“看不见的子弹”:现代战争中叙事的力量

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Aleksandr Zarnadze
{"title":"“看不见的子弹”:现代战争中叙事的力量","authors":"Aleksandr Zarnadze","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper explores the role of narratives in modern warfare, analyzing their impact, mechanisms, and constraints through an analysis of two books—<i>Changing the Narrative: Information Campaigns, Strategy</i>, and <i>Crisis Escalation in the Digital Age</i> by Lawrence Freedman and Heather Williams, and <i>Subversion: The Strategic Weaponization of Narratives</i> by Andreas Krieg. While military power remains decisive, cognitive warfare has evolved into a main instrument of geopolitical rivalry, shaping public perception and influencing strategic outcomes. Freedman and Williams argue that narratives, though central to cognitive warfare, have limited impact on crisis escalation. In contrast, Krieg sees them as potent subversive tools capable of destabilizing societies. This study critiques the short-term focus of Freedman and Williams, highlighting the long-term role of narratives in shaping ideological foundations for mass mobilization. It argues that narratives are not static; their authority and truthfulness evolve over time, influenced by shifting political and social contexts. Additionally, the study underscores the growing challenge democracies face in countering hostile narratives, calling for deeper research into trust, audience psychology, and effective counter-narrative strategies in the digital age.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 2","pages":"419-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Invisible Bullets”: The Power of Narratives in Modern Warfare\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandr Zarnadze\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This paper explores the role of narratives in modern warfare, analyzing their impact, mechanisms, and constraints through an analysis of two books—<i>Changing the Narrative: Information Campaigns, Strategy</i>, and <i>Crisis Escalation in the Digital Age</i> by Lawrence Freedman and Heather Williams, and <i>Subversion: The Strategic Weaponization of Narratives</i> by Andreas Krieg. While military power remains decisive, cognitive warfare has evolved into a main instrument of geopolitical rivalry, shaping public perception and influencing strategic outcomes. Freedman and Williams argue that narratives, though central to cognitive warfare, have limited impact on crisis escalation. In contrast, Krieg sees them as potent subversive tools capable of destabilizing societies. This study critiques the short-term focus of Freedman and Williams, highlighting the long-term role of narratives in shaping ideological foundations for mass mobilization. It argues that narratives are not static; their authority and truthfulness evolve over time, influenced by shifting political and social contexts. Additionally, the study underscores the growing challenge democracies face in countering hostile narratives, calling for deeper research into trust, audience psychology, and effective counter-narrative strategies in the digital age.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"419-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对两本书——劳伦斯·弗里德曼和希瑟·威廉姆斯合著的《改变叙事:数字时代的信息战役、战略和危机升级》和安德烈亚斯·克里格合著的《颠覆:叙事的战略武器化》——的分析,探讨了叙事在现代战争中的作用,分析了叙事的影响、机制和制约因素。虽然军事力量仍然是决定性的,但认知战已经演变成地缘政治竞争的主要工具,塑造公众认知并影响战略结果。弗里德曼和威廉姆斯认为,叙事虽然是认知战的核心,但对危机升级的影响有限。相反,克里格认为它们是强大的颠覆性工具,能够破坏社会的稳定。本研究批评了弗里德曼和威廉姆斯的短期关注,强调了叙事在塑造大众动员的意识形态基础方面的长期作用。它认为叙事不是静态的;它们的权威性和真实性随着时间的推移而演变,受到不断变化的政治和社会背景的影响。此外,该研究强调了民主国家在对抗敌对叙事方面面临的日益严峻的挑战,呼吁对信任、受众心理和数字时代有效的反叙事策略进行更深入的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Invisible Bullets”: The Power of Narratives in Modern Warfare

This paper explores the role of narratives in modern warfare, analyzing their impact, mechanisms, and constraints through an analysis of two books—Changing the Narrative: Information Campaigns, Strategy, and Crisis Escalation in the Digital Age by Lawrence Freedman and Heather Williams, and Subversion: The Strategic Weaponization of Narratives by Andreas Krieg. While military power remains decisive, cognitive warfare has evolved into a main instrument of geopolitical rivalry, shaping public perception and influencing strategic outcomes. Freedman and Williams argue that narratives, though central to cognitive warfare, have limited impact on crisis escalation. In contrast, Krieg sees them as potent subversive tools capable of destabilizing societies. This study critiques the short-term focus of Freedman and Williams, highlighting the long-term role of narratives in shaping ideological foundations for mass mobilization. It argues that narratives are not static; their authority and truthfulness evolve over time, influenced by shifting political and social contexts. Additionally, the study underscores the growing challenge democracies face in countering hostile narratives, calling for deeper research into trust, audience psychology, and effective counter-narrative strategies in the digital age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信