Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior最新文献_第8页

Innovations in Sampling: Improving the Appropriateness and Quality of Samples in Organizational Research 抽样创新：提高组织研究样本的适当性和质量

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-052946

M. Zickar, Melissa G. Keith

{"title":"Innovations in Sampling: Improving the Appropriateness and Quality of Samples in Organizational Research","authors":"M. Zickar, Melissa G. Keith","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-052946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-052946","url":null,"abstract":"Technology has changed the way that organizational researchers obtain participants for their research studies. Although technology has facilitated the collection of large quantities of data through online platforms, it has also highlighted potential data quality issues for many of our samples. In this article, we review different sampling techniques, including convenience, purposive, probability-based, and snowball sampling. We highlight strengths and weaknesses of each approach to help organizational researchers choose the most appropriate sampling techniques for their research questions. We identify best practices that researchers can use to improve the quality of their samples, including reviewing screening techniques to increase the quality of online sampling. Finally, as part of our review we examined the sampling procedures of all empirical research articles published in Journal of Applied Psychology in the past 5 years, and we use observations from these results to make conclusions about the lack of methodological and sample diversity in organizational research, the overreliance on a few sampling techniques, the need to report key aspects of sampling, and concerns about participant quality. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 10 is January 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44003187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

Employee Voice and Silence: Taking Stock a Decade Later 员工的声音与沉默：十年后的盘点

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2022-10-06 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654

E. W. Morrison

引用次数: 38

Cross-Cultural Innovation and Entrepreneurship 跨文化创新创业

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2022-01-21 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091040

U. Stephan

引用次数: 9

Introduction 介绍

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2022-01-21 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-op-09-110221-100001

F. Morgeson

引用次数: 0

Smart Heuristics for Individuals, Teams, and Organizations 个人、团队和组织的智能启发式

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2022-01-21 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090506

G. Gigerenzer, J. Reb, S. Luan

引用次数: 21

When Gender Matters in Organizational Negotiations 组织谈判中的性别问题

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2021-11-16 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055523

H. Bowles, Bobbi Thomason, Inmaculada Macias-Alonso

{"title":"When Gender Matters in Organizational Negotiations","authors":"H. Bowles, Bobbi Thomason, Inmaculada Macias-Alonso","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055523","url":null,"abstract":"A person's gender is not a reliable predictor of their negotiation behavior or outcomes, because the degree and character of gender dynamics in negotiation vary across situations. Systematic effects of gender on negotiation are best predicted by situational characteristics that cue gendered behavior or increase reliance on gendered standards for agreement. In this review, we illuminate two levers that heighten or constrain the potential for gender effects in organizational negotiations: ( a) the salience and relevance of gender within the negotiating context and ( b) the degree of ambiguity (i.e., lack of objective standards or information) with regard to what is negotiable, how to negotiate, or who the parties are as negotiators. In our summary, we review practical implications of this research for organizational leaders and individuals who are motivated to reduce gender-based inequities in negotiation outcomes. In conclusion, we suggest future directions for research on gender in organizational negotiations. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 9 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41357352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

The Science of Leadership: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda 领导科学：一个理论模型和研究议程

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091227

A. Carton

{"title":"The Science of Leadership: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda","authors":"A. Carton","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091227","url":null,"abstract":"I review the empirical literature on leadership, focusing on papers published since 2010. To do so, I introduce a framework composed of two features: whether theories ( a) involve the study of leaders or leading (i.e., the person versus the process) and ( b) conceptualize leadership as a cause or a consequence (i.e., an independent versus dependent variable). This framework can enable future research to accumulate in a more programmatic fashion and help scholars determine where their own studies are located within the landscape of leadership research. I end the review by critically evaluating existing work, arguing that the most popular subcategory of leadership research—lumped conceptualizations of leading, in which scholars examine multiple leader behaviors within a single construct—has significant limitations and may need to be replaced by a greater focus on split conceptualizations of leading, wherein scholars isolate single leader behaviors. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 9 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47981784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Assessing Interests in the Twenty-First-Century Workforce: Building on a Century of Interest Measurement 21世纪劳动力的利益评估:建立在一个世纪的利益测量基础上

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-083120

Christopher D. Nye

引用次数: 7

Revisiting Behavioral Integrity: Progress and New Directions After 20 Years 重新审视行为完整性:20年后的进展与新方向

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062016

T. Simons, H. Leroy, L. Nishii

{"title":"Revisiting Behavioral Integrity: Progress and New Directions After 20 Years","authors":"T. Simons, H. Leroy, L. Nishii","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062016","url":null,"abstract":"Behavioral integrity (BI) describes the extent to which an observer believes that an actor's words tend to align with their actions. It considers whether the actor is seen as keeping promises and enacting the same values they espouse. Although the construct of BI was introduced in 1999 and developed more fully in 2002, it builds on the work of earlier scholars that discussed related notions of hypocrisy, credibility, and gaps between espousal and enactment. Since the 2002 paper, a growing literature has established the BI construct, largely but not exclusively in the leadership realm, as a critical antecedent to positive attitudes such as trust and commitment, positive behaviors such as turnover and performance, and as a moderator of the effectiveness of leadership initiatives. BI is by definition subjectively assessed, and perceptions of BI are susceptible to various forms of perceptual biases. A variety of factors appear to affect whether observers interpret a particular word-action alignment or gap as an indication of the actor's high or low BI. In this article, we examine and synthesize this literature and suggest directions for future research. We discuss the early history of BI research and then examine contemporary research at the individual, group, and organizational levels of analysis. We assess what we have learned and what methodological challenges and theoretical questions remain to be addressed. We hope in this way to stimulate further research on this consequential construct. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 9 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48474979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Accumulating Knowledge in the Organizational Sciences 在组织科学中积累知识

IF 13.7 1区管理学

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090657

Frank Bosco

{"title":"Accumulating Knowledge in the Organizational Sciences","authors":"Frank Bosco","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090657","url":null,"abstract":"In some fields, research findings are rigorously curated in a common language and made available to enable future use and large-scale, robust insights. Organizational researchers have begun such efforts [e.g., metaBUS ( http://metabus.org/ )] but are far from the efficient, comprehensive curation seen in areas such as cognitive neuroscience or genetics. This review provides a sample of insights from research curation efforts in organizational research, psychology, and beyond—insights not possible by even large-scale, substantive meta-analyses. Efforts are classified as either science-of-science research or large-scale, substantive research. The various methods used for information extraction (e.g., from PDF files) and classification (e.g., using consensus ontologies) is reviewed. The review concludes with a series of recommendations for developing and leveraging the available corpus of organizational research to speed scientific progress. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 9 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44751870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0