{"title":"计算机辅助协作写作中任务复杂性对第二语言写作过程和成果的影响","authors":"Xin Rong, Andrea Révész","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we investigated the extent to which task complexity impacted writing behaviors, associated cognitive activities, and resulting texts of second language (L2) users completing integrated tasks in collaborative writing contexts. The participants were 56 Chinese users of L2 English, with Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) B2 and C1 proficiency. They were organized into 28 randomly assigned pairs. Each pair completed two reading-to-write tasks which varied in cognitive complexity. The simple task version required participants to summarize a single text, while the complex task version asked participants to write a summary by integrating information presented in three texts. Participants’ typing behaviors were recorded via keystroke logging software. Eight pairs were invited to stimulated recall interviews after the second task. A series of linear mixed-effects models found that the simple task version elicited higher speed fluency, longer and more frequent pauses, and improved linguistic complexity and functional adequacy. These findings, together with the stimulated recall comments, suggest that the simple task version reduced cognitive burden on text organization, freeing up resources for linguistic encoding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101216"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of task complexity on second language writing processes and products in computer-assisted collaborative writing\",\"authors\":\"Xin Rong, Andrea Révész\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, we investigated the extent to which task complexity impacted writing behaviors, associated cognitive activities, and resulting texts of second language (L2) users completing integrated tasks in collaborative writing contexts. The participants were 56 Chinese users of L2 English, with Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) B2 and C1 proficiency. They were organized into 28 randomly assigned pairs. Each pair completed two reading-to-write tasks which varied in cognitive complexity. The simple task version required participants to summarize a single text, while the complex task version asked participants to write a summary by integrating information presented in three texts. Participants’ typing behaviors were recorded via keystroke logging software. Eight pairs were invited to stimulated recall interviews after the second task. A series of linear mixed-effects models found that the simple task version elicited higher speed fluency, longer and more frequent pauses, and improved linguistic complexity and functional adequacy. These findings, together with the stimulated recall comments, suggest that the simple task version reduced cognitive burden on text organization, freeing up resources for linguistic encoding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000414\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effects of task complexity on second language writing processes and products in computer-assisted collaborative writing
In this study, we investigated the extent to which task complexity impacted writing behaviors, associated cognitive activities, and resulting texts of second language (L2) users completing integrated tasks in collaborative writing contexts. The participants were 56 Chinese users of L2 English, with Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) B2 and C1 proficiency. They were organized into 28 randomly assigned pairs. Each pair completed two reading-to-write tasks which varied in cognitive complexity. The simple task version required participants to summarize a single text, while the complex task version asked participants to write a summary by integrating information presented in three texts. Participants’ typing behaviors were recorded via keystroke logging software. Eight pairs were invited to stimulated recall interviews after the second task. A series of linear mixed-effects models found that the simple task version elicited higher speed fluency, longer and more frequent pauses, and improved linguistic complexity and functional adequacy. These findings, together with the stimulated recall comments, suggest that the simple task version reduced cognitive burden on text organization, freeing up resources for linguistic encoding.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.