基于团队的初级保健对与质量相关的保健服务和获得初级保健的影响:挪威初级保健团队试点方案

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Øyvind Snilsberg, Tor Iversen
{"title":"基于团队的初级保健对与质量相关的保健服务和获得初级保健的影响:挪威初级保健团队试点方案","authors":"Øyvind Snilsberg,&nbsp;Tor Iversen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.102987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates Norway's Primary Healthcare Teams (PHT) pilot program, which introduced team-based care in general practice clinics to improve care for patients with complex conditions. Practices hired nurses and chose between an activity-based or block funding model. This analysis examines the activity-based funding model, which incorporated fee-for-service (FFS) for nurses. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the study assesses the program's impact on quality-related primary care services, out-of-hours care, hospitalizations, general practitioners’ (GPs’) working hours, and patient list length. The findings show that PHTs increased quality-related services for target groups (primarily provided by nurses) without affecting GP working hours or list length, suggesting that added nurse capacity was used to enhance care for target patients, not expand primary care access. There is little evidence of changes in healthcare utilization outside primary care, except a possible reduction in hospitalizations for type 2 diabetes patients with ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102987"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of team-based primary care on quality-related healthcare services and access to primary care: Norway's primary healthcare teams pilot program\",\"authors\":\"Øyvind Snilsberg,&nbsp;Tor Iversen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.102987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluates Norway's Primary Healthcare Teams (PHT) pilot program, which introduced team-based care in general practice clinics to improve care for patients with complex conditions. Practices hired nurses and chose between an activity-based or block funding model. This analysis examines the activity-based funding model, which incorporated fee-for-service (FFS) for nurses. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the study assesses the program's impact on quality-related primary care services, out-of-hours care, hospitalizations, general practitioners’ (GPs’) working hours, and patient list length. The findings show that PHTs increased quality-related services for target groups (primarily provided by nurses) without affecting GP working hours or list length, suggesting that added nurse capacity was used to enhance care for target patients, not expand primary care access. There is little evidence of changes in healthcare utilization outside primary care, except a possible reduction in hospitalizations for type 2 diabetes patients with ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000219\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了挪威的初级保健团队(PHT)试点方案,该方案在全科诊所引入了团队护理,以改善对复杂病情患者的护理。诊所雇用护士,并在以活动为基础的模式和集体资助模式之间做出选择。本分析考察了基于活动的筹资模式,其中纳入了护士按服务收费(FFS)。采用差异中的差异(DID)方法,该研究评估了该计划对与质量相关的初级保健服务、非工作时间护理、住院、全科医生(gp)工作时间和患者名单长度的影响。研究结果表明,初级保健服务增加了目标群体(主要由护士提供)的质量相关服务,而不影响全科医生的工作时间或名单长度,这表明增加的护士能力是用来加强对目标患者的护理,而不是扩大初级保健的可及性。除了对门诊护理敏感的2型糖尿病患者的住院率可能减少外,几乎没有证据表明初级保健以外的医疗保健利用发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of team-based primary care on quality-related healthcare services and access to primary care: Norway's primary healthcare teams pilot program
This study evaluates Norway's Primary Healthcare Teams (PHT) pilot program, which introduced team-based care in general practice clinics to improve care for patients with complex conditions. Practices hired nurses and chose between an activity-based or block funding model. This analysis examines the activity-based funding model, which incorporated fee-for-service (FFS) for nurses. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the study assesses the program's impact on quality-related primary care services, out-of-hours care, hospitalizations, general practitioners’ (GPs’) working hours, and patient list length. The findings show that PHTs increased quality-related services for target groups (primarily provided by nurses) without affecting GP working hours or list length, suggesting that added nurse capacity was used to enhance care for target patients, not expand primary care access. There is little evidence of changes in healthcare utilization outside primary care, except a possible reduction in hospitalizations for type 2 diabetes patients with ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信