Social and Personality Psychology Compass最新文献_第9页

Safety behaviors were associated with greater anxious symptoms during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic 在COVID - 19大流行的第一年，安全行为与更大的焦虑症状相关

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12904

Jane K. Stallman, Kirsten N. Bains Williams, Jason T. Goodson, Gerald J. Haeffel

{"title":"Safety behaviors were associated with greater anxious symptoms during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic","authors":"Jane K. Stallman, Kirsten N. Bains Williams, Jason T. Goodson, Gerald J. Haeffel","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12904","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research shows that people who use safety behaviors are at greater risk factor for anxiety than people who do not use safety behaviors. However, the perception of some safety behaviors changed during the COVID‐19 pandemic; behaviors that were once considered unnecessary or excessive were now commonplace (e.g., monitoring bodily symptoms, avoiding crowds). The purpose of this study was to determine the degree to which the pandemic changed the status of health‐related safety behaviors as a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety. To this end, we tested the effect of safety behavior use on anxious symptoms during the first year of the pandemic using a longitudinal design with 8 time points and participants ( n = 233) from over 20 countries. Despite possible changes in their perception, those engaging in high levels of safety behaviors reported the greatest levels of anxious symptoms throughout the pandemic year. However, the outcomes for safety behavior users were not all negative. Safety behavior use at baseline was the only predictor of participants' willingness to receive the COVID‐19 vaccine (measured one year later).","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135347284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A growth mindset intervention to improve mental health in adolescents during COVID‐19 成长心态干预在COVID - 19期间改善青少年心理健康

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12894

Nikolette P. Lipsey, Jeni L. Burnette, Whitney Becker, Levi R. Baker, Jordyn McCrimmon, Joseph Billingsley

引用次数: 0

Changes in loneliness and coping strategies during COVID‐19 COVID - 19期间孤独感的变化及应对策略

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12895

Manon A. van Scheppingen, Anne K. Reitz, Elien De Caluwé, Gerine Lodder

{"title":"Changes in loneliness and coping strategies during COVID‐19","authors":"Manon A. van Scheppingen, Anne K. Reitz, Elien De Caluwé, Gerine Lodder","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12895","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The social distancing measures implemented to slow the spread of COVID‐19 impacted many aspects of people's lives. Previous research has reported negative consequences of these measures for people's psychological well‐being, and that people differed in the impact on their psychological well‐being. The present study aimed to describe the different coping strategies Dutch people used to deal with these measures and to link these strategies to loneliness. In addition, the study aimed to examine mean‐level changes in loneliness and to explore individual differences in loneliness change. We used data from 2009 participants of a panel study of representative Dutch households. We assessed coping strategies used during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic in May 2020 and examined changes in loneliness between October 2019 (before COVID‐19) and May 2020 (during the first wave of COVID‐19). First, results showed that most people employed specific coping strategies. The most frequently used social strategies were chatting and (video)calling; the most frequently used non‐social strategies were going outside, doing chores, watching TV, reading and self‐care. Second, people who used more coping strategies reported lower levels of loneliness. Third, analyses revealed an average increase in loneliness between October 2019 and May 2020. Fourth, we observed two significant interaction effects, showing a stronger positive link between the number of social coping strategies and initial loneliness levels among those with a partner or living with others than for those who were single or lived alone. Yet, no moderating effects on changes in loneliness were found: people using more coping strategies did not differ in loneliness changes from people using fewer coping strategies. Together, findings suggest that loneliness increased in the Netherlands during the first phase of COVID‐19 and that, while people's coping strategies were related to loneliness levels, they did not buffer against loneliness increases.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135481522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

What factors predict anti‐Black bias in pain perception? An internal meta‐analysis across 40 experimental studies 哪些因素可以预测疼痛感知中的反黑人偏见?对40项实验研究进行内部荟萃分析

