{"title":"Institutional Dysfunctions and Trust Repair: An Introduction","authors":"Marta Giunta Martino","doi":"10.1002/japp.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/japp.70074","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article introduces the conceptual framework for the Symposium on Institutional Dysfunctions and Trust Repair. It examines what it means for public institutions in liberal democracies to function well and how dysfunctions challenge institutional legitimacy and corrode citizens' trust. After identifying three recurring forms of dysfunction – inefficiency, democratic deficits, and corruption – and linking them to broader patterns of structural injustice, it surveys philosophical accounts of institutional functioning, contrasting purpose-oriented and principle-based approaches. It also highlights officeholders' affective and contestatory reactions as crucial to diagnosing and correcting institutional dysfunctions. Finally, the article situates these themes within debates on institutional trust and trust repair, emphasizing the role of officeholders' conduct in restoring institutional functioning and repairing trust. Together, the symposium's contributions advance a composite understanding of institutional functioning, failure, and recovery, and chart new directions for philosophical inquiry into the moral life of public institutions.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146223957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Ethics of Combatting Pernicious Ideological Beliefs","authors":"Allen Buchanan","doi":"10.1111/japp.70060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70060","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Some ideological beliefs are harmful, both to those whose beliefs they are, and to others, insofar as those beliefs motivate harmful behavior toward others. Ideological beliefs are often recalcitrant to correction, because ideologies typically include belief-management processes that insulate beliefs from corrective measures. Consequently, rational argumentation and the presentation of evidence may not suffice to expunge pernicious ideological beliefs and nonconsensual, coercive means may be required for correction. In this article, I argue that nonconsensual, coercive interventions to correct pernicious ideological beliefs are justifiable in principle, even if they are undertaken on paternalistic rather than other-regarding grounds. I show that some of the effects of ideologies, including the disabling of ‘theory of mind’ – the ability to make reliable inferences about other persons' intentions and beliefs on the basis of their behavior – are closely analogous to serious mental illness. Accordingly, I argue in favor of ‘remedial soft paternalism’: interventions to restore a person's competence when they have become incompetent due to impairments of normal cognitive abilities.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"297-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tracking the Epistemic Harms of Marital Rape: The Case for Experiential Injustice","authors":"Sushruth Ravish, Ritu Sharma","doi":"10.1111/japp.70058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70058","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Empirical studies suggest that rape in marriages continues to be treated as a less severe crime than other forms of rape. Although the psychological and legal dimensions of marital rape have received some attention, its epistemic harms remain under-theorised. This article argues that these harms are not exhausted by hermeneutical injustice, where victims lack the conceptual resources to identify or articulate their experience as rape. We introduce the concept of experiential injustice to capture a deeper epistemic harm in which victims, shaped by trauma or internalised oppression, lose evaluative grip on their own experience. Drawing on victims' testimonies, we show how marital rape can erode epistemic self-trust and diminish the capacity to register harm as experientially significant. These harms resist easy remediation and call for a broader framework to understand how epistemic injustice occurs in the contexts of marital rape. Recognising these layered epistemic harms is crucial for legal and social reforms addressing marital rape.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"276-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70058","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"No Art on a Dead Planet: Political Iconoclasm as Climate Activism","authors":"Alice Madeleine Hilder Jarvis","doi":"10.1111/japp.70055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70055","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A trend has recently emerged among climate activists of attacking artworks as a means of registering protest. I analyse this mode of protest, which I term political iconoclasm, and offer a novel partial defence of political iconoclasm as a protest strategy for environmental activists. I focus on Just Stop Oil's attack on van Gogh's <i>Sunflowers</i>. I argue that climate activists' art-attacking protests differ significantly from other recent art-attacking protests: climate protestors generally target non-commemorative, morally innocent artworks, and usually do not seek to destroy the artworks they attack. I argue that iconoclastic protests have been unusually good at capturing attention. Moreover, iconoclasm can enable protestors to communicate with their audience in an unusually direct and compelling way. I address some worries about political iconoclasm, and evaluate it against two theories of permissible protest: one on which disobedience must be civil, and another on which disobedience must meet standards of proportionality and necessity, adapted from the ethics of self-defence and war. I argue that iconoclasm may be permissible on either theory. Iconoclasm is most likely to be permissible when used sparingly, when the artwork attacked has relevant representational content, and when the iconoclastic act transforms the artwork into a protest symbol.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"215-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70055","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Funding Research Randomly","authors":"Louis Larue","doi":"10.1111/japp.70057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article compares three different procedures to select research applications: the current peer review procedure, pure random selection, and a modified lottery involving some level of peer review as a first step and random selection as a second step. This article considers four important desiderata: (1) the ability of the procedure to select the best applications, (2) the minimisation of the costs of selecting applications, (3) the impartiality of the selection procedure, and (4) the fairness of the selection procedure. The article shows that there are trade-offs between these desiderata and that it cannot be concluded that a single procedure will necessarily satisfy all of them. Yet the article shows that the Modified Lottery provides the best balance between the ability to keep costs low, impartiality, fairness, and, most importantly, the ability to select the best applications.