取消 AOCI 过滤器与压力时期的银行贷款

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
{"title":"取消 AOCI 过滤器与压力时期的银行贷款","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the extent to which the regulatory accumulated other comprehensive income filter removal affects banks’ lending behavior in times of stress. Using the Covid-19 crisis as an exogenous shock to the liquidity of banks’ securities holdings in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that banks subject to the AOCI filter removal reduce loan growth more (or increase loan growth less), relative to unaffected banks, during the pandemic. Further results show that the effect is more pronounced among affected banks with relatively higher (lower) ex-ante holdings of held-to-maturity (available-for-sale) securities and those with a higher proportion of the most liquid securities booked in HTM rather than AFS, ex-ante, consistent with banks’ filter-induced HTM securities holdings, the prevailing market frictions in the wake of the crisis, and the binding HTM tainting rules potentially constraining credit growth. We also find that affected banks reduce the growth in repo borrowing more (or increase repo growth less) during the pandemic, in line with the filter removal potentially limiting banks’ ability to obtain repo funding in times of stress and/or dampening their willingness to source such facilities. Overall, our results suggest that marking banks’ regulatory capital to the market could suppress credit supply at a time when it is most needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The AOCI filter removal and bank lending in times of stress\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the extent to which the regulatory accumulated other comprehensive income filter removal affects banks’ lending behavior in times of stress. Using the Covid-19 crisis as an exogenous shock to the liquidity of banks’ securities holdings in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that banks subject to the AOCI filter removal reduce loan growth more (or increase loan growth less), relative to unaffected banks, during the pandemic. Further results show that the effect is more pronounced among affected banks with relatively higher (lower) ex-ante holdings of held-to-maturity (available-for-sale) securities and those with a higher proportion of the most liquid securities booked in HTM rather than AFS, ex-ante, consistent with banks’ filter-induced HTM securities holdings, the prevailing market frictions in the wake of the crisis, and the binding HTM tainting rules potentially constraining credit growth. We also find that affected banks reduce the growth in repo borrowing more (or increase repo growth less) during the pandemic, in line with the filter removal potentially limiting banks’ ability to obtain repo funding in times of stress and/or dampening their willingness to source such facilities. Overall, our results suggest that marking banks’ regulatory capital to the market could suppress credit supply at a time when it is most needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000814\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了监管机构取消累计其他综合收益过滤对银行在压力时期贷款行为的影响程度。在差分法框架下,我们将 Covid-19 危机作为对银行所持证券流动性的外生冲击,结果发现,相对于未受影响的银行,受取消累积其他综合收益过滤器影响的银行在危机期间会更多地减少贷款增长(或更少地增加贷款增长)。进一步的结果显示,受影响的银行在事前持有的持有至到期(可供出售)证券相对较高(较低),以及在事前以持有至到期(可供出售)证券而不是以持有至到期(可供出售)证券入账的流动性最强的证券比例较高的银行中,这种影响更为明显,这与银行因过滤器而持有的持有至到期(可供出售)证券、危机后普遍存在的市场摩擦以及具有约束力的持有至到期(可供出售)证券污点规则可能会限制信贷增长是一致的。我们还发现,受影响的银行在大流行病期间会更多地减少回购借款的增长(或更少地增加回购借款的增长),这与去除过滤器可能会限制银行在压力时期获得回购资金的能力和/或抑制其寻求此类融资的意愿是一致的。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在最需要信贷供应的时候,向市场标注银行监管资本可能会抑制信贷供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The AOCI filter removal and bank lending in times of stress
This study examines the extent to which the regulatory accumulated other comprehensive income filter removal affects banks’ lending behavior in times of stress. Using the Covid-19 crisis as an exogenous shock to the liquidity of banks’ securities holdings in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that banks subject to the AOCI filter removal reduce loan growth more (or increase loan growth less), relative to unaffected banks, during the pandemic. Further results show that the effect is more pronounced among affected banks with relatively higher (lower) ex-ante holdings of held-to-maturity (available-for-sale) securities and those with a higher proportion of the most liquid securities booked in HTM rather than AFS, ex-ante, consistent with banks’ filter-induced HTM securities holdings, the prevailing market frictions in the wake of the crisis, and the binding HTM tainting rules potentially constraining credit growth. We also find that affected banks reduce the growth in repo borrowing more (or increase repo growth less) during the pandemic, in line with the filter removal potentially limiting banks’ ability to obtain repo funding in times of stress and/or dampening their willingness to source such facilities. Overall, our results suggest that marking banks’ regulatory capital to the market could suppress credit supply at a time when it is most needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信