Wilhelmina van Dijk, Christopher Schatschneider, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Holly B. Lane, Sara A. Hart
{"title":"检验差异干预效果:个性化学生干预效果是否因学生能力和特征而异?","authors":"Wilhelmina van Dijk, Christopher Schatschneider, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Holly B. Lane, Sara A. Hart","doi":"10.1177/00144029251378405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Individualized Student Instruction (ISI) intervention was designed to help teachers increase their use of differentiated core reading instruction, to optimize student growth by providing appropriate amounts of code- and meaning-focused instruction. Based on the results from original studies on ISI, it is still unclear if differentiated instruction can mitigate the influence of individual differences, and if this is similar for all students. Using integrative data analytic techniques, we combined data from six randomized control trials on the ISI intervention conducted in kindergarten and first grade and obtained a dataset with a total sample of 3,144 students in Grades K and 1. We then fit conditional multilevel quantile regression models to examine differential effects on word reading and vocabulary outcomes and the moderating effect of pre-intervention skills. The model coefficients did not indicate a treatment effect of the ISI intervention on either vocabulary or word reading skills. We discuss these results in the light of the importance of data sharing and registered reports to uncover what works for which students under which conditions.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Differential Intervention Effects: Do Individualized Student Intervention Effects Vary by Student Abilities and Characteristics?\",\"authors\":\"Wilhelmina van Dijk, Christopher Schatschneider, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Holly B. Lane, Sara A. Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00144029251378405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Individualized Student Instruction (ISI) intervention was designed to help teachers increase their use of differentiated core reading instruction, to optimize student growth by providing appropriate amounts of code- and meaning-focused instruction. Based on the results from original studies on ISI, it is still unclear if differentiated instruction can mitigate the influence of individual differences, and if this is similar for all students. Using integrative data analytic techniques, we combined data from six randomized control trials on the ISI intervention conducted in kindergarten and first grade and obtained a dataset with a total sample of 3,144 students in Grades K and 1. We then fit conditional multilevel quantile regression models to examine differential effects on word reading and vocabulary outcomes and the moderating effect of pre-intervention skills. The model coefficients did not indicate a treatment effect of the ISI intervention on either vocabulary or word reading skills. We discuss these results in the light of the importance of data sharing and registered reports to uncover what works for which students under which conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptional Children\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptional Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029251378405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029251378405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining Differential Intervention Effects: Do Individualized Student Intervention Effects Vary by Student Abilities and Characteristics?
The Individualized Student Instruction (ISI) intervention was designed to help teachers increase their use of differentiated core reading instruction, to optimize student growth by providing appropriate amounts of code- and meaning-focused instruction. Based on the results from original studies on ISI, it is still unclear if differentiated instruction can mitigate the influence of individual differences, and if this is similar for all students. Using integrative data analytic techniques, we combined data from six randomized control trials on the ISI intervention conducted in kindergarten and first grade and obtained a dataset with a total sample of 3,144 students in Grades K and 1. We then fit conditional multilevel quantile regression models to examine differential effects on word reading and vocabulary outcomes and the moderating effect of pre-intervention skills. The model coefficients did not indicate a treatment effect of the ISI intervention on either vocabulary or word reading skills. We discuss these results in the light of the importance of data sharing and registered reports to uncover what works for which students under which conditions.
期刊介绍:
Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.