Electoral Studies最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
To moderate, or not to moderate: Strategic domain sharing by congressional campaigns
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102907
Maggie Macdonald , Megan A. Brown , Joshua A. Tucker , Jonathan Nagler
{"title":"To moderate, or not to moderate: Strategic domain sharing by congressional campaigns","authors":"Maggie Macdonald ,&nbsp;Megan A. Brown ,&nbsp;Joshua A. Tucker ,&nbsp;Jonathan Nagler","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102907","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102907","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We test whether candidates move to the extremes before a primary but then return to the center for the general election to appeal to the different preferences of each electorate. Incumbents are now more vulnerable to primary challenges than ever as social media offers a viable pathway for fundraising and messaging for challengers, while homogeneity of districts has reduced general election competitiveness. To assess candidates’ ideological trajectories, we estimate the messaging ideology of 2020 congressional campaigns before and after their primaries using a homophily-based measure of domains shared on Twitter. This method provides temporally granular data to observe changes in communication within a single election campaign cycle. We find suggestive evidence that incumbents in safe seats moved towards the extreme before their primaries and back towards the center for the general election, but only when threatened by a well-funded primary challenge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143637188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electoral systems and assembly size
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102922
Simon Otjes
{"title":"Electoral systems and assembly size","authors":"Simon Otjes","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102922","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102922","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The cube-root rules of assembly size is one of the strongest relationships in political science. Its theoretical underpinning is given by Taagepera (1972). It is based on the notion that assembly size is optimal when the number of communication channels between representatives among themselves <em>and</em> between citizens and their representative is minimal. This article argues that if one follows the logic of the cube-root rule, proportional electoral systems should be associated with greater assemblies: in that case citizens can communicate with more than one representative. This additional links will result in larger assemblies. This article tests this in 128 national parliaments or lower houses. It finds strong evidence for the importance of electoral systems for assembly size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143609379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring rural and urban consciousness in Europe
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-03-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102912
Christopher Claassen , Sascha Göbel , Antonia Lang , Kathrin Ackermann , Petar Bankov , Kevin Brookes , Bartolomeo Cappellina , Christopher Carman , Markus Freitag , Rubén García Del Horno , Enrique Hernández , Guillem Rico , Sigrid Rossteutscher , Richard Traunmüller , Michael Webb , Sonja Zmerli , Alina Zumbrunn
{"title":"Measuring rural and urban consciousness in Europe","authors":"Christopher Claassen ,&nbsp;Sascha Göbel ,&nbsp;Antonia Lang ,&nbsp;Kathrin Ackermann ,&nbsp;Petar Bankov ,&nbsp;Kevin Brookes ,&nbsp;Bartolomeo Cappellina ,&nbsp;Christopher Carman ,&nbsp;Markus Freitag ,&nbsp;Rubén García Del Horno ,&nbsp;Enrique Hernández ,&nbsp;Guillem Rico ,&nbsp;Sigrid Rossteutscher ,&nbsp;Richard Traunmüller ,&nbsp;Michael Webb ,&nbsp;Sonja Zmerli ,&nbsp;Alina Zumbrunn","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102912","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102912","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A rural consciousness, encompassing a rural identity and resentments directed at urban areas and the political elite, has emerged as a key explanation for the growing rural–urban political divides affecting many Western democracies. However, existing research has largely focused on the case of the United States; there is also no consensus as to the structure or dimensionality of rural (and urban) consciousness. In response, this paper develops and tests a battery of 16 items for measuring consciousness in five Western European countries: Britain, France, Germany, Spain, and Switzerland. We show that both rural and urban consciousness are best understood as comprising a dimension of identity and three dimensions of resentment pertaining to power, resources, and culture, in line with Cramer’s original conceptualization. We furthermore find that rural consciousness in Western Europe is generally associated with indicators of “left behind” status such as low income and lack of a university education and is also associated with identification with the political right. This shows how rural–urban identities and resentments can help illuminate the changing political landscape of Western Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143578725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The strategic dilemma of social democracy: Lessons from Slovakia
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102911
Roman Hlatky , Oľga Gyárfášová
