Utilizing Generative Text-to-Image AI Models to Explore Race, Gender, and Age in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Maissa Trabilsy, Arianna Genovese, Srinivasagam Prabha, Sahar Borna, Cesar A Gomez-Cabello, Syed Ali Haider, Cui Tao, Antonio J Forte
{"title":"Utilizing Generative Text-to-Image AI Models to Explore Race, Gender, and Age in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery.","authors":"Maissa Trabilsy, Arianna Genovese, Srinivasagam Prabha, Sahar Borna, Cesar A Gomez-Cabello, Syed Ali Haider, Cui Tao, Antonio J Forte","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear how representative and inclusive of various patient populations generative text-to-image AI models are.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This project explores the diversity of race, gender, and age in the images generated by AI models: DALL-E3, Midjourney, and Adobe Firefly, in response to prompts focused on liposuction, blepharoplasty, and rhinoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prompts were designed to prompt the AI model to generate images of surgical outcomes for liposuction, blepharoplasty, and rhinoplasty for each gender, race and age combination: male vs. female, Caucasian or white, Black or African American, Latino or Hispanic, and age groups: 20-30 years, 31-45 years, and 46+ years. Each generated image was evaluated for representation of skin color by Fitzpatrick and Monk scales, sex parity using a 4-item questionnaire, and the incorporation of Westernized beauty standards. Analysis was then conducted, utilizing the Kruskal-Walis test or the Fischer's exact test between the 3 models (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the representation of light skin color (Fitzpatrick I-III & Monk 1-5) vs. dark skin color (Fitzpatrick IV-VI & Monk 6-10) between the models (p=0.26 & p=0.31). A significant difference was found between the models and between females vs. males regarding aging (p<0.0001 & p=0.0009). There were also significant differences found for the depiction of clear skin (p <0.0001), large and/or light-colored eyes (p=0.0010), and narrow noses (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is fair representation of light skin colors and dark skin colors across the models, the depiction of gender bias and Westernized beauty standards can be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is unclear how representative and inclusive of various patient populations generative text-to-image AI models are.

Objectives: This project explores the diversity of race, gender, and age in the images generated by AI models: DALL-E3, Midjourney, and Adobe Firefly, in response to prompts focused on liposuction, blepharoplasty, and rhinoplasty.

Methods: Prompts were designed to prompt the AI model to generate images of surgical outcomes for liposuction, blepharoplasty, and rhinoplasty for each gender, race and age combination: male vs. female, Caucasian or white, Black or African American, Latino or Hispanic, and age groups: 20-30 years, 31-45 years, and 46+ years. Each generated image was evaluated for representation of skin color by Fitzpatrick and Monk scales, sex parity using a 4-item questionnaire, and the incorporation of Westernized beauty standards. Analysis was then conducted, utilizing the Kruskal-Walis test or the Fischer's exact test between the 3 models (p<0.05).

Results: There was no significant difference between the representation of light skin color (Fitzpatrick I-III & Monk 1-5) vs. dark skin color (Fitzpatrick IV-VI & Monk 6-10) between the models (p=0.26 & p=0.31). A significant difference was found between the models and between females vs. males regarding aging (p<0.0001 & p=0.0009). There were also significant differences found for the depiction of clear skin (p <0.0001), large and/or light-colored eyes (p=0.0010), and narrow noses (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Although there is fair representation of light skin colors and dark skin colors across the models, the depiction of gender bias and Westernized beauty standards can be improved.

利用生成文本到图像的人工智能模型探索整形和美容手术中的种族,性别和年龄。
背景:目前尚不清楚生成文本到图像的人工智能模型在不同患者群体中的代表性和包容性。目的:本项目探讨人工智能模型DALL-E3、Midjourney和Adobe Firefly生成的图像中种族、性别和年龄的多样性,以响应专注于吸脂、眼睑整形和鼻整形的提示。方法:设计提示提示,提示AI模型生成不同性别、种族和年龄组合(男性与女性、高加索人或白人、黑人或非裔美国人、拉丁美洲人或西班牙人)和年龄组(20-30岁、31-45岁和46岁以上)的吸脂、眼睑成形术和鼻成形术的手术结果图像。每张生成的图像都是通过Fitzpatrick和Monk量表来评估皮肤颜色的代表性,使用4项问卷来评估性别平等,并结合西方化的审美标准。然后利用Kruskal-Walis检验或Fischer精确检验在3个模型之间进行分析(结果:浅肤色(Fitzpatrick I-III & Monk 1-5)与深肤色(Fitzpatrick IV-VI & Monk 6-10)在模型之间的表征没有显著差异(p=0.26 & p=0.31)。结论:尽管模特对浅肤色和深肤色的描述是公平的,但性别偏见和西方化的审美标准的描述可以得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信