Journal of Optometry最新文献

{"title":"Efficacy of anti-suppression therapy in improving binocular vision in children with small-angle Esotropia","authors":"Preeti Sharma,&nbsp;Shailja Tibrewal,&nbsp;Prem Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Suma Ganesh","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2023.100490","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy of anti-suppression exercises in children with small-angle esotropia in achieving binocular vision.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of patients aged 3–8 years who underwent anti-suppression exercises for either monocular or alternate suppression between January 2016 and December 2021 was conducted. Patients with esotropia less than 15 prism diopters (PD) and visual acuity ≥ 6/12 were included. Patients with previous intra-ocular surgery or less than three-month follow-up were excluded. Success was defined as the development of binocular single vision (BSV) for distance, near, or both (measured clinically with either the 4 prism base out test or Worth four dot test) and maintained at two consecutive visits. Qualified success was defined as the presence of diplopia response for both distance and near. Additionally, improvement in near stereo acuity was measured using the Stereo Fly test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen patients with a mean age of 5.4 ± 1.38 years (range 3–8 years) at the time of initiation of exercises were included in the study. The male female ratio was 10:8. The mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.18 LogMAR unit(s) and the mean spherical equivalent was +3.8 ± 0.14 diopters (D). The etiology of the esotropia was fully accommodative refractive esotropia (8), microtropia (1), post–operative infantile esotropia (4), partially accommodative esotropia (1), and post-operative partially accommodative esotropia (4). Patients received either office-based, home-based, or both modes of treatment for an average duration of 4.8 months (range 3–8). After therapy, BSV was achieved for either distance or near in 66.6 % of patients (95 % CI = 40.03–93.31 %). Binocular single vision for both distance and near was seen in 50 % of children. Qualified success was observed in 38.46% of patients. Persistence of suppression was observed in one patient (5.5 %). Near stereopsis improved to 200 s of arc or more in 60% of the patients. The mean esotropia reduced from 5.7 ± 4.0 PD for distance and 6.2 ± 4.66 PD for near to 2.7 ± 2.4 PD and 3.38 ± 4.7 PD respectively, at the last follow-up (<em>p</em>-value 0.004 and 0.006). Failure of therapy was noticed after six months of follow-up in the child with infantile esotropia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Anti-suppression exercises may be beneficial to improve binocular vision functions in children with small-angle esotropias of variable etiologies. Recurrence of suppression after cessation of therapy is possible, warranting regular follow up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000389/pdfft?md5=85274c84146e460060c509e5f6b21c9b&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000389-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138500823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Red and green defocus curves and duochrome test in different age groups","authors":"Riccardo Rolandi ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Zeri ,&nbsp;Alessandro Duse ,&nbsp;Giulia Carlotta Rizzo ,&nbsp;Erika Ponzini ,&nbsp;Silvia Tavazzi","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100497","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100497","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the eye defocus curves (DCs) obtained with stimuli on red, green, and white backgrounds and to investigate the applicability of the duochrome test (DT) in different age groups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>12 elderly (ELD: 59.3 ± 3.9 years) and 8 young (YG: 22.1 ± 1.1 years) subjects were recruited. An optometric assessment with the DT was carried out to obtain the subjective refraction at distance. DCs at distance on green, white, and red backgrounds were measured and the following parameters were deduced: dioptric difference between red-green, green-white, red-white focal positions (minima of the DCs), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and widths of the DCs for red, green, and white.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DC difference between the green-white focal positions (mean ± standard deviation) was -0.12±0.17 diopters (D) (ELD, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.012) and -0.11±0.12 D (YG, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.039), while the red-white difference was not statistically significant. The DC red-green difference was 0.20±0.16 D (ELD, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.002) and 0.18±0.18 D (YG, <em>p</em> = 0.008). The ELD BCVA with green background was significantly worse than BCVA with red (<em>p</em> = 0.007) and white (<em>p</em> = 0.007). The mean value of the DC's width in ELD for green (1.01±0.36 D) was higher than for red (0.77±0.21 D) and for white (0.84±0.35 D), but with no statistical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both age groups showed a slight focusing preference for red when using white light. Moreover, ELD showed a worse BCVA with a green compared to a red background. Despite these results deduced by DC analyses, these aspects do not compromise the possibility of using the DT in clinical practice both in the young and in the elderly. Furthermore, the difference of about 0.20 D between red-green DC in both groups confirms the clinical appropriateness of the widespread use of 0.25 D step as the standard minimum difference in power between correcting lenses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000456/pdfft?md5=11b7b767f848d8e89bdf02cd0799c905&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000456-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Binocular vision parameters and visual performance in bilateral keratoconus corrected with spectacles versus rigid gas-permeable contact lenses","authors":"Luis Fernando Barba–Gallardo ,&nbsp;Lina María Jaramillo-Trejos ,&nbsp;Ana María Agudelo-Guevara ,&nbsp;Andrea Paola Galicia-Durán ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Casillas–Casillas","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100514","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To analyze binocular vision of individuals aged 18 to 35 years diagnosed with keratoconus, utilizing spectacles and rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses. Research was led by the Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México and Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina Pereira, Colombia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single center, prospective non-randomized, comparative, interventional, open-label study, in which the differences in binocular vision performance with both spectacles and RGP contact lenses was carried out from December 2018 to December 2019. Sampling was performed according to consecutive cases with keratoconus that met the inclusion criteria until the proposed sample size was reached.