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12901

Jingrun Lin, Alexis Drain, Azaadeh Goharzad, Peter Mende‐Siedlecki

{"title":"What factors predict anti‐Black bias in pain perception? An internal meta‐analysis across 40 experimental studies","authors":"Jingrun Lin, Alexis Drain, Azaadeh Goharzad, Peter Mende‐Siedlecki","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12901","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12901","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Racial disparities in pain care affecting Black Americans are mirrored by a similar perceptual bias: perceivers see pain less readily on Black (vs. White) faces. Here, we examine the findings of the initial wave of research on this phenomenon, described herein as anti‐Black bias in pain perception. Specifically, we conducted an internal meta‐analysis across 40 studies conducted in the U.S. with primarily White samples ( N = 6252) assessing the generalizability, robustness, and psychological correlates of anti‐Black bias in pain perception. We also assessed the evidence for accounts of this bias focused on intergroup processes, racialized stereotypes and prejudice, dehumanization, and contact. This meta‐analysis strongly confirms our prior findings. Moreover, anti‐Black bias in pain perception is consistently associated with bias in treatment recommendations. These effects are robust to differences in stimuli, samples, and perceiver gender and race. Notably, both Black and White perceivers demonstrate more conservative perceptual thresholds for seeing pain on Black faces, suggesting this bias is not merely a consequence of group membership. Further, increased dehumanization of and decreased intergroup contact with Black individuals predicts biased pain perception and treatment recommendations, though these effects were small. These results demonstrate the robustness of anti‐Black bias in pain perception and establish a strong foundation for future inquiry.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134973673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Implicit and explicit COVID‐19‐vaccine harmfulness/helpfulness associations predict vaccine beliefs, intentions, and behaviors 隐性和显性COVID - 19 -疫苗有害/有益关联预测疫苗信念、意图和行为

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12905

Bianca M. Hinojosa, William B. Meese, Jennifer L. Howell, Kristen P. Lindgren, Brian O’Shea, Bethany A. Teachman, Alexandra Werntz

引用次数: 0

Uncertainty and risk during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A latent profile analysis COVID - 19大流行期间的不确定性和风险:潜在特征分析

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12890

Angela E. Johnson, Jacqueline Hua, Bianca Hinojosa, William B. Meese, Avia Gray, Jennifer L. Howell

{"title":"Uncertainty and risk during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A latent profile analysis","authors":"Angela E. Johnson, Jacqueline Hua, Bianca Hinojosa, William B. Meese, Avia Gray, Jennifer L. Howell","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12890","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the present study, we examine how subgroups of people are characterized by different profiles of uncertainty surrounding COVID‐19, susceptibility, and recovery. Participants ( N = 199) were U.S. residents recruited online for a longitudinal study during the summer of 2020. We first, identified groups using latent profile analysis (LPA) and then examined whether these profiles predicted differences in COVID‐related risky and preventative behaviors. LPA identified five distinct profiles of people representing a combination of low and high uncertainty and low, moderate, and high risk perceptions. Results revealed that latent‐profile group membership predicted intention to interact with others outside of the household, intention to engage in non‐essential shopping, intention to attend an in‐person religious gathering, intention to wear a mask in public, and self‐reported physical distancing in the past week. Profile membership did not predict intentions to: dine out, go to the nail/hair salon, go to the gym, nor physically distance from others in the future, nor did it predict handwashing in the past week.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135597265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Does Online Social Support Uniquely Buffer Effects of Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic?: A Natural Experiment. 在 COVID-19 大流行期间，在线社交支持是否能独特地缓冲压力效应？

IF 4.8 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-14 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12836

Madison L Eamiello, Allecia Reid

{"title":"Does Online Social Support Uniquely Buffer Effects of Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic?: A Natural Experiment.","authors":"Madison L Eamiello, Allecia Reid","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12836","DOIUrl":"10.1111/spc3.12836","url":null,"abstract":"In-person sources of social support buffer effects of stress on mental health. However, online social support inconsistently demonstrates stress-buffering effects. Highly stressful circumstances, such as the first month of COVID-19 lockdown, may be necessary to benefit from support received from online networks. We investigated whether online support demonstrated an increased stress-buffering effect on depressive symptoms during the first month of COVID-19 lockdown. We collected cross-sectional data on three distinct groups of participants from February to April 2020-preceding lockdown (pre-COVID; n = 53), up to four weeks following university closures (initial lockdown; n = 136), and the final weeks of the semester (later lockdown; n = 127). Initial lockdown participants reported significantly more stress than pre-COVID but not later lockdown participants. The online social support by stress by COVID phase interaction was only significant for the initial versus later lockdown comparison. Online support buffered stress during initial lockdown but not later lockdown. Stress-buffering effects of offline support were observed and did not depend on COVID phase. Online support may only buffer stress when stress is heightened and offline support is less available.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340688/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72942052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Stop the blame game: An analysis of blaming on Weibo during the early days of the COVID‐19 pandemic in rice and wheat areas in China 停止指责游戏:中国水稻和小麦产区COVID - 19大流行初期的微博指责分析

