{"title":"审计师关心公司层面的政治风险吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study auditors’ client risk management with regard to firm-level political risk. While prior research relies mainly on economy-wide proxies for political risk (such as the economic policy uncertainty index), Hassan, Hollander, van Lent, and Tahoun (2019) suggest that a substantial part of political risk plays out at the firm level. Using a new measure of firm-level political risk, we find that higher political-risk firms are charged with higher audit fees and associated with longer audit report delay. Higher political-risk firms are also more likely to receive going concern opinions. However, we do not find that auditors are more likely to resign from higher political-risk firms. We contribute to the auditing literature by studying previously unexamined firm-level political risk and demonstrating that it affects auditor decisions. Our findings have significant implications for accounting firms, regulators, and managers and directors (especially audit committee members) of public companies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do auditors care about firm-level political risk?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We study auditors’ client risk management with regard to firm-level political risk. While prior research relies mainly on economy-wide proxies for political risk (such as the economic policy uncertainty index), Hassan, Hollander, van Lent, and Tahoun (2019) suggest that a substantial part of political risk plays out at the firm level. Using a new measure of firm-level political risk, we find that higher political-risk firms are charged with higher audit fees and associated with longer audit report delay. Higher political-risk firms are also more likely to receive going concern opinions. However, we do not find that auditors are more likely to resign from higher political-risk firms. We contribute to the auditing literature by studying previously unexamined firm-level political risk and demonstrating that it affects auditor decisions. Our findings have significant implications for accounting firms, regulators, and managers and directors (especially audit committee members) of public companies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000632\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
We study auditors’ client risk management with regard to firm-level political risk. While prior research relies mainly on economy-wide proxies for political risk (such as the economic policy uncertainty index), Hassan, Hollander, van Lent, and Tahoun (2019) suggest that a substantial part of political risk plays out at the firm level. Using a new measure of firm-level political risk, we find that higher political-risk firms are charged with higher audit fees and associated with longer audit report delay. Higher political-risk firms are also more likely to receive going concern opinions. However, we do not find that auditors are more likely to resign from higher political-risk firms. We contribute to the auditing literature by studying previously unexamined firm-level political risk and demonstrating that it affects auditor decisions. Our findings have significant implications for accounting firms, regulators, and managers and directors (especially audit committee members) of public companies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.