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses notably enhanced distance and near visual acuity in keratoconus patients compared to spectacles. Visual alignment analysis shows exophoria at both distances and is slightly higher with RGP contact lenses. The difference was statistically significant (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05), with 82.5 % presenting compensated phoria with spectacles and pnly 42.50% with RGP contact lenses. Stereoscopic vision improved while wearing RGP contact lenses (42.59 %), although accommodation and accommodative flexibility remained within normal ranges.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with keratoconus fitted with RGP contact lenses have improved binocular vision skills such as visual acuity, stereopsis, and accommodative flexibility. However, even when the vergence and motor system is decompensated with respect to normal ranges, the range between break and recovery points for both fusional reserves and the near point of convergence (NPC) improves with the use of RGP contact lenses, giving indications of an adaptive condition of the motor system from the medium to the long term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000025/pdfft?md5=e4af1048d9da48bd759d1803a0e2a18a&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429624000025-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139694505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sensory exotropia versus sensory esotropia: A comparative clinical features study","authors":"Mohammad Reza Akbari ,&nbsp;Alaa Alghurab ,&nbsp;Masoud Khorrami-Nejad ,&nbsp;Elham Azizi ,&nbsp;Babak Masoomian","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100516","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the preoperative clinical features of patients with sensory esotropia (ET) and sensory exotropia (XT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a retrospective study, the medical records of 13,252 patients who underwent strabismus surgery were reviewed at the Farabi Eye Hospital, Iran, from 2012 to March 2022. There were 1017 patients with sensory horizontal strabismus whose, in their worse eye, had corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) equal to or &lt;20/160 tested with the Snellen chart.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of patients was 29.0 ± 12.4 years [574 (56.4%) males and 443 (43.6%) females]. Sensory XT and ET were observed in 717 (70.5%) and 300 (29.5%) patients, respectively (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). The mean CDVA in the strabismic and non-strabismic eyes was 1.40 ± 0.75 and 0.05 ± 0.13, respectively (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). Also, the CDVA in the strabismic eyes was significantly worse in the patients with sensory XT than in the patients with sensory ET (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). Sphere and spherical equivalent (SE) components were more hyperopic in both eyes of patients with sensory ET than sensory XT (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). In sensory ET group, the mean horizontal deviation at far and near was significantly higher than the sensory XT group (both <em>P</em>&lt;.001). The prevalence of moderate and severe amblyopia among all patients with sensory strabismus was 274 (26.9%) and 727 (71.5%), respectively (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). There were 398 (39.1%) patients who needed more than one surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The frequency of sensory XT was about 2.5 times more than the sensory ET. Most patients with sensory ET were operated at a younger age, had better CDVA, more hyperopic spherical and SE, and higher angle of deviation compared with patients with sensory XT. The chance of reoperation in patients with sensory strabismus was about 40%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429624000049/pdfft?md5=21052348ce33c2a07e76816dcae78747&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429624000049-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140646746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Visual function correlates of self-reported vision-related nighttime driving difficulties","authors":"Samuel Bert Boadi-Kusi ,&nbsp;Princess Marie Aikins ,&nbsp;Ebenezer Zaabaar ,&nbsp;Anthony Gyimah Duku","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100506","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100506","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the visual function correlates of self-reported vision-related night driving difficulties among drivers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred and seven drivers (age: 46.06 ± 8.24, visual acuity [VA] of 0.2logMAR or better) were included in the study. A standard vision and night driving questionnaire (VND-Q) was administered. VA and contrast sensitivity were measured under photopic and mesopic conditions. Mesopic VA was remeasured after introducing a peripheral glare source into the participants' field of view to enable computation of disability glare index. Regression analyses were used to assess the associations between VND-Q scores, and visual function measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean VND-Q score was -3.96±1.95 logit (interval scale score: 2.46±1.28). Simple linear regression models for photopic contrast sensitivity, mesopic VA, mesopic contrast sensitivity, and disability index significantly predicted VND-Q score (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05), with mesopic VA and disability glare index accounting for the greatest variation (21 %) in VND-Q scores followed by photopic contrast sensitivity (19 %), and mesopic contrast sensitivity (15 %). A multiple regression model to determine the association between the predictors (photopic contrast sensitivity, mesopic VA, mesopic contrast sensitivity, and disability index) and VND-Q score yielded significant results, F (4, 102) = 8.58, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>adj. R²</em> = 0.2224. Seeing dark-colored cars was the most challenging vision task.