Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-03Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70035
Corneliu Bjola, Markus Kornprobst
{"title":"Studying Tech Diplomacy—Introduction to the Special Issue on Tech Diplomacy","authors":"Corneliu Bjola, Markus Kornprobst","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article serves as an introduction to the special issue on tech diplomacy, exploring its emergence and evolution as a distinct approach to global affairs in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Originating with Denmark's 2017 “TechPlomacy” initiative, tech diplomacy has gained global momentum, with over two dozen countries adopting it to address challenges posed by emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and 5G. Defined by its dynamic and polylateral nature, tech diplomacy engages a diverse array of actors—including states, tech companies, international organizations, and civil society—to navigate the complex interplay of technological innovation and geopolitical transformation. The paper makes three key contributions to the field. First, it provides a refined definition of tech diplomacy, distinguishing it from related concepts like digital and science diplomacy while emphasizing its focus on innovation power. Second, it introduces an analytical triangle—encompassing technological, agential, and ordering processes—as a framework for studying tech diplomacy's mechanisms and impacts. Third, it maps the field through examples of national initiatives, multistakeholder collaborations, and regulatory efforts, highlighting tech diplomacy's potential to reshape global governance and address inequalities exacerbated by technological disruption. This introduction lays the groundwork for the contributions in the special issue, offering conceptual clarity and practical insights into the transformative role of tech diplomacy in global affairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S4","pages":"S4-S11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148878278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-03Epub Date: 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70024
Eugenio V. Garcia
{"title":"Technology for Whom and for What? A Global South View of Tech Diplomacy","authors":"Eugenio V. Garcia","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>International politics is linked to its technical-social character. Also, technology is socially constructed and thereby not entirely neutral or impartial. A tech-driven geopolitical landscape has been a defining feature of contemporary world politics. The struggle for global technological supremacy seems to dominate many ongoing discussions on tech diplomacy. But for most developing countries, plagued by inequality, underdevelopment, and exclusion, what are their top concerns? This policy paper explores what countries of the Global South can do to ensure that technology helps humanity end poverty, build resilient societies, protect the planet, and achieve the SDGs by 2030. It is high time for a development-centered tech diplomacy to foster innovation through diffusion, access, inclusion, equitable distribution of benefits, national priorities, and local ownership. Its ultimate goal should be promoting genuine co-governance with the participation of all interested parties in a multi-stakeholder setting, while addressing structural limitations and power imbalances to prevent widening inequalities. Unless we take the concerns of the majority of the world's population seriously, reaping the rewards of the technological revolution will be a privilege confined to a minority, or worse still, controlled by a few hands.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S4","pages":"S68-S76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148878288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-03Epub Date: 2025-06-23DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70023
Ilan Manor
{"title":"A “Tech First” Approach to Foreign Policy? The Three Meanings of Tech Diplomacy","authors":"Ilan Manor","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have recently argued that international politics is plagued by instability as the world rapidly transitions from one crisis to another. This state of “Permacrisis,” or permanent crises between states, is driven by technological innovations which create new kinds of crises and drive competitions between adversarial states. It is amid the backdrop of “Permacrisis” that this article conceptualizes and defines the term tech diplomacy which has three meanings. First, tech diplomacy denotes a shift in how foreign ministries (MFAs) contend with the rapid development of new digital technologies. The article suggests that tech diplomacy constitutes a form of <i>proactive digitalization</i> in which diplomats foster networks with tech actors to prepare for future digital landscapes and map potential tech-based challenges. Second, tech diplomacy refers to diplomats' growing need to manage tech-related issues. In a digitally connected world, technologies have national, regional, and global ramifications necessitating diplomatic action. Finally, tech diplomacy denotes a “Tech First” approach to foreign policy in which tech-based negotiations are viewed as a steppingstone towards diplomatic engagement between adversarial states. The article uses the case study of cryptocurrency regulation in the US and China to discuss the potential and the limitations of tech diplomacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S4","pages":"S45-S55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148878380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-03Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70041
Corneliu Bjola, Raluca Csernatoni
