{"title":"民间社会参与创建可持续发展目标指标框架:开放但有限","authors":"Roni Kay M. O'Dell","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG-SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author-created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 4","pages":"553-567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited\",\"authors\":\"Roni Kay M. O'Dell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG-SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author-created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"553-567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited
This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG-SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author-created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.