Personality disorders最新文献

{"title":"Comparing the clinical utility of the alternative model for personality disorders to the Section II personality disorder model: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Laura C Weekers, Joost Hutsebaut, Hilde De Saeger, Jan H Kamphuis","doi":"10.1037/per0000651","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000651","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) has been extensively studied over the past decade, but to date there is no direct comparison of the clinical utility of the AMPD model relative to the Section II personality disorder (PD) model in an ecologically valid design. The current study examined the clinical utility of an AMPD-informed assessment procedure and Section II PD assessment procedure as assessed by both patients and clinicians in a randomized controlled trial. A sample of 119 patients were randomly assigned to either an AMPD or a Section II PD assessment procedure. At the end of the assessment, patients filled out questionnaires pertaining to clinical utility, satisfaction, motivation for treatment, and general experience of the assessment. Clinicians who subsequently started treatment with these patients also completed two clinical utility questionnaires. There were no significant differences between the AMPD and Section II PD assessment procedure on patients' reported clinical utility, motivation for treatment, satisfaction, and general experience of the assessment nor were there significant differences between the models on clinician reported clinical utility. Explorative analyses revealed that, for patients, a positive relationship with the assessor was predictive of experienced utility. This study shows no superiority of the AMPD in terms of clinical utility but suggests that the alliance with the assessor is a particularly salient factor in clinical utility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"386-394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139564267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A comparison of the associations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Section II personality disorders and Section III personality domains with clinical dysfunction in a psychiatric patient sample.","authors":"R Michael Bagby, Sharlane C L Lau, Carolyn A Watters, Lena C Quilty, Martin Sellbom","doi":"10.1037/per0000687","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000687","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we compare the incremental predictive capacities of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, <i>Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR)</i> Section II personality disorders (SII-PDs) with Section III trait domains of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) in a psychiatric outpatient sample (<i>N</i> = 185). To this end, a series of hierarchical regression analyses was conducted in which the 10 SII-PDs and the five AMPD trait domains served as the predictor variables and five areas of clinical dysfunction as the criterion variables. Two models for each criterion were tested. In Model A, the 10 PDs were entered as a block, followed by the block entry of trait domains; in Model B, the block entry of these predictors was reversed. As the AMPD was designed to address the shortcomings of the SII-PDs, it was hypothesized that the AMPD trait domains would show greater predictive capacity vis-à-vis the latter by (a) explaining more overall variance for each criterion variables when entered first into the model versus when SII-PDs was entered first and (b) explaining more incremental variance than SII-PDs when block was entered second. These hypotheses were partially supported. Overall, the AMPD trait domains predicted more variance than SII-PDs and demonstrated better model fit and more predictive power for three of the criterion variables. Similarly, the AMPD domains predicted a significant but modest incremental increase in variance over that of the SII-PDs for three of the criterion variables. We conclude that more work needs to be done to improve the AMPD, particularly in the assessment of externalizing psychopathology as it relates to clinical dysfunction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"15 5","pages":"322-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploring personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization: A cross-sectional comparison of section ii personality disorder model and alternative model for personality disorders.","authors":"Dominika Górska, Monika Olga Jańczak","doi":"10.1037/per0000682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our cross-sectional study provides a head-to-head comparison of Section II and Section III of <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic models of personality disorders (PDs) in identifying significant personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization (PH). PH is an indicator of a breakdown in one's existing ability to manage mental crisis. The sample was recruited from psychiatric clinical services (<i>N = 60</i>) as well as universities and the local community (<i>N = 49</i>). We used the Structured Clinical Interview for <i>DSM-5</i> PD (SCID-5-PD) for Section II <i>DSM-5</i> diagnosis, the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) for Criterion A and the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> (PID-5) for Criterion B. Separate logistic regressions analyses showed high discriminative utility for all diagnostic models: the number of Section II diagnosis, level of personality functioning, and five maladaptive traits (AUC between .89 and .97). Binomial logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure showed that Section II number of diagnoses revealed incremental utility over Criteria A and B in distinguishing between individuals experiencing a mental health crisis requiring PH and those not requiring immediate intervention. We conclude that each diagnostic model, when considered individually, exhibits a high degree of discriminatory performance. However, employing all these models concurrently for identifying personality correlates of PH proves impractical. