Jennifer Lillis, Elizabeth Bettini, David J. Peyton, Martha Lorena Hernández Flores, Tashnuva Shaheen, Ana Bianca Santos, Daisy Pua, Germaine Koziarski, Alexi Themelis
{"title":"Working Conditions and Instructional Decision-Making Among Special Educators Teaching Elementary Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders","authors":"Jennifer Lillis, Elizabeth Bettini, David J. Peyton, Martha Lorena Hernández Flores, Tashnuva Shaheen, Ana Bianca Santos, Daisy Pua, Germaine Koziarski, Alexi Themelis","doi":"10.1177/00144029261438017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261438017","url":null,"abstract":"Growing research indicates working conditions can facilitate or constrain special education teachers’ (SETs) instructional quality. However, prior studies provide limited insight into <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">how</jats:italic> working conditions shape instruction—how SETs’ responsibilities and resources contribute to their decisions as they plan for and provide instruction. We conducted a mixed methods study to explore how working conditions shape instructional decision-making among nine elementary SETs serving students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Using a convergent parallel mixed methods design, we brought together quantitative data on the quality of SETs’ reading lessons with qualitative data on their working conditions and instructional decision-making. Our findings highlight the complexity of SETs’ instructional decisions: When deciding what or how to teach, they were not simply identifying an evidence-based practice that matched individual student learning needs. Rather, each instructional decision required them to simultaneously navigate (a) students’ complex academic and social-emotional strengths and support needs, (b) paraeducator availability and skill, and (c) available instructional resources. Their decisions were shaped by the interplay of these factors. Results have implications for how school leaders can support SETs to make more effective instructional decisions, and thereby improve instruction for students with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147743966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does the Early Bird Catch the Label? Relative Age Effects in the Assessment of Special Educational Needs and ADHD: Evidence from Germany","authors":"Janka Goldan, Franz G. Westermaier","doi":"10.1177/00144029261441922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261441922","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the causal effect of relative age at school entry on the likelihood of being identified with special educational needs (SEN) or diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Germany. Drawing on representative data from the National Assessment Studies (IQB) for Grades 4 and 9, we use a two-stage least squares (2SLS) instrumental variable approach, leveraging exogenous variation in school starting age created by state-specific enrollment cutoff dates. Results indicate that relatively younger students within a grade cohort are significantly more likely to be classified with SEN, particularly in the domains of learning and developmental disorders, with effects being more pronounced in Grade 9 than in Grade 4. Similarly, we find robust evidence of a relative age effect on ADHD diagnoses in Grade 4, although this effect diminishes by Grade 9. The findings suggest that age-related maturity differences systematically influence assessment and diagnostic decisions. Our results highlight the need for developmentally sensitive and bias-mitigating assessment practices that do not rely solely on teacher judgments, in order to avoid misclassification and ensure educational equity.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147719922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Early Childhood Special Education Teachers’ Use of Trauma-Informed, Equity-Centred Practices","authors":"Mia Chudzik, Abby Hardy, Catherine Corr","doi":"10.1177/00144029261427957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261427957","url":null,"abstract":"There have been an increasing number of calls for the use of trauma-informed practices with young children with disabilities. However, the use of trauma-informed practices without an equity-oriented approach can cause further harm to children in schools. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to explore early childhood special education teachers’ use of trauma-informed, equity-centered practices. Semi-structured interviews using photo-elicitation were conducted with 12 early childhood special education teachers in one state. Our findings indicate that while participants did share using trauma-informed, equity-centered practices, they also reported using practices that did not align with an equity-centered approach. The findings from this study have implications for research, practice, and policy related to supporting early childhood special education teachers’ use of trauma-informed, equity-centered practices.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147684609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kathryn M. Meyer, Norma P. Urquiza, Ayana Bass, Elizabeth Bettini
{"title":"“Check[ing] My Needs at the Door:” White Saviorism and Ableism in Educators’ Talk About Working Conditions","authors":"Kathryn M. Meyer, Norma P. Urquiza, Ayana Bass, Elizabeth Bettini","doi":"10.1177/00144029261434717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261434717","url":null,"abstract":"Teachers work, teach, and learn in complex educational systems that have upheld white, colonial, and nondisabled norms. Shaped by this dominant culture, special educators often engage in work that strives to “save,” “fix,” or assimilate students who deviate from these norms. Using white saviorism and ableism as a conceptual framework, this critical qualitative analysis examined how white nondisabled special educators teaching in self-contained classrooms from one school district discussed their working conditions and how they reproduced and/or resisted white savior and ableist narratives. Working in contexts that normalized overwork and sacrifice, we found participants often oscillated between accepting and resisting these conditions. Further, invested in white savior logics, they upheld oppressive perspectives related to teaching and learning. Participants pitted people's needs against one another and exceptionalized teachers and students in special education when trying to make sense of these working conditions.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147682146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James D. Lee, Veronica Y. Kang, Sean Joo, Adriana Kaori Terol, Sehee Jung, Yuanchen Kuo, Hedda Meadan
{"title":"Adaptation and Multi-Methods Validation of the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI)","authors":"James D. Lee, Veronica Y. Kang, Sean Joo, Adriana Kaori Terol, Sehee Jung, Yuanchen Kuo, Hedda Meadan","doi":"10.1177/00144029261433795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261433795","url":null,"abstract":"It is widely known that marginalized families of young children with disabilities have inequitable access to evidence-based practices within publicly funded systems of care, such as the Part C early intervention (EI) system. One factor contributing to this inequality is providers’ limited cultural self-efficacy, which can be defined as the confidence and competence to engage effectively with families from different cultural or linguistic backgrounds than their own. However, little is known about how to assess cultural self-efficacy specifically among EI providers. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt and validate the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale in Early Intervention (CSES-EI), a scale to assess EI providers’ cultural self-efficacy when working with marginalized families. We used a modified Delphi method to adapt 32 items from an original scale into the CSES-EI. A total of 201 EI providers from diverse professional backgrounds completed the survey. Data analysis involved exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multiple regression to assess the reliability, validity, and underlying structure of the scale. The CSES-EI demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .91, ω = .94) and a three-factor structure accounting for 47.9% of the variance. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed that EI providers emphasized family-centered coaching, cultural competence, and the need for flexibility when working with marginalized families. Findings underscore the importance of culturally responsive practices in EI and suggest that professional development targeting cultural efficacy is essential for improving service delivery with diverse populations. This validated tool provides a foundation for assessing and enhancing cultural self-efficacy among EI providers.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147635990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Handicapped Children's Early Education Program","authors":"William W. Swan","doi":"10.1177/001440298004700102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298004700102","url":null,"abstract":"All 21 of the first cohort of the Handicapped Children's Early Education Program (HCEEP) demonstration projects were contacted to determine whether each had maintained continuation funding of the direct services components of the demonstration model. Of these projects, 18 (86%) had maintained continuation funding of their direct services components with monies from 16 different funding sources. Further, they maintained their models basically as developed and expected to continue direct services in the future. Many of the projects were continuing to disseminate information to target audiences and to stimulate increased comprehensive services for preschool handicapped children and their families. These results indicate the viability of demonstration seed money programs under appropriate conditions.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"421 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147586607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Responses of Adolescents on a Masculinity-Femininity Scale and a Stereotyping Questionnaire","authors":"Linda Altholtz Bernknopf","doi":"10.1177/001440298004700112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298004700112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147586600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}