Information Systems Journal最新文献

{"title":"Exploring Alternative (Non-Economic) Forms of Value Engendered by Digital Platforms","authors":"Petros Chamakiotis, Dimitra Petrakaki","doi":"10.1111/isj.12576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12576","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital platforms, and their implications for business and society, have gained widespread and multidisciplinary popularity in recent years (e.g. Howcroft and Bergvall-Kåreborn <span>2019</span>; Sutherland and Jarrahi <span>2018</span>; Zutshi and Grilo <span>2019</span>). Scholars have studied the multifaceted consequences of digital platforms, including: the impact of labour platforms on the future of work, such as working conditions, identity and professionalisation (Berg et al. <span>2018</span>; Bosma <span>2022</span>; Dunn <span>2020</span>; Elbanna and Idowu <span>2022</span>; Idowu and Elbanna <span>2021</span>; Taylor and Joshi <span>2019</span>); the effects of knowledge datafication on digital transformation of organisations (Alaimo <span>2021</span>); commodification and subsequent exploitation of emerging platform economies such as ‘user experience’ (Lupton <span>2014</span>) and ‘emotional economy’ (Patulny, Lazarevic, and Smith <span>2020</span>); inevitable surveillance afforded by platform algorithms (Galière <span>2020</span>; Newlands <span>2021</span>; Zuboff <span>2019</span>); their implications for development (Anwar and Graham <span>2020</span>; Bonina et al. <span>2021</span>; Nicholson, Nielsen, and Saebo <span>2021</span>); and new forms of activism in response to platforms' colonial effects (Chamakiotis, Petrakaki, and Panteli <span>2021</span>). The value, and specifically the non-economic value, platforms produce has however remained understudied.</p><p>In the literature that explores platforms' value (e.g. Nachtwey and Schaupp <span>2024</span>; Pesce, Neirotti, and Paolucci <span>2019</span>; Sutherland and Jarrahi <span>2018</span>; Zutshi and Grilo <span>2019</span>), most studies have approached value from an economic perspective looking into profitability, income generation and return on investment (e.g. Constantinides, Henfridsson, and Parker <span>2018</span>; Wang, Guo, and Liu <span>2024</span>). This should be no surprise. Research in Information Systems (IS) has primarily focused on the Western world, the Global North, aiming to understand it better, to improve it further and to increase its productivity and efficiency through IS. Clarke and Davison (<span>2020</span>) find that most IS literature is in fact dominated by a focus on the economic dimension, with little or no attention paid to the non-economic dimensions of IS, such as their social and environmental aspects or their potential to educate, to free and to enlighten. Similarly, a recent paper curation found that 40% of articles on platforms published in the <i>Management Information Systems Quarterly</i> draw upon economic theory (Krishnan et al. <span>2024</span>). Economic notions of value have prevailed insofar that technology often becomes associated with the value it is supposed to produce: ‘write software save lives’ as Sahay (<span>2016</span>) reports. Yet, how transferable, relevant and purposeful are such aims for the rest of the ","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 4","pages":"1093-1100"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12576","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144273135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Protracted War Against Counterfeits: Navigating Tension Management Under External Pressures on an E-Commerce Platform","authors":"Bin Hao,&nbsp;Yanan Feng,&nbsp;Ken Kamoche","doi":"10.1111/isj.12575","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12575","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study examines how external pressures drive a platform leader to fight counterfeiting over time. Acknowledging the tension between the illegality and legitimacy of counterfeiting, we find that the fighting effort involves an enduring balance between the two poles of the tension until counterfeits have been sharply reduced. We demonstrate how the management of the tension entails an interactive process in which a platform leader decouples counterfeit fighting actions to pursue legitimacy. We suggest that pressures from external forces predict a process of decoupling and legitimation through which the platform leader promotes ecosystem acceptance and builds a shared understanding of ecosystem purposes, and the endeavours to balance platform quality and activity prompt the platform leader to pursue legitimation which demonstrates the viability of an ecosystem. We show that these processes are accompanied by activating and stabilising the tension, which predicts varied strength and scope of measures and the reduction of counterfeits over time.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 4","pages":"1218-1232"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144273134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Navigating Tensions Between Indigeneity and Social Media Participation: A Case Study of the Guarani Community in South America","authors":"Edin Smailhodzic,&nbsp;Aline Fernandes,&nbsp;Nonhlanhla Dube,&nbsp;Monideepa Tarafdar","doi":"10.1111/isj.12574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12574","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates inherent tensions between social media participation and the ways of life in an Indigenous community and subsequent navigation approaches. Relying on an in-depth qualitative study and the notion of two-eyed seeing as a theoretical approach, the study focuses on the complex relationship between social media platform participation and the ways of life in a ‘Guarani’ Indigenous community in South America. This community successfully navigates tensions between participation on social