民间社会参与创建可持续发展目标指标框架:开放但有限

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Roni Kay M. O'Dell
{"title":"民间社会参与创建可持续发展目标指标框架:开放但有限","authors":"Roni Kay M. O'Dell","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG-SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author-created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 4","pages":"553-567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited\",\"authors\":\"Roni Kay M. O'Dell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG-SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author-created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"553-567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了公民社会和其他利益相关者(cso)如何参与2015年至2016年可持续发展目标(sdg)指标框架的创建。在联合国大会批准17项可持续发展目标和169个具体目标后,联合国统计委员会成立了可持续发展目标指标机构间专家组(IAEG-SDGs),就衡量可持续发展目标的指标进行谈判。本文利用民主治理参与框架,分析联合国非政府组织联络处、联合国经济和社会事务部的几个小组以及IAEG-SDGs如何将民间社会组织纳入磋商和谈判,以及谁参与了磋商和谈判。公民社会组织一词被广泛用于包括非政府组织、学术界、私营部门和其他团体(例如,主要团体或运动)。这篇论文评估了民主协商的程度。这项研究依赖于访谈、文件和视频分析,以及作者创建的初步公开磋商受访者数据库。分析表明,来自全球北方的组织和那些拥有更多资源或网络联盟的组织占主导地位。研究表明,联合国可以致力于支持民主治理,但与联合国官僚机构和会员国鼓励或允许的参与程度有关的问题出现了。本文的见解可以应用于联合国国际谈判中正在进行的磋商和包容性实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited

Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited

This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG-SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author-created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信