屏蔽视角：视觉注意力如何调节社会身份与对警察的偏见判断之间的联系

IF 4.8 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1111/spc3.12994

Jennie Qu‐Lee, Emily Balcetis

{"title":"屏蔽视角：视觉注意力如何调节社会身份与对警察的偏见判断之间的联系","authors":"Jennie Qu‐Lee, Emily Balcetis","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals from different social groups form divergent legal punishment decisions about police officers engaged in altercations with civilians despite viewing the same visual evidence. We review empirical and archival data in the legal domain to offer four vision‐based moderators of polarized legal judgments determined after viewing evidence with a focus on research relevant to police‐civilian altercations. We discuss how selective visual attention, flittering and staring tendencies, differences in cognitive engagement, and visual confirmation bias contribute to divergent legal decisions within and across social groups. By incorporating visual experience into models of legal decision‐making, we reconcile inconsistencies regarding the impact of social group identity on bias in police punishment.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shielded perspectives: How visual attention moderates the link between social identity and biased judgments about police\",\"authors\":\"Jennie Qu‐Lee, Emily Balcetis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spc3.12994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individuals from different social groups form divergent legal punishment decisions about police officers engaged in altercations with civilians despite viewing the same visual evidence. We review empirical and archival data in the legal domain to offer four vision‐based moderators of polarized legal judgments determined after viewing evidence with a focus on research relevant to police‐civilian altercations. We discuss how selective visual attention, flittering and staring tendencies, differences in cognitive engagement, and visual confirmation bias contribute to divergent legal decisions within and across social groups. By incorporating visual experience into models of legal decision‐making, we reconcile inconsistencies regarding the impact of social group identity on bias in police punishment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Personality Psychology Compass\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Personality Psychology Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12994\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

不同社会群体的个体在观看相同的视觉证据时，会对警察与平民发生口角的行为做出不同的法律惩罚决定。我们回顾了法律领域的实证数据和档案数据，提出了四种基于视觉的调节因素，以调节在观看证据后做出的两极化法律判断，重点关注与警民冲突相关的研究。我们讨论了选择性视觉注意力、闪烁和凝视倾向、认知参与的差异以及视觉确认偏差是如何在社会群体内部和之间造成不同法律决定的。通过将视觉经验纳入法律决策模型，我们调和了社会群体认同对警察处罚偏见影响的不一致之处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Shielded perspectives: How visual attention moderates the link between social identity and biased judgments about police

Individuals from different social groups form divergent legal punishment decisions about police officers engaged in altercations with civilians despite viewing the same visual evidence. We review empirical and archival data in the legal domain to offer four vision‐based moderators of polarized legal judgments determined after viewing evidence with a focus on research relevant to police‐civilian altercations. We discuss how selective visual attention, flittering and staring tendencies, differences in cognitive engagement, and visual confirmation bias contribute to divergent legal decisions within and across social groups. By incorporating visual experience into models of legal decision‐making, we reconcile inconsistencies regarding the impact of social group identity on bias in police punishment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social and Personality Psychology Compass Psychology-Social Psychology

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

2.20%

发文量