收敛不足症状调查对意大利语的翻译与验证:心理测量结果

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Laura Boccardo , Assunta Di Vizio , Giulia Galli , Shehzad A. Naroo , Antonio Fratini , Silvia Tavazzi , Massimo Gurioli , Fabrizio Zeri
{"title":"收敛不足症状调查对意大利语的翻译与验证:心理测量结果","authors":"Laura Boccardo ,&nbsp;Assunta Di Vizio ,&nbsp;Giulia Galli ,&nbsp;Shehzad A. Naroo ,&nbsp;Antonio Fratini ,&nbsp;Silvia Tavazzi ,&nbsp;Massimo Gurioli ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Zeri","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2022.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to translate the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) into the Italian language and assess psychometric properties of the translated questionnaire (CISS_I).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The CISS_I was arranged according to guidelines for a comprehensive multistep methodologic process for translating, adapting, and validating psychometric instruments in health care research. The CISS_I questionnaire was administered to 103 volunteers (21.8 ± 2.2 years), students in higher education, at two different times. A complete optometric evaluation was performed including subjective refraction, best corrected visual acuity, near point of convergence, prism fusional ranges to blur, diplopia and recovery, TNO stereo test and prism cover test for measurement of heterophoria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The performance of the CISS_I in terms of validity showed some points of weakness. Sensitivity was 42%, specificity was 74%, positive predictive value was 27% and negative predictive value was 85%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.672. On the contrary, the results showed good internal consistency of the CISS_I (Cronbach's alpha - α=0.89) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92). Rasch analysis showed good model fit (all items, except one, with infit and outfit mean square between 0.7 and 1.3), good measurement precision (person separation = 2.66) and good targeting –0,81 logits but also some evidence of multidimensionality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CISS_I showed some point of weakness in terms of validity but also good psychometric properties and has been shown to be applicable to an Italian speaking population to quantify the visual discomfort associated with near vision in higher education students. The results show that high CISS_I score is not necessarily linked to convergence insufficiency, while low scores can exclude the presence of this anomaly. The CISS_I can help in interpreting and monitoring convergence insufficiency symptoms in already identified subjects, but it is not suitable for screening a general population of young adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 189-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/48/main.PMC10323179.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and validation of convergence insufficiency symptom survey to Italian: Psychometric results\",\"authors\":\"Laura Boccardo ,&nbsp;Assunta Di Vizio ,&nbsp;Giulia Galli ,&nbsp;Shehzad A. Naroo ,&nbsp;Antonio Fratini ,&nbsp;Silvia Tavazzi ,&nbsp;Massimo Gurioli ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Zeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2022.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to translate the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) into the Italian language and assess psychometric properties of the translated questionnaire (CISS_I).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The CISS_I was arranged according to guidelines for a comprehensive multistep methodologic process for translating, adapting, and validating psychometric instruments in health care research. The CISS_I questionnaire was administered to 103 volunteers (21.8 ± 2.2 years), students in higher education, at two different times. A complete optometric evaluation was performed including subjective refraction, best corrected visual acuity, near point of convergence, prism fusional ranges to blur, diplopia and recovery, TNO stereo test and prism cover test for measurement of heterophoria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The performance of the CISS_I in terms of validity showed some points of weakness. Sensitivity was 42%, specificity was 74%, positive predictive value was 27% and negative predictive value was 85%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.672. On the contrary, the results showed good internal consistency of the CISS_I (Cronbach's alpha - α=0.89) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92). Rasch analysis showed good model fit (all items, except one, with infit and outfit mean square between 0.7 and 1.3), good measurement precision (person separation = 2.66) and good targeting –0,81 logits but also some evidence of multidimensionality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CISS_I showed some point of weakness in terms of validity but also good psychometric properties and has been shown to be applicable to an Italian speaking population to quantify the visual discomfort associated with near vision in higher education students. The results show that high CISS_I score is not necessarily linked to convergence insufficiency, while low scores can exclude the presence of this anomaly. The CISS_I can help in interpreting and monitoring convergence insufficiency symptoms in already identified subjects, but it is not suitable for screening a general population of young adults.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 189-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/48/main.PMC10323179.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在将衔接不足症状调查(CISS)翻译成意大利语,并评估翻译后的问卷(CISS_I)的心理测量特性。CISS_I问卷在两个不同的时间对103名志愿者(21.8±2.2岁)进行了调查。进行了完整的验光评估,包括主观屈光度、最佳矫正视力、近会聚点、棱镜融合范围至模糊、复视和恢复、TNO立体测试和棱镜盖测试,用于测量斜视。结果CISS_I在有效性方面的表现存在一些弱点。敏感性为42%,特异性为74%,阳性预测值为27%,阴性预测值为85%。ROC曲线下面积为0.672。相反,结果显示CISS_I具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbachα-α=0.89)和良好的重测可靠性(ICC=0.92),良好的测量精度(人间距=2.66)和良好的目标定位–0.81 logits,但也有一些多维性的证据。结论CISS_I在有效性方面表现出一定的弱点,但也具有良好的心理测量特性,并已被证明适用于意大利语人群,以量化高等教育学生与近视相关的视觉不适。结果表明,CISS_I得分高并不一定与收敛不足有关,而得分低则可以排除这种异常的存在。CISS_I可以帮助解释和监测已经确定的受试者的收敛不足症状,但它不适合筛查年轻人的一般人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Translation and validation of convergence insufficiency symptom survey to Italian: Psychometric results

Translation and validation of convergence insufficiency symptom survey to Italian: Psychometric results

Translation and validation of convergence insufficiency symptom survey to Italian: Psychometric results

Translation and validation of convergence insufficiency symptom survey to Italian: Psychometric results

Purpose

This study aimed to translate the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) into the Italian language and assess psychometric properties of the translated questionnaire (CISS_I).

Methods

The CISS_I was arranged according to guidelines for a comprehensive multistep methodologic process for translating, adapting, and validating psychometric instruments in health care research. The CISS_I questionnaire was administered to 103 volunteers (21.8 ± 2.2 years), students in higher education, at two different times. A complete optometric evaluation was performed including subjective refraction, best corrected visual acuity, near point of convergence, prism fusional ranges to blur, diplopia and recovery, TNO stereo test and prism cover test for measurement of heterophoria.

Results

The performance of the CISS_I in terms of validity showed some points of weakness. Sensitivity was 42%, specificity was 74%, positive predictive value was 27% and negative predictive value was 85%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.672. On the contrary, the results showed good internal consistency of the CISS_I (Cronbach's alpha - α=0.89) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92). Rasch analysis showed good model fit (all items, except one, with infit and outfit mean square between 0.7 and 1.3), good measurement precision (person separation = 2.66) and good targeting –0,81 logits but also some evidence of multidimensionality.

Conclusions

The CISS_I showed some point of weakness in terms of validity but also good psychometric properties and has been shown to be applicable to an Italian speaking population to quantify the visual discomfort associated with near vision in higher education students. The results show that high CISS_I score is not necessarily linked to convergence insufficiency, while low scores can exclude the presence of this anomaly. The CISS_I can help in interpreting and monitoring convergence insufficiency symptoms in already identified subjects, but it is not suitable for screening a general population of young adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信