{"title":"The strategic dilemma of social democracy: Lessons from Slovakia","authors":"Roman Hlatky ,&nbsp;Oľga Gyárfášová","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102911","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102911","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The declining fortunes of European social democracy have been the subject of much attention. A contested explanation for how to remedy the decline concerns whether conservative shifts on sociocultural and transnational issues are helpful or harmful at the ballot box. In contrast, we focus on an underexplored adaptation strategy: the split of social democracy along the sociocultural cleavage. We analyze the Slovak case where a successful, dominant social democratic party, Smer-SD, divided. One part of the divide took radical, conservative stances on sociocultural and geopolitical issues, while the other part adopted moderate positions. Analyzing over 30 public opinion polls, we show that the split and the parties’ subsequent ideological differentiation led to electoral success. Radicalization attracted conservative former radical-right voters; moderation ensured the support of the more liberal middle class. Situating Slovakia in the wider European context, we: (1) suggest that the salience of the sociocultural cleavage has strengthened the appeal of a nationalist left programmatic direction in Central and Eastern Europe; (2) explore why moderate social democracy succeeded in Slovakia but failed elsewhere; and (3) confirm previous findings on the importance of strong leadership and a large membership base for splinter party success, and on voter responsiveness to parties' ideological and programmatic shifts. More generally, the Slovak case illustrates that party splits are both a consequence of and a potentially effective response to the strategic dilemma of social democracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143562848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The poles in polarization: Social categorization and affective polarization in multiparty systems
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102908
Adrian Rothers
{"title":"The poles in polarization: Social categorization and affective polarization in multiparty systems","authors":"Adrian Rothers","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102908","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102908","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A challenge in adapting the concept of affective polarization to multiparty systems has been to determine who is polarized against whom. I propose a strategy to uncover the different ways in which people construe the political field – that is, how they categorize the party landscape in terms of “us” and “them” from commonly-used survey data. Using 2023 panel data from Germany, a multiparty democracy, I show that people are polarized in opposing camps along three different divides: between Left and Right, between Mainstream and Rightwing Populists, and between Center and Extreme. To understand what people are polarized over, I explore the issue differences that underpin each of the divides. Lastly, I examine the associations between affective polarization and democratic attitudes across camps and find considerable variation in those associations. This variation suggests that perhaps not all affective polarization should be seen as equally problematic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143550562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnitude matters: Voter turnout under different electoral systems
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102910
Michał Pierzgalski , Maciej A. Górecki , Paweł Stępień
{"title":"Magnitude matters: Voter turnout under different electoral systems","authors":"Michał Pierzgalski ,&nbsp;Maciej A. Górecki ,&nbsp;Paweł Stępień","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102910","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102910","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Do voters participate more under proportional than plurality systems? While existing research typically suggests proportional representation (PR) systems exhibit higher turnout than majoritarian systems, several studies indicate a less clear-cut relationship between proportionality and voter turnout. Using a regression discontinuity design, we analyze constituency-level data from Polish municipal elections (1998-2010) to compare three electoral systems: single-member district plurality (SMDP), multi-member district plurality (MMDP), and open-list proportional representation (OLPR). This institutional setting allows us to examine both electoral formula and district magnitude effects through two transitions: from SMDP to OLPR (changing both formula and magnitude) and from MMDP to OLPR (changing primarily formula). We find that PR increases turnout by 3-4 percentage points compared to SMDP but shows no significant differences compared to MMDP. These contrasting effects suggest that district magnitude, not just electoral formula, shapes voter participation. Our findings challenge the view that proportional representation inherently increases voter participation by showing that turnout differences emerge primarily from the shift to multi-member districts. The results demonstrate how the interaction between district magnitude and electoral formula affects voting behavior, moving beyond the simple majoritarian-proportional dichotomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143454740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Institutional personalism and personalised behaviour: Electoral systems, candidate selection methods, and politicians’ campaign strategy 制度个人主义与个性化行为:选举制度、候选人遴选方法和政治家的竞选策略
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102909
Or Tuttnauer , Gideon Rahat
{"title":"Institutional personalism and personalised behaviour: Electoral systems, candidate selection methods, and politicians’ campaign strategy","authors":"Or Tuttnauer ,&nbsp;Gideon Rahat","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102909","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102909","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we investigate how two crucial political institutions – the electoral system and the intraparty candidate selection method – incentivise elite personalistic campaigning behaviour. We offer two contributions. First, we show the interactive effect of the two institutions on elite behaviour in campaigns, unlike most of the extant literature that focuses on parliamentary activity. Second, we apply the distinction between leader-focused (centralised) and individual-focused (decentralised) personalism to candidate selection methods. We argue that selection methods dominated by the party leader and ones employing primaries, two types of selection methods usually seen as opposites on established scales of candidate selection, are actually similar in their effect on politicians’ personalistic behaviour during electoral campaigns.