Studies in History and Philosophy of Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Why did the clinic make gender? 诊所为什么要区分性别?
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.008
Beans Velocci
{"title":"Why did the clinic make gender?","authors":"Beans Velocci","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 21-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144255019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reactivity, validity, and measurement in the social sciences 社会科学中的反应性、有效性和测量
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.006
Rosa W. Runhardt
{"title":"Reactivity, validity, and measurement in the social sciences","authors":"Rosa W. Runhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reactivity takes place when being measured or classified affects a subject's attitudes and behaviour to such an extent that this affects results in (subsequent) measurement or classification. How one should recognize and evaluate such changes over time is a prominent topic in the psychometric literature, where it falls under the broader concept of <em>response shift</em>. A key question in that literature is if reactive changes are ever <em>natural</em>, that is, whether there are cases in which the measurement results before and after the shift are both accurate to the underlying phenomenon. This is thought to depend on what causal regularities obtain in the area of study, but also on whether the phenomenon is in part constituted by normative and changeable evaluations by the respondent. While the naturalness of reactivity is typically discussed exclusively at the level of measures of individual respondents, much philosophical attention has also been spent in recent years on the reactivity in measurement of <em>macro</em>-social entities, like countries and institutions. This article offers conceptual clarification for that new field by mapping concepts from psychometrics to the measurement of macro-social phenomena. In particular, this article distinguishes two existing arguments about the naturalness of reactivity in psychometrics (‘the argument from regularity’ and ‘the argument from strong evaluation’) and shows what is needed to extrapolate them fruitfully, by focusing on two examples of public measures, viz., democracy indicators and university rankings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144243309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interaction, pluralism, and community in conflictual contexts 冲突环境中的互动、多元主义与社群
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.004
Helen E. Longino
{"title":"Interaction, pluralism, and community in conflictual contexts","authors":"Helen E. Longino","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Three concepts from Critical Contextual Empiricism are resonant in the context of “expert”-“lay” interactions: Interaction, pluralism, and community. These are broad concepts applied in many different contexts. I will engage with them here in several specific ways: 1. Their role in Critical Contextual Empiricism and in recent philosophical work on pluralism; 2. Their introduction in two contexts of expert-lay engagement in areas of center-margin social tension in northern Israel and 3. Reflections on the experience of engaging with those communities and the different ways they took up the concept.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144243308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Historicizing gender 历史化了性别
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.009
Sandra Eder
{"title":"Historicizing gender","authors":"Sandra Eder","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 10-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144243307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Resisting epistemic exploitation: From institutional remedies to community-based research 抵制知识剥削:从制度救济到社区研究
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-05-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.005
Kristina H. Rolin
{"title":"Resisting epistemic exploitation: From institutional remedies to community-based research","authors":"Kristina H. Rolin","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines epistemic exploitation in the context of social scientific and other research with human participants. Despite researchers' good intentions, attempts to engage members of marginalized social groups can involve elements of epistemic exploitation. Epistemic exploitation occurs when privileged persons compel marginalized persons to produce an education about the nature of the oppression they face. Epistemic exploitation is harmful not only to those who are exploited but also to research that depends on people's voluntary participation. It increases the risk that potential research participants systematically decline invitations to participate in research. To illustrate this, I discuss the phenomenon of research fatigue in studies of the Sámi, Indigenous people living in Northern Europe. While research fatigue can be interpreted as resistance to epistemic exploitation, it has a downside. It prevents people from enjoying the benefits of research that could improve their lives in many ways. I discuss four types of institutional remedies to epistemic exploitation: raising awareness, allocating resources for education, rewarding epistemic diversity work, and requiring ethical review. Acknowledging the limitations of institutional interventions, I argue that community-based research is a promising avenue for counteracting epistemic exploitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144123141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk, Islam, and counter-experts: Analyzing the fatwa against the Muria nuclear power plant 风险、伊斯兰教和反专家:分析针对穆里亚核电站的法特瓦
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.003
Pratama Yudha Pradheksa , Ahmad Imron Rozuli
