Journal of Applied Philosophy最新文献_第8页

Where Is My Cut? Justifying Resale Rights 我的分成在哪里？证明转售权利的合理性

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70035

Anna Bartsch

引用次数: 0

Meaning in the Lives of Children 儿童生活的意义

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70031

Roland Kipke

引用次数: 0

Speech Acts and Unspeakable Raps 言语行为和不可言说的说唱

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70029

Tareeq Jalloh

引用次数: 0

Direct-to-Consumer Telehealth and the Ambivalence of Self-Care 直接面向消费者的远程医疗和自我保健的矛盾心理

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70028

Mercer E. Gary

引用次数: 0

Technological Contributions to Ethical Nudging: Enhancing Safeguards 技术对道德推动的贡献：加强保障措施

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70033

Stefano Calboli

{"title":"Technological Contributions to Ethical Nudging: Enhancing Safeguards","authors":"Stefano Calboli","doi":"10.1111/japp.70033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article discusses the contributions that information-access-facilitator technologies promise to deliver in implementing ethical safeguards in the use of nudging techniques. It begins by identifying two broad issues within the debate on the ethics of nudging: first, the risk of misalignment between will and action that nudges can impose, and second, citizens' tendency to be oblivious to normatively relevant information regarding nudges. The subsequent analysis focuses on the safeguards intended to mitigate these two issues. Proceeding with the main argument, the article contends that leveraging technological potential can enhance the effectiveness of safeguards. Technologies meant to facilitate access to information, such as apps, Internet of Things products, wearable technologies, virtual assistants, and augmented reality applications, can be used as friction minimizers for obtaining information, saliency enhancers, enablers of information retrieval, and proactive measures to mitigate misjudgments, and can be characterized by a polymorphic warning design, resulting in nudging interventions that optimally fulfill ethical demands.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 4","pages":"1151-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144897607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Misunderstanding Epistemic Injustice: The Case of Chronic Pain Reports 误解认知不公正：慢性疼痛报告的案例

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70032

Veronica de Souza Campos, Daniel De Luca-Noronha

{"title":"Misunderstanding Epistemic Injustice: The Case of Chronic Pain Reports","authors":"Veronica de Souza Campos, Daniel De Luca-Noronha","doi":"10.1111/japp.70032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article critiques the broad interpretation of inadequate medical responses to chronic pain reports as instances of testimonial or hermeneutical injustice. While Miranda Fricker's concepts help highlight the neglect of chronic pain sufferers – such as healthcare professionals' failure to take reports seriously (testimonial injustice) or the lack of adequate language to communicate pain experiences (hermeneutical injustice) – we argue that applying these frameworks overlooks important nuances. Specifically, we contend that there is an additional, distinct epistemic failure in how healthcare providers engage with chronic pain complaints: a failure to respond to these reports in adequate ways, beyond merely understanding or believing them. We hypothesize that it has to do with inquisitive inertia (a decision not to investigate further, in the absence of good medical reasons to ground such a decision), and we conceptualize this failure in terms of distributive epistemic injustice, that may persist even in the absence of testimonial or hermeneutical injustices as they are traditionally understood.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 5","pages":"1438-1453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145429248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rights, Duties, and Inviolability 权利、义务和不可侵犯性

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70027

Bradley Hillier-Smith

{"title":"Rights, Duties, and Inviolability","authors":"Bradley Hillier-Smith","doi":"10.1111/japp.70027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rights entail corresponding negative duties not to violate those rights. On this, all rights theorists agree. Yet, in our non-ideal world, these negative duties and thereby persons’ rights are pervasively violated. What duties are there to right-holders whose rights are under threat and are violated? There is substantial disagreement among rights theorists here on whether rights also entail positive duties to protect and assist the right-holder if and when their rights are threatened and violated. While the Interest Justification of Rights supports such positive duties, defenders of the Inviolable Moral Status Justification of Rights reject them. On this latter view, all persons have an inviolable moral status that gives rise to particularly robust rights and stringent negative duties, but not additional positive duties, which are not necessary to reflect inviolability. This article challenges that view by demonstrating that positive duties to protect and assist right-holders against rights violations are in fact grounded by that very same justification invoked to ground robust rights and stringent negative duties: the inviolable moral status of persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 4","pages":"1338-1358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144897832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Correction to ‘A Species-Focused Approach to Assessing Speciesism’ 更正“以物种为中心评估物种歧视的方法”

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70030

引用次数: 0

Rethinking the Ethics of GenAI in Higher Education: A Critique of Moral Arguments and Policy Implications 重新思考高等教育中的遗传伦理：对道德争论和政策影响的批判

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70026

Karl de Fine Licht

{"title":"Rethinking the Ethics of GenAI in Higher Education: A Critique of Moral Arguments and Policy Implications","authors":"Karl de Fine Licht","doi":"10.1111/japp.70026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article critically examines the moral arguments for restrictive policies regarding student use of generative AI in higher education. While existing literature addresses various concerns about AI in education, there has been limited rigorous ethical analysis of arguments for restricting its use. This article analyzes two main types of moral arguments: those based on direct difference-making (where individual university actions have measurable impacts) and those centered on non-difference-making participation (where symbolic participation in harmful systems matters regardless of direct impact). Key concerns examined include environmental harm from AI energy consumption, exploitative labor practices in AI development, and privacy risks. Through careful analysis, the article argues that these arguments face significant challenges when examined in depth. The difference-making arguments often fail to establish that individual university actions meaningfully contribute to claimed harms, while the non-difference-making arguments lead to impractical conclusions when applied consistently across university operations. Rather than supporting blanket restrictions, the analysis suggests universities should focus on fostering responsible AI engagement through ethical guidelines, licensed tools, and education on responsible use. The article concludes that a balanced approach considering both moral and practical factors is more effective than restrictive policies in addressing ethical concerns while preserving educational benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 4","pages":"1317-1337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144897611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Against Human Content Moderation: Algorithms without Trauma 反对人类内容审核：没有创伤的算法

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1111/japp.70024

Juan Espíndola

{"title":"Against Human Content Moderation: Algorithms without Trauma","authors":"Juan Espíndola","doi":"10.1111/japp.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores the morality of human content moderation. It focuses on content moderation of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) as it takes place in commercial digital platforms, broadly understood. I select CSAM for examination because there is a widespread and uncontroversial consensus around the need to remove it, which furnishes the strongest possible argument for human content moderation. The paper makes the case that, even if we grant that social media platforms or chatbots are a valuable—or inevitable— force in current societies, and even if moderation plays an important role in protecting users and society more generally from the detrimental effects of these digital tools, it is far from clear that tasking humans to conduct such moderation is permissible without constraints, given the psychic toll of the practice on moderators. While a blanket prohibition of human moderation would be objectionable, given the benefits of the practice, it behooves us to identify the fundamental interests affected by the harms of human moderation, the obligations that platforms acquire to protect such interests, and the conditions under which their realization is in fact possible. I argue that the failure to comply with certain standards renders human moderation impermissible.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 4","pages":"1285-1300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144897612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0