生成式人工智能对第二语言写作很有用,但学习者何时、为什么以及使用多长时间?

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Haerim Hwang , Xingyu Chang, Jiaxin Sun
{"title":"生成式人工智能对第二语言写作很有用,但学习者何时、为什么以及使用多长时间?","authors":"Haerim Hwang ,&nbsp;Xingyu Chang,&nbsp;Jiaxin Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous studies have highlighted the benefits of recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology for second language (L2) writing. However, most of these studies have relied on pretest/posttest designs or interview/questionnaire methods that reflect the researchers’ perspectives. To expand the research on this topic, we take two approaches. Firstly, we investigate how L2 learners of English utilize ChatGPT in a writing task in real time by analyzing recordings of their computer screens collected throughout the writing process. Secondly, we explore how they perceive the usefulness of ChatGPT by analyzing their responses to an open-ended question. Frequency and time-series analyses show that the participants primarily utilized ChatGPT to generate ideas, particularly during the initial stages of writing. They also used it later in the writing process, albeit less frequently and for less time overall, for a word/grammar search/check, polishing, and example generation, alongside idea generation. Semantic network analyses of their responses to the open-ended question further reveal that the participants generally held a positive opinion of ChatGPT, valuing its assistance in content creation and time management, while expressing some concerns. The results emphasize the potential of generative AI in facilitating L2 writing and suggest the importance of digital literacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative AI is useful for second language writing, but when, why, and for how long do learners use it?\",\"authors\":\"Haerim Hwang ,&nbsp;Xingyu Chang,&nbsp;Jiaxin Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Numerous studies have highlighted the benefits of recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology for second language (L2) writing. However, most of these studies have relied on pretest/posttest designs or interview/questionnaire methods that reflect the researchers’ perspectives. To expand the research on this topic, we take two approaches. Firstly, we investigate how L2 learners of English utilize ChatGPT in a writing task in real time by analyzing recordings of their computer screens collected throughout the writing process. Secondly, we explore how they perceive the usefulness of ChatGPT by analyzing their responses to an open-ended question. Frequency and time-series analyses show that the participants primarily utilized ChatGPT to generate ideas, particularly during the initial stages of writing. They also used it later in the writing process, albeit less frequently and for less time overall, for a word/grammar search/check, polishing, and example generation, alongside idea generation. Semantic network analyses of their responses to the open-ended question further reveal that the participants generally held a positive opinion of ChatGPT, valuing its assistance in content creation and time management, while expressing some concerns. The results emphasize the potential of generative AI in facilitating L2 writing and suggest the importance of digital literacy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000554\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000554","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多研究都强调了生成式人工智能(AI)技术在第二语言写作方面的最新进展。然而,这些研究大多依赖于反映研究人员观点的前测/后测设计或访谈/问卷调查方法。为了扩大对这一主题的研究,我们采取了两种方法。首先,我们通过分析二语英语学习者在写作过程中收集的电脑屏幕记录,来研究二语英语学习者如何在写作任务中实时使用ChatGPT。其次,我们通过分析他们对开放式问题的回答来探索他们如何看待ChatGPT的有用性。频率和时间序列分析表明,参与者主要利用ChatGPT来产生想法,特别是在写作的初始阶段。他们也会在写作过程的后期使用它,尽管频率和时间都不那么频繁,用于单词/语法搜索/检查、润色和示例生成,以及想法生成。对开放式问题回答的语义网络分析进一步揭示,参与者普遍对ChatGPT持积极态度,重视其在内容创作和时间管理方面的帮助,同时也表达了一些担忧。研究结果强调了生成式人工智能在促进第二语言写作方面的潜力,并提出了数字素养的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generative AI is useful for second language writing, but when, why, and for how long do learners use it?
Numerous studies have highlighted the benefits of recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology for second language (L2) writing. However, most of these studies have relied on pretest/posttest designs or interview/questionnaire methods that reflect the researchers’ perspectives. To expand the research on this topic, we take two approaches. Firstly, we investigate how L2 learners of English utilize ChatGPT in a writing task in real time by analyzing recordings of their computer screens collected throughout the writing process. Secondly, we explore how they perceive the usefulness of ChatGPT by analyzing their responses to an open-ended question. Frequency and time-series analyses show that the participants primarily utilized ChatGPT to generate ideas, particularly during the initial stages of writing. They also used it later in the writing process, albeit less frequently and for less time overall, for a word/grammar search/check, polishing, and example generation, alongside idea generation. Semantic network analyses of their responses to the open-ended question further reveal that the participants generally held a positive opinion of ChatGPT, valuing its assistance in content creation and time management, while expressing some concerns. The results emphasize the potential of generative AI in facilitating L2 writing and suggest the importance of digital literacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信