Lex Prudentium Law Journal最新文献

Pembuktian Kesamaan Ip Address Dalam Persekongkolan Tender Pengadaan Barang Jasa Pemerintah 证据匹配Ip在一个政府服务竞标计划中

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.27

Salsabila Sekar Rachmadhani

引用次数: 0

Perseroan Perorangan dan Pertanggungjawabannya terhadap Pihak Ketiga: Perbandingan Jerman dan Indonesia 个体公司及其对第三方的责任：德国与印度尼西亚的比较

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.28

Keavin Frizky Maria

{"title":"Perseroan Perorangan dan Pertanggungjawabannya terhadap Pihak Ketiga: Perbandingan Jerman dan Indonesia","authors":"Keavin Frizky Maria","doi":"10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.28","url":null,"abstract":"Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pertanggungjawaban hukum organ PT Perorangan terhadap pihak ketiga berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan juga memberikan solusi yang dapat dilakukan guna untuk memperkuat ketentuan mengenai PT Perorangan. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel adalah pendekatan undang-undang (statue approach), pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Jenis bahan hukum meliputi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi pustaka yang selanjutnya akan dianalisis secara deduktif dengan logika silogisme. menunjukan bahwa pertama, terkait dengan kepengurusan organ PT Perorangan berdasarkan UU Cipta Kerja, PT Perorangan hanya memiliki 1 (satu) organ, yaitu pemegang saham yang merangkap jabatannya sebagai direksi. Wewenang yang dimiliki oleh Pemegang saham dalam “Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham” digantikan dengan “Keputusan Pemegang Saham” tanpa adanya “musyawarah/rapat” sehingga bersifat mutlak dan memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sama seperti RUPS. Kedua, terkait perbandingan pertanggungjawaban organ PT Perorangan antara Indonesia dengan Jerman, yaitu keduanya memiliki tanggungjawab terbatas pada saham yang dimiliki dan juga dapat dikenakan pertanggungjawaban tidak terbatas. Namun, konsep “konsep one-tier system di Indonesia memiliki perbedaan antara One-tier system pada Gesellschaft mit Beschrankter Haftung (GmbH) di Jerman sehingga pertanggungjawaban berakibat sulit untuk menerapkan pertanggungjawaban terbatas bagi PT Perorangan di Indonesia","PeriodicalId":485854,"journal":{"name":"Lex Prudentium Law Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135252158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

One China Policy dan Dampaknya Bagi Hubungan Indonesia-Taiwan 一个中国政策及其对印尼-台湾关系的影响

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.24

Elisabeth NSB Tukan

{"title":"One China Policy dan Dampaknya Bagi Hubungan Indonesia-Taiwan","authors":"Elisabeth NSB Tukan","doi":"10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.24","url":null,"abstract":"Within international relation, a state’ policy may influence other state policy. “One China Policy” for example. It views that there is “one China” which is People’s Republic of China and Taiwan (Republic of China) is part of it. It is also a recognition of the government of the People’s Republic of China as the “sole legal government of China”, but not acceptance that that government represents or speaks for the people of Taiwan. PRC always promote and assert this policy into its diplomatic relations. Indonesia is one of the states to commit it, and not recognise and establish a diplomatic relations to Taiwan. The aim of this article is to review the impact of “one china policy” in Indonesia’s relations with Taiwan. In spite of not having diplomatic relations among them, Indonesia and Taiwan establish multi-cooperation such as economy and trade, investment, tourism, education, transportation, culture and agricultural technology. Both state also assigns economic and trade office respectively. In general, PRC accept those kind of relationsips, however Indonesia’s commitment to the policy were questionable frequently by PRC, due to Taiwan’s official visit to the state. The impact of implementation of one china policy on Indonesia and Taiwan relation is simply the indonesia’s prudent attitude to keep in PRC’s mind with respect to the policy. Indonesia’s ambigous purpose is to stick to policy while keep in mutual symbiosis with Taiwan.","PeriodicalId":485854,"journal":{"name":"Lex Prudentium Law Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136223093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Thinking Seriously: Discrimination in Papua Asymmetry Autonomy 认真思考:巴布亚不对称自治中的歧视

