Information Systems Journal最新文献

{"title":"Information systems and sustainable development: From conceptual underpinnings to empirical insights","authors":"Barney Tan, Petter Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/isj.12543","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12543","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In our first draft of the call for papers for this special issue, we highlighted the growing interest in research at the intersection of Information Systems (IS) and sustainable development (Tim et al., <span>2018</span>). As scholars of the topic, we were encouraged by the development of this knowledge area (Kranz et al., <span>2022</span>) and noted this accordingly. However, when we presented the draft of our call for papers to Rick Watson, our Special Advisor for the special issue, he offered us a sobering reminder. From his perspective, “the response (of the global IS community) has been dismal and the IS contribution, at best, marginal” (we included this line verbatim in the final version of our call for papers). It was a “curb your enthusiasm” moment.</p><p>Upon reflection, our insight is that while there is indeed a growing body of conceptual work (e.g., Kotlarsky et al., <span>2023</span>; Pan et al., <span>2022</span>), there remains a critical shortage of empirical studies that demonstrate the real-world applications and impacts of IS in promoting sustainability. For a topic with existential implications, our field's collective response remains inadequate. Collectively, the IS community has the knowledge and ability to make a difference, but the key to unlocking this potential lies in generating and offering evidence-based insights through the conduct of empirical studies. This is the focus of our special issue.</p><p>Our call for more empirical studies is not just a call for more data but also a call for more actionable insights (Li et al., <span>2023</span>). Conceptual work has its place; it helps us frame problems, develop hypotheses, and propose models. However, without empirical validation, these contributions risk remaining theoretical exercises with limited impact on practice (Bergh et al., <span>2006</span>). Empirical studies are crucial because they provide concrete evidence of how IS can be leveraged to achieve sustainability goals, offering valuable lessons for sustainability practitioners and policymakers.</p><p>Empirical research helps us bridge the gap between theory and practice (Aguinis & Edwards, <span>2014</span>). It validates conceptual models and frameworks, providing evidence of what works and what doesn't in real-world settings. For example, empirical studies can show how specific IS interventions can reduce energy consumption, improve waste management, or enhance the efficiency of resource use. They can also reveal the challenges and barriers to implementing these interventions, providing insights that can help refine and improve theoretical models (Kotlarsky et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>This first paper, “Digital sustainable business models: Using digital technology to integrate ecological sustainability into the core of business models” (Böttcher et al., <span>2024</span>), explores how digital technologies can be used to create sustainable business models that integrate economic, social, and env","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"414-416"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12543","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141669038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Understanding the influence of digital ecosystems on digital transformation: The OCO (orientation, cooperation, orchestration) theory","authors":"Anna Maria Oberländer,&nbsp;Philip Karnebogen,&nbsp;Patrick Rövekamp,&nbsp;Maximilian Röglinger,&nbsp;Dorothy E. Leidner","doi":"10.1111/isj.12539","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12539","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital transformation is a complex, multi-level phenomenon that still challenges research and practice. Recent research has highlighted the influence of digital ecosystems on digital transformation, but we lack knowledge about how this relationship unfolds across the organisational and the ecosystem levels. Following a phenomenon-based theorising approach and applying a digital resource-based view, we present the OCO (orientation, cooperation, orchestration) theory of digital transformation. The OCO theory explains the relationship between an organisation's digital transformation and its integration into a digital ecosystem. We uncover and explain three interdependent mechanisms, that is, orientation, cooperation, and orchestration, that are set in motion by cross-level interactions between the organisational and the ecosystem levels and that centre around digital resources. Our work advances the frontier of multi-level digital transformation research explaining the influence of a digital ecosystem on digital transformation. We conclude through six propositions that the deeper its digital ecosystem integration, the more likely an organisation's digital transformation is effective. Therewith, we aim at mobilising future digital transformation research to bridge the organisational and the ecosystem levels and provide four future research themes. Our work also encourages practitioners to acknowledge and manage the influence of digital ecosystems on digital transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"368-413"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12539","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141669382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Artificial intelligence misuse and concern for information privacy: New construct validation and future directions","authors":"Philip Menard,&nbsp;Gregory