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Changes in mesopic visual acuity, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, as well as disability glare index are associated with and explain night driving-related visual difficulties. It is recommended to incorporate measurement of these visual functions into assessments related to driving performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000547/pdfft?md5=8abb525f488bea61def96da142d2a29f&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000547-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mean cycloplegic refractive error in emmetropic adults – The Tehran Eye Study","authors":"Jos J. Rozema ,&nbsp;Rafael Iribarren ,&nbsp;Hassan Hashemi ,&nbsp;Mehdi Khabazkhoob ,&nbsp;Akbar Fotouhi","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2023.100512","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In children under <em>20</em> years, refractive development targets a cycloplegic refractive error of <em>+0.5</em> to <em>+1.5D</em>, while presbyopes over <em>40</em> years generally have non-cycloplegic errors of <em>≥ +1D</em>. Some papers suggest these periods are separated by a period of myopic refractive error (i.e., <em>≤ –0.50D</em>), but this remains unclear. Hence, this work investigates the mean cycloplegic refractive error in adults aged between <em>20 – 40</em> years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In <em>2002</em> a cross-sectional study with stratified cluster sampling was performed on the population of Tehran, providing cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractive error data for the right eyes of <em>3,576</em> participants, aged <em>30.6</em> <em>±</em> <em>18.6</em> years (range: <em>1–86</em> years). After grouping these data into age groups of <em>5</em> years, the refractive error histogram of each group was fitted to a Bigaussian function. The mean of the central, emmetropized peak was used to estimate the mean refractive error without the influence of myopia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean cycloplegic refractive error at the emmetropized peak decreased from <em>+1.10</em> <em>±</em> <em>0.11D</em> (<em>95 %</em> confidence interval) to <em>+0.50</em> <em>±</em> <em>0.04D</em> before <em>20</em> years and remains stable at that value until the age of <em>50</em> years. The non-cycloplegic refractive error also sees a stable phase at <em>0.00</em> <em>±</em> <em>0.04D</em> between <em>15 – 45</em> years. After <em>45 – 50</em> years both cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractive error become more hypermetropic over time, <em>+1.14</em> <em>±</em> <em>0.12D</em> at <em>75</em> years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The cycloplegic refractive error in adults is about <em>+0.50D</em> between <em>20 – 50</em> years, disproving the existence of the myopic period at those ages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000602/pdfft?md5=4eda5b6837a5f4f02b240e0453e34ca3&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000602-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139503460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reply to: Comment on: Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in different quality measurements","authors":"Masoud Khorrami-Nejad ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohammed Khodair ,&nbsp;Mehdi Khodaparast ,&nbsp;Farshid Babapour Mofrad ,&nbsp;Farzaneh Dehghanian Nasrabadi","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2023.100511","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000596/pdfft?md5=12547f3b0754b57616ec1c15182b2615&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000596-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139419186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Utility of retinoscopy to examine peripheral refraction","authors":"Maciej Perdziak ,&nbsp;Krystian Prymula ,&nbsp;Anna Przekoracka–Krawczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100505","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100505","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study explored whether retinoscopy (RET) provides comparable results of relative peripheral refraction (RPR) to open–field autorefractometry (AR) in myopic subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Peripheral refraction was measured in 20 myopic and 20 control adult subjects. Both central and peripheral refraction (20° nasal and temporal eccentricity) were measured using RET and open-field AR. Differences in the median central spherical equivalent (SE), median RPR, and median J45/J180 power vectors between the RET and AR techniques were analyzed. Moreover, Bland – Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between RET and AR methods for RPR measurements in MG.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For MG, the median RPR values were positive (hyperopic shift), and no significant differences were observed between the RET and AR techniques with respect to RPR measurement. In addition, we did not observe any significant differences in the RPR values between the nasal and temporal eccentricities for either the RET or AR technique for myopic subjects. There was also a significant correlation and agreement between the RET and AR technique for RPR measurements. With respect to central refraction, the median SE was slightly more positive for the RET than for the AR technique. Inside the CG, we also found significant correlation between the RET and AR technique for RPR measurements, and we observed a myopic shift in peripheral eccentricities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results show that retinoscopy may be a useful tool for objective measurements of RPR in myopic subjects and may be used interchangeably with the open-field AR method in everyday clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000535/pdfft?md5=135f1ccf63fe1596af567bccae5c2c3d&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000535-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comment on: Prevalence of refractive error within a Portuguese sample of optometric records","authors":"Navneet Sharma ,&nbsp;Mahendra Singh ,&nbsp;Suraj Kumar Chaurasiya","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100509","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100509","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 100509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000572/pdfft?md5=42bbdb936783f8d699661452a57536f8&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000572-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139708193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Author response to ” Comment on: Photosensitivity and filter efficacy in albinism” JOPTOM-D-23-00096","authors":"Joaquim Torner Jordana ,&nbsp;Tanja Hansen ,&nbsp;Line Kessel","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100503","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100503","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 100503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000511/pdfft?md5=93f5a889a467ab6d1a9349899ee2a74d&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000511-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71487250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}