The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1,840 Primary Augmentations.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jerzy Kolasinski, Malgorzata Kolenda, Szymon Kolacz, Anna Kasielska-Trojan
{"title":"The Effect of Patient Involvement in Implant Size Selection on Satisfaction With Breast Size: An Analysis of 1,840 Primary Augmentations.","authors":"Jerzy Kolasinski, Malgorzata Kolenda, Szymon Kolacz, Anna Kasielska-Trojan","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aesthetic breast surgery is a specific field, in which the aim is not to achieve any universally defined standard, but to meet the patient's expectations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the proportion of women who were dissatisfied with breast size following primary breast augmentation and decided for revision. The study presents and verifies an algorithm for breast implant selection which involves the patient in the decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed of medical charts from January 2012 to December 2022 from one private center. The final analysis included 1840 patients. All had implants chosen according to the Patient Decision-Making Process on Implant Size Selection (PIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the studied cases, 18 decided for implant exchange due to dissatisfaction with breast size (0.98%). This group differed significantly from the controls (n=1822) in the following aspects: lower BMI during primary procedure, lower mean implant volume and shorter follow-up. In all but two women, mean BMI increased by 1 unit before revisional surgery (from 19.7 to 20.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dissatisfaction with breast implant size is a rare cause of revision in breast augmentation surgery when the patient is involved in the final decision on the volume of the implants. The presented algorithm (PIS) yielded less than 1% dissatisfaction with breast size in a long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aesthetic breast surgery is a specific field, in which the aim is not to achieve any universally defined standard, but to meet the patient's expectations.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the proportion of women who were dissatisfied with breast size following primary breast augmentation and decided for revision. The study presents and verifies an algorithm for breast implant selection which involves the patient in the decision-making process.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of medical charts from January 2012 to December 2022 from one private center. The final analysis included 1840 patients. All had implants chosen according to the Patient Decision-Making Process on Implant Size Selection (PIS).

Results: Of the studied cases, 18 decided for implant exchange due to dissatisfaction with breast size (0.98%). This group differed significantly from the controls (n=1822) in the following aspects: lower BMI during primary procedure, lower mean implant volume and shorter follow-up. In all but two women, mean BMI increased by 1 unit before revisional surgery (from 19.7 to 20.6).

Conclusions: Dissatisfaction with breast implant size is a rare cause of revision in breast augmentation surgery when the patient is involved in the final decision on the volume of the implants. The presented algorithm (PIS) yielded less than 1% dissatisfaction with breast size in a long-term follow-up.

患者参与植入物尺寸选择对乳房尺寸满意度的影响:对1840例初次隆胸手术的分析。
背景:乳房美容手术是一个特定的领域,其目的不是达到任何普遍定义的标准,而是满足患者的期望。目的:本研究的目的是确定首次隆胸后对乳房大小不满意并决定进行乳房修复的女性比例。本研究提出并验证了一种让患者参与决策过程的乳房植入物选择算法。方法:对某民营医院2012年1月至2022年12月的病历进行回顾性分析。最终分析包括1840例患者。所有患者均根据患者对种植体尺寸选择的决策过程(PIS)选择种植体。结果:18例因对乳房尺寸不满意而选择置换术(0.98%)。该组与对照组(n=1822)在以下方面有显著差异:初始手术时BMI较低,平均种植体体积较低,随访时间较短。除两名女性外,所有女性在手术前平均BMI增加了1个单位(从19.7增加到20.6)。结论:在隆胸手术中,当患者参与最终决定植入物的体积时,对乳房植入物大小的不满意是一个罕见的翻修原因。在长期随访中,所提出的算法(PIS)对乳房大小的不满意度低于1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信