Social and Personality Psychology Compass最新文献

Carving to excise, carving to create: Conversations on creating and sustaining safe spaces in higher education 雕刻是为了切除，雕刻是为了创造：关于在高等教育中创建和维持安全空间的对话

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.70001

Devin A. Heyward, Jennifer Ayala, Scarlett Guajala, Ash Madore, Maria Menes, Nico Pickett

{"title":"Carving to excise, carving to create: Conversations on creating and sustaining safe spaces in higher education","authors":"Devin A. Heyward, Jennifer Ayala, Scarlett Guajala, Ash Madore, Maria Menes, Nico Pickett","doi":"10.1111/spc3.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70001","url":null,"abstract":"In this piece, we grapple with the conditions of creating and sustaining liberatory, healing spaces connected to higher education, delivering our analysis through a fictive podcast format. We present three different scenes authored by undergraduates, tied together by common, intersecting threads of both struggle and resistance, community in/as healing amidst layered crises and traumas, and deep desires for universities to fulfill their potential as learning spaces of safety, structural critique and connection. We consider our individual and collective roles as faculty and program directors in these institutional settings, and the conditions that help and hinder opportunities for students to co‐construct or live into liberatory spaces. We also consider the threats to the sustainability and viability of these initiatives, as well as the disproportionate impact on minoritized students, staff, and faculty. These learnings are in line with research that highlights the importance of students' sense of safety and belonging, the role of student agency, and perspectives that position educators through the lens of accompaniment.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Shielded perspectives: How visual attention moderates the link between social identity and biased judgments about police 屏蔽视角：视觉注意力如何调节社会身份与对警察的偏见判断之间的联系

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12994

Jennie Qu‐Lee, Emily Balcetis

引用次数: 0

Cooperation, domination: Twin functions of third‐party punishment 合作、支配：第三方惩罚的双重功能

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12992

Jordan Wylie, Ana Gantman

{"title":"Cooperation, domination: Twin functions of third‐party punishment","authors":"Jordan Wylie, Ana Gantman","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12992","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12992","url":null,"abstract":"Rules serve many important functions in society. One such function is to codify, and make public and enforceable, a society's desired prescriptions and proscriptions. This codification means that rules come with predefined punishments administered by third parties. We argue that when we look at how third parties punish rule violations, we see that rules and their punishments often serve dual functions. They support and help to maintain cooperation as it is usually theorized, but they also facilitate the domination of marginalized others. We begin by reviewing literature on rules and third‐party punishment, arguing that a great deal of punishment research has neglected to consider the unique power of codified rules. We also argue that by focusing on codified rules, it becomes clear that the enforcement of such rules via third‐party punishment is often used to exert control, punish retributively, and oppress outgroup members. By challenging idealized theory of rules as facilitators of social harmony, we highlight their role in satisfying personal punishment motives, and facilitating discrimination in a way that is uniquely justifiable to those who enforce them.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141871019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Who handles the tough talk? Supervisor sense of power and confronting difficult issues 谁来处理棘手问题？主管的权力感和面对困难的问题

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12991

Alexandra Figueroa, Rachael Dailey Goodwin, Cheryl J. Wakslak

{"title":"Who handles the tough talk? Supervisor sense of power and confronting difficult issues","authors":"Alexandra Figueroa, Rachael Dailey Goodwin, Cheryl J. Wakslak","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12991","url":null,"abstract":"Addressing difficult, controversial, or sensitive issues with employees is a critical component of effective leadership, but discussing uncomfortable topics with subordinates can be daunting, even for those with structural power. Distinguishing between the structural power that supervisors hold, and their situationally felt personal sense of power, we consider here how a supervisor's personal sense of power relates to his or her inclination to confront, or to avoid, difficult conversations, as well as to offer social support in such contexts. Integrating a social role theory perspective, we further consider the role of gender. Across an initial study (N = 588), and a follow‐up replication study (N = 567), we show that personal sense of power predicts supervisor's inclination to confront (and not to avoid) difficult issues in the workplace, as well as to offer social support to the target of conversation. We also consider whether such effects vary across male and female supervisors, finding inconsistent results across studies. In Study 1a, we found that power had less of an effect on the avoidance and support intentions of women than men, such that women (but not men) were more likely to constructively confront the difficult issue head on as well as to offer support, even when they felt low in personal power. These effects did not emerge in Study 1b. However, in both studies, we find a main effect of gender on social support such that women were more likely to provide social support when confronting difficult issues. We speculate about reasons for this inconsistency, and further theorize about the role of personal sense of power and gender in explaining supervisor's engagement in difficult conversations.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141871017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations 有意跨越社会鸿沟：群体间接触意愿对群体间关系的理论、政治和实践影响