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12903

Shuang Wang, Alexander S. English, Yue Deng, Ye Zi Zhou, Emma E. Buchtel

{"title":"Stop the blame game: An analysis of blaming on Weibo during the early days of the COVID‐19 pandemic in rice and wheat areas in China","authors":"Shuang Wang, Alexander S. English, Yue Deng, Ye Zi Zhou, Emma E. Buchtel","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12903","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the pandemic era, social media has provided the public with a platform to make their voice heard. One of the most important public opinions online during a pandemic is blame . Blame can lead to stigma towards patients as well as potential patients and decrease social cooperation, which might impede prevention and control measures during epidemics. Thus, studying online blame during the early days of COVID‐19 can facilitate the management and control of future pandemics. By analyzing 3791 posts from one of the most popular social media sites in China (Weibo) over the 10 days immediately after COVID‐19 was declared to be a communicable disease, we found that there were four main agents blamed online: Individuals, corporations, institutions, and the media. Most of the blame targeted individual agents. We also found that there were regional‐cultural differences in the detailed types of blamed individual agents, that is, between rice‐ and wheat‐farming areas in China. After controlling influence of distance from the epicenter of Wuhan, there were still stable differences between regions: people in wheat areas had a higher probability of blaming agentic, harmful individuals, and people in rice areas had a higher probability of blaming individuals with low awareness of social norms for preventive health behavior. Findings have implications for preventing and predicting blame across cultures in future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135246899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Psychopathy and COVID‐19: Callousness, impulsivity, and motivational reasons for engaging in prevention behavior 精神病和COVID - 19:参与预防行为的麻木、冲动和动机原因

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12900

Luke J. Tacke, David A. Lishner, Amy Knepple Carney, Michael J. Vitacco, Ben Saltigerald, Haley R. Jacquez, Vanessa Hillman, MacKenzie Meendering, Brittany Burgess, Allison Smith, Craig S. Neumann

{"title":"Psychopathy and COVID‐19: Callousness, impulsivity, and motivational reasons for engaging in prevention behavior","authors":"Luke J. Tacke, David A. Lishner, Amy Knepple Carney, Michael J. Vitacco, Ben Saltigerald, Haley R. Jacquez, Vanessa Hillman, MacKenzie Meendering, Brittany Burgess, Allison Smith, Craig S. Neumann","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12900","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two direct replication studies were conducted to investigate the associations of psychopathic traits with engagement in COVID‐19 prevention behavior and motivational reasons for engaging in such behavior. College undergraduate students completed two self‐report measures of psychopathic traits based on the four‐factor conceptualization of psychopathy (callous affect, manipulative tendency, erratic lifestyle, criminal tendency) and the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy (meanness, disinhibition, boldness). Participants then reported the degree to which they engaged in COVID‐19 prevention behavior currently and in the past, and reported their self‐focused and other‐focused motivational reasons for doing so. Results aggregated across both studies ( N = 292) revealed that traits reflecting emotional callousness and impulsivity independently predicted lower levels of other‐focused reasons for engaging in prevention behavior. Moreover, controlling for other‐focused reasons appreciably reduced negative associations of emotional callousness and impulsivity with prevention behavior. The results provide insight into points of convergence in conceptualization and measurement of psychopathy from multiple theoretical perspectives and the importance of considering the impact of divisive personality traits on motivation to protect others during pandemics.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135386026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Thinking of threats: Economic threat appraisals and health threat appraisals predict differential racial attitudes during COVID‐19 对威胁的思考:经济威胁评估和健康威胁评估预测了COVID - 19期间的种族态度差异

2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12882

Natalie M. Gallagher, Jordan S. Daley, Galen V. Bodenhausen

引用次数: 0