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"15 5","pages":"304-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorder models scored from the same interview.","authors":"Whitney R Ringwald, William C Woods, Aidan G C Wright","doi":"10.1037/per0000663","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000663","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD) traits were designed to maintain continuity with the Section II personality disorder (PD) diagnoses by retaining the same clinical information. Whether the AMPD traits achieve this is not well established. Prior work testing incremental validity of AMPD traits and Section II diagnoses is limited by the fact each model was measured by a different instrument or rater, making it unclear whether discrepancies are due to the constructs or methods. Here, we compare the incremental validity of AMPD traits versus Section II PDs assessed by the same instrument and rater. Participants (<i>N</i> = 311, 50% received past-year mental health treatment) completed a clinical interview, baseline self-reports, and 14-day ambulatory assessment protocol. Interviewers rated AMPD domains, facets, and Section II criteria from the same interview (Structured Interview for <i>DSM-IV</i> Personality). We used hierarchical regression models to evaluate the variance predicted in 17 clinically relevant cross-sectional and momentary variables by the AMPD traits and Section II PDs. Incremental <i>R</i>² showed that Section II PDs account for little variance in outcomes over and above the AMPD domains/facets, whereas the AMPD facets were generally more predictive of outcomes than the Section II PDs. Results add novel evidence that dimensional PD traits-not a particular assessment method-are equivalent or superior to PD categories for predicting social, emotional, and behavioral functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"371-378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140900544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing the symptom presentation similarities and differences of complex posttraumatic stress disorder and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review.","authors":"Jessica R Atkinson, Kolbrun H Kristinsdottir, Tennyson Lee, Mark C Freestone","doi":"10.1037/per0000664","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) is characterized in the <i>International Classification of Diseases-11</i> by affect dysregulation, negative self-concept, and relationship impairments, symptoms also presented in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Some research shows CPTSD as a distinct disorder, others as a subgroup or a replacement for BPD. No review currently amalgamates the findings on whether CPTSD presents too similarly to BPD to be a standalone disorder. This article systematically reviewed similarities and differences in symptom presentations of the two disorders. Six databases were searched (PsycINFO, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycEXTRA, and Open Access Theses and Dissertations) and identified papers were summarized narratively. The majority of studies found distinct profiles for CPTSD and BPD. One study found no differences between the constructs; however, this used a population without severe trauma. CPTSD and BPD can present comorbidly, these individuals will have likely experienced earlier and more frequent interpersonal trauma and display greater functional impairment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"241-253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140946662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Associations between borderline personality disorder symptoms and personality functioning in adolescents: A brief report.","authors":"Sofie Diondet, Laura C Weekers, Joost Hutsebaut","doi":"10.1037/per0000671","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious mental disorder, which has been linked to a number of negative outcomes in adolescents and adults. BPD is generally linked to more severe impairments in personality functioning. The (differential) association of specific BPD symptoms with severity level, however, has not been explored yet. The present study explores the relationship between all nine BPD symptoms and impairments in personality functioning in adolescents using a cross-sectional design. A total of 116 treatment-seeking adolescents were administered semistructured interviews for <i>DSM-IV</i> Axis I and Axis II disorders and the semistructured interview for personality functioning <i>DSM-5</i> (STiP-5.1). Furthermore, the potential association of symptom disorders, and more specifically mood disorders, with level of personality functioning was assessed. Together, the nine BPD criteria were significantly related to STiP-5.1 total score, even when controlling for the presence of a mood disorder. However, when taking the effect of number of symptom disorders and the other BPD symptoms into account, only the presence of recurrent self-harm and/or suicidal behavior and intense anger, were associated with a higher level of impairment in personality functioning. These findings emphasize the diagnostic importance of repeated self-harm and suicidality and provide additional evidence for the value of using BPD criteria to easily identify teenagers at risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"15 4","pages":"264-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141592328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"\"I am ashamed that I exist. I feel like apologizing for existing\": The phenomenology of shame in patients with borderline personality disorder: A qualitative study.","authors":"Carsten R Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye","doi":"10.1037/per0000655","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000655","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shame is an essential affect in many patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and can be associated with most of the BPD diagnostic criteria. Severe shame is a highly aversive emotion with concomitant beliefs about the self as deeply inferior, insignificant, disgusting, and unloved. Shame and how it is manifested in the subjective experience and behavior in people diagnosed with BPD is remarkably under-researched, and our knowledge of the phenomenology of shame in BPD needs to be improved. Severe shame is often less accessible and available to conscious awareness, making it difficult to access via questionnaires and self-report measures. Therefore, this study is based on semi-structured interviews with 21 women Structural clinical interview for <i>DSM-5</i> disorders' diagnosed with BPD. All interviews were analyzed using the interpretive phenomenological approach. Based on the analysis, the participants' descriptions of how severe shame manifests itself in their subjective experience and behavior are classified into 10 themes: the self is deeply flawed and unlovable; self-hatred/self-contempt; eye contact is awkward and shameful; shameful over being mentally ill; shameful identity diffusion; hiding behind façade/social roles; pleasing others/performing to avoid shame; self-destructive behavior to mitigate shame; sex associated with shame; and shame during the therapy session. