Dante Donati , Ruben Durante , Francesco Sobbrio , Dijana Zejcirovic
{"title":"Lost in the net? Broadband internet and youth mental health","authors":"Dante Donati , Ruben Durante , Francesco Sobbrio , Dijana Zejcirovic","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How does the internet affect young people’s mental health? We study this question using administrative data on the universe of cases of mental disorders diagnosed in Italian hospitals between 2001 and 2013, which we combine with broadband internet availability at the municipal level. Broadband internet access raises the prevalence of mental disorders among younger cohorts (born between 1985 and 1995) by 0.08 standard deviation units, but it does not impact older individuals (1974 and 1984). The adverse effects are driven by individuals who were exposed early in their lives (before the age of 20). These effects persist when examining instances of self-harm and urgent or compulsory hospitalizations, indicating that the negative outcomes are not merely a result of increased awareness and detection of these conditions. The detrimental impacts span across different pathologies, including depression, anxiety, drug abuse, and personality disorders for both genders, in addition to eating disorders for females.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144611715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of nurse practitioner scope-of-practice laws on preventable hospitalizations","authors":"Benjamin J. McMichael","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103044","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increased use of nurse practitioners (NPs) to provide healthcare represents an important policy option to expand access to care. However, restrictive scope-of-practice laws limit NPs’ ability to deliver care in about half of all states. I examine the effect of relaxing these laws (by granting NPs full practice authority) on hospital discharges for conditions classified as prevention quality indicators (PQIs) across 22 states between 2010 and 2019. PQIs measure hospital admissions that may be avoidable with timely outpatient care. I find that full practice authority reduces avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes and other chronic conditions, with particularly consistent effects among privately insured patients. Hospital stays for PQI conditions become longer on average, suggesting that relatively healthier patients are more likely to avoid hospitalization. These results indicate that full practice authority improves access to outpatient care and allows for more efficient use of inpatient resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103044"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144757935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Nursing home payroll subsidies and the trade-off between staffing and access to care for Medicaid enrollees","authors":"Thomas A. Hegland","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Payroll subsidies are a promising tool for increasing nursing home staffing levels. However, promoting increased staffing may come at the expense of access to care for Medicaid enrollees if it enables nursing homes to attract more lucrative, non-Medicaid residents. In this study, I examine a set of payroll subsidies offered by state Medicaid programs between 1998 and 2010, using nursing home-level variation in subsidy generosity to identify subsidy effects. I find that each additional (2010) dollar of subsidies offered per resident-day increased staffing by just over 10 min per resident-day, but decreased the Medicaid share of new nursing home admissions by about 1.8 percentage points. These figures translate into overall average treatment effects equivalent to an increase in staffing by approximately 7.4% of pre-subsidy average staffing, and a decrease in the Medicaid-share of admissions by 11.5% relative to the pre-subsidy baseline. The subsidies also increased nursing home resident turnover and decreased the average care needs of newly admitted residents. Overall, these results highlight that while nursing home payroll subsidies are effective tools for encouraging increased staffing levels, the subsidies also can lead to changes in nursing home admissions and the characteristics of admitted residents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103042"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144831251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Johanna Catherine Maclean , Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia
{"title":"The effects of state paid sick leave mandates on parental childcare time","authors":"Johanna Catherine Maclean , Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103033","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The U.S. lacks a federal paid sick leave policy. To date, 18 states and the District of Columbia have adopted or announced paid sick leave mandates that require employers to provide up to seven days of paid leave per year that can be used for family responsibilities and healthcare. Using time diaries from the 2004–2023 American Time Use Survey and difference-in-differences methods, we estimate the effects of these state paid sick leave mandates on parents’ time spent providing childcare. We find that post-mandate, parental time spent providing primary childcare time increases by 5.8%, with effects being driven by women with younger children. Parents also increase their total time with children by 3.4%, and fathers living with school-aged children only increase their time supervising children while participating in leisure activities by 11.9%. Overall, our findings suggest that paid sick leave mandates allow working parents to better balance work and childcare responsibilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103033"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144852749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Conor Lennon , Johanna Catherine Maclean , Keith Teltser
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Ridesharing and substance use disorder treatment” [Journal of Health Economics Volume 99, January 2025, 102941]","authors":"Conor Lennon , Johanna Catherine Maclean , Keith Teltser","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144709684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intergenerational effects of sick leave on child human capital","authors":"Julie Riise , Barton Willage , Alexander Willén","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103047","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103047","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the intergenerational consequences of parental participation in government social insurance programs, using one of the largest social insurance programs in the world: sick leave. We exploit quasi-random assignment of patients to general practitioners (GPs) in Norway, who vary in their propensity to certify sick leave of different lengths, to estimate the effects of access to longer sick leave for the marginal individual. Linking administrative data on patients and their children, we show that assignment to a more lenient GP lowers children’s GPA in adolescence, reduces the likelihood of completing upper secondary education, and decreases enrollment in higher education. These effects appear to operate through changes in parental trajectories: more sick leave leads to lower long-term earnings, greater reliance on welfare, and deterioration in mental health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103047"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144772049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Nonlinear reimbursement rules for preventive and curative medical care","authors":"Helmuth Cremer , Jean-Marie Lozachmeur","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103049","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103049","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines nonlinear reimbursement rules for secondary preventive and therapeutic care. Individuals may be healthy or ill, with illness severity determining their ex post type. Preventive care is chosen beforehand, while curative care is decided after health status is known.