Emotion最新文献

{"title":"Aggress against the dissent: The consequences of interacting with opposing viewpoints.","authors":"Jonathan Gordils, Jeremy P Jamieson","doi":"10.1037/emo0001520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001520","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disagreements over conflicting viewpoints are common and have important implications for social relationships and overall well-being. A large corpus of research from the political and social sciences documents the myriad negative consequences of disclosing dissenting viewpoints. However, relatively less is known about how sharing (and encountering) opposing viewpoints impacts real-time affective, physiological, and behavioral processes. Toward this end, this research manipulated the beliefs, values, and opinions held by an opposing other in a novel dyadic context to (a) examine ongoing processes during interpersonal disagreements and (b) establish an immersive paradigm to experimentally study interpersonal disagreement (vs. agreement). Participants (<i>N</i> = 193) engaged in a topic discussion task with (ostensibly) an unacquainted participant who was, in fact, a confederate trained to either (a) agree with the participant's stance on the topic (i.e., agree condition, <i>n</i> = 95) or (b) disagree with the participant's stance on the topic (i.e., disagree condition, <i>n</i> = 98). Results demonstrate that participants assigned to interact in the disagree condition reported more negative affect, exhibited greater cardiac output and a shorter preejection period (i.e., a profile consistent with anger), displayed more negative affect (anger and anxiety), and formed more negative attributions of their partner, compared to participants assigned to the agree condition. Then, exploratory analyses indicated that when participants experienced and displayed more anger, they were more likely to aggress against their interaction partner. Implications for theory development and interpersonal dynamics are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Emotion regulation in daily life: Testing bidirectional temporal associations with positive and negative affect.","authors":"Samiul Hossain, Michael J Kyron, Kenneth G DeMarree, Kristin Naragon-Gainey","doi":"10.1037/emo0001496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001496","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotion regulation and affect are closely linked, but little is known about the directionality of their associations in daily life contexts, there is a particular lack of studies that include positive affect and its upregulation, and numerous methodological limitations constrain conclusions that can be drawn. We tested bidirectional associations of four emotion regulation strategies (distraction, reappraisal, rumination, savoring) with positive and negative affect, using ecological momentary assessment. Adult community participants (<i>N</i> = 345) oversampled for treatment-seeking completed up to six reports per day for 7 days. Residual dynamic structural equation modeling showed that savoring and rumination were bidirectionally associated with positive and negative affect, indicating \"virtuous\" and \"vicious\" feedback loops, respectively. Distraction and reappraisal were both predicted by heightened negative affect, and reappraisal also had reciprocal associations with positive affect. Exploratory analyses indicated that clinical status generally did not influence associations between affect and emotion regulation. Results suggest affective cycles associated with repetitive thinking (e.g., rumination and savoring) that may inhibit or support well-being, whereas associations with distraction and reappraisal may depend upon contextual factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Emotional reactivity to daily positive and negative events in adulthood: The role of adverse childhood experiences.","authors":"Sophie Potter, Emma Bridger, Patrycja J Piotrowska, Johanna Drewelies","doi":"10.1037/emo0001512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have lasting impact on everyday emotional experiences in adulthood, with extant evidence linking ACEs to elevated emotional reactivity. However, findings are typically based on reactivity to <i>negative</i> daily events (i.e., stressors) and its moderation by <i>cumulative</i> ACEs (where individual adversities are summed into a total score), which overlooks adversity-specific associations and reactivity to other types of daily events. We therefore examine cumulative and individual ACEs as moderators of emotional reactivity to positive and negative daily events. Data were drawn from the National Study of Daily Experiences 2 (NSDE-II), collected 2004-2009, whereupon middle-aged and older adults (<i>N</i> = 1,994; <i>M</i>_age = 58.61; range = 35-86; 57% female) reported daily events and affect on eight consecutive evenings. Multilevel models were used to estimate the moderating role of ACEs for within-person associations between positive/negative events and affect. We found that cumulative ACEs and a number of individual adversities (specifically those characterized by abuse but not by neglect or household challenge/dysfunction) were associated with emotional reactivity to positive <i>and</i> negative daily events. That is, cumulative and abuse-based ACEs were associated with increased negative affect and/or decreased positive affect on days with a negative event <i>and on days with a positive event</i>. Our findings add to literature on the long-lasting and pervasive influence of early life experiences on everyday emotional experiences in adulthood. We discuss differences in reactivity to positive versus negative daily events and in cumulative versus adversity-specific associations as well as their theoretical and methodological implications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"I can feel it in my bones: Experienced intensity of emotion predicts in-the-moment awareness of body sensations.","authors":"Alexandra MacVittie, Kristen D Petagna, Jolie B Wormwood","doi":"10.1037/emo0001502","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001502","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many emotion theories suggest that sensations from the body are a critical piece of emotional experience. Here, we examine how subjective awareness of body sensations is associated with emotional experience throughout daily life using ecological momentary assessment (data collected in 2021). Participants (<i>N</i> = 161) completed a 7-day protocol where they rated the intensity with which they were currently experiencing 16 different emotions as well as overall awareness of their body sensations (_<i>N</i>obs = 7,483). Experienced emotional intensity was positively associated with in-the-moment body awareness across 12 of 16 emotion terms. This