{"title":"Risk, Islam, and counter-experts: Analyzing the fatwa against the Muria nuclear power plant","authors":"Pratama Yudha Pradheksa ,&nbsp;Ahmad Imron Rozuli","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines how the ulama (Islamic scholars) construct and categorize risk in relation to an Islamic fatwa that forbids the construction of a nuclear power plant in Muria, Indonesia. The primary objective of this article is not to ascertain the veracity of risk but rather to comprehensively analyze the multitude of assertions made by the ulama regarding risk within the fatwa. This article presents findings that indicate the risk associated with the Muria nuclear power plant is primarily shaped and being constructed by democratic principles of accountability and transparency, as analyzed through Science and Technology Studies (STS) concepts such as risk, expertise, and counter-experts. The possible contribution of Islamic values—<em>maslaha</em> (benefits) and <em>mafsadah</em> (harms)—in advancing technological advancements with ethical considerations to benefit the public at large is discussed in this article. It also promotes public participation in science and technology, emphasizing the importance of discussing decisions about nuclear power plants with the impacted communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144098776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Verisimilitude or Probability? The history and analysis of a recurring conflation 真实性还是概率?反复出现的合并的历史和分析
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.03.001
Jakob Süskind
{"title":"Verisimilitude or Probability? The history and analysis of a recurring conflation","authors":"Jakob Süskind","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Verisimilitude and epistemic probability are two fundamentally different concepts, and yet they are often being closely associated. This article outlines the theoretical difference between the two concepts and examines how related concepts – concepts that express either a closeness to truth or a closeness to certainty – were intertwined throughout the history of philosophy. It identifies those related concepts in ancient authors such as Plato, Aristotle, Galen, Cicero and Augustine, as well as in modern authors like J.S. Mill and more recent developments in philosophy and logic. By analysing the two broad families of concepts both theoretically and historically, and by advancing possible explanations for the frequent lack of distinction between them, the article seeks to promote greater clarity in both historical studies and contemporary philosophical thought.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144098775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From dollars to Joules: Integrating energetics into economic theory 从美元到焦耳:将能量学融入经济理论
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.001
Oliver Schlaudt
{"title":"From dollars to Joules: Integrating energetics into economic theory","authors":"Oliver Schlaudt","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For as long as ecological economics has existed, non-economic, physical quantities have played a crucial role in it, in particular the energy metric. However, the correct systematic place of these quantities in economic theory, in particular their relation to the metric of economic value, remains one of the unsolved problems of the ecological approach to economics. In this article, I aim to make progress on this issue by systematically exploring the possible roles of energy and related metrics in economics, drawing on both historical and current literature. Two applications stand out: energetics as a general framework for an evolutionary and historical approach in economics and energetics as an analytical tool for critiquing monetary metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 31-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144084199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disciplinary identity and the idea of a unified social science: A survey of British academics 学科认同与统一社会科学理念:英国学术界调查
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.04.002
Federico Brandmayr
{"title":"Disciplinary identity and the idea of a unified social science: A survey of British academics","authors":"Federico Brandmayr","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is substantial philosophical disagreement over whether the social sciences are united by a set of fundamental epistemic and methodological principles, echoing broader debates about the unity and disunity of science more generally. This question does not merely concern philosophers but also social scientists themselves. Social scientists form beliefs about the unity or disunity of the social sciences which likely influence their research practices, such as their choices of specialty areas and whether they pursue interdisciplinary projects. To assess such beliefs, the article presents the results of a survey of 1188 British academics working in social science departments. It shows that researchers in core disciplines like economics, sociology, and political science are more likely to identify as social scientists, while those in peripheral fields such as history and psychology are less attached to the category. Despite widespread support for interdisciplinarity, results reveal deep epistemological divergences across disciplines and a greater proximity to the humanities rather than the natural sciences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 18-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143864112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unity or disunity of the sciences? The German debate around 1900 科学的统一还是分裂?1900 年前后德国的争论
IF 1.4 2区 哲学
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.04.001
Martin Kusch
{"title":"Unity or disunity of the sciences? The German debate around 1900","authors":"Martin Kusch","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper gives an overview of the intense and prolonged debates concerning the relationships between the natural, social and historical sciences in German-speaking academia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In particular, the paper focuses on discussions over cultural history (Schäfer versus Gothein; Buckle and Du Bois-Raymond versus Droysen and Lorenz; von Below versus Lamprecht); the position of psychology (Steinthal, Lazarus, Wundt, Dilthey); the role of the social sciences (Mohl versusTreitschke and Dilthey); the goals of economics (Knies, Schmoller, Treitschke, Menger, Weber); neo-Kantian conceptions and their rivals (Lange, Cohen, Windelband, Rickert, Dilthey, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche); and the road from Marxism to sociology (Marx, Lassalle, Stammler, Tönnies, Sombart, Simmel). I conclude by gesturing at ways in which these debates were related to social-political controversies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143855088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信