Personality and Social Psychology Review最新文献_第10页

We're Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships. 我们不是那个乔西：浪漫关系中进步偏见的新证据。

IF 10.4 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-10 DOI: 10.1177/10888683211025860

Samantha Joel, Geoff MacDonald

引用次数: 0

How Do Values Affect Behavior? Let Me Count the Ways. 价值观如何影响行为?让我细数。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-28 DOI: 10.1177/10888683211015975

Lilach Sagiv, Sonia Roccas

引用次数: 28

Couple Simulation: A Novel Approach for Evaluating Models of Human Mate Choice. 配偶模拟:一种评估人类配偶选择模型的新方法。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-07 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320971258

Daniel Conroy-Beam

引用次数: 13

Attention Drifting In and Out: The Boredom Feedback Model. 注意力进进出出:无聊反馈模型。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-30 DOI: 10.1177/10888683211010297

Katy Y Y Tam, Wijnand A P van Tilburg, Christian S Chan, Eric R Igou, Hakwan Lau

引用次数: 28

Undermining Your Case to Enhance Your Impact: A Framework for Understanding the Effects of Acts of Receptiveness in Persuasion. 削弱你的论点以增强你的影响力:一个理解说服中接受行为影响的框架。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-03 DOI: 10.1177/10888683211001269

Mohamed A Hussein, Zakary L Tormala

{"title":"Undermining Your Case to Enhance Your Impact: A Framework for Understanding the Effects of Acts of Receptiveness in Persuasion.","authors":"Mohamed A Hussein, Zakary L Tormala","doi":"10.1177/10888683211001269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211001269","url":null,"abstract":"Past research has uncovered actions that would seem to undermine but in fact frequently enhance persuasion. For example, expressing doubt about one's view or presenting arguments against it would seem to weaken one's case, but can sometimes promote it. We propose a framework for understanding these findings. We posit that these actions constitute acts of receptiveness-behaviors that signal openness to new information and opposing viewpoints. We review four classes of acts of receptiveness: conveying uncertainty, acknowledging mistakes, highlighting drawbacks, and asking questions. We identify conditions under which and mechanisms through which these actions boost persuasion. Acts of receptiveness appear to be more persuasive when they come from expert or high-status sources, rather than non-expert or low-status sources, and to operate through two primary mechanisms: increased involvement and enhanced source perceptions. Following a review of this work, we delineate potentially novel acts of receptiveness and outline directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"25 3","pages":"229-250"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10888683211001269","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25567863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Moving Beyond Two Goals: An Integrative Review and Framework for the Study of Multiple Goals. 超越两个目标：多目标研究的综合回顾与框架》。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-04 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320985810

Franki Y H Kung, Abigail A Scholer

引用次数: 0

Evaluating Belief System Networks as a Theory of Political Belief System Dynamics. 作为政治信仰系统动力学理论的信仰系统网络评价。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-03 DOI: 10.1177/1088868321993751

Mark J Brandt, Willem W A Sleegers

{"title":"Evaluating Belief System Networks as a Theory of Political Belief System Dynamics.","authors":"Mark J Brandt, Willem W A Sleegers","doi":"10.1177/1088868321993751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868321993751","url":null,"abstract":"A theory of political belief system dynamics should incorporate causal connections between elements of the belief system and the possibility that belief systems are influenced by exogenous factors. These necessary components can be satisfied by conceptualizing an individual's belief system as a network of causally connected attitudes and identities which, via the interactions between the elements and the push of exogenous influences, produces the disparate phenomena in the belief systems literature. We implement this belief systems as networks theory in a dynamic Ising model and demonstrate that the theory can integrate at least six otherwise unrelated phenomenon in the political belief systems literature, including work on attitude consistency, cross-pressures, spillover effects, partisan cues, and ideological differences in attitude consensus. Our findings suggest that belief systems are not just one thing, but emerge from the interactions between the attitudes and identities in the belief system. All code is available: https://osf.io/aswy8/?view_only=99aff77909094bddabb5d382f6db2622.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"25 2","pages":"159-185"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868321993751","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25431351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 30

In Search of the Cognitively Complex Person: Is There a Meaningful Trait Component of Cognitive Complexity? 寻找认知复杂的人:认知复杂性中是否存在有意义的特质成分?

