Journal of Applied Philosophy最新文献

Responsibility Gaps and Technology: Old Wine in New Bottles? 责任差距与技术：新瓶装旧酒？

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12763

Ann‐Katrien Oimann, Fabio Tollon

{"title":"Responsibility Gaps and Technology: Old Wine in New Bottles?","authors":"Ann‐Katrien Oimann, Fabio Tollon","doi":"10.1111/japp.12763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12763","url":null,"abstract":"Recent work in philosophy of technology has come to bear on the question of responsibility gaps. Some authors argue that the increase in the autonomous capabilities of decision‐making systems makes it impossible to properly attribute responsibility for AI‐based outcomes. In this article we argue that one important, and often neglected, feature of recent debates on responsibility gaps is how this debate maps on to old debates in responsibility theory. More specifically, we suggest that one of the key questions that is still at issue is the significance of the reactive attitudes, and how these ought to feature in our theorizing about responsibility. We will therefore provide a new descriptive categorization of different perspectives with respect to responsibility gaps. Such reflection can provide analytical clarity about what is at stake between the various interlocutors in this debate. The main upshot of our account is the articulation of a way to frame this ‘new’ debate by drawing on the rich intellectual history of ‘old’ concepts. By regarding the question of responsibility gaps as being concerned with questions of metaphysical priority, we see that the problem of these gaps lies not in any advanced technology, but rather in how we think about responsibility.","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142188668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Parental Imprisonment and Children's Right Not to be Separated from Their Parents 父母入狱与儿童不与父母分离的权利

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12757

William Bülow, Lars Lindblom

{"title":"Parental Imprisonment and Children's Right Not to be Separated from Their Parents","authors":"William Bülow, Lars Lindblom","doi":"10.1111/japp.12757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12757","url":null,"abstract":"It is widely known that criminal punishment, especially imprisonment, has negative effects for innocent persons, most notably the families of prisoners. This is an issue attracting increasing attention from penal theorists and philosophers. Adding to this literature, this article examines the extent to which incarceration of a parent is consistent with fundamental rights that are often ascribed to children. In particular, we focus on children's rights against being separated from their parents. To this end, we begin with a discussion of the philosophical basis for children's rights against being separated from their parents against their will. Drawing from recent work by Kimberley Brownlee and Matthew Liao, we argue that children have such a right and that it is grounded in children's welfare interest and the importance of parent–child relationships for children to develop adequately into autonomous agents. We then examine three arguments why imprisoning a parent is justified despite the fact that children have a right against being separated from their parents. For each of these arguments, we argue that while they may show the imprisonment of a particular parent to be sometimes compatible with respecting the right against parent–child separation, an extensive use of imprisonment as punishment of the sort that persists in many states is not.","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142224621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Revolutionary Care: Commitment and Ethos. M.Hamington, 2024. New York and London, Routledge. xiii +223 pp, $144.00 (hb) $39.99 (pb) 革命性的护理：承诺与伦理》。M.Hamington，2024 年。xiii +223 pp, $144.00 (hb) $39.99 (pb)

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12760

Shaun Respess

引用次数: 0

Explaining Injustice: Causation through a Remedial Lens 解释不公正：从补救角度看因果关系

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12753

Susan Erck

引用次数: 0

Something AI Should Tell You – The Case for Labelling Synthetic Content 人工智能应该告诉你的事情--合成内容标签化的理由

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12758

Sarah A. Fisher

引用次数: 0

Why it Can Be Permissible to Have Kids in the Climate Emergency 为什么在气候紧急情况下可以生孩子？

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12756

Elizabeth Cripps

{"title":"Why it Can Be Permissible to Have Kids in the Climate Emergency","authors":"Elizabeth Cripps","doi":"10.1111/japp.12756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12756","url":null,"abstract":"Having a child is one of the highest‐carbon decisions made by affluent individuals. Does this uncomfortable fact mean they should limit biological family size? This salient question also forces attention to two key issues. One is just how demanding individual climate justice duties are. The other is the danger of ‘ivory tower’ reasoning by privileged philosophers. On some topics, it is imperative carefully to integrate philosophical discussion with sociological and psychological research. Assuming individual climate justice duties include cutting one's carbon impact, the discussion goes as follows. Should affluent couples and individuals have no biological children, because of the carbon cost? Not unless emissions‐cutting duties are extremely demanding, or we make dangerous, generalised socio‐psychological assumptions. Is there any individual duty to consider carbon impact when determining family size? Yes, because individual emissions‐cutting duties are more than trivially demanding. Should all duty‐bearers ‘stop at’ some fixed maximum number of biological kids? Not unless that number is one and we are prepared to accept very demanding individual emissions‐cutting duties and make problematic sociological assumptions. Finally, the article outlines three further individual duties following from the ‘uncomfortable fact’: to raise good climate citizens, become activists, and cut the family carbon footprint.","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142188671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Entitled to Love: Relationships, Commandability, and Obligation 爱的权利关系、命令性和义务

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12752

Anna Hartford, Dan J. Stein

{"title":"Entitled to Love: Relationships, Commandability, and Obligation","authors":"Anna Hartford, Dan J. Stein","doi":"10.1111/japp.12752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12752","url":null,"abstract":"The notion of uncommandability has been central to how we perceive our emotional lives, and particularly romantic love. According to this notion, while we can control how we treat people, we have little control over how we feel about them. The argument from uncommandability is often evoked as a way of sidestepping moral obligations regarding our romantic emotions. One challenge to uncommandability is the potential to manipulate our emotions through psychopharmaceuticals. Much of the debate on so‐called ‘love drugs’ has concerned the permissibility and worth of these interventions. By comparison, there has been less exploration of their implications for moral obligation and responsibility. How might the emergence of these interventions change what can be emotionally demanded of us? We ultimately suggest that it is necessary to view the complex morality of our emotional lives through different evaluative paradigms: one concerning moral duty and obligation, where we have no claim to each other's romantic love irrespective of its commandability, and the other concerning the appropriateness of our reactive attitudes, where we are at times justified in feeling morally injured by another person on account of their failure to love us, regardless of whether they had control in the matter.","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142224623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Procreative Obligations and the Directed Duty of Care 生育义务和定向照管责任

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12755

Reuven Brandt

引用次数: 0

On the Morality of Enjoying Simulated Rape with Robots and by Other Fictional Means 论通过机器人和其他虚构手段享受模拟强奸的道德性

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12751

Garry Young

引用次数: 0

Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law. J.Waldron, 2023. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 336 pp, $49.00 (hb) 深思熟虑与法治。J.Waldron，2023 年。剑桥，哈佛大学出版社。336 pp, $49.00 (hb)

IF 1.1 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12754

Eric Scarffe

引用次数: 0