Personality and Social Psychology Review最新文献_第8页

Introducing the Sociopolitical Motive × Intergroup Threat Model to Understand How Monoracial Perceivers' Sociopolitical Motives Influence Their Categorization of Multiracial People. 引入社会政治动机×群体间威胁模型，了解单一种族感知者的社会政治动机如何影响他们对多种族人群的分类。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-25 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320917051

Arnold K Ho, Nour S Kteily, Jacqueline M Chen

{"title":"Introducing the Sociopolitical Motive × Intergroup Threat Model to Understand How Monoracial Perceivers' Sociopolitical Motives Influence Their Categorization of Multiracial People.","authors":"Arnold K Ho, Nour S Kteily, Jacqueline M Chen","doi":"10.1177/1088868320917051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320917051","url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have used social dominance, system justification, authoritarianism, and social identity theories to understand how monoracial perceivers' sociopolitical motives influence their categorization of multiracial people. The result has been a growing understanding of how particular sociopolitical motives and contexts affect categorization, without a unifying perspective to integrate these insights. We review evidence supporting each theory's predictions concerning how monoracial perceivers categorize multiracial people who combine their ingroup with an outgroup, with attention to the moderating role of perceiver group status. We find most studies cannot arbitrate between theories of categorization and reveal additional gaps in the literature. To advance this research area, we introduce the sociopolitical motive × intergroup threat model of racial categorization that (a) clarifies which sociopolitical motives interact with which intergroup threats to predict categorization and (b) highlights the role of perceiver group status. Furthermore, we consider how our model can help understand phenomena beyond multiracial categorization.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"24 3","pages":"260-286"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868320917051","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37972474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14

Implicit? What Do You Mean? A Comprehensive Review of the Delusive Implicitness Construct in Attitude Research. 隐式?你是什么意思?态度研究中的错觉内隐构念综述。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-20 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320911325

Olivier Corneille, Mandy Hütter

{"title":"Implicit? What Do You Mean? A Comprehensive Review of the Delusive Implicitness Construct in Attitude Research.","authors":"Olivier Corneille, Mandy Hütter","doi":"10.1177/1088868320911325","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320911325","url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a comprehensive review of divergent conceptualizations of the \"implicit\" construct that have emerged in attitude research over the past two decades. In doing so, our goal is to raise awareness of the harmful consequences of conceptual ambiguities associated with this terminology. We identify three main conceptualizations of the \"implicitness\" construct: the procedural conceptualization (implicit-as-indirect), the functional conceptualization (implicit-as-automatic), and the mental theory conceptualization (implicit-as-associative), as well as two hybrid conceptualizations (implicit-as-indirect-and-automatic, implicit-as-driven-by-affective-gut-reactions). We discuss critical limitations associated with each conceptualization and explain that confusion also arises from their coexistence. We recommend discontinuing the usage of the \"implicit\" terminology in attitude research and research inspired by it. We offer terminological alternatives aimed at increasing both the precision of theorization and the practical value of future research.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"24 3","pages":"212-232"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868320911325","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37756547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 84

Victims, Vignettes, and Videos: Meta-Analytic and Experimental Evidence That Emotional Impact Enhances the Derogation of Innocent Victims. 受害者、小故事和视频：元分析和实验证据表明，情感冲击会增强对无辜受害者的贬损。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-22 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320914208

Rael J Dawtry, Mitchell J Callan, Annelie J Harvey, Ana I Gheorghiu

{"title":"Victims, Vignettes, and Videos: Meta-Analytic and Experimental Evidence That Emotional Impact Enhances the Derogation of Innocent Victims.","authors":"Rael J Dawtry, Mitchell J Callan, Annelie J Harvey, Ana I Gheorghiu","doi":"10.1177/1088868320914208","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1088868320914208","url":null,"abstract":"Research during the 1960s found that observers could be moved enough by an innocent victim's suffering to derogate their character. However, recent research has produced inconsistent evidence for this effect. We conducted the first meta-analysis (k = 55) of the experimental literature on the victim derogation effect to test the hypothesis that it varies as a function of the emotional impactfulness of the context for observers. We found that studies which employed more impactful contexts (e.g., that were real and vivid) reported larger derogation effects. Emotional impact was, however, confounded by year of appearance, such that older studies reported larger effects and were more impactful. To disentangle the role of emotional impact, in two primary experiments we found that more impactful contexts increased the derogation of an innocent victim. Overall, the findings advance our theoretical understanding of the contexts in which observers are more likely to derogate an innocent victim.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"24 3","pages":"233-259"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7506872/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37860267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Intragroup Emotion Convergence: Beyond Contagion and Social Appraisal 群体内情绪趋同:超越传染和社会评价

