{"title":"Timely and timeless topic: Global Englishes in L2 writing pedagogy and challenges","authors":"Ryuko Kubota","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101252","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101252","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145268222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From algorithms to annotations: Rethinking feedback practices in academic writing through AI-human comparison","authors":"Hadi Kashiha","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101254","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101254","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While ChatGPT has gained prominence in education for its efficiency, little is known about how its feedback compares to that of human instructors, particularly in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) settings with second language (L2) writers. This study examined how ChatGPT and instructors used epistemic strategies (assertiveness vs. mitigation) and delivery methods (monologic vs. dialogic) in their evaluative comments on 200 academic introductions written by Malaysian L2 students. The findings revealed that both feedback sources employed mitigation comparably to foster a face-saving environment for receiving academic criticism. However, instructors demonstrated greater assertiveness and relied more on dialogic feedback, reflecting their authoritative role in guiding revisions and prompting interaction. Conversely, ChatGPT predominantly provided monologic feedback, offering immediate and grammatically sound but static comments. The most common blend in both sources was mitigation combined with dialogic delivery, which highlights a balance between flexibility and engagement. Overall, the study indicates that while AI feedback can complement human input, it often lacks the adaptability and interpersonal depth of instructor responses. These insights inform EAP and L2 writing pedagogy by pointing to the value of blended feedback models that leverage AI’s efficiency while retaining the interactive and authoritative qualities of human expertise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101254"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145268221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The plurality of English in Global Englishes","authors":"Yachao Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101253","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101253","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This response to Christine Tardy’s paper affirms the value of Global Englishes (GE) and Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) for multilingual writing while arguing that effective implementation requires an explicit ideological stance on English plurality within GE. Drawing on frameworks between World Englishes (WE) and translingualism, and on the homogenizing tendencies of GenAI, this response paper contends that teachers need guidance for when to preserve, adapt, or normalize linguistic features. Building on Tardy’s “why” and “what,” this paper focuses on “how”: calling for clarifying English plurality within GE to inform instruction, assessment, and calibrated GenAI use, thereby fostering inclusive, rhetorically responsive, and transparent classroom ecologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145221123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Developing students’ reflexive knowledge through EAP instruction","authors":"Yan (Olivia) Zhang , Ken Hyland","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101245","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101245","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Being reflective means thinking deeply and thoughtfully about one's experiences, thoughts, and emotions, fostering greater self-awareness and understanding. It is a process of self-examination and a skill learners need to develop to fully articulate their ideas and interpretations in writing. While increasing attention is now devoted to promoting students’ reflective practice, instruction that develops their reflexive knowledge remains underexplored. Based on analyses of an EAP teaching context in China, we show how sequenced tasks (guided textual analysis, multi-source feedback, collaborative text reworking and self-assessment) can enhance students’ <em>reflection-on-practice</em> and their use of various kinds of knowledge (cognitive, linguistic, cultural, assessment) in situated contexts. Through analyses of students’ group exemplar and self-feedback, we discuss students’ engagement and reflective judgement in writing through resources of teacher instruction, peer-assisted learning and self-assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101245"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145159114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"EFL undergraduate students’ thinking and awareness in genre-based writing: Conceptualizing rhetorical moves and experimenting with linguistic knowledge","authors":"Naoko Mochizuki","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101243","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101243","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In genre-based writing classes, students’ understanding and application of genre concepts vary based on their backgrounds and contexts. However, the thought processes underlying students’ genre-based writing remain understudied, particularly in undergraduate English for General Academic Purposes (EGAP) classes in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) settings. To address this gap, this ethnographic case study explores students’ thinking and awareness during genre-based academic essay writing in EGAP classes I taught at a university in Japan. Data were collected from students’ genre analysis of a sample text, drafts, annotated revised essays, written reflections, and recordings of writing conferences. The analysis reveals shifts in students’ reading stances during genre analysis, and their simplistic conceptualizations of perceived genre characteristics (e.g., rhetorical moves) and their experimentations with L2 linguistic knowledge based on rhetorical considerations (e.g., to express own thoughts in the text) during text construction. These findings highlight students’ evolving genre knowledge, genre and language needs, and potential for learning, as well as gaps in my genre-based teaching. Informed by critical reflection on my teaching practices, pedagogical implications emphasize the importance of promptly eliciting and addressing students’ emerging needs during text construction through explicit guidance and metacognitive