Journal of Surgical Education最新文献

{"title":"Table of Contents & Bacode","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1931-7204(24)00308-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1931-7204(24)00308-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424003088/pdfft?md5=81f3bcce23acdae7e684dae7b2b1622a&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424003088-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141729273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Do Interns Learn On-The-Job How to Obtain Proper Informed Consent for Surgical Procedures?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Obtaining surgical informed consent (SIC) is a critical skill most residents are expected to learn “on-the-job.” This study sought to quantify the effect of 1 year of clinical experience on performance obtaining SIC in the absence of formal informed consent education.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>In this case-control cohort study, PGY1 and PGY2 surgical residents in an academic program were surveyed regarding their experiences and confidence in obtaining SIC; then assessed obtaining informed consent for a right hemicolectomy from a standardized patient.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Single academic general surgery residency program in Buffalo, NY.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>Ten PGY1 and eight PGY2 general surgery residents were included in the study, after excluding residents with additional years of training.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>PGY2 residents had significantly more experience obtaining SIC compared to PGY1 residents (median response: “&gt;50” vs “between 6 and 15,” p = 0.001), however there was no difference in self-reported confidence in ability obtaining SIC (mean 3.2/5 in PGY1 vs 3.4/5 in PGY2, p = 0.61), self-reported knowledge of SIC (mean 3.1/5 in PGY1 vs 3.6/5 in PGY2, p = 0.15), performance on a test regarding SIC (mean score 9.0/20, SD 3.9 for PGY1 vs mean score 9.6/20, SD 3.5, t = 0.387, p = 0.739) or performance during a standardized patient interview (mean 11.2/20, SD 2.78 for PGY1 vs mean 11.4/20, SD 1.51 for PGY2, p = 0.87). In the interviews all residents addressed general risks (bleeding/infection), however both groups performed worse in addressing procedure-specific risks including anastomotic leak as risk for hemicolectomy.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>A year of clinical training between PGY1 to PGY2 did not improve performance in obtaining surgical informed consent when lacking formal education, despite self-confidence in their ability. A curriculum covering the content, delivery and assessment of informed consent should be initiated for residents upon arrival to surgical training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141725326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery: Where Do We Stand? Highlighting Overlooked Issues in Efforts to Improve Representation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>The lack of diversity among applicants successfully matching into integrated plastic surgery residency continues to be a topic of significant discussion, yet substantial improvements in representation remain elusive. This article aims to highlight the systemic barriers contributing to the decline in diverse plastic surgery trainees.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>This perspective summarizes current and existing challenges in improving recruitment efforts of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) trainees and those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>While acknowledging current DEI initiatives, the authors point out those underappreciated modifiable and nonmodifiable obstacles that perpetuate the lack of equity and inclusivity in the match process. We emphasize the importance of continued commitment from program directors and chairs to these initiatives and its generational augmentative effects on achieving true and lasting diversity and equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141636310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Characteristics and Experiences Associated with Interest in Global Surgery: What Brings US Medical Students to the Field?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>An estimated 5 billion people lack access to safe surgical care. Development and nurturing of medical student interest in global surgery can play a part in addressing this need. This study examines characteristics and experiences of medical students in the United States (US) associated with interest in global surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey study of US-based medical students was performed. Student leaders from the Global Surgery Student Alliance were recruited via email and distributed the online survey to peers at their institutions. Responses from students currently training outside of the US were excluded, as were surveys with &lt;80% completion. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were performed with p &lt; 0.05 indicating significance in R (Vienna, Austria).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>About 708 responses from students at 38 US medical schools were analyzed. 251 students (34.6%) identified as being interested in global surgery. After adjusting for covariates on multivariable regression, demographic factors significantly associated with interest in global surgery were Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (in comparison to Non-Hispanic White/Caucasian, OR = 1.30) and being born outside of the United States (OR = 1.21). Increased interest was also associated with previous clinical experiences in low or middle-income countries (OR = 1.19), public or global health experiences (OR = 1.18), and international service experiences (OR = 1.13).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While many factors may influence student interest in global surgery, previous global health experience and nonclinical global service work are important predictors regardless of background. Our results suggest that medical educators should look to both international clinical and nonclinical collaborations as a means to cultivate and nourish global surgery interest in medical students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141629609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An Ethical Framework for Disclosing the Training Status and Roles of Resident-Level Surgeons to Patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of informed consent includes disclosure of all information that a reasonable patient would need to make a well-informed decision about whether to undergo a surgical procedure. This has traditionally been defined as including diagnosis, details about the procedure, prognosis, potential risks, and alternative treatments. The operating surgeon has final say and responsibility