohol abuse, >3 marriages, >10 sexual partners, sex and work addiction, eating disorders, and self-defined burnout (all P < .020). Emotional abuse predicted alcohol abuse. Sexual abuse predicted sex addiction. Emotional neglect predicted autoimmune disease, antidepressant/anxiolytic use, eating disorder, and work addiction. Physical neglect predicted chronic fatigue/chronic pain, depression, and burnout (all P < .001 or less).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adverse childhood experiences occurred in 42% of our 252-member plastic surgeon cohort and predicted 13 adult illnesses and self-harming behaviors that can impair surgeons' lives and performances. This may facilitate their recognition and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"321-332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty.","authors":"Jake A Alford, Sean McCleary, Jason Roostaeian","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae221","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inherent subjectivity in aesthetic outcomes presents a unique challenge in assessing rhinoplasty. Crowdsourcing has provided a new metric for objective analysis. The authors designed a retrospective study to compare the aesthetic outcomes of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty vs structural rhinoplasty.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to objectively quantify the relative aesthetic advantages of performing a dorsal preservation technique. Additionally, we aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of crowdsourcing as an efficient and reliable method for evaluating any plastic surgery aesthetic outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients' preoperative and postoperative photographs were divided into 2 cohorts. Photographs were evaluated by crowdworkers on a secure online rating platform based on the overall nasal appearance, dorsal profile, dorsal aesthetic line symmetry, and dorsal contour, and rated their confidence about whether a patient had undergone surgery. A delta was calculated by comparing preoperative to postoperative states to represent an absolute value of improvement after surgery. Each cohort was compared with non-paired t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The structural rhinoplasty cohort included 34 patients. The dorsal preservation cohort included 30 patients. Both cohorts demonstrated improved aesthetic outcomes (dorsal preservation 0.300, 95% CI 0.047; structural 0.377, 95% CI 0.055). When raters were asked to predict whether a patient had surgery, the correlation coefficient of the structural cohort (0.74) suggested that a crowdworker was better able to identify whether a patient had surgery in those patients. The correlation coefficient in the dorsal preservation cohort (-0.0554) suggested that the raters were unable to identify which patients had surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significant improvements in overall aesthetic outcomes with both techniques, although a more natural \"unoperated\" outcome was achieved when performing a dorsal preservation technique. We also provide evidence of the efficacy of crowdsourcing as an efficient and reliable method for evaluating aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142581811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Abdominoplasty With Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Long-term Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Charles A Messa, Harrison D Davis, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Chris Amro, Robyn B Broach, John P Fischer","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae230","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risks and benefits of performing small fat-containing ventral or umbilical hernia repair (HR) during cosmetic abdominoplasty remains a reconstructive and aesthetic challenge for plastic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes in patients undergoing abdominoplasty with concurrent HR and abdominoplasty alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients undergoing abdominoplasty with and without concurrent HR from January 2015 to June 2022 was performed. Patients were stratified by concurrent HR. All hernia patients underwent primary fascial repair, without mesh. Demographics, surgical site occurrences (SSO), and cosmetic complications, including delayed healing and necrosis, were assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed to compare association of umbilical hernia repair with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and six patients underwent abdominoplasty, and 68 (64%) had concurrent HR. No significant difference in demographics was identified between groups, including mean BMI (HR = 27.2 kg/m2 and no HR = 26.3 kg/m2, P = .73), and number of previous open hernia repairs (P = .09). After a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, hernia recurrence rate was 1.4% (n = 1), with a time to hernia recurrence of 12.2 months. After controlling for confounders, there was no difference in risk of SSO (OR 1.02 [0.31-3.36] P = .978), cosmetic complications (OR 0.80 [0.14-4.57] P = .805), procedure length (-21.5 minutes [-46.92-22.93] P = .501), readmission (2.8% vs 0%, P = .336), or reoperation (8.8% vs 10%, P = .766) between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominoplasty with concurrent HR can be performed safely and effectively, with no increase in adverse outcomes or cosmetic complications. The benefit of performing mesh-free HR with abdominoplasty can achieve an enhanced aesthetic outcome and reduce long-term abdominal wall morbidity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP71-NP78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142612579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"To Net or Not to Net?","authors":"Foad Nahai, Robert Singer","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae243","DOIUrl":"10.1093/asj/sjae243","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP95-NP97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142811715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}