media platforms and preserving their traditional ways of life. We contribute to two streams of literature. First, we contribute to the literature on digital platforms and indigeneity showing that social media use by Indigenous communities leads to specific tensions, as these communities try to balance the use of social media with their desire to preserve their ways of life and protect the natural environment and how they navigate these tensions. Second, we contribute to the literature in relation to digital platforms and non-economic value as we unpack social and environmental value in the context of the Indigenous community and show that non-economic value benefits multiple entities. Overall, we contribute to a deeper understanding of how Indigenous communities navigate tensions between participation on social media and their traditional way of life. Our study also offers practical insights into how policy makers and designers of social media platforms can better meet Indigenous communities' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 4","pages":"1198-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12574","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144273216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Transforming to a Sustainable Visitor Economy With Information Systems","authors":"Brad McKenna,&nbsp;Wenjie Cai,&nbsp;Tuure Tuunanen","doi":"10.1111/isj.12573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12573","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The global visitor economy sector, which includes tourism, hospitality and events, makes significant economic contributions. In 2023, there were 1.3 billion international tourist arrivals globally, with expenditure of $1.5 trillion (USD) (UN Tourism &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). The Travel and Tourism sector contributed 9.1% to global GDP, a 23.2% rise from 2022, alongside 27 million new jobs, increased domestic spending surpassing pre-pandemic levels, and a substantial 33.1% boost in international spending, indicating that tourism has rebounded after the pandemic (World Travel and Tourism Council &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). The global hospitality sector is worth around $4.7 trillion (USD) in 2023, with an annual growth rate of 7% (Hospitality Insights &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). In the UK, the hospitality sector contributes significantly to the economy, contributing £93 billion (GBP) in 2023, supporting 3.5 million jobs as the third largest employer, and generating £54 billion (GBP) in tax revenue, £20 billion (GBP) in exports, and £7 billion (GBP) in business investment (UK Hospitality &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The global events sector, which primarily consists of sports, music events, conferences and festivals, was valued at $1.4 trillion (USD) (Claight &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). Mega-events, such as the Olympics, have large economic impacts on the host country (Sato et al. &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;; Wolfe et al. &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;), including job creation and tourism revenues. For instance, the 2024 Paris Olympics is set to generate between €6.7 and €11.1 billion (EUR) net economic benefit to the region (Claight &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;) and create up to 247 000 jobs (CDES &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). Concerts and world tours also impact economies, society and sustainability. Taylor Swift's Eras tour is estimated to have contributed £1 Billion (GBP) to the UK with spending on tickets, travel, accommodation and hospitality (Masud &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). ABBA Voyage, a virtual concert in London, features avatars of the original band members created with motion capture technologies (ABBA Voyage &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;), boosted the London economy by £322 million (GBP) (Prynn &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;) and provides event goers with new types of entertainment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The visitor economy can also contribute to sustainability goals. For example, Cold Play's Music of the Spheres world tour aims to be as sustainable and low-carbon as possible (Cold Play &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). In addition to the economic impact, the visitor economy also contributes to social and environmental sustainability, such as empowering women and young people in the workforce, transforming perceptions through intercultural encounters, advancing heritage preservations through educating and engaging with stakeholders, improving quality of life and reducing inequality in developing countries through community development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A sustainable visitor economy is crucial due to its scale, multifaceted benefits and potential impacts. Its importance is particula","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 3","pages":"1079-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12573","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143809823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ethics in the Age of Algorithms: Unravelling the Impact of Algorithmic Unfairness on Data Analytics Recommendation Acceptance","authors":"Maryam Ghasemaghaei,&nbsp;Nima Kordzadeh","doi":"10.1111/isj.12572","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12572","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Algorithms used in data analytics (DA) tools, particularly in high-stakes contexts such as hiring and promotion, may yield unfair recommendations that deviate from merit-based standards and adversely affect individuals. While significant research from fields such as machine learning and human–computer interaction (HCI) has