Yuting Qian , Bo Qin , Weiqiang Tan , Daifei Troy Yao
{"title":"Skin in the game: Does outside directors’ equity-based compensation induce or mitigate stock price crash risk?","authors":"Yuting Qian , Bo Qin , Weiqiang Tan , Daifei Troy Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107308","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107308","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the relationship between outside directors’ equity-based compensation (DEC) and stock price crash risk using a sample of U.S. firms from 2008 to 2021. We find that DEC is associated with lower crash risk, primarily through its role in reducing over-investment, financial misreporting, and bad news hoarding<strong>—</strong>suggesting that enhanced director monitoring mitigates key crash risk factors. Subsample analyses reveal that the DEC-crash relationship is more pronounced when monitoring demands are higher, such as with greater information asymmetry, agency costs, audit risk, and transient institutional ownership. The impact of DEC also varies with director attributes, including busyness, gender diversity, and quad-qualification. Overall, our findings highlight that equity pay can align outside directors’ interests with shareholders by strengthening risk oversight, offering insights into optimal compensation contracts and governance mechanisms to mitigate crash risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 107308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143643818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Significant expected lifetime credit loss impairments: Determinants of bank loss recognition and stability implications","authors":"Sebastian Fleer","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107305","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107305","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores how a recognition threshold approach for significant expected lifetime credit losses (ELCL) affects the joint surplus of a bank's debtholders and shareholders (bank social value). Banks play a dual role in the economy by supplying credit to the real sector and providing liquidity to depositors. Information released on ELCL induces sound risk-taking in credit supply while potentially distorting the bank's liquidity provision. A recognition threshold for ELCL can balance these social gains and costs by restricting ELCL recognition for a transaction to extreme outcomes. In this balancing act, the recognition threshold enhances a bank's social value by providing sufficient incentives for sound risk-taking while decreasing the social costs of liquidity disruption. Less favorable economic conditions necessitate tighter recognition thresholds to sustain sound risk-taking, which inflates the social costs of liquidity disruption. When these costs become excessive, the balance is disrupted, and forgoing ELCL recognition can enhance the bank's social value. While this practice safeguards stability in the short run, it ultimately undermines it in the long run. From a policy perspective, the results highlight the value of the principle-based notion of IFRS 9's significant increase in credit risk (SICR) criterion to address bank-specific trade-offs and increase a bank's social value. Uniformity of recognition thresholds can be demonstrated for at least a subset of banks. Lastly, the paper emphasizes that a recognition threshold approach does not maximize the social value of a bank, and more complex disclosure rules can further increase it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 107305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143632018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Access to IT-Capable employees and the relevance of financial information","authors":"J. Philipp Klaus , Adi Masli , Pradeep Sapkota","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107284","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107284","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we examine IT-capable employees’ role in the production process of financial information. We posit that enhanced management of raw data during this process decreases technical errors and increases data processing speed, thus allowing financial information to be more relevant and, therefore, more useful to the users of financial statements. Since employee characteristics such as IT capability are not observable at the firm level, we utilize US Census Bureau data to create a set of proxies of IT-capable employees at the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) level. These measures include the percentage of IT graduates relative to the active workforce and IT graduates’ education and income levels. We find that each of our proxies for employee IT capability is associated with lower XBRL extensions and lower earnings announcement lag. Our findings suggest that greater access to IT-capable employees is associated with increased relevance of financial disclosures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 107284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143528683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Can innovative enforcement mechanism work in weak investor protection Countries? Evidence from China","authors":"Chenyu Zhang , Jingyan Li , Deqiu Chen , Xu Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107294","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107294","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the effect of China Securities Investor Services Center (ISC) shareholding, a joint public–private enforcement mechanism, on mergers and acquisitions (M&As). Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) analysis, we demonstrate that acquirers whose shares are owned by the ISC (ISC acquirers) encounter more price-related M&A withdrawals, more bid revisions, and shorter deal durations. Such effects are mainly driven by weak investor protection environments, lack of external supervision, and information asymmetry. Mechanism analysis indicates that ISC shareholding has monitoring and demonstration effects by drawing public attention and encouraging minority shareholder activism. Furthermore, ISC acquirers experience positive market reactions on withdrawal announcements and better long-term performance, such as higher stock returns, lower goodwill impairment, and better financial performance. Overall, our study suggests that as a joint public–private enforcement mechanism, ISC shareholding can protect minority shareholders’ interests, especially when the investor protection is weak. Our findings enrich the understanding of the enforcement mechanisms in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 107294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143471529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Too much of a good thing? Mandatory risk disclosure and corporate innovation","authors":"Shiu-Yik Au , Hongping Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107292","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107292","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using textual analysis of 10-K filings, we find that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandate for risk disclosure has a negative effect on the inputs and outputs of corporate innovation, a proxy for risky corporate activity, with no corresponding decrease in capital expenditures. Moreover, firms’ innovation shifts towards less risky exploitative patents and away from more risky exploratory patents. Further analysis identifies financial constraints as a potential channel for the negative impact of mandatory risk disclosure on innovation. We address endogeneity concerns through a regression discontinuity design (RDD) which shows that removing mandatory risk disclosure has a positive impact on firm innovation for smaller reporting companies. These results are consistent with theoretical predictions that mandating increased disclosure can have unintended consequences for firms making risky investments, such as innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 107292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143463980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of joint provision of audit and tax services on the advice of tax professionals","authors":"Devan Mescall, Regan N. Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107293","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107293","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior public policy research has questioned the impact of joint provision of audit and non-audit services by examining auditor behavior and audit quality. This study contributes to the public policy debate by examining the behavior of the non-audit service provider, specifically tax professionals. The results of an experiment provide the first evidence that joint provision of audit and tax services impacts the judgments of the tax professional and reduces the aggressiveness of tax advice provided by experienced tax professionals, consistent with ingroup behavioral theory. In addition, tax professionals’ assessments of uncertainty—the basis for financial statement reserve recognition—are relatively greater when their firm is providing joint audit and tax services. Tax uncertainty assessments mediate the relationship between service provision and tax aggressive advice. Collectively, this study informs the public policy debate by demonstrating that joint provision of audit and non-audit services impacts the non-audit service provided by the same firm and provides clarity on how public policy may decrease tax aggressive advice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 107293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143453804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disclosure of off-balance sheet financing and financial reporting quality","authors":"Tae-Nyun Kim, Yutong Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107285","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107285","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study how the accounting treatment of off-balance sheet financing affects the financial reporting quality. Utilizing a quasi-natural experiment created by Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02 which requires operating leases to be capitalized on the balance sheet, we find that financial reporting quality improves after the update. Such improvement is concentrated among firms with high information asymmetry. We further show that firms with improved financial reporting quality use more debt financing after the rule change. Our evidence corroborates the argument that ASU 2016-02 increases cost of financing and firms mitigate the impact by improving financial reporting quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 107285"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143158175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Huaxi Zhang , Byungcherl Charlie Sohn , Kexin Zhang
{"title":"Financial reporting during gloomy days: Air pollution and real earnings management","authors":"Huaxi Zhang , Byungcherl Charlie Sohn , Kexin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107283","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107283","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate whether long-term exposure to polluted air affects a firm’s real earnings management (REM). Using a sample of U.S. listed firms and <em>Visibility</em>, a novel measure of air pollution, we find that firms whose managers and employees are exposed to polluted air are more likely to engage in short-term-oriented REM. However, these firms do not show significant differences in accrual-based earnings management (AEM). A one standard deviation decrease in <em>Visibility</em> is associated with a 24.3 percent increase in REM. Interestingly, this effect is disproportionately associated with the overproduction of inventory and cuts in discretionary expenses, rather than in the manipulation of sales prices or credit terms. The impact of polluted air on REM is more pronounced in firms with high analyst pressure, no credit rating, low institutional ownership, or poor corporate governance. The results suggest the existence of earnings-target-oriented managerial myopia among firms exposed to polluted air. Cognitive biases among managers and reduced employee productivity, both induced by air pollution, are potential channels through which polluted air triggers firms’ myopic earnings management behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 107283"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143158174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alessandra Allini , Martina Prisco , David A. Ziebart , Riccardo Macchioni
{"title":"Earnings management by banks through loan loss provisioning during downturns","authors":"Alessandra Allini , Martina Prisco , David A. Ziebart , Riccardo Macchioni","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107282","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107282","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether and how downturns affect earnings management through loan loss provisioning in banks with poor performance. We capture downturns using three different crises that have significantly impacted the banking context, i.e., the Global Financial Crisis, the Sovereign Debt Crisis, and the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on a sample of 1,430 United States and European Union banks, we find that banks with negative pre-managed earnings recognize higher loan loss provisions to adjust downward earnings during downturns. Further tests show that such higher provisions are not significantly associated with future net charge-offs, whereas they are positively associated with future returns on assets. Collectively, empirical evidence suggests that banks with negative pre-managed earnings recognize higher than necessary losses during downturns to report better future performance. This study contributes to previous literature on earnings management by banks and offers insightful practical implications to regulators, policymakers, and investors, who are interested in evaluating the quality of financial reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 107282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143158176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stavriana Hadjigavriel , María Gutiérrez-Urtiaga , Susana Gago-Rodríguez
{"title":"Bribes and audit fees","authors":"Stavriana Hadjigavriel , María Gutiérrez-Urtiaga , Susana Gago-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107277","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107277","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine how the UK Bribery Act 2010—a law aimed at discouraging corruption—affected auditors’ fees and perceived risks associated with client firms engaging in bribery. Adopting a triple-difference design, we find that those client firms subject to the act and operating in countries perceived as more corrupt pay higher audit fees following the enactment of the act, are more likely to change auditors, and are less likely to be audited by one of the Big 4 auditors. However, we observe no significant changes for subject client firms that operate in low-corruption environments. Moreover, the act has no impact on financial reporting quality across clients. Therefore, we conclude that the increase in audit fees after the passage of the act for client firms operating in high-corruption environments is the response of auditors to the higher potential litigation and reputation costs they face when engaging with clients who are more likely to engage in bribery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 107277"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143172570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}