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"258-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146217622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Dumbed-Down Discourse Dilemma","authors":"Malte Jauch","doi":"10.1111/japp.70056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some critics worry that the average quality of public discourse in liberal democracies is deplorably low. An example of this is that superficial media content enjoys a much broader audience than highly informative content. States can take various measures to improve the quality of public discourse. For example, states can implement strong incentives for private outlets to produce content of high quality. Should states implement such measures? This article argues that answers to this question face a dilemma. Accepting the existence of a dumbed-down discourse is difficult because of several negative consequences that dumbed-down discourses create. Improving the quality of public discourse is problematic because some of the most promising interventions to improve discourse quality cannot be justified in ways that are compatible with liberal neutrality. The article assesses two possible solutions to the dilemma and finds both of them wanting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"235-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How to Change Minds Ethically: Doxastic Vulnerability, Epistemic Harm Reduction, and the Role of Therapists in Psychedelic Therapy","authors":"Jan Christoph Bublitz","doi":"10.1111/japp.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Psychedelics offer an intriguing novel method for changing minds, supposedly by destabilizing the neurobiology of the belief system. The resulting power to change minds raises ethical and epistemic concerns. This article examines the epistemic status of psychedelic experiences and suggests a skeptical attitude towards beliefs formed under their influence, a position that stands in contrast to some epistemic practices in the field. It proposes four norms for the ethics of altering beliefs and opinions of others, based on both the outcomes of interventions and the processes they involve. It introduces the concept of ‘doxastic vulnerability’ for states of heightened susceptibility to belief change, such as those induced by psychedelics. It further argues that placing people in a state of doxastic vulnerability generates responsibilities to prevent or mitigate harms arising from such states. This should motivate epistemic harm reduction measures in psychedelic therapy and, contrary to several recent statements in the literature, a reconsideration of a passive non-directive stance of therapists in favor of a more active role as epistemic guides.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"178-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Is Partisanship Dysfunctional for Representative Institutions?","authors":"Chiara Destri","doi":"10.1111/japp.70052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As political institutions, representative assemblies can be seen as rule-governed structures of interrelated roles with power mandates, which elected officeholders must exercise in accordance with the normative values justifying the institutions' establishment. One such essential value is collective self-government, which requires representatives to consider citizens' input. However, partisan disagreement means citizens often have conflicting views on how representatives should act, especially in polarized contexts. This article defends three propositions: (1) trust between citizens and representatives is essential for realizing collective self-government; (2) for this trust to be justified, representatives must be worthy of it; and (3) partisanship strains citizens' trust in representatives of opposing parties. What I call the partisan predicament illustrates a fundamental issue: representatives inevitably disappoint either their supporters or their non-supporters. Since trust is critical to collective self-government, this dilemma can impair the functioning of representative institutions. Although this shows how citizens' autonomy remains a regulative ideal that is never fully achieved, the presence of procedures through which representatives offer justifications for their own interpretation of their commitments and for their compatibility with broader democratic values helps mitigate the negative effects of partisanship.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"34-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70052","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146217588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Monitoring and Institutional Trust Repair","authors":"Emma C. Gordon","doi":"10.1111/japp.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A monitoring-based strategy for repairing ruptured institutional trust is motivated and defended, bringing together insights about both interpersonal and institutional trust breakdown. The strategy pursued identifies and exploits important differences between interpersonal and institutional trust relations, insofar as monitoring in each case mitigates against the kind of risks that by trusting one makes oneself vulnerable. Once the relevant differences are appreciated, certain kinds of monitoring are shown to have special promise in the case of repairing institutional trust following institutional abuses of power. Particular strategies are then outlined and compared favourably to alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"75-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.70046","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146223924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Taking the Political Context Seriously: How to Evaluate Ethics Commissions","authors":"Eilev Hegstad","doi":"10.1111/japp.70051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ethics commissions, which are a type of government advisory commission, give expert advice to governments on what policies to implement on ethical issues, most often within the field of bioethics. Besides recommending policies, they are also often mandated to inform and stimulate public debate. Discussions about the role of these commissions have not paid sufficient attention to the political context that ethics commissions operate within. Instead, they have too often been evaluated based on academic or pragmatic standards. In this article, I argue for and develop a political standard for evaluating ethics commissions. This standard emphasizes the contribution these commissions should make to public deliberation, and more specifically, their epistemic, democratic, and ethical functions. Following this, the implications of the two-part mandate of ethics commissions – informing and stimulating public debate and recommending policies – will be drawn out. These include the most important role of moral cartography, which involves seriously considering a range of views including those based on comprehensive doctrines, and the expectation that recommendations should be public justifications.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"43 1","pages":"199-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}