{"title":"取消 AOCI 过滤器与压力时期的银行贷款","authors":"Makafui Anani , Eman Ibrahem Elwasify","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the extent to which the regulatory accumulated other comprehensive income filter removal affects banks’ lending behavior in times of stress. Using the Covid-19 crisis as an exogenous shock to the liquidity of banks’ securities holdings in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that banks subject to the AOCI filter removal reduce loan growth more (or increase loan growth less), relative to unaffected banks, during the pandemic. Further results show that the effect is more pronounced among affected banks with relatively higher (lower) ex-ante holdings of held-to-maturity (available-for-sale) securities and those with a higher proportion of the most liquid securities booked in HTM rather than AFS, ex-ante, consistent with banks’ filter-induced HTM securities holdings, the prevailing market frictions in the wake of the crisis, and the binding HTM tainting rules potentially constraining credit growth. We also find that affected banks reduce the growth in repo borrowing more (or increase repo growth less) during the pandemic, in line with the filter removal potentially limiting banks’ ability to obtain repo funding in times of stress and/or dampening their willingness to source such facilities. Overall, our results suggest that marking banks’ regulatory capital to the market could suppress credit supply at a time when it is most needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 107258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The AOCI filter removal and bank lending in times of stress\",\"authors\":\"Makafui Anani , Eman Ibrahem Elwasify\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the extent to which the regulatory accumulated other comprehensive income filter removal affects banks’ lending behavior in times of stress. Using the Covid-19 crisis as an exogenous shock to the liquidity of banks’ securities holdings in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that banks subject to the AOCI filter removal reduce loan growth more (or increase loan growth less), relative to unaffected banks, during the pandemic. Further results show that the effect is more pronounced among affected banks with relatively higher (lower) ex-ante holdings of held-to-maturity (available-for-sale) securities and those with a higher proportion of the most liquid securities booked in HTM rather than AFS, ex-ante, consistent with banks’ filter-induced HTM securities holdings, the prevailing market frictions in the wake of the crisis, and the binding HTM tainting rules potentially constraining credit growth. We also find that affected banks reduce the growth in repo borrowing more (or increase repo growth less) during the pandemic, in line with the filter removal potentially limiting banks’ ability to obtain repo funding in times of stress and/or dampening their willingness to source such facilities. Overall, our results suggest that marking banks’ regulatory capital to the market could suppress credit supply at a time when it is most needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000814\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The AOCI filter removal and bank lending in times of stress
This study examines the extent to which the regulatory accumulated other comprehensive income filter removal affects banks’ lending behavior in times of stress. Using the Covid-19 crisis as an exogenous shock to the liquidity of banks’ securities holdings in a difference-in-differences framework, we find that banks subject to the AOCI filter removal reduce loan growth more (or increase loan growth less), relative to unaffected banks, during the pandemic. Further results show that the effect is more pronounced among affected banks with relatively higher (lower) ex-ante holdings of held-to-maturity (available-for-sale) securities and those with a higher proportion of the most liquid securities booked in HTM rather than AFS, ex-ante, consistent with banks’ filter-induced HTM securities holdings, the prevailing market frictions in the wake of the crisis, and the binding HTM tainting rules potentially constraining credit growth. We also find that affected banks reduce the growth in repo borrowing more (or increase repo growth less) during the pandemic, in line with the filter removal potentially limiting banks’ ability to obtain repo funding in times of stress and/or dampening their willingness to source such facilities. Overall, our results suggest that marking banks’ regulatory capital to the market could suppress credit supply at a time when it is most needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.