scaffolding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101243"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145159116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Syntactic complexity and L2 Chinese proficiency: An analysis of Malaysian CSL learners’ writing","authors":"Zhouye Zhu, Wenxin Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101242","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101242","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A substantial body of research has investigated the role of syntactic complexity in gauging second language (L2) learners’ writing performance, but Malaysian Chinese-as-a-second-language (CSL) learners remain largely underexplored. This study examined the relationship between syntactic complexity and L2 Chinese proficiency in Malaysian CSL learners’ writing. Our data consisted of a corpus of 976 essays written by Malaysian CSL learners over eight consecutive semesters spanning four academic years. Each essay was analyzed using 13 syntactic complexity measures based on length, quantity and dependency distance at both global and phrasal levels. Results revealed that 12 of the 13 indices showed significant differences across four proficiency levels, with mean dependency distance of sentence having the largest effect size. Our findings contribute to the multidimensional measurement of L2 syntactic complexity, promote a more inclusive representation of learner diversity in L2 writing research, and offer valuable insights for L2 Chinese writing research and pedagogy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101242"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145159115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Embracing Global Englishes approach to teaching multilingual writing via EIL-aware Teacher Education","authors":"Roby Marlina","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101244","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101244","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper responds to Christine Tardy’s observation of multilingual writing teachers’ lack of engagement with scholarship on writing pedagogy with the Global Englishes orientation. It explores how the EIL-aware Teacher Education framework can be applied to multilingual writing teacher development, with the aim of preparing practitioners to teach writing through the Global Englishes lens. Specifically, it illustrates how teachers can be supported through three interconnected phases – Exposure, Critical Awareness, and Action Plan – that progressively foster reflection, awareness, and pedagogical transformation. It concludes with a discussion of challenges and reflections, highlighting the need to move beyond the academic sphere to realise a more pluricentric and context-sensitive approach to writing pedagogy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145118946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A cross-linguistic perspective on the relationship between syntactic complexity and Chinese L2 writing quality","authors":"Yuxin Hao , Sijia Guo , Shuai Bin , Haitao Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101241","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101241","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing studies have shown that when learners with different L1s learn the L2, their L2 syntactic complexity will show different differences due to the influence of different L1s. However, previous research mainly stays at the macro level of L1 as an influencing factor. In addition, no research has discussed the impact of L1 on the relationship between SC and L2 writing quality. Through a linear mixed-effects model, our study examined whether large-grained and fine-grained indicators predict the quality of learners' Chinese L2 writing differently depending on the learners' L1s. The study found that: (1) The whole model of large-grained indicators explained 51.96 % of the variance (fixed effects: 39.17 %; random effects: 12.65 %). The relationship between the mean length of sentence, mean length of clause, mean length of T-unit, clauses per sentence, T-units per sentence, and dependency distance indicators and scores was moderated by L1s. (2) The whole model of fine-grained indicators explained 59.6 % of the variance (fixed effects: 53.9 %; random effects: 5.4 %). The ratio of subject-verb, adverbial, and coordinate were moderated by the L1 and showed differences between groups. We found that even those indicators that are common across languages may show different effects when predicting scores due to different L1s (subject-verb, adverbial).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145027799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Selected bibliography of recent scholarship in Second Language Writing","authors":"Colleen Brice , Carolina Pelaez-Morales","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101236","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101236","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145219041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Effects of extracurricular academic reading on syntactic development in L2 abstract writing","authors":"Xiaoyi Bi, Zewen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101240","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101240","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how and to what extent extracurricular academic reading (AR) enhances the syntactic complexity (SC) of graduate students’ abstract writing. Through a semester-long AR programme, we collected and analysed research article abstracts written by 30 s-year graduate students majoring in English literature, compared with another 30 English literature students who did not participate in the AR programme. By using a combined set of large- and fine-grained SC indices, the results showed the AR group exhibited significantly greater development of SC than the comparison group. It was found that AR students produced longer sentences, and used more subordination, complex nominals, verb phrases, nominal clauses, initial adverbial participle clauses, finite relative clauses, and multiple prepositional phrases after AR programme. In contrast, the comparison group showed growth only in the holistic length of sentence, the usage of coordination phrases and multiple-word sequences as pre-modifiers. The findings suggest that AR programme contributes to the SC development of AR students, who gained a deeper understanding of the abstract genre and its rhetorical structure. This study also provides new insights and pedagogical implications for L2 academic writing instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101240"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144920239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}