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"181-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139708766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Disinhibited attachment behavior among infants reared at home: Relations to maternal severe mental illness and personality disorder symptoms.","authors":"Sofie Stender, Kirstine A Davidsen, Karlen Lyons-Ruth, Susanne Harder","doi":"10.1037/per0000653","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000653","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disinhibited attachment behavior (DAB) among infants is persistent and associated with behavioral and relational problems throughout childhood and adolescence. Little is known about risk factors for DAB among infants reared at home, although studies have linked DAB with maternal psychiatric hospitalization and maternal borderline personality disorder. The aim of the current study was to further assess the association between DAB, maternal severe mental illness (SMI; schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression), and maternal PD symptoms. Ninety-three mothers and their infants participated in the study: 46.2% with SMI and 53.8% with no-diagnosis. During pregnancy, mothers were assessed on the Structured Clinical Interview for <i>DSM-5</i> and the Standardized Assessment of Personality Abbreviated Scale a validated measure of personality disorder (PD) symptoms. Infants were assessed for DAB at 1 year of age using the rating of infant stranger engagement, assessed during the strange situation procedure. Infants of mothers with clinical levels of PD symptoms were significantly more likely to display DAB (<i>OR</i> = 3.44) compared to infants of mothers without clinical levels of PD symptoms. Maternal SMI was not significantly associated with infant DAB. Because most mothers with clinical levels of PD symptoms also had comorbid diagnoses in this study, further work is needed to evaluate the role of comorbidity. These results add to the emerging literature indicating that maternal personality symptoms may be a risk factor for indiscriminate forms of attachment behavior among home-reared infants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"207-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139708767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ripples in the water: Fluctuations of narcissistic states in daily life.","authors":"Vanessa Lea Freund, Gudrun Vera Eisele, Frenk Peeters, Jill Lobbestael","doi":"10.1037/per0000650","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000650","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Narcissistic traits are traditionally viewed as consistent similar to the mirrorlike self-reflection of Narcissus in the water. However, evidence suggests that state levels of narcissism are more dynamic than previously believed. The current research explored fluctuations within and between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in daily life. We investigated whether individuals' levels of grandiosity and vulnerability (a) vary, (b) are instable, and (c) display inertia and cross-lagged effects in their daily narcissistic expressions. Participants (<i>N</i> = 253; <i>M</i>_age = 22, 85% female) completed grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic trait questionnaires. Using ecological momentary assessment, they further completed up to 60 grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic state questionnaires over 6 days. The results showed that higher grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic traits led to more within-person variability within their corresponding states. Additionally, higher grandiose leadership/authority traits related to greater vulnerable within-person variability, while grandiose self-absorption/self-admiration reduced this. Similarly, all narcissistic traits, except for exploitativeness/entitlement and egocentrism, were positively related to increased instability in their corresponding state. Further, both grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic states demonstrated significant inertia, that is, lingering narcissistic endorsements within their own states. Overall, though the effect sizes were limited, the results showed that grandiosity and vulnerability include time-variant states that are intertwined and need to be acknowledged as additional moving, dimensional constructs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"193-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139708768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Changes in mentalization in patients with personality disorders during sequential brief-Adlerian psychodynamic psychotherapy: The role of therapists' technique and countertransference.","authors":"Andrea Ferrero, Giulia Gagliardini, Barbara Simonelli, Simona Fassina, Silvana Lerda, Salvatore Gullo, A. Colli","doi":"10.1037/per0000659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000659","url":null,"abstract":"Mentalization, that is the capacity to understand our and others' behaviors in terms of intentional mental states, represents one of the core features of personality disorders (PDs) and can be related to therapists' countertransference (CT) and interventions.\u0000\u0000\u0000AIMS\u0000The aim of the present work was to study the relationship between therapists' technique, therapists' CT, and patients' mentalization, in a sample of patients with PDs undergoing a 40-session program of sequential brief-adlerian psychodynamic psychotherapy, a psychodynamic therapeutic model specifically developed for the treatment of PDs in public mental health services.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHOD\u0000Eighty-seven patients with PD and their therapists completed ratings of mentalization (mentalization imbalances scale and reflective functioning questionnaire), CT (therapist response questionnaire), and therapists' intervention (comparative psychotherapy process scale) at five different time points (Sessions 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40).\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Results showed that patients' mentalizing problematics decreased over time. Moreover, we found a reduction of therapists' disengaged CT, and an increase in positive CT over time. Regarding therapists' techniques, psychodynamic-interpersonal interventions were on average higher than cognitive-behavioral, but both techniques were used increasingly over time. Our results also showed significant and clinically coherent interactions between therapist's CT and techniques and between patient's mentalization imbalance and therapist's response. Our results highlighted the importance of early stages in therapy, since the most significant relationships between the various process variables (patient's mentalizing imbalances, therapist's techniques, and emotional responses) are observed between t₁ and t₂, corresponding to the initial phases of the treatments. Clinical implications will be discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140743450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}