{"title":"Attention to corporate disclosure and earnings Management: Evidence from downloads of SEC filings","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107264","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107264","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using stakeholders’ downloads of SEC filings as a proxy for their attention to corporate disclosure, we find that a higher number of downloads of a firm’s filings is associated with less accruals-based upward earnings management at the firm. This result suggests that this attention from stakeholders constrains corporate reporting bias. We also find that the negative association between downloads of SEC filings and earnings management is more pronounced when there are more stakeholders also download filings of the firm’s peers or customers or its previous year’s filings and when the firm’s managers have greater incentives to manage earnings. In supplementary analyses, we find some evidence of substitution in earnings management methods. Specifically, a higher number of downloads of a firm’s filings is associated with upward earnings management via overproduction (a form of real earnings management) and income classification shifting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142573584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Government spending and CEO equity incentives: Evidence from changes in U.S. Senate committee chairs","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107263","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107263","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of government spending on CEO equity incentives. Using changes in U.S. Senate committee chairs as a source of exogenous variation in state-level federal government spending, we find that firms headquartered in a state whose senator becomes a committee chair significantly reduce the convexity of their CEOs’ option-based pay, as captured by portfolio vega. This effect is more pronounced for firms with greater reliance on the government, more geographically concentrated operations, and in states with tighter local labor markets. We further find that in response to a government spending shock, firms actively adjust CEOs’ risk-taking incentives by decreasing CEO vega from annual option grants and decreasing both the number and value of CEOs’ option grants. Additionally, we document a shift in the compensation structure towards increased fixed salary and higher bonus compensation, accompanied by a shorter pay duration. Finally, we show that following the increase in government spending, firms receive more procurement contracts, experience reduced performance volatility, and those providing CEOs with less convex payoffs show lower R&D investment. Overall, our findings suggest that the positive shock to government spending due to a new committee chair reduces a firm’s desired level of risk-taking, which discourages offering risk-taking equity incentives to the CEO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Window dressing on bank problem loans: Evidence from natural disaster responses","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107262","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107262","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using natural disasters as shocks to local borrowers’ solvency, we investigate how banks’ post-shock reporting patterns of troubled assets are affected by their existing asset quality. We find that local banks with high nonperforming loan ratios tend to report fewer problem loans in financial statements upon facing natural disasters in the regions. These results are not driven by the banks’ stricter loan risk management, such as expanding origination of safer loans and cleaning up toxic assets through charge-off or disposal. We conclude that banks’ current loan quality is an important driver behind their use of managerial discretion in asset quality review to reduce reported problem loans in financial statements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142446684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does company reputation matter for voluntary disclosure quality? evidence from management earnings forecasts","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107259","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107259","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the association between company reputation and voluntary disclosure quality as proxied by the issuance and characteristics of management earnings forecasts. We follow prior literature and proxy for company reputation using measures based on <em>Fortune Magazine</em>’s “<em>America’s Most Admired Companies</em>” List. We find that companies with higher reputations are more likely to issue earnings forecasts and forecast earnings more frequently. Among companies on the <em>Most Admired</em> List, we also find that earnings forecasts issued by higher-reputation companies are more accurate than those issued by lower-reputation companies. Sensitivity analyses show that the changes in management forecasting behaviors can be attributed to changes in company reputation and are unlikely to result from changes in managerial ability. Our study contributes to the voluntary disclosure literature by identifying a unique factor that motivates companies to disclose better forward-looking information and to the reputation literature by documenting that company reputation impacts information transparency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142421347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An unintended consequence of raising public environmental awareness: Evidence from the release of the environmental documentary “Under the Dome” on earnings management","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107260","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107260","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Raising public environmental awareness provides many benefits. However, using an exogenous shock—the unexpected release of the environmental documentary “Under the Dome” in China—we find that raising environmental awareness may have the unintended consequence of distorting firms’ financial reporting behavior. Our difference-in-differences analyses suggest that relative to control firms, polluting firms manage earnings downwards following the release of this documentary. This finding is not driven by underlying performance changes and is robust to a battery of identification tests. We also find that this relation is more pronounced when the treatment firms are located in areas receiving more environmental complaints, areas with higher indices of PM2.5, and areas that are closer to the local environmental protection bureaus. Further, post-event downward earnings management by the treatment firms is associated with higher government subsidies on environmental protection investments, a lower likelihood of receiving government sanctions over environmental violations, and less severe sanctions, all of which indicate real benefits (incentives) for polluting firms to manipulate earnings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142420803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Managing conflicts of interest in the financial media: Evidence from a natural experiment in