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12988

Stefania Paolini, Jake Harwood, Mark Rubin, Jonathan Huck, Kevin Dunn, John Dixon

{"title":"Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations","authors":"Stefania Paolini, Jake Harwood, Mark Rubin, Jonathan Huck, Kevin Dunn, John Dixon","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12988","url":null,"abstract":"The benefits of positive intergroup contact for intergroup attitudes are well‐established. Yet individual and group self‐segregation practices demonstrate that opportunities for intergroup contact are not sufficient for contact uptake; and persistent institutionalized segregation reinforces and compounds this problem. Hence, we need to understand what drives people towards and away from intergroup contact and what consequences the capacity to deliberately engage or avoid contact has for individuals, groups, and communities. This paper formally introduces the concept of intergroup contact volition: our perceived personal control over intergroup contact engagement and avoidance. We demonstrate this concept's theoretical, political, and practical significance by highlighting its embeddedness in both old and recent literature. We document debates around volition in early intergroup contact research and note a prolonged neglect since. After discussing reasons for that neglect, we present a detailed analysis of the concept, outlining how the idea of volition itself is contested and political, as well as the ways it intersects with broader societal power and status dynamics. We then outline pathways for future research, including investigations of when taking volition away (making contact mandated) might be helpful, intersections between psychological and human geography perspectives on volition, and connections between volition and system justification. We argue that contact volition is intimately and ultimately linked to issues of social change: support of, versus resistance to, policies promoting intergroup integration. As a result, an enhanced understanding of volition is critical to developing intergroup contact research and practice into outcomes that maximize social justice.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141871025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

My circumstances, their circumstances: An actor‐observer distinction in the consequences of external attributions 我的情况，他们的情况：外部归因后果中行为者与观察者的区别

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12993

Rebecca Peretz‐Lange, Guadalupe D. S. Gonzalez, Yanine D. Hess

{"title":"My circumstances, their circumstances: An actor‐observer distinction in the consequences of external attributions","authors":"Rebecca Peretz‐Lange, Guadalupe D. S. Gonzalez, Yanine D. Hess","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12993","url":null,"abstract":"People may attribute social phenomena to either internal causes (e.g., people's ability, intelligence, effort, or personality) or external causes (e.g., people's circumstances, access to opportunities, treatment by others). In this review, we focus on external attributions, which have been widely characterized as positive because they help people view marginalized groups and rejected individuals sympathetically. We argue, however, that there exists an important actor‐observer distinction in the consequences of external attributions, giving them the potential to yield both positive and negative consequences: When observers attribute others' setbacks or rejections to external causes, this may help them adopt a sympathetic view. However, when actors attribute their own setbacks or rejections to external causes, this view may harm their mental wellbeing, motivation, or self‐concept. We identify this actor‐observer distinction in three domains: social disparities, social rejection, and academic setbacks. Finally, we discuss some implications of this actor‐observer difference and directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141871015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Freedom dreaming from the university‐community nexus: Relational praxis as counterspace 大学与社区关系中的自由梦想：作为反空间的关系实践

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12990

Christopher C. Sonn, Rama P. Agung‐Igusti, Geskeva Komba, Ruth Nyarout Ruach, Ez Eldin Deng