advanced our understanding of algorithmic fairness, less is known about how managers in organisational contexts perceive and respond to unfair algorithmic recommendations, particularly in terms of individual-level distributive fairness. This study focuses on job promotions to uncover how algorithmic unfairness impacts managers' perceived fairness and their subsequent acceptance of DA recommendations. Through an experimental study, we find that (1) algorithmic unfairness (against women) in promotion recommendations reduces managers' perceived distributive fairness, influencing their acceptance of these recommendations; (2) managers' trust in DA competency moderates the relationship between perceived fairness and DA recommendation acceptance; and (3) managers' moral identity moderates the impact of algorithmic unfairness on perceived fairness. These insights contribute to the existing literature by elucidating how perceived distributive fairness plays a critical role in managers' acceptance of unfair algorithmic outputs in job promotion contexts, highlighting the importance of trust and moral identity in these processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 4","pages":"1166-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12572","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144273558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"‘Invented-on-the-fly’ mobile application for disaster response: Construction of technological frames and impact","authors":"Sujeet Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Jang Bahadur Singh,&nbsp;Mayank Kumar","doi":"10.1111/isj.12568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12568","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The natural disaster response efforts are time-constrained, requiring quick and on-the-fly development and the adoption of technological innovations to meet the ever-changing contextual requirements. However, there are limited available insights on implementing and managing those ‘invented-on-the-fly’ innovations. This study draws upon sensemaking and technological frames to examine the adoption process of an on-the-fly developed mobile app in the context of the Gaja cyclone in India. Our findings inform that the adoption of technological innovation in disaster response is linked to its ‘features’ that actors draw upon in their sensemaking process and forming their technological frames. Initial sensemaking and technological framing may involve ‘concrete features’. However, the later sensemaking of evolving contingencies may include discovering various ‘abstract features’ in action. Discoveries of abstract features in action trigger reframing, leading to a congruent technological frame and better exploitation of innovations. Given that natural disasters are occurring more frequently, findings from our study provide critical insights into managing technology innovations in these contexts. The revelation of the role of features in technological (re)framing also enriches the analytical power of the technological frame lens.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 4","pages":"1132-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144273424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Technology affordances, actualisation and adaptation for heritage preservation: A case study of Beijing's Palace Museum","authors":"Dan Zhang,&nbsp;Shan L. Pan,&nbsp;Zixiu Guo","doi":"10.1111/isj.12563","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12563","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Museums are vital cultural and educational institutions that play a key role in heritage preservation. Despite the importance of museums, the interaction between these conventional institutions and advanced technologies remains relatively underexplored in information systems (IS) research. Adopting affordance-actualisation (A–A) theory as the theoretical lens, we conducted an in-depth case study of the Palace Museum in Beijing, China, to investigate its implementation of evolving IS for heritage preservation. We identify three key affordances of these systems and develop a conceptual model illustrating the process of actualising these affordances. Our model extends A–A theory by adding an adaptation phase, wherein the museum responds to the outcomes of the actualisation process by amplifying the achieved outcomes and altering the unintended ones. Additionally, we uncover a hierarchical structure among these affordances, revealing a progressive pattern of actualisation specific to heritage preservation in museums. This research contributes to the literature on A–A theory, heritage preservation in museums, and IS implementation. Furthermore, it provides guidance for practitioners, particularly those in museum contexts, in effectively implementing IS for heritage preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 3","pages":"1045-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143809885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unpacking reflexivity, psychological empowerment, and agile project dynamics among information systems professionals","authors":"Riitta Hekkala,&nbsp;Emma Nordbäck","doi":"10.1111/isj.12569","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12569","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we examine the reflexivity modes of information systems (IS) professionals and integrate the IS context—including structural, technological, and social properties—with IS professionals' biographical, inner dialogues to theorise about the role of reflexivity modes in their experiences of psychological empowerment. Through the lens of Archer's (2007) three-stage model of reflexivity and different modes of reflexivity (communicative, autonomous, meta, and fractured), we investigate the experiences of psychological empowerment and project dynamics among IS professionals in IS development work by zooming in on 6 