China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107261","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the effect of media regulation aimed at curbing the media’s conflict of interest on news reporting quality and its capital market consequences. Exploiting the large-scale merger and revocation of local reporter stations of Chinese central media outlets as a shock, we document a significant improvement in news reporting quality following the regulation of reporter stations in the province where the firms are located. Cross-sectional analyses show that the effect is stronger when the reporters are ex ante more susceptible to conflicts of interest (i.e., when covering a less transparent firm or stationed farther away from the headquarters, or when the media has closer business relations with the firm). Additionally, after the regulation, the coverage of the treated media is more effective in exposing and raising regulatory awareness of financial fraud, reducing accounting information manipulation, and enhancing market efficiency, consistent with an improvement in firm information environment when covered by media with greater editorial independence. The paper contributes to the research on media in the capital market, and has important practical implications for the healthy development of media outlets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142420802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The AOCI filter removal and bank lending in times of stress","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107258","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107258","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the extent to which the regulatory accumulated other comprehensive income filter removal affects banks’ lending behavior in times of stress. Using the Covid-19 crisis as an exogenous shock to the liquidity of banks’ securities holdings in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that banks subject to the AOCI filter removal reduce loan growth more (or increase loan growth less), relative to unaffected banks, during the pandemic. Further results show that the effect is more pronounced among affected banks with relatively higher (lower) ex-ante holdings of held-to-maturity (available-for-sale) securities and those with a higher proportion of the most liquid securities booked in HTM rather than AFS, ex-ante, consistent with banks’ filter-induced HTM securities holdings, the prevailing market frictions in the wake of the crisis, and the binding HTM tainting rules potentially constraining credit growth. We also find that affected banks reduce the growth in repo borrowing more (or increase repo growth less) during the pandemic, in line with the filter removal potentially limiting banks’ ability to obtain repo funding in times of stress and/or dampening their willingness to source such facilities. Overall, our results suggest that marking banks’ regulatory capital to the market could suppress credit supply at a time when it is most needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142420801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do auditors care about firm-level political risk?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107240","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107240","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study auditors’ client risk management with regard to firm-level political risk. While prior research relies mainly on economy-wide proxies for political risk (such as the economic policy uncertainty index), Hassan, Hollander, van Lent, and Tahoun (2019) suggest that a substantial part of political risk plays out at the firm level. Using a new measure of firm-level political risk, we find that higher political-risk firms are charged with higher audit fees and associated with longer audit report delay. Higher political-risk firms are also more likely to receive going concern opinions. However, we do not find that auditors are more likely to resign from higher political-risk firms. We contribute to the auditing literature by studying previously unexamined firm-level political risk and demonstrating that it affects auditor decisions. Our findings have significant implications for accounting firms, regulators, and managers and directors (especially audit committee members) of public companies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142310796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Clawback provisions and insider trading profits","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107242","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107242","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mitigating managerial rent extraction in the form of excess pay and insider trading profits based on financial misreporting is an important governance issue. Clawback provisions allow companies to recover excess pay related to misreported earnings when accounting restatements occur in subsequent periods. We examine whether clawback provisions effectively restrict insider trading profits through improved financial reporting quality. Our finding is that insider trading profits decrease after clawback adoption, and this effect is more prominent when clawback provisions are adopted to improve rather than signal already high levels of financial reporting quality. Moreover, we find that offering managers additional explicit pay to compensate for the increased compensation risk imposed by clawback provisions enhances the effectiveness of these provisions in curbing insider trading profits. Overall, our findings support the efficacy of clawback provisions in mitigating rent extraction through insider trading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of investment banks going public on underwriting behavior: Evidence from IPO clients’ earnings management","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107241","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107241","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the economic incentive theory, positing that listed investment banks facing significant economic pressure are likely to compromise their underwriting quality to meet client demands. Analyzing Chinese IPO firms from 2006 to 2020, we observe that those underwritten by listed investment banks demonstrate more substantial earnings management compared to those underwritten by privately held banks. This tendency is more evident in scenarios where investment banks have stronger economic incentives, weaker corporate governance, and increased performance pressure. We also find that IPO firms underwritten by listed investment banks are likelier to pass the IPO screening by the China Securities Regulatory Commission and secure higher IPO prices through pronounced earnings management. Additionally, these firms show poorer post-IPO accounting performance and stock returns. Our findings suggest that the public listing of investment banks can compromise the impartiality and quality of their services as gatekeepers in the capital market, particularly in emerging markets with limited shareholder rights protection. These results underscore the need for investors, stakeholders and regulators to be vigilant about the potential compromise to the independence of investment banks following their public listings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142233856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}