{"title":"Freedom dreaming from the university‐community nexus: Relational praxis as counterspace","authors":"Christopher C. Sonn, Rama P. Agung‐Igusti, Geskeva Komba, Ruth Nyarout Ruach, Ez Eldin Deng","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12990","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12990","url":null,"abstract":"In this article we draw on storytelling and bricolage to reflect on critical accompaniment as relational praxis with cultural workers from the African diaspora inside/outside/in‐between the university‐community nexus in Australia. We write together weaving our voices as we re‐member our journey and our coming together fuelled by our shared desire, to tell our own stories on our terms; to contest virulent racisms and misrecognition of the African diaspora in media, academic, and political discourse; and to create spaces, settings, and narratives for identity, community and belonging. In reflecting on this journey we distil some insights on our efforts to enact just methods, our routes and roots of creating praxis inside/outside and with the university. We suggest that our relationships, forged through critical dialogue and examination of racism in settings that we intentionally create, is central to developing communality. Drawing from the rich history of African and diasporic archives, we also advocate for expanding ecologies of knowledge and practice and modalities for endarkened counter storytelling.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141745758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Relationship commitment regulation: Influencing a partner's commitment to achieve one's commitment goals 关系承诺调节：影响伴侣的承诺以实现自己的承诺目标

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12986

Laura V. Machia, Kenneth Tan, Christopher R. Agnew

引用次数: 0

The role of social support and social identification in challenge and threat, perceived stress, and life satisfaction 社会支持和社会认同在挑战与威胁、感知压力和生活满意度中的作用

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12982

Jamie C. Gillman, Martin J. Turner, Matthew J. Slater

{"title":"The role of social support and social identification in challenge and threat, perceived stress, and life satisfaction","authors":"Jamie C. Gillman, Martin J. Turner, Matthew J. Slater","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12982","url":null,"abstract":"Individualistic appraisals have dominated contemporary stress theory and have too often overlooked socially derived perceptions of group resources. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of social support and social identification on individuals' challenge and threat appraisal, perceived stress, and life satisfaction across a range of group contexts. An online survey was completed by 480 participants across four groups: students (n = 110), workplace employees (n = 126), team sport athletes (n = 116), and group exercisers (n = 128) on one occasion. We found a positive relationship between social support and social identification along with significant associations of these social factors being positively related with self‐efficacy, control, approach, and challenge, while negatively related with threat. Avoidance, along with challenge and threat was positively associated with perceived stress, while self‐efficacy was negatively associated with perceived stress. Further, control, self‐efficacy, social identification, and social support was positively associated with life satisfaction, while approach, threat, and perceived stress was negatively associated, with life satisfaction. Social identification also moderated the positive association between social support and life satisfaction. Overall, we found evidence for the resource appraisals outlined in contemporary theory being associated with both social support and social identification, along with perceived stress and life satisfaction across different group contexts. Therefore, when understanding individuals' stress responses and associated life satisfaction, research and practice should consider the combination of individual and social factors.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141608632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Why do organizations take political stances? A review of reasons and risks 组织为何采取政治立场？原因和风险综述

IF 4.6 2区心理学

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12985

Cory J. Clark, Calvin Isch, Azim Shariff

{"title":"Why do organizations take political stances? A review of reasons and risks","authors":"Cory J. Clark, Calvin Isch, Azim Shariff","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12985","url":null,"abstract":"Organizations and their leaders have begun publicly signaling political values in candidate endorsements, statements, and advertisements, yet political action often has negative organizational consequences, including lower public support, financial costs, and reduced trust. We review the costs of organizational politicization, moderators of those costs (such as ideological alignment and size of the organization), and potential reasons why leaders take political action. Scholars often attribute political action to public pressure to “take a stand”, but this public pressure may be misunderstood. Members of the public who want organizations to take political stances desire particular stances to be made in particular ways, tend to believe in the superiority of their own values, and are relatively likely to boycott businesses for political reasons. Catering to these individuals could lead to the accumulation of supporters who are especially politically zealous and likely to punish perceived political missteps. Demands to “take a stand” might seem like one unified call to action, but they may instead be a large set of directly conflicting demands. We make recommendations for future research to better understand leaders' reasons for political action and when, if ever, such actions support the interests of organizations and broader society.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141587120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0