医院垂直整合是否预示着护理协调?来自商业参保人的动态分析的证据

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
William Encinosa , Avi Dor
{"title":"医院垂直整合是否预示着护理协调?来自商业参保人的动态分析的证据","authors":"William Encinosa ,&nbsp;Avi Dor","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.102997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sharp growth in physician groups being purchased by hospitals has sparked extensive policy debate, with little evidence on the merits of such integration. We fill the gap by examining care-coordination under integration. We exploit the fact that integration varies across MSAs and focus on PPO patients with employment-based moves between MSAs. We develop a mover-stayer model with heterogenous effects to examine whether vertically integrated practices treat patients differently, or whether they just treat different patients. Moving to a more integrated market causes an increase in care coordination indices. Specifically, moving to an area with more specialty care integration causes an increase in team referrals between primary and specialty care, less lab and imaging use, less out-of-network care, and reductions in spending. That is, systems are able to narrow the scope of specialty services overall, hence creating greater social efficiencies. Moving to a market with more integrated primary care causes an increase in preventive care, decreased inpatient use by women, but an increase in spending. JEL I11, L14, C22.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102997"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does physician-hospital vertical integration signal care-coordination? Evidence from mover-stayer analysis of commercially insured enrollees\",\"authors\":\"William Encinosa ,&nbsp;Avi Dor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.102997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The sharp growth in physician groups being purchased by hospitals has sparked extensive policy debate, with little evidence on the merits of such integration. We fill the gap by examining care-coordination under integration. We exploit the fact that integration varies across MSAs and focus on PPO patients with employment-based moves between MSAs. We develop a mover-stayer model with heterogenous effects to examine whether vertically integrated practices treat patients differently, or whether they just treat different patients. Moving to a more integrated market causes an increase in care coordination indices. Specifically, moving to an area with more specialty care integration causes an increase in team referrals between primary and specialty care, less lab and imaging use, less out-of-network care, and reductions in spending. That is, systems are able to narrow the scope of specialty services overall, hence creating greater social efficiencies. Moving to a market with more integrated primary care causes an increase in preventive care, decreased inpatient use by women, but an increase in spending. JEL I11, L14, C22.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000311\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院购买医生团体的急剧增长引发了广泛的政策辩论,几乎没有证据表明这种整合的优点。我们通过检查整合下的护理协调来填补这一空白。我们利用这一事实,整合不同的msa和专注于PPO患者之间的就业为基础的msa之间的移动。我们开发了一个具有异质性效应的推动者-停留者模型,以检验垂直整合实践是否对患者有不同的治疗,或者是否只是治疗不同的患者。向更加一体化的市场转移导致护理协调指数增加。具体来说,搬到一个专业护理整合程度更高的地区会增加初级和专业护理之间的团队转诊,减少实验室和成像的使用,减少网络外护理,并减少支出。也就是说,系统能够缩小专业服务的范围,从而创造更高的社会效率。向初级保健更加一体化的市场转移,导致预防性保健增加,妇女住院使用减少,但支出增加。耶11:11,14,22。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does physician-hospital vertical integration signal care-coordination? Evidence from mover-stayer analysis of commercially insured enrollees
The sharp growth in physician groups being purchased by hospitals has sparked extensive policy debate, with little evidence on the merits of such integration. We fill the gap by examining care-coordination under integration. We exploit the fact that integration varies across MSAs and focus on PPO patients with employment-based moves between MSAs. We develop a mover-stayer model with heterogenous effects to examine whether vertically integrated practices treat patients differently, or whether they just treat different patients. Moving to a more integrated market causes an increase in care coordination indices. Specifically, moving to an area with more specialty care integration causes an increase in team referrals between primary and specialty care, less lab and imaging use, less out-of-network care, and reductions in spending. That is, systems are able to narrow the scope of specialty services overall, hence creating greater social efficiencies. Moving to a market with more integrated primary care causes an increase in preventive care, decreased inpatient use by women, but an increase in spending. JEL I11, L14, C22.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信