J. Bott","doi":"10.1111/isj.12544","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12544","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To address various business challenges, organisations are increasingly employing artificial intelligence (AI) to analyse vast amounts of data. One application involves consolidating diverse user data into unified profiles, aggregating consumer behaviours to accurately tailor marketing efforts. Although AI provides more convenience to consumers and more efficient and profitable marketing for organisations, the act of aggregating data into behavioural profiles for use in machine learning algorithms introduces significant privacy implications for users, including unforeseeable personal disclosure, outcomes biased against marginalised population groups and organisations' inability to fully remove data from AI systems on consumer request. Although these implementations of AI are rapidly altering the way consumers perceive information privacy, researchers have thus far lacked an accurate method for measuring consumers' privacy concerns related to AI. In this study, we aim to (1) validate a scale for measuring privacy concerns related to AI misuse (PC-AIM) and (2) examine the effects that PC-AIM has on nomologically related constructs under the APCO framework. We provide evidence demonstrating the validity of our newly developed scale. We also find that PC-AIM significantly increases risk beliefs and personal privacy advocacy behaviour, while decreasing trusting beliefs. Trusting beliefs and risk beliefs do not significantly affect behaviour, which differs from prior privacy findings. We further discuss the implications of our work on both research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"322-367"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141695568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Beyond the office walls: Work design configurations for task performance across on-site, hybrid and remote forms of work","authors":"Amadeja Lamovšek,&nbsp;Ivan Radević,&nbsp;Shaima' Salem Mohammed,&nbsp;Matej Černe","doi":"10.1111/isj.12542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12542","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite alternative work arrangements becoming more prevalent, existing work design approaches are mostly based on research and practice of traditional on-site work. Struggles with capturing employee performance are reported across different off-site, non-traditional forms of work, such as remote and hybrid. This article performs a comprehensive fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to juxtaposing different configurations of job characteristics across forms of work. Our multi-source study is based on a matched sample of 1215 diverse working personnel (with supervisors, who evaluated employee performance) in Montenegro. Based on the pathways leading to task performance in different forms of work, we develop propositions centered on the key principles of designing traditional and alternative, non-traditional forms of work. While we confirm the importance of enriched work design, several specific characteristics and their accompanying configurations (including compensatory effects) are highlighted with regard to the task performance achieved. These include high levels of task identity for all three forms of work (on-site, hybrid and remote). Work performed in a traditional on-site setting additionally requires greater task variety. Conversely, remote work requires high information processing and social support. The hybrid model calls for the most complicated work design that combines essential elements of both the on-site and remote work paradigms, namely task variety and information processing, and also for enhanced mechanisms for job feedback. Hybrid work is a universal social phenomenon still on the uptake that likely represents the future of work, and since it combines traditional settings with information and communication technologies, we also emphasise the importance of field-bridging future research of information systems and organisational design areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"279-321"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12542","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Challenges in developing information and communication technology (ICT) use for rural e-governance: An ecology perspective","authors":"Minghuan Shou,&nbsp;Furong Jia,&nbsp;Jie Yu,&nbsp;Yi Wu","doi":"10.1111/isj.12540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12540","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The utilisation of information and communication technology (ICT) has a profound impact on e-governance across countries, albeit, with limited attention to rural areas. The existing literature on this topic either examines the positive effects of ICT use on e-governance at the individual level or from the urban–rural dichotomy perspective. Meanwhile, the majority of studies are conducted within an urban context, but they scarcely focus on identifying the challenges in developing rural e-governance. As such, we contend that an ecology perspective is necessary to identify the specific distinctions of ICT use on e-governance in various rural ecosystems. To this end, we employ various empirical specifications, namely a fixed-effects model and an instrumental variable approach, to provide evidence of distinct influences of ICT use on e-governance. As follows, we adopt a qualitative research approach to gather evidence on the differentiations of ICT use on rural e-governance within diverse ecosystems. Subsequently, we have identified five crucial obstacles encountered by rural ecosystems in Western China while attempting to develop e-governance. Furthermore, we delineate an all-encompassing internal-external strategy to overcome