association was present for both normatively positive and negative emotions, as well as for both normatively high and low arousal emotions. These findings extend prior theories on the role of body sensations in emotional experience and demonstrate that the association between conscious experiences of the body and emotion covaries in the moment within participants across different contexts in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143598013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Emotion brokering in Latinx college students: Associations with depressive symptoms and acculturative stress.","authors":"Sivenesi Subramoney, Eric A Walle, Alexandra Main, Dalia Magaña","doi":"10.1037/emo0001506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on cultural brokering (i.e., interpreting cultural norms for others) indicates that some brokering practices (i.e., interpreting language) predict negative psychological adjustment. Recent research indicates that individuals also interpret emotions for others (i.e., emotion brokering). However, the associations between emotion brokering and psychological adjustment have yet to be reported. This investigation is the first to examine the associations between emotion brokering and psychological adjustment (i.e., depressive symptoms, acculturative stress) among Latinx college students. Study 1 (data collected in 2020) compared emotion brokering and language brokering and investigated how the frequency of each type of brokering (emotion, language) and the emotions (embarrassment, pride) experienced when brokering related to psychological adjustment. Results revealed that frequent emotion brokering predicted greater depressive symptoms among those who experienced greater embarrassment when emotion brokering. In addition, frequent emotion brokering predicted lower acculturative stress among those who experienced greater pride when emotion brokering. Study 2 (data collected from 2021 to 2022) examined the role of familism and family assistance attitudes as moderators of the relationships between emotion brokering frequency, emotions experienced (embarrassment, pride) when emotion brokering, and psychological adjustment. Findings revealed that the relationships between the emotions experienced when emotion brokering and depressive symptoms were moderated by the endorsement of emotion brokering as a means of family assistance, rather than familism values more broadly. These novel findings have implications for cultural brokering and psychological adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Retraction of \"The well-being paradox: Comparing prosocial and self-kindness interventions for mental health benefits\" by Naclerio et al. (2024).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/emo0001522","DOIUrl":"10.1037/emo0001522","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports the retraction of \"The well-being paradox: Comparing prosocial and self-kindness interventions for mental health benefits\" by Maria E. Naclerio, Lee Lazar, Erica A. Hornstein and Naomi I. Eisenberger (<i>Emotion</i>, Advanced Online Publication, Nov 11, 2024, np). After publication, the first author became aware that data for the self-kindness condition at the post-intervention time points for the depression and anxiety measures did not match the output originally exported from Qualtrics. The second author reported that when they were merging Qualtrics outputs into a single data file for analyses, they experienced repeated software crashes. This technical issue likely caused data cells to be incorrectly merged for the self-kindness condition at the post-intervention time point. Due to the corrupted data, the findings related to the self-kindness group at the post-intervention time point (for depression and anxiety) are incorrect. Data from the other groups and timepoints remain unaffected. This retraction was requested by all authors. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2025-44126-001). A growing body of literature supports the idea that prosocial behavior, or behavior done on behalf of another person, is beneficial to well-being. However, modern society often places a greater emphasis on self-care or \"treating yourself\" in the pursuit of well-being. To understand the effects of these differing forms of kindness (to others or the self), we conducted a 2-week intervention study in December 2020. Participants (<i>N</i> = 999) were randomly assigned to an other-kindness, self-kindness, or control condition. Participants in the other- and self-kindness groups were asked to perform three acts of kindness each week, while participants in the control condition were not. Of those who completed the intervention (<i>N</i> = 781), we found that participants in the other-kindness (vs. self-kindness and control) group experienced significant decreases in depression, anxiety, and loneliness from pre- to postintervention, offering compelling evidence for the mental health benefits of prosocial behavior. Unexpectedly, we also found that participants in the self-kindness (vs. other-kindness and control) group experienced significant increases in depression and anxiety. While the self-kindness group reported enjoying their acts of kindness more, the other-kindness group felt more connected. Overall, these findings reaffirm the benefits of prosocial behavior on well-being and suggest that self-kindness might not be as positive as it feels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A multisample investigation of links between individual differences in emotion dysregulation and perceived helpfulness of interpersonal emotion regulation interactions.","authors":"Benjamin A Swerdlow, Sheri L Johnson","doi":"10.1037/emo0001415","DOIUrl":"10.1037/emo0001415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior theory and research offer competing predictions for associations between intrapersonal emotion (dys)regulation and interpersonal emotion regulation (IER). One possibility is that difficulties recognizing, accepting, or managing one's emotions might tend to interfere with seeking or benefiting from IER. Alternatively, people who struggle to regulate their emotions by themselves might nevertheless be able to outsource regulatory functions or capitalize on regulatory support effectively, such that benefits of IER might be preserved or even amplified. We conducted secondary analyses of five samples (<i>N</i>s = 90-381) collected between 2016 and 2020 to examine links between individual differences in intrapersonal emotion (dys)regulation and reported desire for, seeking of, and helpfulness of receiving IER. The samples consisted of students at a public university in California (Samples 1-3), romantic couples recruited predominantly from the Greater San Francisco Bay Area community (Sample 4), and adults reporting difficulties with emotion-related