技术对道德推动的贡献:加强保障措施

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS
Stefano Calboli
{"title":"技术对道德推动的贡献:加强保障措施","authors":"Stefano Calboli","doi":"10.1111/japp.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article discusses the contributions that information-access-facilitator technologies promise to deliver in implementing ethical safeguards in the use of nudging techniques. It begins by identifying two broad issues within the debate on the ethics of nudging: first, the risk of misalignment between will and action that nudges can impose, and second, citizens' tendency to be oblivious to normatively relevant information regarding nudges. The subsequent analysis focuses on the safeguards intended to mitigate these two issues. Proceeding with the main argument, the article contends that leveraging technological potential can enhance the effectiveness of safeguards. Technologies meant to facilitate access to information, such as apps, Internet of Things products, wearable technologies, virtual assistants, and augmented reality applications, can be used as friction minimizers for obtaining information, saliency enhancers, enablers of information retrieval, and proactive measures to mitigate misjudgments, and can be characterized by a polymorphic warning design, resulting in nudging interventions that optimally fulfill ethical demands.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 4","pages":"1151-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technological Contributions to Ethical Nudging: Enhancing Safeguards\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Calboli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/japp.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article discusses the contributions that information-access-facilitator technologies promise to deliver in implementing ethical safeguards in the use of nudging techniques. It begins by identifying two broad issues within the debate on the ethics of nudging: first, the risk of misalignment between will and action that nudges can impose, and second, citizens' tendency to be oblivious to normatively relevant information regarding nudges. The subsequent analysis focuses on the safeguards intended to mitigate these two issues. Proceeding with the main argument, the article contends that leveraging technological potential can enhance the effectiveness of safeguards. Technologies meant to facilitate access to information, such as apps, Internet of Things products, wearable technologies, virtual assistants, and augmented reality applications, can be used as friction minimizers for obtaining information, saliency enhancers, enablers of information retrieval, and proactive measures to mitigate misjudgments, and can be characterized by a polymorphic warning design, resulting in nudging interventions that optimally fulfill ethical demands.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"1151-1171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.70033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.70033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了信息访问促进技术有望在使用助推技术时实现道德保障方面做出的贡献。首先,在关于轻推道德的辩论中,确定了两个广泛的问题:第一,轻推可能造成的意志和行动不一致的风险;第二,公民倾向于忽略与轻推有关的规范相关信息。随后的分析侧重于旨在减轻这两个问题的保障措施。文章从主要论点出发,认为利用技术潜力可以提高保障措施的有效性。旨在促进信息获取的技术,如应用程序、物联网产品、可穿戴技术、虚拟助手和增强现实应用,可以用作获取信息的摩擦最小化器、显著性增强器、信息检索的推动者和减少误判的主动措施,并且可以通过多态警告设计来表征,从而实现最优地满足道德要求的助推干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technological Contributions to Ethical Nudging: Enhancing Safeguards

This article discusses the contributions that information-access-facilitator technologies promise to deliver in implementing ethical safeguards in the use of nudging techniques. It begins by identifying two broad issues within the debate on the ethics of nudging: first, the risk of misalignment between will and action that nudges can impose, and second, citizens' tendency to be oblivious to normatively relevant information regarding nudges. The subsequent analysis focuses on the safeguards intended to mitigate these two issues. Proceeding with the main argument, the article contends that leveraging technological potential can enhance the effectiveness of safeguards. Technologies meant to facilitate access to information, such as apps, Internet of Things products, wearable technologies, virtual assistants, and augmented reality applications, can be used as friction minimizers for obtaining information, saliency enhancers, enablers of information retrieval, and proactive measures to mitigate misjudgments, and can be characterized by a polymorphic warning design, resulting in nudging interventions that optimally fulfill ethical demands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信