Confusing my viewpoint with his: Altered self-other distinction performance in antisocial personality disorder.

Alix Bigot, Luca A Tiberi, Xavier Saloppé, Jean-Louis Nandrino, Thierry Pham, Henryk Bukowski
{"title":"Confusing my viewpoint with his: Altered self-other distinction performance in antisocial personality disorder.","authors":"Alix Bigot, Luca A Tiberi, Xavier Saloppé, Jean-Louis Nandrino, Thierry Pham, Henryk Bukowski","doi":"10.1037/per0000660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deficits of social cognition are regularly but inconsistently reported among individuals with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Because of the multifaceted nature of social cognition, deficits might be only observed when assessing specific facets of social cognition and under sufficiently demanding conditions. This study examined self-other distinction performance, a key facet lying at the core of the attachment-based model of mentalizing (Fonagy & Luyten, 2009). Twenty-one forensic inpatients with ASPD and 19 participants from the community completed a visual perspective-taking paradigm allowing to tease apart self-other priority (i.e., how self-focused one is) from self-other distinction performance (i.e., how much one confuses his with others' mental states). The ASPD group made significantly more errors at handling conflicting self-other viewpoints when requiring self-other distinction (19%) than the control group (4%), but the ASPD group was not significantly more self-focused. In contrast, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index self-report scale did not differentiate the two groups. However, a novel measure of self-other distinction based on empathic concern (i.e., the tendency to experience feelings of concern and compassion for others) and personal distress subscales (i.e., the tendency to experience personal distress in response to the distress of others) did differentiate the two groups, albeit to a significantly lower extent than the objective measure of self-other distinction. Altogether, these findings indicate the presence of a self-other distinction deficit in ASPD and advocate for psychometric approaches that embrace the multifaceted nature of social cognition and the need for objective measures with sufficient sensitivity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deficits of social cognition are regularly but inconsistently reported among individuals with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Because of the multifaceted nature of social cognition, deficits might be only observed when assessing specific facets of social cognition and under sufficiently demanding conditions. This study examined self-other distinction performance, a key facet lying at the core of the attachment-based model of mentalizing (Fonagy & Luyten, 2009). Twenty-one forensic inpatients with ASPD and 19 participants from the community completed a visual perspective-taking paradigm allowing to tease apart self-other priority (i.e., how self-focused one is) from self-other distinction performance (i.e., how much one confuses his with others' mental states). The ASPD group made significantly more errors at handling conflicting self-other viewpoints when requiring self-other distinction (19%) than the control group (4%), but the ASPD group was not significantly more self-focused. In contrast, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index self-report scale did not differentiate the two groups. However, a novel measure of self-other distinction based on empathic concern (i.e., the tendency to experience feelings of concern and compassion for others) and personal distress subscales (i.e., the tendency to experience personal distress in response to the distress of others) did differentiate the two groups, albeit to a significantly lower extent than the objective measure of self-other distinction. Altogether, these findings indicate the presence of a self-other distinction deficit in ASPD and advocate for psychometric approaches that embrace the multifaceted nature of social cognition and the need for objective measures with sufficient sensitivity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

将我的观点与他的观点混淆:反社会人格障碍患者自我-他人区分表现的改变。
社会认知缺陷在反社会人格障碍(ASPD)患者中有规律但不一致的报道。由于社会认知的多面性,只有在评估社会认知的特定方面和在足够苛刻的条件下才能观察到缺陷。本研究考察了自我-他人区分表现,这是基于依恋的心智化模型的核心(Fonagy & Luyten, 2009)。21名ASPD住院法医患者和19名来自社区的参与者完成了一个视觉视角获取范式,该范式允许将自我-他人优先级(即,一个人的自我关注程度)与自我-他人区分表现(即,一个人将自己的精神状态与他人的精神状态混淆的程度)分开。在要求区分自我-他人时,ASPD组在处理相互冲突的自我-他人观点方面的错误(19%)明显多于对照组(4%),但ASPD组的自我关注程度并没有显著提高。相比之下,人际反应指数自我报告量表没有区分两组。然而,一种基于共情关怀(即,对他人感到关心和同情的倾向)和个人痛苦子量表(即,对他人的痛苦作出反应的个人痛苦的倾向)的自我-他人区别的新测量确实区分了这两组,尽管其程度明显低于自我-他人区别的客观测量。总之,这些发现表明反社会人格障碍中存在自我-他人区分缺陷,并提倡采用心理测量方法,包括社会认知的多面性和对足够敏感的客观测量的需要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信