years of three IS professionals' work lives. Our findings make several contributions to theory and practice. First, we elucidate the interplay between reflexivity and psychological empowerment. Second, we show how different IS professionals' approach similar structural, technological, or social circumstances differently (such as agile work practices), depending on their reflexive inner dialogues. This includes showing how different reflexivity modes, focused on various properties of the IS context (structural, technological, and social), becomes entangled with interpersonal dynamics and IS project dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 4","pages":"1101-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12569","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144273130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reviews, recommendations and decisions: Contrasting perspectives","authors":"Robert M. Davison","doi":"10.1111/isj.12571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12571","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a junior scholar, I used to be petrified of reviewers. Perhaps you are too. Reviewers, it appeared, were the ultimate arbiters of whether my paper could be published. Consequently, satisfying the reviewers became the be-all and end-all of the publication process. This fear of reviewers is not limited to junior scholars. As Allen Lee (cited in Davison, <span>2019</span>) noted: ‘I believe that many or most seasoned researchers write with reviewers in mind, if not for the first submission, then certainly by the third revision. In fact, the exasperation is so great by the third or fourth revision that the general audience has completely disappeared from the author's mind and the author is left just wanting to address what the reviewers and editor want’. Even now, as I cross the 30-year mark as an academic who is both an editor and an author, reviewers can exert a baneful influence.</p><p>Although this is an editorial, I am conscious that I am writing it from both editorial and authorial perspectives. As an author, I am shielded by tenure to some degree, but my dean still hopes that I will publish in what he deems to be the top journals in the field (I may not agree about that) and has the carrots to induce compliance. Deans apart, I also enjoy conducting research and the writing process, so I can say that I write for my own pleasure. However, my papers also witness the sharp end of reviewers' tongues (or fingers) with comments that can be disheartening, destructive or ridiculous. What should I make of the reviewer who suggested that in future I should not bother with ethnographies because they are too subjective and instead collect survey data? Or the reviewer who advised that collecting data in China is of little value because it cannot be generalised to anywhere else, whereas data collected in the USA is universally generalisable. Honestly, I am not making this up; I could not! These perspectives are so far beyond the pale of reasonable human thinking as to be in the category of ‘truth is stranger than fiction’.</p><p>Meanwhile, as editor, I see the best and the worst of reviewers (and of course everything in between). Reviewers can be polite and constructive to a fault, but they can also be vicious, self-serving and/or just plain nasty, seeming to revel in their power to determine the fate of a manuscript. As editor, can I ‘edit’ the reviews before I send them to authors? Strictly speaking, this depends on publisher policy. At some journals, such editing is allowed, whereas at others it is not. I know one editor who routinely edits all reviewer comments for style and readability. But there are many editors who don't. Personally, I try not to micromanage the process unless it is really critical. Reviewers who are offensive will find their reviews rescinded, that is, returned with a request that they moderate their language or tone; some comply, others do not.</p><p>Nevertheless, conversations with my colleagues have reinforced that sense tha","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 3","pages":"821-823"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12571","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143809436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Orchestration logics for artificial intelligence platforms: From raw data to industry-specific applications","authors":"Michael Weber,&nbsp;Andreas Hein,&nbsp;Jörg Weking,&nbsp;Helmut Krcmar","doi":"10.1111/isj.12567","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12567","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms face distinct orchestration challenges in industry-specific settings, such as the need for specialised resources, data-sharing concerns, heterogeneous users and context-sensitive applications. This study investigates how these platforms can effectively orchestrate autonomous actors in developing and consuming AI applications despite these challenges. Through an analysis of five AI platforms for medical imaging, we identify four orchestration logics: platform resourcing, data-centric collaboration, distributed refinement and application brokering. These logics illustrate how platform owners can verticalize the AI development process by orchestrating actors who co-create, share and refine data and AI models, ultimately producing industry-specific applications capable of generalisation. Our findings extend research on platform orchestration logics and change our perspective from boundary resources to a process of boundary processing. These insights provide a theoretical foundation and practical strategies to build effective industry-specific AI platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 3","pages":"1015-1043"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12567","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143809435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}