{"title":"Tech Diplomacy and the Digital International Order: The Case of the EU–U.S. Trade and Technology Council","authors":"Corneliu Bjola, Raluca Csernatoni","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the evolving role of the U.S.–EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC) in advancing the EU's digital diplomacy, with a particular focus on its contribution to global digital ordering. Positioned at the intersection of normative engagement and regulatory coordination, the TTC operates as a hybrid mechanism that integrates networked ordering—through norm diffusion, stakeholder engagement, and shared value promotion—with structural ordering, involving formal regulatory frameworks, technical standards, and institutional deliverables. Drawing on a qualitative content analysis of key TTC documents (2021–2024), the article traces how agential strategies such as winning over, enticing, and forcing are embedded in the TTC's policy outputs and diplomatic practices. The findings underscore the complementary roles of digital and tech diplomacy, with the TTC exemplifying how normative engagement and regulatory coordination can be integrated within a single framework. More broadly, the analysis sheds light on how the EU navigates and shapes the global digital landscape by linking outward-facing diplomatic practices with deeper institutional and governance structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S4","pages":"S34-S44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148878523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-03Epub Date: 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70104
Nikita Chiu, Markus Kornprobst
{"title":"Rendezvous in Space: Tech Diplomacy and the Commercial Space Era—A Study of Rendezvous and Docking Technologies and Space Exploration Co-Operation Since the Cold War","authors":"Nikita Chiu, Markus Kornprobst","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70104","url":null,"abstract":"<p>On-orbit rendezvous and docking constitute one of the most technically challenging activities in the history of space activities. As space endeavours mature to crewed missions, space rendezous and docking technologies (RDT) emerge as an area of technological innovation critical to advances in future crewed space exploration. Anchored around technical and diplomatic exchanges in relation to RDT standards in crewed space exploration, this article seeks to understand the evolution of tech diplomacy through comparing and contrasting developments in establishing the International Docking System (IDS) (2010s to Present) with those of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) (1970s)—widely considered to be the first major international collbaoration in the history of crewed space exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S4","pages":"S56-S67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70104","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148878344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-03Epub Date: 2025-08-17DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70068
Katharina E. Höne
{"title":"Sharing the Same Playground? An Analysis of the Private Sector's Role in Tech Diplomacy","authors":"Katharina E. Höne","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article takes the emergence of tech diplomacy as the motivation for an investigation into shifting relationships between traditional diplomatic actors and non-state actors. The observation that ‘new diplomatic actors’ and new diplomatic venues have led to a ‘new kind of diplomacy’ dates back to at least the 1990s. In the area of Internet Governance, digital topics are addressed through a variety of multistakeholder models. The article investigates discourses on tech diplomacy, broadly understood, by focusing on how traditional diplomatic actors discursively frame their relationship with multinational tech companies and how these frames might depart from previous perspectives. In doing so, it analyses the relevant strategies of selected countries (Australia, Denmark, Germany, Malta, Switzerland, and the UK) and the views of tech diplomacy practitioners. The frames identified by the article range from a focus on established multistakeholder models to suggestions of a more fundamental shift in the relationship. As a theoretical lens to grasp these shifts, the article suggests a ‘recognition game’ between traditional diplomatic actors and multinational tech companies. Thus, what the article calls ‘tech diplomacy beyond established multistakeholderism’ emerges as one attempt to address the rising power of tech companies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S4","pages":"S12-S21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148878450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-02Epub Date: 2025-05-28DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70030
Philip De Man, Jan Wouters
{"title":"EU Space Governance at the Threshold of a New Era","authors":"Philip De Man, Jan Wouters","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This introductory article to the special issue “EU Space Governance at the Threshold of a New Era” explores the European Union's evolving role as a strategic actor in space. It argues that the EU is undergoing a fundamental shift from a regulatory to a security-oriented approach, driven by institutional consolidation, technological ambition, and geopolitical pressures—particularly following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The article is divided into two parts. The first outlines key conceptual and institutional developments in EU space governance, including the emergence of hybrid governance models, the securitization of flagship programmes, and the launch of new initiatives such as IRIS<sup>2</sup>. The second part introduces the seven contributions to the special issue, which examine core themes such as dual-use infrastructure, cybersecurity, environmental sustainability, industrial policy, and legal harmonization. Together, these articles provide a comprehensive and critical assessment of the EU's transition toward strategic autonomy in space. They highlight both the opportunities and constraints of this moment, offering insights into the governance choices that will shape Europe's space future.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S3","pages":"S4-S8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148862516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-02Epub Date: 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70125