for the case, but the actual operation may be done (under supervision) by a surgeon in training. In this paper, we discuss the ethical dimensions of disclosing resident involvement, reviewing considerations such as established legal and professional standards, consequences for patients and for the surgical educators responsible for preparing future generations of surgeons, and patient rights. We conclude by offering a novel ethical framework intended to serve as a guide to disclosing resident involvement as part of the overall consent process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141629608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA): An Iterative Approach to Optimize Residents Performance in the American Board of Surgery in-Training Exam (ABSITE)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.022","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ITE), or ABSITE, preparation requires an effective study approach. In 2014, the ABS announced the alignment of ABSITE to the SCORE® Curriculum. We hypothesized that implementing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach would help surgery residents improve their performance on the ABSITE.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Over 20 years, in a single institution, residents’ ABSITE performance was evaluated over 3 timeframes: Time A (2004-2013), no specific curriculum; Time B (2014-2019), an annual comprehensive ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based multiple-choice exam (MCQ) was administered; and Time C (2020-2023), like Time B with the addition of the PDSA approach for those with less than 60% correct on the ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam. At the beginning of the academic year, in July, all residents are encouraged to (1) initiate a study plan for the upcoming ABSITE using SCORE® guided by the published ABSITE outlines content topics (Plan), (2) take an ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam in October (Do), (3) assess the results/scores (Study), and (4) identify appropriate next steps (Act). Correlational analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ABSITE scores and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time B and Time C. The primary outcome was the change in the proportions of ABSITE scores &lt;30^th percentile.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 294 ABSITE scores of 94 residents (34 females and 60 males) were analyzed. We found stronger correlation between the correct percentage on ABSITE and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time C (<em>r</em> = 0.73, p &lt; 0.0001) compared to Time B (0.62, p &lt; 0.0001). The percentage of residents with ABSITE scores lower than 30^th percentile dropped significantly from 14.0% to 3.7% (p = 0.016).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Implementing the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach using the SCORE® curriculum significantly enhances residents’ performance on the ABSITE exam. Surgery residents are encouraged to use this approach and to utilize the SCORE-contents outlined by the ABS in their study plan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141629610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"How Do Plastic Surgery Program's Websites Feature Diversity and Inclusion Elements? An Analysis of 89 Integrated Plastic Surgery Programs’ Websites","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><p><span>Plastic surgery residency programs leverage their websites as platforms for promoting their commitment to diversity and inclusion to potential candidates. </span>Medical students who are seeking residency positions, including individuals from underrepresented backgrounds, place significant importance on the alignment of program culture and diversity. The authors assessed how these programs showcased diversity and inclusion efforts on their websites.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The authors analyzed 89 plastic surgery integrated residency program websites for the presence of 12 elements, (1) nondiscrimination, (2) diversity and inclusion statement, (3) community resources, (4) extended resident biographies, (5) faculty biographies, (6) faculty photos, (7) resident photos, (8) additional financial resources for trainees, (9) wellness, (10) mental health resources, (11) health disparities/community engagement, and (12) presence of a diversity council. Additionally, we examined the presence of these 12 elements by geographic region (West, Midwest, South, and Northeast). Our analyzed use chi-squared, t-tests, and Mann–Whitney U; significance level was p = 0.005. The independent plastic surgery programs were excluded, considering their websites were combined with the integrated-residency programs.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>We reviewed 89 websites from February 9, 2024 until February 24, 2024 and on average had 6.32 ± 1.1 diversity and inclusion elements. Resident photos (n = 84, 94.4%), community resources (n = 55, 61.8%), faculty photos (n = 63, 70.8%), and additional financial resources for trainees (n = 56, 62.9%) were the most common. The least common diversity and inclusion elements were diversity councils (n = 12, 13.5%), wellness resources (n = 36, 40.4%), and diversity and inclusion statements (n = 42, 47.2%). The primary analysis revealed that programs with higher number of incoming positions (3 or more) (5.2 ± 1.8) had a significantly higher diversity and inclusion scores when compared to programs with lower number of incoming positions (3.6 ± 2.1) (p = 0.002). Furthermore, based on the geographic regions from the U.S. Census, there was no significant difference between geographic regions.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Characterizing the number of program websites and quantifying the number of diversity elements on each site provide an opportunity for more residency programs to further commit to diversity and inclusion. Displaying different diversity and inclusive initiatives on program websites may attract more diverse applicants, particularly individuals from underrepresented populations in medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141604698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing Educator Burnout in Online Synchronous Teaching in Surgical Disciplines","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 had a tremendous impact on surgical residency education and training. With little experience or training in using online learning in pedagogically informed ways, some surgical educators and learners experienced the disadvantages of online learning which may have contributed to a greater sense of burnout in the pandemic. The purpose of this study is to survey the level of burnout in surgical educators and assess educators' perspectives on factors that increased or decreased burnout in synchronous online teaching during