these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"247-278"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142851516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Responding to platform owner moves: A 14-year qualitative study of four enterprise software complementors","authors":"Thomas Kude,&nbsp;Thomas L. Huber","doi":"10.1111/isj.12527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12527","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrating the competition and the cooperation perspectives on value co-creation in platform ecosystems, this study explores complementor responses to platform owner moves that adversely affect the complementor's positioning. Our primary focus is to discern dynamic patterns of complementor responses and to understand their role in the process of re-stabilising the complementor's positioning. To this end, we conducted a 14-year longitudinal study, analysing 21 move-response instances across four platform partnerships. Our findings reveal three distinct complementor response archetypes: insist, pivot, and detach. Over time, complementors combine these archetypes into three unique response patterns. Through progressive diverging, complementors sidestep platform owner moves by diversifying their offer beyond the focal ecosystem. Although this can entail substantial multi-homing costs, it reduces dependence on the platform owner and bolsters resilience against future moves. Through adaptive oscillating, complementors use platform owner moves as opportunities to gradually diversify their offer within the focal ecosystem. This stepwise market expansion makes them resilient against future moves, while mitigating costs and efforts related to multi-homing. Through persistent insisting, complementors can re-establish their previous positioning, but at the cost of increased dependence on the platform owner, leaving the complementor vulnerable to future moves. We synthesise these findings in our process model of complementor positioning. Emphasising the importance of complementor responses in fostering resilient software ecosystems, this model bears important implications for research on platform governance and platform-dependent entrepreneurship.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"209-246"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12527","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Decolonizing IT governance in international non-governmental organisations: An Ubuntu approach","authors":"Marie-E. Zubler,&nbsp;Ralf Plattfaut,&nbsp;Björn Niehaves","doi":"10.1111/isj.12541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12541","url":null,"abstract":"<p>IT has an enormous potential to democratise, equalise and decolonize development aid; however, the right IT governance is needed to actualize this potential. Such governance must align with the general efforts in development work to decolonize and eradicate adverse power imbalances. Power imbalances are at play when donors from the Global North finance and thereby set the development agenda for the Global South without concern for the actual needs. IT use in development aid is an important tool in decolonisation struggles, but corresponding structures also risk cementing problematic power distributions. As such, guidelines are needed on how to set up and decolonize IT governance structures. Using insights from a case study of a large international development aid NGO and building on the African emancipation philosophy Ubuntu, we propose five organising principles for a decolonized IT governance. These organising principles serve as guidelines to set up decolonized and emancipating IT governance structures and extend current IT governance theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"163-208"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12541","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142851329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fit, scope and the shifting baseline: Is your submission likely to be desk rejected?","authors":"Robert M. Davison,&nbsp;Stan Karanasios,&nbsp;Sutirtha Chatterjee","doi":"10.1111/isj.12538","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12538","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The field of information systems (IS) has long had to navigate challenges in defining its scope, often straddling the realms of computer science, psychology, management and organisational behaviour. This positioning has rendered its boundaries occasionally ambiguous (Sarker et al., &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;), yet at the same time the field has remained undeniably important in its relevance to practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This ongoing debate about the field's boundaries and identity has persisted over several decades (Alavi &amp; Carlson, &lt;span&gt;1992&lt;/span&gt;; Benbasat &amp; Zmud, &lt;span&gt;2003&lt;/span&gt;; Palvia et al., &lt;span&gt;2004&lt;/span&gt;; Sarker et al., &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;) and has followed both technological advancements and methodological innovations. The challenge of encapsulating the breadth of IS is illustrated by early attempts to categorise the discipline through keyword schemes (Barki et al., &lt;span&gt;1993&lt;/span&gt;), which, even though encompassing nearly 1300 keywords, still fall short of covering the full range of topics that IS journals publish today (Upreti et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). Indeed, defining the intellectual core of the IS discipline (Sidorova et al., &lt;span&gt;2008&lt;/span&gt;) is a challenging task (Chatterjee et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Schwartz, &lt;span&gt;2014&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regardless of the varying opinions on what IS is (or is not) and thus what the IS discipline entails, some basic tenets of the IS