Gustavo G. Müller, Philip De Man
{"title":"Incremental Shifts, Strategic Orbits: The Evolution of EU Space Policy Through Gradual Security Linkages","authors":"Gustavo G. Müller, Philip De Man","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70125","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the evolution of European Union (EU) space policy through the lens of historical institutionalism, highlighting how security and defence considerations have been incrementally integrated into a domain originally framed as civilian and scientific. Rather than relying on sudden policy shifts driven by critical junctures, the EU has pursued a strategy of gradual transformation through layering and conversion—incrementally adding security dimensions to existing frameworks and repurposing institutions to support strategic objectives. The analysis reveals how external shocks, particularly Russia's invasions of Ukraine and shifting US security commitments, have acted as accelerants, reinforcing the EU's pursuit of space-based strategic autonomy. Institutional constraints, including veto points and power dynamics among member states, have shaped the pace and scope of this evolution, necessitating a pragmatic approach to policy adaptation. The study contributes to broader debates on EU integration and institutional change, demonstrating that space policy exemplifies the Union's growing role as a geopolitical actor. The findings underscore the need for sustained coalition-building, flexible policy adaptation, and investment in secure, autonomous space capabilities to ensure Europe's resilience in an increasingly contested global environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S3","pages":"S9-S21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70125","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148862558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-02Epub Date: 2026-03-18DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70137
Nina Klimburg-Witjes, Joseph Popper
{"title":"Multiplying Elements of Fragmentation? Polycentrism, the Launcher Crisis and the Future of Europe in Space","authors":"Nina Klimburg-Witjes, Joseph Popper","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70137","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the current controversies surrounding the European Ariane launcher and its implications for the future of European space governance. The Ariane program, historically a symbol of European technopolitical integration, faces mounting challenges due to delays, rising costs and increasing competition from private actors like SpaceX. These tensions have led to debates on the future of European space policy, particularly the balance between integration and fragmentation in a rapidly changing space landscape. The article examines two recent moments in European space governance, the Launcher Crisis between 2022 and 2023 and the subsequent European Launcher Challenge (ELC), which encourages competition among national companies to develop launch services, aiming to enhance Europe's strategic autonomy in space. We discuss how technopolitical decisions related to the launching sector reflect broader visions of European integration and geopolitical ambitions. Building on work from International Relations (IR) and Science & Technology Studies (STS) and drawing on empirical findings from 25 interviews, we argue that while the embrace of competition and commercialisation offers potential for innovation, it also raises concerns about the risk of undermining Europe's collective strength in the global space race. The article concludes with reflections on the future of European space governance amidst these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S3","pages":"S53-S60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70137","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148862479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global PolicyPub Date : 2026-09-02Epub Date: 2025-06-02DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70020
Elena Cirkovic, Vitali Braun
{"title":"EU Space Law and Earth's Boundaries: Integrating Environmental Impact Assessment and Corporate Due Diligence","authors":"Elena Cirkovic, Vitali Braun","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Union's proposed Space Law aims to establish a unified approach for sustainable space activities across the EU. While the EU's satellite constellations contribute to sustainability efforts, they can also have negative environmental impacts. This article argues that to address the challenges of space environment sustainability and the impact of space activities on Earth's planetary boundaries (EPB), the EU Space Law should incorporate environmental impact assessments (EIA) and public-private governance measures tailored for the space sector. The article examines potential interactions among EU space activities and existing legal frameworks, such as the outer space law regime, the EU's EIA Directive, and corporate social responsibility developments, including the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The analysis focuses on the relationship between the EPB approach and outer space activities, due diligence and strict liability in relation to intergenerational equity and future generations in international law, and the applicability of EIA and corporate governance to the emergent EU Space Law. The article emphasizes the importance of incorporating environmental and social considerations into the governance of space activities to protect outer space-Earth complex systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 S3","pages":"S34-S45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148862393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}