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.20

Dhia Al Uyun

{"title":"Thinking Seriously: Discrimination in Papua Asymmetry Autonomy","authors":"Dhia Al Uyun","doi":"10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.20","url":null,"abstract":"The land of Papua is a gift. However, this gift belongs to the indigenous Papuan, so it is right when special autonomy interpreted the benefits of the original intent of the indigenous Papuan. This research is a doctrinal research with primary and secondary legal materials which are analyzed textually and contextually so that it finds the men behind the rule and the discourse of positive and negative discrimination that occurs. This discourse produces a particular light that special autonomy does not guarantee a solution to the Papuan conflict. Thinking Seriously about Special Autonomy Discrimination in Papuan results in a analysis that legal orientalism is influential in this matter. Referendum is a solution but does not solve the root of the problem. The Noken system will strengthen a patrimonial consolidated democracy. What the central government needs to do is resolve past human rights cases, accommodate people’s aspirations which have been manifested in various demonstrations and open space for dialogue between Papuan nationalists and other Indonesians. Special Autonomy is inherently regional within the federal state which is a middle way to overcome the power struggle over Papua.","PeriodicalId":485854,"journal":{"name":"Lex Prudentium Law Journal","volume":"573 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136223092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ethical Analysis of the Possible Introduction of Chemical Castration as a Criminal Sanction 引入化学阉割作为刑事制裁的伦理分析

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v2i1.23

Zsófia Németh-Szebeni

引用次数: 0

Analysis of Dispute Resolution in the Marketplace For Consumer Losses: A Comparative Study Between Shopee And Amazon 消费者损失的市场纠纷解决分析:Shopee和Amazon的比较研究

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.15

Avira Marchell Putri Ariawan

{"title":"Analysis of Dispute Resolution in the Marketplace For Consumer Losses: A Comparative Study Between Shopee And Amazon","authors":"Avira Marchell Putri Ariawan","doi":"10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.15","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify and analyze comparisons of dispute resolution when defaults occur in the Shopee and Amazon marketplaces, especially when consumers settle disputes by returning goods to sellers to receive compensation. This study uses the Economic Analysis Of Law theory by Richard Posner with an economics approach based on three principles, namely value, benefit, and efficiency. This research is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. Types of research data using secondary data include primary and secondary legal materials relevant to legal analysis. This research approach uses a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The data collection technique used is a literature study. The study results show that the settlement of disputes through the return of goods between Shopee and Amazon using the Economic Analysis Of Law theory by Richard Posner is different. In the Shopee marketplace, it is concluded that returning goods to their place of origin fulfills three principles of economics against the law: maximum value, benefit, and efficiency because consumers do not bear the costs of returning goods to sellers. However, resolving disputes by returning goods to their place of origin on the Amazon marketplace based on these three principles is not optimal because consumers must bear the costs of returning goods to their place of origin. Moreover, consumers have to take taxes and customs duties because they buy from outside the jurisdiction of Indonesia, namely the United States","PeriodicalId":485854,"journal":{"name":"Lex Prudentium Law Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136179609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Legitimasi Mediasi Uni Eropa Dalam Manajemen Konflik Kosovo-Serbia 欧洲联盟在塞尔维亚冲突管理中的合法性

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.9

David William Izak Mantiri, Natalia Yeti Puspita

引用次数: 0

Peran Bicara Sebagai Alternatif Peradilan Pidana Pada Masyarakat Jeneponto 言论是杰内蓬托社会刑事司法的替代作用