the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study consisting of 4 sections was sent to surgical educators at the University of Toronto. Demographic data, validated surveys on burnout and videoconferencing fatigue (the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES) and the Zoom Exhaustion and Fatigue (ZEF) scale respectively), and quantitative questions about teaching factors in synchronous online environments were collected and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The MBI-ES demonstrated a high degree of emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization and a moderate degree of personal accomplishment in surgeon educators. The ZEF scale noted moderate fatigue across all domains. Although educators noted online learning to be a moderate factor contributing to burnout during the pandemic, there was no correlation between the number of hours or percentage of time teaching online to burnout or zoom fatigue scores. The largest reported contributing factor to online learning leading to burnout was lack of connection to learners, whereas the largest mitigating factor was decreased travel time.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><p>The study found a moderate degree of exhaustion and burnout among surgical educators in Canada during COVID-19 and examined how aspects of online synchronous learning may have contributed to or helped mitigate these experiences. Based on this, we present approaches and educational theories to improve the online learning experience for surgical educators going forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002897/pdfft?md5=ea4b7219c57be44a2e4ab59e04b00326&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424002897-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141602389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of Simulation Training on Core Skill Competency of Undergraduate Medical Students","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Simulation based medical training (SBMT) is gaining traction for undergraduate learning and development. We designed, implemented, and independently assessed the impact of an SBMT programme on competency in surgical history taking and clinical examination for senior clinical students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With institutional ethical approval and initial pilot study of student volunteers that ensured format appropriateness, we implemented an SBMT programme weekly for ten weeks during the core surgery module of our Medicine degree programme. Groups of 5 students collaboratively undertook an observed focused history and physical examination while simultaneously directing care on a simulated surgical patient (actor) with acute abdominal pain. This was conducted in a nonclinical, standardised, tutor-supervised environment and followed by a group debriefing led by both the simulated patient and tutor discussing student interaction and competency. All students undertook Southampton Medical Assessment Tool (SMAT) on a surgical inpatient prior to (baseline) and within 2 weeks after SBMT. Students without simulation training functioned as a control group and randomized cluster sampling was utilised for group selection. Second assessments were by independent surgical academics blinded to student group. Feedback was collected via anonymous questionnaire from those who undertook SBMT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred students took part, fifty of whom undertook SBMT. Global mean SMAT scores were similar between the control and intervention group at baseline (p &gt; 0.05). Scores on the second assessment were significantly higher (p = 0.0006) for those who had undertaken SBMT vs. controls; 94% of students taking SBMT reported benefit via questionnaire with 85% stating increased confidence in history-taking and 78% reporting improved abdominal examination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Undergraduate simulation training at scale is feasible and positively impacts undergraduate student core task competency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002782/pdfft?md5=449fedf47b7b3e2d3199b6b6ff76fc31&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424002782-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141565437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Examining the Most Impactful Strategies for In-service Preparation: A Systemic Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><p>Resident performance on the Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination (PSITE) is used as a predictor of success on the American Board of Plastic Surgery Written Examination, as well as resident progression and fellowship applications. However, information specifically addressing strategies on optimal PSITE preparation is lacking in the plastic surgery literature when compared to general surgery. For this reason, we aim to understand if the topic is well-studied and denote effective study strategies and curricular interventions in both fields that can help residents and programs optimize PSITE performance.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>A literature search including studies from 2012 to 2022 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in PubMed and EMBASE to identify articles on strategies to improve in-service exam scores for general surgery and plastic surgery. Only studies that reported measurable outcomes in raw score, percentile score, or percent correct were included.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Qualitative analysis of 30 articles revealed 2 categories of interventions: individual study habits and institutional curricular interventions. In general surgery literature, 27 articles examined interventions positively impacting resident ABSITE scores, with 21 studies classified as institutional curricular interventions and 6 articles addressing individual study habits. Themes associated with improved ABSITE performance included mandatory remediation programs, dedicated study time, and problem-based learning interventions. In contrast, only 3 articles in plastic surgery literature discussed interventions associated with improved PSITE scores, all falling under curricular interventions.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Unfortunately, the plastic surgery literature lacks concrete evidence on how residents can improve performance. Future research in plastic surgery should replicate successful strategies from general surgery and further investigate optimal preparation strategies for the PSITE. Such endeavors can contribute to improving resident performance and advancing plastic surgery education and patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002721/pdfft?md5=b3d61873275d29ad84aea1f1a6136ab9&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424002721-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141545681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}