impulsivity enrolled in an online intervention to reduce aggression (Sample 5). Methods varied across samples, including questionnaires, autobiographical recall, nightly diaries, and ecological momentary assessment. Across samples, individual differences in emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression were more robustly tied to perceived helpfulness of IER than reported desire for IER. More specifically, emotion dysregulation and suppression use were negatively associated with helpfulness, whereas reappraisal use was positively associated with helpfulness; however, some results were inconsistent across samples. We examine these consistencies and inconsistencies considering differences in sample characteristics and methods. We discuss conceptual and practical implications of these findings alongside strengths, limitations, and future directions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"340-354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"I want you to feel bad: Understanding the role of anger in extrinsic interpersonal affect worsening with ecological momentary assessment.","authors":"Shayne Polias, Antonio Zuffianò, Yuhui Chen, Lucia Manfredi, Fulvio Gregori, Lorna Bourke, Belén López-Pérez","doi":"10.1037/emo0001470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated how people are motivated to induce negative feelings in others, a phenomenon known as extrinsic interpersonal affect worsening. This process has been linked to decreased well-being for those involved in regulating these emotions. However, prior studies have primarily centered on experimental scenarios, neglecting the emotions (such as anger) experienced by those regulating extrinsic affect worsening as possible predictors. To address this gap, a study involving 166 British adults (<i>M</i>_age = 35.09, <i>SD</i> = 12.94) was conducted from the end of 2019 to February 2020. Participants reported their general disposition to engage in extrinsic interpersonal affect worsening and subsequently recorded their levels of momentary anger and momentary extrinsic affect worsening through ecological momentary assessments for 28 days at three different daily time points. The findings unveiled a reciprocal relation with nuanced differences between occurrence and intensity of affect worsening. While for occurrence, we only observed an effect where the occurrence of affect worsening led to a heightened experience of anger in the regulator; for intensity, we observed a detrimental cycle in which anger can serve as both a cause and a consequence of the higher intensity of extrinsic affect worsening. These results are discussed within the context of aggression and abuse theories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":"25 2","pages":"320-329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143391983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Out of sight but in mind: Experimentally activating partner representations in daily life buffers against common stressors.","authors":"Vivian Zayas, Betul Urganci, Steve Strycharz","doi":"10.1037/emo0001419","DOIUrl":"10.1037/emo0001419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lab experiments have shown that reminders of romantic partners buffer against stressors. Yet, tightly controlled experiments do not mimic what transpires in people's actual lives. Thus, an important question is as follows: To what extent do reminders of romantic partners confer affective benefits when they occur \"in the wild\" as people experience their daily activities? To capture people's emotional experience in real time, two studies, each spanning 3 months, used event-contingent ecological momentary assessments with a within-subject experimental manipulation. Prior to encountering a stressful event (taking an exam), participants received either a supportive text message from their partner or no message (Studies 1 and 2), or a supportive text message from the research team (Study 2). Receiving supportive partner messages, compared to no messages or messages from the research team, led to less negative affect and greater positive affect, and to less negative affect and greater positive affect about the exam itself. Receiving supportive partner messages had no statistically significant effects on subjective stress. Interestingly, the quality of the partner messages, as coded by independent raters, did not significantly predict the magnitude of the affective benefits. These findings suggest that receiving any supportive partner message, and not necessarily more subtle differences in the quality of the message, may be the key ingredient for these benefits to occur. The present work advances understanding of how the symbolic presence of partners confers affective regulatory benefits in everyday life. Implications for emotion regulation and the utility of integrating perspectives from adult attachment are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"430-442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142607101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Regulating and emerging: Extrinsic affect improvement and the emergence of leadership.","authors":"Arik Cheshin, Gil Luria, Sagi Goldberger","doi":"10.1037/emo0001461","DOIUrl":"10.1037/emo0001461","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotions are powerful tools through which formal leaders influence their followers, whether by overt emotional displays or deliberate attempts to regulate their own and others' emotions. This raises the following question: Can the strategic effort to regulate others' emotions help team members emerge as informal leaders? This work demonstrates that extrinsic emotion regulation-a goal-directed action aimed at regulating team members' emotions-can enable individuals to rise to informal leadership positions. We hypothesize that team members who improve group emotions emerge as informal leaders. This was tested in two studies. In Study 1 (a lab study on 25 ad hoc groups; <i>n</i> = 100), individuals recognized for improving group affect were chosen as informal leaders. In Study 2 (a field study of 43 student groups that worked together for 6 weeks; <i>n</i> = 141), individuals who self-reported engaging in extrinsic affect-improving were recognized by their peers as fostering positive group affect and subsequently were chosen as the informal leaders of the group. Notably, our findings show that the impact of extrinsic affect-improving was above and beyond that of intrinsic affect-improving. These results underscore the pivotal role of interpersonal emotion regulation, specifically extrinsic affect-improving, in the emergence of informal leadership and highlight its unique contribution to leadership dynamics within teams. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"387-396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}