</div><div>Using a dataset combining candidate surveys and expert coding of party selection rules, we analyse 9320 candidate responses from 101 parties across 16 democracies. We demonstrate that primaries-based selection methods correlate with more personalistic behaviour than collegial selection methods under party-centred electoral systems but with less personalistic behaviour in the most candidate-centred electoral systems. Leader-dominated selection methods similarly correlate with more personalistic behaviour than collegial ones only in closed-list PR systems, while their effect is insignificant in more candidate-centred systems. Our findings have wide-ranging implications. They call into question the conventional conceptualisation of candidate selection methods and their effect on politicians' behaviour. They also refine the scope of intraparty institutions’ impact, limiting it to party-centred electoral systems. Conversely, our findings serve as a reminder that students of electoral systems investigating their effects on elite behaviour must, at least in party-centred electoral systems, take intraparty institutions into consideration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143421088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How congruent are populist parties with their constituencies? Evidence from the 2019 European Parliament Elections in Italy, the Netherlands, Germany and Sweden
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102906
Andrei Zhirnov , Jan Philipp Thomeczek , Michele Scotto Di Vettimo , Alberto López Ortega , André Krouwel , Lorenza Antonucci , Roberta Di Stefano , Norbert Kersting
{"title":"How congruent are populist parties with their constituencies? Evidence from the 2019 European Parliament Elections in Italy, the Netherlands, Germany and Sweden","authors":"Andrei Zhirnov ,&nbsp;Jan Philipp Thomeczek ,&nbsp;Michele Scotto Di Vettimo ,&nbsp;Alberto López Ortega ,&nbsp;André Krouwel ,&nbsp;Lorenza Antonucci ,&nbsp;Roberta Di Stefano ,&nbsp;Norbert Kersting","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102906","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102906","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise of populism in Europe has often been described as a response to representation deficits. Arguably, populist parties (1) contribute to the representation of underrepresented constituencies by taking stances that non-populist parties are too constrained to advocate and (2) make a promise of extreme responsiveness to those frustrated with the lack of representation. In this research note, we investigate whether populist parties are indeed closer to their voters in the policy space than non-populist parties and are more congruent with their constituencies than the other parties are with theirs. Using data from Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden, we find that populist parties are indeed often the best policy option for their voters, but the correspondence between their positions and those of their constituencies is on average as good or bad as that between other parties and their voters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143151453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Explaining 2020 Trump support: The role of anti-Muslim, pro-police, and anti-BLM attitudes
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102888
Nazita Lajevardi , Jan Zilinsky
{"title":"Explaining 2020 Trump support: The role of anti-Muslim, pro-police, and anti-BLM attitudes","authors":"Nazita Lajevardi ,&nbsp;Jan Zilinsky","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102888","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102888","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For at least 75 years, social scientists have pointed to racial attitudes as a dominant force in American politics. But the relative positioning of outgroups can be dynamic, suggesting that attitudes toward one group might be predictive of vote choice in one electoral context, but not another. Here, we estimate which group attitudes in the U.S. were correlated with presidential vote choice from 2012–2020. Panel data at four time points during this period indicates that attitudes towards Muslims were the strongest predictor of Republican presidential support until 2019, but faded in substantive importance in 2020 when anti-BLM attitudes became highly prognostic. High-frequency weekly data from 2019-2020 pinpoints when this shift occurred: anti-Muslim prejudice shaped Trump approval from 2019 through May 2020. After the George Floyd murder, pro-police and anti-BLM attitudes immediately become the most important predictors of Trump approval, whilst the effect of anti-Muslim attitudes diminished.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143092065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do voters prefer logrolling to compromise in parliamentary democracies?
IF 2.9 2区 社会学
Electoral Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102889
Alejandro Ecker , Thomas M. Meyer , Carolina Plescia
{"title":"Do voters prefer logrolling to compromise in parliamentary democracies?","authors":"Alejandro Ecker ,&nbsp;Thomas M. Meyer ,&nbsp;Carolina Plescia","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In countries ruled by coalition governments, government policy is the result of negotiations between parties with diverging policy positions. We study what type of deals voters are willing to accept in these negotiations: policy compromises on individual issues or logrolls where each party gets to keep its position on one issue while conceding on another one. Based on a pre-registered survey experiment conducted after the 2021 Dutch general election, we find no evidence that respondents prefer logroll deals over policy compromises <em>per se</em>. Yet, voters are more sensitive to their policy preferences when evaluating logroll compared to compromise deals. In additional analyses, we show that this logroll effect is more pronounced when the logroll allows parties to keep their positions on their respective core issues. Our results have wider implications for political representation and government formation processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143092069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信