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-15 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320972299

Shailee R Woodard, Linus Chan, Lucian Gideon Conway

{"title":"In Search of the Cognitively Complex Person: Is There a Meaningful Trait Component of Cognitive Complexity?","authors":"Shailee R Woodard, Linus Chan, Lucian Gideon Conway","doi":"10.1177/1088868320972299","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320972299","url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have long assumed that complex thinking is determined by both situational factors and stable, trait-based differences. However, although situational influences on complexity have been discussed at length in the literature, there is still no comprehensive integration of evidence regarding the theorized trait component of cognitive complexity. To fill this gap, we evaluate the degree that cognitive complexity is attributable to trait variance. Specifically, we review two domains of evidence pertaining to (a) the generalizability of individuals' complex thinking across domains and the temporal stability of individuals' complex thinking and (b) the relationship of complex thinking with conceptually related traits. Cumulatively, the literature suggests that persons' cognitive complexity at any point in time results partially from a stable and generalizable trait component that accounts for a small-to-moderate amount of variance. It further suggests that cognitively complex persons are characterized by chronic trait-based differences in motivation and ability to think complexly.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"25 2","pages":"95-129"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868320972299","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38823819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

What Makes Things Funny? An Integrative Review of the Antecedents of Laughter and Amusement. 是什么让事情变得有趣?笑声与娱乐前因的综合研究。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-21 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320961909

Caleb Warren, Adam Barsky, A Peter McGraw

{"title":"What Makes Things Funny? An Integrative Review of the Antecedents of Laughter and Amusement.","authors":"Caleb Warren, Adam Barsky, A Peter McGraw","doi":"10.1177/1088868320961909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320961909","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the broad importance of humor, psychologists do not agree on the basic elements that cause people to experience laughter, amusement, and the perception that something is funny. There are more than 20 distinct psychological theories that propose appraisals that characterize humor appreciation. Most of these theories leverage a subset of five potential antecedents of humor appreciation: surprise, simultaneity, superiority, a violation appraisal, and conditions that facilitate a benign appraisal. We evaluate each antecedent against the existing empirical evidence and find that simultaneity, violation, and benign appraisals all help distinguish humorous from nonhumorous experiences, but surprise and superiority do not. Our review helps organize a disconnected literature, dispel popular but inaccurate ideas, offers a framework for future research, and helps answer three long-standing questions about humor: what conditions predict laughter and amusement, what are the adaptive benefits of humor, and why do different people think vastly different things are humorous?","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"41-65"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868320961909","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38729785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 32

Loosening the GRIP (Gender Roles Inhibiting Prosociality) to Promote Gender Equality. 松绑(性别角色抑制亲社会)促进性别平等。

IF 10.8 1区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/1088868320964615

Alyssa Croft, Ciara Atkinson, Gillian Sandstrom, Sheina Orbell, Lara Aknin

{"title":"Loosening the GRIP (Gender Roles Inhibiting Prosociality) to Promote Gender Equality.","authors":"Alyssa Croft, Ciara Atkinson, Gillian Sandstrom, Sheina Orbell, Lara Aknin","doi":"10.1177/1088868320964615","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320964615","url":null,"abstract":"Prosociality is an ideal context to begin shifting traditional gender role stereotypes and promoting equality. Men and women both help others frequently, but assistance often follows traditional gender role expectations, which further reinforces restrictive gender stereotypes in other domains. We propose an integrative process model of gender roles inhibiting prosociality (GRIP) to explain why and how this occurs. We argue that prosociality provides a unique entry point for change because it is (a) immediately rewarding (which cultivates positive attitude formation), (b) less likely to threaten the gender status hierarchy, and therefore less susceptible to social backlash (which translates into less restrictive social norms), and (c) a skill that can be learned (which leads to stronger beliefs in one's own ability to help). Using the GRIP model, we derive a series of hypothesized interventions to interrupt the self-reinforcing cycle of gender role stereotyping and facilitate progress toward broader gender equality.","PeriodicalId":48386,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"66-92"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1088868320964615","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38804336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14