拘留男孩品行障碍的多指标模型:与品行障碍标准的关系以及病因学和临床相关的相关性。

Olivier F Colins, Kostas A Fanti
{"title":"拘留男孩品行障碍的多指标模型:与品行障碍标准的关系以及病因学和临床相关的相关性。","authors":"Olivier F Colins, Kostas A Fanti","doi":"10.1037/per0000708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A multispecifier model for subtyping children and adolescents with conduct disorder (CD) has been proposed that, in addition to callous-unemotional (CU) traits, also considers grandiose-manipulative (GM) and daring-impulsive (DI) traits. Yet, concerns have been raised about the potential overlap of these latter two specifiers with existing CD criteria and their limited added value to the prediction of etiologically and clinically relevant correlates. The present study was designed to address these concerns while using data from 286 detained boys with a CD diagnosis (ages 16 to 17 years). In addition to a diagnostic interview, participants completed questionnaires that assessed GM, CU, and DI traits, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, and external correlates. Findings showed that all three specifiers were weakly to moderately correlated to the CD symptom scores. In support of the CU subtyping scheme, CU traits incrementally contributed to the prediction of various external correlates, beyond the total number of CD symptoms, childhood-onset CD, and ADHD symptoms. Importantly, GM and DI traits also significantly added to the prediction of etiologically (i.e., maternal parenting, empathy, and anxiety) and clinically (i.e., proactive aggression and substance use) relevant correlates beyond CU traits. In conclusion, this study suggests that GM and DI traits, just like CU traits, add to the classification of detained boys with CD and have validity for subtyping CD. Nevertheless, a systematic evaluation of the multispecifier model for CD and related concerns is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn about the utility of having additional specifiers for CD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":"16 1","pages":"31-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The multispecifier model for conduct disorder in detained boys: Relations with conduct disorder criteria and etiologically and clinically relevant correlates.\",\"authors\":\"Olivier F Colins, Kostas A Fanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/per0000708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A multispecifier model for subtyping children and adolescents with conduct disorder (CD) has been proposed that, in addition to callous-unemotional (CU) traits, also considers grandiose-manipulative (GM) and daring-impulsive (DI) traits. Yet, concerns have been raised about the potential overlap of these latter two specifiers with existing CD criteria and their limited added value to the prediction of etiologically and clinically relevant correlates. The present study was designed to address these concerns while using data from 286 detained boys with a CD diagnosis (ages 16 to 17 years). In addition to a diagnostic interview, participants completed questionnaires that assessed GM, CU, and DI traits, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, and external correlates. Findings showed that all three specifiers were weakly to moderately correlated to the CD symptom scores. In support of the CU subtyping scheme, CU traits incrementally contributed to the prediction of various external correlates, beyond the total number of CD symptoms, childhood-onset CD, and ADHD symptoms. Importantly, GM and DI traits also significantly added to the prediction of etiologically (i.e., maternal parenting, empathy, and anxiety) and clinically (i.e., proactive aggression and substance use) relevant correlates beyond CU traits. In conclusion, this study suggests that GM and DI traits, just like CU traits, add to the classification of detained boys with CD and have validity for subtyping CD. Nevertheless, a systematic evaluation of the multispecifier model for CD and related concerns is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn about the utility of having additional specifiers for CD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality disorders\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"31-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童和青少年品行障碍(CD)的多特征模型除了考虑冷酷无情(CU)的特征外,还考虑了浮夸操纵(GM)和大胆冲动(DI)的特征。然而,人们担心后两种指标可能与现有的乳糜泻标准重叠,以及它们在预测病因和临床相关因素方面的有限附加价值。本研究旨在解决这些问题,同时使用286名诊断为乳糜泻的被拘留男孩(16至17岁)的数据。除了诊断性访谈外,参与者还完成了评估GM、CU和DI特征、注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状和外部相关因素的问卷调查。研究结果显示,所有三个指标与乳糜泻症状评分呈弱至中度相关。为了支持CU亚型方案,除了CD症状、儿童期发病CD和ADHD症状的总数之外,CU特征逐渐有助于预测各种外部相关因素。重要的是,除CU特征外,GM和DI特征还显著增加了对病因(即母亲养育、共情和焦虑)和临床(即主动攻击和物质使用)相关因素的预测。总之,本研究表明,GM和DI特征,就像CU特征一样,增加了患有CD的被拘留男孩的分类,并且具有CD亚型的有效性。然而,在得出关于CD附加说明符的效用的确切结论之前,需要对CD的多说明符模型和相关问题进行系统评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The multispecifier model for conduct disorder in detained boys: Relations with conduct disorder criteria and etiologically and clinically relevant correlates.

A multispecifier model for subtyping children and adolescents with conduct disorder (CD) has been proposed that, in addition to callous-unemotional (CU) traits, also considers grandiose-manipulative (GM) and daring-impulsive (DI) traits. Yet, concerns have been raised about the potential overlap of these latter two specifiers with existing CD criteria and their limited added value to the prediction of etiologically and clinically relevant correlates. The present study was designed to address these concerns while using data from 286 detained boys with a CD diagnosis (ages 16 to 17 years). In addition to a diagnostic interview, participants completed questionnaires that assessed GM, CU, and DI traits, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, and external correlates. Findings showed that all three specifiers were weakly to moderately correlated to the CD symptom scores. In support of the CU subtyping scheme, CU traits incrementally contributed to the prediction of various external correlates, beyond the total number of CD symptoms, childhood-onset CD, and ADHD symptoms. Importantly, GM and DI traits also significantly added to the prediction of etiologically (i.e., maternal parenting, empathy, and anxiety) and clinically (i.e., proactive aggression and substance use) relevant correlates beyond CU traits. In conclusion, this study suggests that GM and DI traits, just like CU traits, add to the classification of detained boys with CD and have validity for subtyping CD. Nevertheless, a systematic evaluation of the multispecifier model for CD and related concerns is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn about the utility of having additional specifiers for CD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信