</div><div>In an ideal scenario where health status is observable, optimal insurance provides lump-sum payments unrelated to expenditures. However, when severity is unobservable (causing ex post moral hazard), this approach is not incentive-compatible. Instead, optimal insurance designs benefits that increase with both preventive and curative care, as higher expenditures reduce informational rents and align incentives.</div><div>Preventive care, though chosen before illness occurs, affects incentive constraints due to two factors: (1) it is more effective for severely ill individuals, and (2) they have lower marginal utility of income, meaning preventive expenditures impact them less. These effects shape the optimal reimbursement structure.</div><div>Additionally, when individuals misperceive preventive care benefits, the main results hold, but an extra corrective (Pigouvian) term appears in the reimbursement formula to adjust for this misperception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144906952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Longevity, Education, and Income: How large is the triangle?","authors":"Hoyt Bleakley","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103052","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103052","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While health affects economic development and wellbeing through a variety of pathways, one commonly suggested channel is a “horizon” mechanism in which increased longevity induces additional education. A recent literature devotes much attention to how much education responds to increasing longevity, while this study asks instead what impact this specific channel has on wellbeing (welfare). I note that death is like a tax on human-capital investments, which suggests using a standard tool of introductory economics: triangles. I estimate the (triangular) gain from reoptimization when education adjusts to lower adult mortality. Even for implausibly large responses of education to survival differences, almost all of today’s low-human-development countries, if switched instantaneously to Japan’s survival curve, would place a value on this channel of less than 3% of income. (This contrasts with a 40% ‘rectangle’ that they would gain even if education were held fixed.) Calibrating the model instead with well identified studies, I find that the horizon triangle for the typical low-income country is less than a percent of lifetime income.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103052"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144911839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Overcoming medical overuse with AI assistance: An experimental investigation","authors":"Ziyi Wang , Lijia Wei , Lian Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103043","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103043","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in reducing medical overtreatment, a critical healthcare challenge that increases costs and patient risks. In two experiments – with 196 physicians at a hospital and 120 students at a medical school in Wuhan – we use a novel medical prescription task under three incentive schemes: <em>flat</em> (constant pay), <em>progressive</em> (pay increases with treatment quantity), and <em>regressive</em> (penalties for overtreatment) to estimate receptivity to AI assistance and its effects on overtreatment and treatment accuracy, and test whether effects vary with incentives. AI recommendation of a treatment is estimated to increase the probability a physician prescribes it by 25.7–28.4 percentage points (pp), with the largest effect under the flat scheme. Physicians are more receptive to AI recommendations in medical domains with which they are less familiar. We estimate that AI assistance reduces the probability a physician overtreats by 10.9–25.7 pp (15.2–80.3%), with significantly larger absolute and relative effects under the flat scheme compared to progressive and regressive schemes. AI assistance improves physicians’ treatment accuracy by 9.8–13.3 pp (14.6–19.9%), with the largest absolute effect under the regressive scheme. These findings are corroborated by the medical school experiment, which reveals that factors indicative of <em>insufficient ability</em> account for 34% of the explained variation in overtreatment, <em>monetary incentives</em> account for 22%, <em>patient welfare considerations</em> account for 20%, and factors related to <em>defensive medicine</em> for 10%. These results provide valuable insights for healthcare administrators considering AI integration into healthcare systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144779673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Impacts of health checkup programs standardization on working-age self-employed and unemployed: Insights from Japan’s local government response to national policy","authors":"Masato Oikawa , Takamasa Otake , Toshihide Awatani , Haruko Noguchi , Akira Kawamura","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103046","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103046","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes the effects of the expansion of municipal per capita expenses on health checkup programs, following the introduction of the Specific Health Checkups and Specific Health Guidance (SHC-SHG), on the health outcomes and behaviors of self-employed and unemployed populations, which have been largely overlooked by previous research. To address this, we applied a dosing difference-in-differences (DID) estimation method, exploiting variation in treatment intensity across municipalities. The DID estimation reveals that the SHC-SHG introduction led to a reduction in the proportion of people diagnosed with lifestyle-related diseases in the municipalities that required significant increases in per-capita health checkup program expenses to comply with the new program, with a more pronounced impact on those with multiple diagnoses compared to those with a single diagnosis. A subgroup analysis indicates that health improvements following the SHC-SHG introduction were observed among self-employed workers and homeowners, whereas such improvements were not evident among the unemployed and renters. Moreover, we identify significant behavioral changes among the population in the high-expansion municipalities following the policy introduction. A back-of-the-envelope calculation demonstrates the municipal response to the SHC-SHG introduction is cost-effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144866197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}