{"title":"A hybrid marching cubes based IsoAlpha method for interface reconstruction","authors":"G.S. Abhishek, Shyamprasad Karagadde","doi":"10.1002/fld.5320","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fld.5320","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In modelling two-phase flows, accurate representation of interfaces is crucial. A class of methods for interface reconstruction are based on isosurface extraction, which involves a non-iterative, interpolation based approach. These approaches have been shown to be faster by an order of magnitude than the conventional PLIC schemes. In this work, we present a new isosurface extraction based interface reconstruction scheme based on the Marching Cubes algorithm (MC), which is commonly used in computer graphics for visualizing isosurfaces. The MC algorithm apriori lists and categorizes all possible interface configurations in a single grid cell into a Look Up Table (LUT), which makes this approach fast and robust. We also show that for certain interface configurations, the inverse problem of obtaining the isovalue from the cell volume fraction is not surjective, and a special treatment is required while handling these cases. We then demonstrate the capabilities of the method through benchmark cases for 2D and 3D static/dynamic interface reconstruction.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"96 11","pages":"1741-1759"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141550771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marina G. Kontou, Xenofon S. Trompoukis, Varvara G. Asouti, Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou
{"title":"The continuous adjoint method to the \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 γ\u0000 \u0000 −\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 R\u0000 \u0000 ˜\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 e\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 θ\u0000 t\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 $$ gamma -tilde{R}{e}_{theta t} $$\u0000 transition model coupled with the Spalart–Allmaras model for compressible flows","authors":"Marina G. Kontou, Xenofon S. Trompoukis, Varvara G. Asouti, Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou","doi":"10.1002/fld.5319","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fld.5319","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The continuous adjoint method for transitional flows of compressible fluids is developed and assessed, for the first time in the literature. The gradient of aerodynamic objective functions (aerodynamic forces) with respect to design variables, in problems governed by the compressible Navier–Stokes equations coupled with the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model and the <span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>γ</mi>\u0000 <mspace></mspace>\u0000 <mo>−</mo>\u0000 <mspace></mspace>\u0000 <mover>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>R</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 <mo>˜</mo>\u0000 </mover>\u0000 <msub>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>e</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>θ</mi>\u0000 <mi>t</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 </msub>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 <annotation>$$ gamma -tilde{R}{e}_{theta t} $$</annotation>\u0000 </semantics></math> transition model (in three, non-smooth and smooth, variants of it), is computed based on the continuous adjoint method. The development of the adjoint to the smooth transition model variant proved to be beneficial. The accuracy of the computed sensitivity derivatives is verified against finite differences. Programming is performed in an in-house, vertex-centered finite-volume code, efficiently running on GPUs. The proposed continuous adjoint method is used in 2D and 3D aerodynamic shape optimization problems, namely the constrained optimization of the NLF(1)–0416 isolated airfoil and that of the ONERA M6 wing. The impact of “frozen transition” (assumption according to which the adjoint to the transition model equations are not solved) or “frozen turbulence” (by additionally ignoring the adjoint to the turbulence model) are evaluated; it is shown that both lead to inaccurate sensitivities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"96 11","pages":"1715-1740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.5319","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141503919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}