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1177/1088868319882596

B. Parkinson

引用次数: 35

He is a Stud, She is a Slut! A Meta-Analysis on the Continued Existence of Sexual Double Standards. 他是种马，她是荡妇!性别双重标准持续存在的元分析。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-05-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-27 DOI: 10.1177/1088868319891310

Joyce J Endendijk, Anneloes L van Baar, Maja Deković

{"title":"He is a Stud, She is a Slut! A Meta-Analysis on the Continued Existence of Sexual Double Standards.","authors":"Joyce J Endendijk, Anneloes L van Baar, Maja Deković","doi":"10.1177/1088868319891310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319891310","url":null,"abstract":"(Hetero)sexual double standards (SDS) entail that different sexual behaviors are appropriate for men and women. This meta-analysis (k = 99; N = 123,343) tested predictions of evolutionary and biosocial theories regarding the existence of SDS in social cognitions. Databases were searched for studies examining attitudes or stereotypes regarding the sexual behaviors of men versus women. Studies assessing differences in evaluations, or expectations, of men's and women's sexual behavior yielded evidence for traditional SDS (d = 0.25). For men, frequent sexual activity was more expected, and evaluated more positively, than for women. Studies using Likert-type-scale questionnaires did not yield evidence of SDS (combined M = -0.09). Effects were moderated by level of gender equality in the country in which the study was conducted, SDS-operationalization (attitudes vs. stereotypes), questionnaire type, and sexual behavior type. Results are consistent with a hybrid model incorporating both evolutionary and sociocultural factors contributing to SDS.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"24 2","pages":"163-190"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868319891310","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37494879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 72

Are Collectivistic Cultures More Prone to Rapid Transformation? Computational Models of Cross-Cultural Differences, Social Network Structure, Dynamic Social Influence, and Cultural Change. 集体主义文化更容易快速转型吗?跨文化差异、社会网络结构、动态社会影响和文化变迁的计算模型。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-05-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-28 DOI: 10.1177/1088868319855783

Michael Muthukrishna, Mark Schaller

{"title":"Are Collectivistic Cultures More Prone to Rapid Transformation? Computational Models of Cross-Cultural Differences, Social Network Structure, Dynamic Social Influence, and Cultural Change.","authors":"Michael Muthukrishna, Mark Schaller","doi":"10.1177/1088868319855783","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319855783","url":null,"abstract":"Societies differ in susceptibility to social influence and in the social network structure through which individuals influence each other. What implications might these cultural differences have for changes in cultural norms over time? Using parameters informed by empirical evidence, we computationally modeled these cross-cultural differences to predict two forms of cultural change: consolidation of opinion majorities into stronger majorities, and the spread of initially unpopular beliefs. Results obtained from more than 300,000 computer simulations showed that in populations characterized by greater susceptibility to social influence, there was more rapid consolidation of majority opinion and also more successful spread of initially unpopular beliefs. Initially unpopular beliefs also spread more readily in populations characterized by less densely connected social networks. These computational outputs highlight the value of computational modeling methods as a means to specify hypotheses about specific ways in which cross-cultural differences may have long-term consequences for cultural stability and cultural change.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"24 2","pages":"103-120"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868319855783","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37380683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 38

Social Psychological Theory as History: Outlining the Critical-Historical Approach to Theory 作为历史的社会心理学理论:概述理论的批判-历史方法

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI: 10.1177/1088868319883174

Daniel Sullivan

引用次数: 18

Ecologizing Social Psychology: The Physical Environment as a Necessary Constituent of Social Processes. 生态社会心理学:自然环境作为社会过程的必要组成部分。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2020-02-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-30 DOI: 10.1177/1088868319845938

Benjamin R Meagher

引用次数: 42

The Relationship Problem Solving (RePS) Model: How Partners Influence One Another to Resolve Relationship Problems 关系问题解决(RePS)模型:伴侣如何相互影响以解决关系问题

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2019-10-29 DOI: 10.1177/1088868319881243

L. Baker, J. McNulty

引用次数: 8

The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017. 道德心理学:对1940年至2017年发表的实证研究的回顾和分析。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2019-09-01 Epub Date: 2019-01-18 DOI: 10.1177/1088868318811759

Naomi Ellemers, Jojanneke van der Toorn, Yavor Paunov, Thed van Leeuwen

引用次数: 182