discipline have become broadly accepted over time. Most scholars would agree that: IS is a sociotechnical discipline where social and technical factors acquire comparative salience in terms of their relationships with outcomes (Beath et al., &lt;span&gt;2013&lt;/span&gt;; Sarker et al., &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;); IS research needs theoretical grounding (Díaz Andrade et al., &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;); IS scholarship has substantial diversity (Taylor et al., &lt;span&gt;2010&lt;/span&gt;); and IS research benefits from both intra- and inter-disciplinary approaches (Tarafdar &amp; Davison, &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, we feel that these well-accepted characteristics of IS research sometimes conflict with each other, creating confusion in the minds of authors submitting their work to IS journals. For example, the interdisciplinary and diverse nature of the IS research landscape often prompts authors from other disciplines (notably engineering, business and the social sciences) to submit their work to IS journals without reflecting upon whether the work is truly sociotechnical and has an identifiable IS artefact (Chatterjee et al., &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;) or even if it has a strong theoretical grounding (Davison &amp; Tarafdar, &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;/span&gt;) that is consistent with how the IS discipline understands theory (Gregor, &lt;span&gt;2006&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ISJ is also encountering this trend: we often see situations involving authors who, in their submitted papers, make no connection to any of the fundamental tenets of IS research, such as a carefully-articulated theoretical contribution, or an identifiable sociotechni","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12538","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141124586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Speculative foresight: A foray beyond digital transformation","authors":"Dirk S. Hovorka,&nbsp;Benjamin Mueller","doi":"10.1111/isj.12530","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12530","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the discourse regarding digital transformation has developed, we see an opportunity to extend the concept of becoming digital into an as-of-yet unrealized future. By examining the foundational assumptions of digital transformation, we reveal two frontiers that expand the current transformation discourse into futures where their implications and outcomes will reside. A conceptual frontier suggests that we begin to conceptualise the worlds in which future organisations and people observe digital technologies and their enactments as an unexceptional and quite mundane aspect of their daily lives. We initiate conceptualising being digital as an outcome of the transformations our current research studies. A second analytic frontier embraces world-making in current theorizations and the development of future-leaning conceptualization of alternative worlds. Speculative foresight is an approach for staging new concepts and relationships, critiquing current research practice and theory boundaries, and creating novel and generative theorizations. An example speculative foresight scenario illustrates onto-epistemic assumptions and ambiguities in current theories of digital transformation regarding how future ethics will be conceived. The implications and limitations of this approach are discussed in the context of the need for IS research to develop orientations that can contribute to understanding digital transformation processes and both positive and negative transformation outcomes that will constitute yet unrealized futures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"140-162"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12530","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140976998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mobilising new frontiers in digital transformation research: A problematization review","authors":"Amir Ashrafi,&nbsp;Panos Constantinides,&nbsp;Nikolay Mehandjiev,&nbsp;Jason Bennett Thatcher","doi":"10.1111/isj.12531","DOIUrl":"10.1111/isj.12531","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we mobilise new frontiers in digital transformation (DT) research by deconstructing the literature's underlying assumptions and analysing their correspondence with current theory. To do so, we conduct a problematization review across the fields of IS, strategy and entrepreneurship, organisation theory and management studies, to capture the multidimensionality of DT research. Unlike systematic literature reviews commonly found in DT research, a problematization review critically questions how theoretical contributions have been constructed in past research to develop novel theoretical questions. Our findings offer three contributions. First, we uncover five research trajectories, each with its own in-house assumptions about the nature of digital technologies and how organisations, groups and individuals interact with those technologies and the data they generate. Second, we show how individual studies within the identified research trajectories position themselves against prior research, pointing at six distinct processes of constructing theoretical contributions. Finally, we mobilise new frontiers of research by questioning DT research field assumptions that cut across the five research trajectories. We conclude by discussing the theoretical implications of our problematization review for further DT research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"97-139"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12531","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140982350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}