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.7

Adryan Andis, Andika Wahyudi Gani

{"title":"Peran Bicara Sebagai Alternatif Peradilan Pidana Pada Masyarakat Jeneponto","authors":"Adryan Andis, Andika Wahyudi Gani","doi":"10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.7","url":null,"abstract":"Norma Bicara merupakan bagian dari sistem hukum Pangngadakkang yang memuat tentang mekanisme peradilan pidana melalui penyelesaian secara adat. Dalam tulisan ini penulis mengkaji peran Bicara (peradilan adat) pada masyarakat Jeneponto sebagai suatu alternatif peradilan pidana. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana mekanisme Bicara sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum Pangngadakkang yang dalam penerapan sanksinya memenuhi tujuan pemidanaan. Adapun peran putusan Bicara dapat mewujudkan tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan, kepastian hukum serta kemanfaatan. Dalam konteks yang lebih luas tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum pidana adat dalam pembaruan hukum pidana nasional dengan menggunakan kajian pluralisme hukum. Lebih lanjut tulisan ini memberikan solusi kepada negara utamanya dalam menyelesaikan masalah perdebatan siapa yang berwenang dalam menyelesaikan Metode penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder yang diperoleh dari kajian pustaka. Langkah-langkah untuk memperoleh data sekunder tersebut yakni: (1) Studi Pendahuluan, (2) Pengumpulan Referensi, (3) Kondensasi Data, (4) Penyusunan Data, dan (5) Penyusunan Kesimpulan dan Hasil Penelitian. Adapun teori yang digunakan sebagai pisau analisa dalam menjawab rumusan masalah: (1) Teori Sistem Hukum, (2) Tujuan Pemidanaan, (3) Teori Keadilan, dan (4) Teori Pluralisme Hukum","PeriodicalId":485854,"journal":{"name":"Lex Prudentium Law Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Yuridiksi dan Implementasi Kewenangan Mahkamah Internasional Dalam Sengketa Laut Indonesia 关于印尼海的争议，国际法院的管辖权和授权的执行

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.8

Winda Rahmawati

引用次数: 0

Pengaturan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Amerika Serikat dan Inggris 印尼议会法律:美国和英国的法律比较研究

Lex Prudentium Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.6

F Yudhi Priyo Amboro

{"title":"Pengaturan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Amerika Serikat dan Inggris","authors":"F Yudhi Priyo Amboro","doi":"10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.6","url":null,"abstract":"Kepailitan dan PKPU di Indonesia merupakan solusi penyelesaian permasalahan utang. Dalam perkembangannya ternyata masih menyisakan permasalahan tersendiri, terutama bagi kelangsungan usaha korporasi, yang disebabkan oleh substansi hukumnya. Pandemi COVID-19 membuka jalan bagi kasus-kasus kepailitan dan PKPU yang banyak bermunculan, sebagai akibat dari permasalahan substansi hukum kepailitan dan PKPU yang belum diselesaikan. Pandemi sekaligus menjadi langkah awal untuk adanya pembaharuan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji konsep pengaturan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia di masa mendatang yang dapat memberikan perlindungan bagi kreditor dan debitor. Guna mendapatkan tujuan penelitian tersebut, penelitian ini dijalankan dengan metode perbandingan hukum negara Amerika Serikat dan Inggris. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pengaturan kembali insolvency test, melakukan optimalisasi rencana perdamaian, melakukan pengaturan rencana perdamaian yang detail, diperlukannya pengawas pelaksanaan perdamaian, dan optimalisasi peran kurator dan pengurus dalam pengelolaan bisnis debitor. Selain itu, karena kepailitan dan PKPU membawa dampak kehilangan kendali debitor, maka untuk memastikan perlindungan bagi kreditor dan debitor maka perlu adanya pengendalian oleh kreditor melalui batasan oleh hukum, memastikan terjadinya corporate governance melalui mekanisme rapat kreditor, dan juga adanya sistem yang memberikan keterwakilan kepentingan kreditor. Semua hal tersebut seharusnya bisa menjadi ius constituendum dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia mendatang","PeriodicalId":485854,"journal":{"name":"Lex Prudentium Law Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135053460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0